Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer Versus Plate and Cage for 3-Level Contiguous Cervical Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with zero-profile anchored spacer (ZPAS) versus plate and cage (PC) for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease.

METHODS

The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024512706). The Web of Science core collection, PubMed, and Embase were searched up to February 12, 2024. Review Manager 5.3 was used. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval were evaluated for dichotomous data. Continuous data were assessed using the mean difference and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Nine studies comparing ACDF with ZPAS versus PC for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease were included. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in ZPAS were significantly less than those in PC. The subsidence rate, loss of cervical alignment, fusion segmental height, and intervertebral disc height were significantly greater in ZPAS than in PC. The cervical alignment and dysphagia rate within 6 months were significantly lower in ZPAS than in PC. The ASD of ZPAS was significantly lower than that of PC according to the sensitivity analysis when 1 study was excluded. No significant differences were identified in the other aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ACDF with ZPAS and PC were safe and effective procedures. PC was associated with increased surgical trauma. The ZPAS could better decrease the incidence of ASD and dysphagia. ZPAS was also accompanied by high subsidence rate and poor cervical alignment.

Two-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open-door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito-Atlantoaxial Complex

OBJECTIVE

Both two-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t-ACCF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t-ACCF and ODLP on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t-ACCF and ODLP.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t-ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2-7, C0-2, C0-1, C1-2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS.

RESULTS

In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2-7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p < 0.05), and the UCS (C0-2) Cobb angle was significantly compensated for at 1 year postoperatively compared with the t-ACCF group (3.05 ± 4.09 vs 0.79 ± 2.62; p < 0.01). The SCS and lateral flexion ROM of the ODLP group was better maintained than t-ACCF (14.51 ± 6.00 vs 10.72 ± 3.79; 6.87 ± 4.56 vs 3.81 ± 1.67; p < 0.01). The compensatory increase in C0-2, C0-1, and C1-2 ROM was pronounced in both groups, especially in the ODLP group. The results of multiple linear regression showed that only the surgical procedure was a significant factor influencing UCS.

CONCLUSION

The loss of the SCS Cobb angle was more pronounced in ODLP relative to t-ACCF, resulting in a significant compensatory increase in UCS and atlantoaxial Cobb angle. The ROM of the UCS, atlantooccipital, and atlantoaxial joints was significantly increased in both groups, this may accelerate degenerative changes in the occipital-atlantoaxial complex, may leading to poorer outcomes in the long-term; of these, ODLP should receive more attention. In contrast, t-ACCF better maintains normal curvature of the SCS and occipito-atlantoaxial complex but loses more ROM.

Zero-profile implant system versus novel plate systems after ACDF for comparison of sagittal balance parameters and clinical efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

The zero-profile implant system (Zero-P) and conventional plates have been widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spondylosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the application of Zero-P and new conventional plates (ZEVO, Skyline) in ACDF on the sagittal imaging parameters of cervical spondylosis patients and to analyze their clinical efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 119 cervical spondylosis patients from January 2018 to December 2021, comparing outcomes between those receiving the Zero-P device (n = 63) and those receiving a novel conventional plate (n = 56, including 46 ZEVO and 10 Skyline plates) through ACDF. Cervical sagittal alignment was assessed pre- and postoperatively via lateral radiographs. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at baseline, after surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up to evaluate patient recovery and intervention success.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the postoperative C0-C2 Cobb angle and postoperative sagittal segmental angle (SSA) between patients in the novel conventional plate group and those in the Zero-P group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were significant changes in the C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, SSA, and average surgical disc height (ASDH) compared to the preoperative values in both patient groups (P < 0.05). Dysphagia in the immediate postoperative period was lower in the Zero-P group than in the new conventional plate group (0% in the Zero-P group, 7.14% in the novel conventional plate group, P = 0.046), and the symptoms disappeared within 2 years in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of complications of adjacent spondylolisthesis (ASD) at 2 years postoperatively (3.17% in the Zero-P group, 8.93% in the novel conventional plate group; P = 0.252). According to the subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in the postoperative C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and ASDH between the ZEVO group and the Skyline group (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative scores, the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores of all groups significantly improved at the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.01). According to the subgroup analysis, the immediate postoperative NDI and VAS scores of the ZEVO group were significantly better than those of the Skyline group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In ACDF, both novel conventional plates and Zero-P can improve sagittal parameters and related scale scores. Compared to the Zero-P plate, the novel conventional plate has a greater advantage in correcting the curvature of the surgical segment, but the Zero-P plate is less likely to produce postoperative dysphagia.

Comparative analysis of risk factors associated with degeneration of adjacent segments: zero-profile anchored spacer vs. anterior cervical plate and cage construct

Objective

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease, but cervical spine surgery may affect sagittal alignment parameters and induce adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). This study aimed to determine the risk factors for developing ASD following anterior cervical plate and cage (ACPC) compared with the use of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C).

Methods

A retrospective contrastive study included 105 patients who underwent ACPC or ROI-C between January 2014 and October 2019 at our treatment centre. There were 50 cases in the ROI-C group and 55 patients in the ACPC group. Clinical and radiological results and the incidence of ASD were assessed after surgery. All patients were further divided into the ASD and non-ASD groups for subgroup analysis.

Results

At each follow-up time, there was no statistically significant in radiographic parameters between the two groups. The overall ASD rate was higher in the ACPC group than in the ROI-C group (65.5% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.027). The low preoperative Cobb angle, low preoperative segment angle (SA), and loss of Cobb (ΔCobb) were significantly correlated with ASD. However, clinical outcomes were not associated with ASD at any postoperative follow-up visit.

Conclusion

Equally good therapeutic effects were achieved with both the ROI-C and ACPC. The occurrence of ASD was considerably higher in the ACPC group than in the ROI-C group. The preoperative Cobb angle, preoperative SA, and ΔCobb were the most associated with an increase in the risk of ASD.

Outcomes of different zero-profile spacers in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative disk disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of two different zero-profile spacers (ROI-C and anchor-C) in contiguous two-level ACDF for CDDD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent contiguous two-level ACDF due to CDDD between January 2015 and December 2020 in our hospital. Patients who received ROI-C and anchor-C were included as the study groups, and those who underwent plate-cage construct (PCC) were included as the control group. The primary outcome measures were radiographical parameters, and the secondary outcome measures were dysphagia, JOA scores and VAS scores for these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were enrolled in the study; there were 31, 21 and 39 patients in the ROI-C, anchor-C and PCC groups, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 24.52 months (range, 18-48 months) in the ROI-C group, 24.38 months (range, 16-52 months) in the anchor-C group and 25.18 months (range, 15-54 months) in the PCC group. The loss of the intervertebral space height and cage subsidence rate in the ROI-C group were significantly higher than those in the anchor-C group and PCC group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The ROI-C group showed a lower incidence of adjacent segment degeneration than the anchor-C group and PCC group, but the difference was not significant. The fusion rates were not different among these three groups. The early dysphagia rate was significantly lower in the patients with zero-profile spacers than in the PCC group (P < 0.05), but the difference was not significant at the last follow-up. No relevant differences were found in the JOA scores and VAS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Zero-profile spacers showed promising clinical outcomes in CDDD patients having contiguous two-level ACDF. However, ROI-C resulted in a higher intervertebral space height loss and a higher cage subsidence rate than anchor-C during the follow-up.

The clinical validity of atlantoaxial joint inclination angle and reduction index for atlantoaxial dislocation

Objective

Atlantoaxial dislocation patients with neurological defects require surgery. Sometimes, release surgery is necessary for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation to further achieve reduction. Whether release surgery is essential relies on the surgeon's experience and lacks objective reference criteria. To evaluate the value of atlantoaxial joint inclination angle (AAJI) in sagittal and coronal planes and reduction index (RI) in the surgical approach selection for atlantoaxial dislocation.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed 87 cases (42 males and 45 females, 9-89 years) of atlantoaxial dislocation from January 2011 to November 2020. In addition, 40 individuals without atlantoaxial dislocation were selected as the control group. Imaging parameters were compared between the two groups. According to surgical methods, the experiment group was divided into two groups including Group A(release surgery group) and Group B (conventional operation group). The parameters were measured based on CT and x-ray. The relevant imaging parameters and clinical scores, including the AAJI in sagittal and coronal planes, the atlas-dens interval (ADI) before and after traction, the RI, and JOA scores were measured and analyzed.

Results

The sagittal and coronal atlantoaxial joint inclination angles(SAAJI and CAAJI) in the control group were 7.91 ± 0.42(L), 7.99 ± 0.39°(R), 12.92 ± 0.41°(L), 12.97 ± 0.37°(R), in A were 28.94 ± 1.46°(L), 28.57 ± 1.55°(R), 27.41 ± 1.29°(L), 27.84 ± 1.55°(R), and in B were 16.16 ± 0.95°(L), 16.80 ± 1.00°(R), 24.60 ± 0.84°(L), 24.92 ± 0.93°(R) respectively. Statistical analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in the SAAJI between the control group and the experiment group (P < 0.01), as well as between groups A and B (P < 0.01). The RI in groups A and B was 27.78 ± 1.46% and 48.60 ± 1.22% respectively, and there was also a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). There was negative correlation between SAAJI and RI.

Conclusions

The SAAJI and RI can be used as objective imaging indexes to evaluate the reducibility of atlantoaxial dislocation. And these parameters could further guide the selection of surgery methods. When the RI is smaller than 48.60% and SAAJI is bigger than 28.94°, anterior release may be required.

Is 3D-printed Titanium cage a reliable option for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in treating degenerative cervical spondylosis?

Background

To assess the clinical and radiographical outcomes of 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a 3D-printed titanium cage in treating degenerative cervical spondylosis.

Methods

In this study, 25 patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis who underwent 3-level ACDF using a 3D-printed titanium cage from March 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) for the neck (VAS-neck) and arm pain (VAS-arm), Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, SF-12 concise health survey, and the Odom criteria. The radiographical parameters, including C2-C7 lordosis, segmental angle, segmental height, and subsidence, were assessed. The mean duration of follow-up was 25.6 months.

Results

Bony fusion was achieved in all patients (100%). In three patients (12%) mild dysphagia was observed during the follow-up. The VAS-neck, VAS-arm, NDI score, JOA score, SF-12 score, C2-C7 lordosis, and segmental angle improved noticeably at the latest follow-up. Based on the Odom criteria, 22 patients (88%) reported satisfactory (excellent or good). The mean loss of C2-C7 lordosis and segmental angle between the immediate postoperative and the latest follow-up values were 1.6° ± 0.5° and 1.1° ± 0.5°, respectively. The mean subsidence was 0.9 ± 0.6 mm.

Conclusion

In patients with multi-level degenerative cervical spondylosis, 3-level ACDF using the 3D-printed titanium cage can effectively relieve the symptoms, stabilize the spine, and restore segmental height and cervical curvature. It is proven to be a reliable option for patients with 3-level degenerative cervical spondylosis. However, a future comparative study involving a larger population and longer follow-up time may be required to further evaluate the safety, efficacy and outcomes of our preliminary results.

Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System

The Zero-P spacer was primarily developed aiming to reduce the morbidity associated with the traditional anterior cervical plate. During the past decade, many authors have reported the use of Zero-P spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of one or two segments. Nevertheless, there is still a paucity of knowledge on the safety and feasibility of using Zero-P spacers for 3-level fixation. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes, with a focus on the sagittal alignment reconstruction of 3-level ACDF surgery using Zero-P spacers versus those using a traditional plate and cage system. From Sep 2013 to Aug 2016, a total of 44 patients who received 3-level ACDF surgery due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy were recruited. The Zero-P spacer was used in 23 patients (group ZP) and the traditional plate and cage system in 21 (group PC). Clinical outcomes were analyzed by Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and dysphagia was evaluated using the Bazaz score. Radiological outcomes, including fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and especially changes in cervical sagittal alignment, were analyzed. The NDI and JOA scores did not differ significantly between the two groups postoperatively (p > 0.05); however, there was significantly less dysphagia in patients using Zero-P spacers at the 3- and 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, the fusion rate and ASD were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Interestingly, patients using Zero-P spacers had a significantly lower postoperative C2-7 Cobb angle and fused segment Cobb angle, compared to those using a traditional plate and cage system (p < 0.05); meanwhile, the fused segment disc wedge was also found to be significantly smaller in patients using Zero-P spacers after surgery (p < 0.05). Moreover, we further divided patients into subgroups according to their cervical lordosis. In patients with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle ≤ 10°, significantly less cervical and local lordosis, as well as disc wedge, were seen in group ZP after surgery (p < 0.05), while in others with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°, no significant difference in postoperative changes of the cervical sagittal alignment was seen between group ZP and group PC (p > 0.05). Zero-P spacers used in 3-level ACDF surgery could provide equivalent clinical outcomes and a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia, compared to the traditional plate and cage system. However, our results showed that it was inferior to the cervical plate in terms of sagittal alignment reconstruction for 3-level fixation. We recommend applying Zero-P spacers for 3-level ACDF in patients with good preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°), in order to restore and maintain physiological curvature of the cervical spine postoperatively.

Anatomical and Imaging Study on the Optimum Entry Point and Trajectory for Anterior Transpedicular Root Screw Placement into the Lower Cervical Spine

Objective

To study the optimum entry point and trajectory for anterior transpedicular root screw (ATPRS) placement into the lower cervical spine (LCS), so as to provide a basis for clinical application.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of cervical CT images of patients who underwent cervical CT examination in the Spinal Surgery of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital from January 2020 to August 2021 was conducted. The data were obtained and modeled. On the coronal plane, the vertebral body (VB) between the anterior midline of cervical vertebral segments C_3-7 and the left P line (by drawing the line parallel to the anterior midline of the VB at the intersection of the anterior edge of the Luschka's joint and the upper endplate) was equally divided into 9 zones (a-i). The ideal entry point and path of cervical ATPRS were designed and recorded. Additionally, 7 cadaveric specimens were selected, and the screw placement parameters were regenerated according to the above methods for screw placement.

Results

Zone i of each segment, with the longest screw length, was the best area for screw placement. In all patients, the horizontal angles of vertebrae C_3-7 in zones a, d, and g, zones b, e, and h, and zones c, f, and i showed a gradually decreasing trend. The sagittal angle range of C_3-7 in all patients showed a gradually increasing trend in zones a-c, d-f, and g-i. The distance from the anterior midline of C_3-7 to the P line increased in all patients, and the distance was longer in males than in females, with statistical significance. Pedicle screws were successfully inserted in all the 7 cadaveric specimens.

Conclusions

ATPRS placement can be used for LCS internal fixation, and the precise screw placement parameters can be simulated by the software, which provides theoretical basis for its future clinical application.