The potential of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosis of spinal infection: a retrospective study

Influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing negative results in diagnosed patients with spinal infection

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) negative results in the diagnosed patients with spinal infection. mNGS test was applied in a cohort of 114 patients with suspected spinal infection, among which 56 patients had a final diagnosis of spinal infection. mNGS achieved a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI, 61.6% to 85.6%) and a specificity of 84.5% (95% CI, 72.6% to 92.7%), using histopathology and culture results as reference. Diagnosed patients with a negative culture result had lower white blood cell account, percentage of neutrophilic granulocyte, C-reactive protein (all P<0.05) and relatively higher rate of prior antimicrobial treatment history (P=0.059). However, diagnosed patients with a negative mNGS result did not have such difference with mNGS-positive patients, suggesting that mNGS was not strictly limited by the above indicators, which presented the advantages of this technique from another point of view.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Spinal Infections: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Early diagnosis of spinal infections remains challenging, and emerging metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology holds promise in addressing this issue. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS in spinal infections.

Patients and Methods

A total of 78 cases with suspected spinal infections were enrolled in this study, all of whom underwent laboratory, histopathological and mNGS examinations upon admission. Lesion samples were obtained by surgical or C-arm-guided puncture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of culture and mNGS were calculated for statistical analysis.

Results

With histopathological results as the reference, the included 78 patients were categorized into 50 cases in the spinal infection group and 28 cases in the aseptic group. The sensitivity (84%) and negative predictive value (77.14%) of mNGS were significantly higher than those of culture (32% and 44.26%, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed in terms of specificity and positive predictive value. In the subgroup analysis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the sensitivity of mNGS (90.91%) and T-spot (90.91%) was significantly higher than that of culture (0). Additionally, mNGS demonstrated markedly higher specificity (100%) compared to T-spot (85.07%).

Conclusion

This study underscores the substantial advantages of mNGS in terms of diagnostic accuracy and bacterial coverage for spinal infections. The findings provide compelling clinical evidence that supports the enhanced diagnostic efficacy of mNGS.

Diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing and conventional microbial culture for spinal infection: a retrospective comparative study

PURPOSE

The study evaluated the diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) as a diagnostic test for biopsy samples from patients with suspected spinal infection (SI) and compared the diagnostic performance of mNGS with that of microbial culture.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with clinical suspicion of SI were enrolled, and data were collected through a retrospective chart review of patient records. Biopsy specimens obtained from each patient were tested via mNGS and microbial culture. Samples were enriched for microbial DNA using the universal DNA extraction kit, whole-genome amplified, and sequenced using MGISEQ-200 instrument. After Low-quality reads removed, the remaining sequences for microbial content were analyzed and aligned using SNAP and kraken2 tools.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients (19 men and 20 women) were deemed suitable for enrollment. The detection rate for pathogens of mNGS was 71.8% (28/39), which was significantly higher than that of microbial culture (23.1%, p = 0.016). Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex was the most frequently isolated. Using pathologic test as the standard reference for SI, thirty-one cases were classified as infected, and eight cases were considered aseptic. The sensitivity and specificity values for detecting pathogens with mNGS were 87.1% and 87.5%, while these rates were 25.8% and 87.5% with conventional culture. mNGS was able to detect 88.9% (8/9) of pathogens identified by conventional culture, with a genus-level sensitivity of 100% (8/8) and a species-level sensitivity of 87.5% (7/8).

CONCLUSION

The present work suggests that mNGS might be superior to microbial culture for detecting SI pathogens.

Pathogen detection in suspected spinal infection: metagenomic next-generation sequencing versus culture

PURPOSE

The aim is to compare the pathogen detection performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and the culturing of percutaneous needle biopsy samples obtained from an individual with a suspected spinal infection.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 141 individuals with a suspected spinal infection was conducted, and mNGS was performed. The microbial spectra and detection performance between mNGS and the culturing-based method were compared, and the effects of antibiotic intervention and biopsy on the detection performance were assessed.

RESULTS

The microorganisms isolated most commonly via the culturing-based method were Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 21), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 13). The most common microorganisms detected via mNGS were Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) (n = 39), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 15). The difference in the type of detected microorganisms between culturing and mNGS was observed only in Mycobacterium (P = 0.001). mNGS helped identify potential pathogens in 80.9% of cases, which was significantly higher than the positivity rate of 59.6% observed for the culturing-based method (P < 0.001). Moreover, mNGS had a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 78.4% to 91.3%), a specificity of 86.7% (95% CI, 59.5% to 98.3%), and sensitivity gains of 35% (85.7% vs. 50.8%; P < 0.001) during culturing, while no differences were observed in the specificity (86.7% vs. 93.3%; P = 0.543). In addition, antibiotic interventions significantly lowered the positivity rate of the culturing-based method (66.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.021) but had no effects on the results of mNGS (82.5% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.467).

CONCLUSION

The use of mNGS could result in a higher detection rate compared to that observed with the culturing-based method in an individual with spinal infection and is particularly valuable for evaluating the effects of a mycobacterial infection or previous antibiotic intervention.

Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for spinal tuberculosis infection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tuberculosis (TB) is the most fatal infectious disease worldwide. Approximately 24.6% of tuberculosis cases are extrapulmonary and predominantly affect the spine. It is difficult to diagnose spinal TB (STB). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)-960 culture, T-SPOT.TB, Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB)/resistance to rifampin (RIF), and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) to detect STB.

METHODS

We assessed 126 patients presumed to have STB using these four methods. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using clinical diagnosis as a reference.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 41 were diagnosed with STB and 85 with non-STB. In the STB group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the MGIT-960 culture were 29.3% (12/41), 100% (85/85), 100% (12/12), and 74.6% (85/114), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of T-SPOT.TB were 92.7% (38/41), 82.4% (70/85), 58.5% (31/53), and 95.9% (70/73), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 53.7% (22/41), 100% (85/85), 100% (22/22), and 81.7% (85/104), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mNGS were 39.0% (16/41), 98.8% (84/85), 94.1% (16/17), and 77.1% (84/109), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mNGS + Xpert MTB/RIF were 73.2% (30/41), 100% (85/85), 96.8% (30/31), and 72.0% (85/118), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the mNGS + T-spot assay were 97.6% (40/41), 100% (85/85), 67.9% (38/56), and 75.9% (85/113), respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of T-spot + Xpert MTB/RIF were 95.1% (39/41), 100% (85/85), 72.2% (39/54), and 81.0% (85/105), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

T-SPOT.TB is the most effective method for diagnosing STB; however, Xpert MTB/RIF is more reliable and can detect RIF resistance. Clinicians can use mNGS to identify pathogens in patients with spinal infections; these pathogens appeared to be more meaningful in guiding the clinical management of patients in the non-STB group. The combination of Xpert MTB/RIF and mNGS can improve the early diagnosis rate and drug resistance detection, reduce the diagnostic cycle, and provide early targeted anti-TB treatment for patients with STB.

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the detection of pathogens in spinal infections

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The precise diagnosis and treatment of spinal infections (SI) remains challenging for spine surgeons. Identifying the pathogens of SI through metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) may be a key approach to addressing this challenge.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and applicability of mNGS in determining the etiology of SI.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic test study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty-five patients who had a clinical suspicion of SI and underwent mNGS testing.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The specificity, sensitivity, and time cost of mNGS and bacterial culture were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Demographic data and laboratory results (blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), and C-reactive protein level (CRP) were also evaluated.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, samples were obtained from 25 eligible patients via surgery or CT-guided puncture and subjected to histopathological examination, bacterial culture, and mNGS. The sensitivity and specificity of the bacterial cultures and mNGS were calculated with respect to the histopathological results as a reference. Postoperative antibiotics or antituberculosis drugs were administered on the basis of mNGS results, combined with clinical manifestations, imaging examination, and histopathology. The changes of clinical outcomes and laboratory results after treatment were observed.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients, 21 had a positive pathology, of which 10 showed a tuberculous pathology, and the remaining 11 showed a nontuberculous inflammatory pathology. The sensitivity of mNGS was higher than that of the bacterial culture. However, the difference in specificity between bacterial culture and mNGS was not significant. Moreover, the time needed to perform mNGS was significantly lower than that of bacterial culture and pathology. All patients were followed up for more than three months, and CRP and NEUT% significantly decreased by three months after treatment. There was no significant difference in WBC and ESR. The ODI, NRS and JOA scores were significantly improved after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology can play an important role in the detection of pathogens in SI and should be further investigated and applied in future studies.

Clinical application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of spinal infections and its impact on clinical outcomes

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of precise treatment administered according to the results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) on the clinical outcomes of patients with spinal infections. In this multicenter retrospective study, the clinical data of 158 patients with spinal infections who were admitted to Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Xiangya Boai Rehabilitation Hospital, The First Hospital of Changsha, and Hunan Chest Hospital from 2017 to 2022 were reviewed. Among these 158 patients, 80 patients were treated with targeted antibiotics according to the mNGS results and were assigned to the targeted medicine (TM) group. The remaining 78 patients with negative mNGS results and those without mNGS and negative microbial culture results were treated with empirical antibiotics and assigned to the empirical drug (EM) group. The impact of targeted antibiotics based on the mNGS results on the clinical outcomes of patients with spinal infections in the two groups was analyzed. The positive rate of mNGS for diagnosing spinal infections was significantly higher than that of microbiological culture (X ²=83.92, P<0.001), procalcitonin (X ²=44.34, P<0.001), white blood cells (X ²=89.21, P < 0.001), and IGRAs (Interferon-gamma Release Tests) (X ² = 41.50, P < 0.001). After surgery, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) showed a decreasing trend in the patients with spinal infections in both the TM and EM groups. The decrease in CRP was more obvious in the TM group than in the EM group at 7, 14 days, 3, and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The decrease in ESR was also significantly obvious in the TM group compared with the EM group at 1 and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The time taken for CRP and ESR to return to normal in the TM group was significantly shorter than that in the EM group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of poor postoperative outcomes between the two groups. The positive rate of mNGS for the diagnosis of spinal infection is significantly higher than that of traditional detection methods. The use of targeted antibiotics based on mNGS results could enable patients with spinal infections to achieve a faster clinical cure.

Diagnostic efficiency of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected spinal tuberculosis in China: A multicenter prospective study

Background

The pathogens of suspected spinal tuberculosis (TB) include TB and non-TB bacteria. A rapid and effective diagnostic method that can detect TB and non-TB pathogens simultaneously remains lacking. Here, we used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect the pathogens in patients with suspected spinal TB.

Methods

The enrolled patients with suspected spinal TB were regrouped three times into patients with spinal infection and controls, patients with spinal TB and controls, and patients with non-TB spinal infection and controls. We tested the three groups separately by using mNGS and conventional detection methods.

Results

Ultimately, 100 patients were included in this study. Pathogens were detected in 82 patients. Among the 82 patients, 37 had TB and 45 were infected with other bacteria. In patients with spinal infection, the sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The specificity of the mNGS assay was not statistically different from that of culture and pathological examination (p = 1.000, p = 1.000). In patients with spinal TB, no statistical difference was found between the sensitivity of the mNGS assay and that of Xpert and T-SPOT.TB (p = 1.000, p = 0.430). The sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of MGIT 960 culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p = 0.006). The specificities of the mNGS assay, Xpert, MGIT 960 culture, and pathological examination were all 100%. The specificity of T-SPOT.TB (78.3%) was lower than that of the mNGS assay (100%; p < 0.001). In patients with non-TB spinal infection, the sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of bacterial culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The specificity of the mNGS assay was not statistically different from that of bacterial culture and pathological examination (p = 1.000, p = 1.000).

Conclusion

Data presented here demonstrated that mNGS can detect TB and non-TB bacteria simultaneously, with high sensitivity, specificity and short detection time. Compared with conventional detection methods, mNGS is a more rapid and effective diagnostic tool for suspected spinal TB.

Evaluation of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing performance in pathogenic detection in patients with spinal infection

Spinal infection is a rarely occurred pathology, whose diagnosis remains a major challenge due to the low sensitivity of culturing techniques. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel approach to identify the pathogenic organisms in infectious diseases. In this study, mNGS technology was adopted for pathogenic detection in spinal infection from the tissue and pus samples. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of mNGS for spinal infection was evaluated, by comparing it with that of the conventional microbial culture, with the histopathological results as the gold standard. Overall, 56 samples from 38 patients were enrolled for mNGS testing, and 69 samples were included for microbial culture. 30 patients (78.95%) were identified to be positive by the mNGS method, which was higher than that of microbial culture (17, 44.74%). The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS with pus samples were 84.2% and 100.0%, respectively, which outperformed those of microbial culture (42.1% and 100.0%). The pathogen identification results were applied to medication guidance, and all 38 patients experienced favorable outcomes at three months, followed-up post-treatment, without any adverse effects. These findings proved that mNGS was superior to microbial culture in pathogenic identification of the spinal infection, thereby showing great promise in guiding drug administration and improving clinical outcomes.

Improved accuracy of etiological diagnosis of spinal infection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Currently, the use of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), a new approach to identify organisms in infectious diseases, is rarely reported in the diagnosis of spinal infection. This study aimed to evaluate the potential value of mNGS in etiological diagnosis of spinal infection. In this retrospective study, the clinical data of patients with suspected spinal infection were collected by electronic medical records. Specimens obtained from each patient were tested via mNGS assay and other conventional microbiological tests (CMTs). The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS and CMTs were calculated using the final clinical diagnosis as the golden standard. In total, 108 patients were eligible for the study, with the mean length of stay of 42.8 days. Regarding the overall identification of pathogens, mNGS exhibited a better performance than CMTs, and several nontuberculous mycobacteria, fungi, and bacteria were newly discovered. In the diagnosis of spinal infection, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of mNGS were 90.72%, 81.82%, and 0.89, respectively, which were all higher than 52.17%, 56.25%, and 0.72 of the CMTs. At hospital discharge, the C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count of patients significantly decreased compared with hospitalization (all p < 0.05), and 88.89% showed good outcomes. These findings may suggest that mNGS has a better diagnostic accuracy in pathogenic identification of patients with suspected spinal infection, and patients treated with NGS-guided antimicrobial therapy mostly seem to have good outcomes.