1
|
Martino Cinnera A, Morone G, Iosa M, Bonomi S, Calabrò RS, Tonin P, Cerasa A, Ricci A, Ciancarelli I. Artificial neural network analysis of factors affecting functional independence recovery in patients with lumbar stenosis after neurosurgery treatment: An observational cohort study. J Orthop 2024; 55:38-43. [PMID: 38638115 PMCID: PMC11021912 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aim Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of low back pain and lower limbs pain often associated with functional impairment which entails the loss or the impairment of independence in older adults. Conservative treatment is effective in a small percentage of patients, while a significant percentage undergo surgery, even if often without a complete resolution of clinical symptoms and motor deficits. The aim of the study is to identify clinical and demographic prognostic factors characterising the patients who would benefit most from surgical treatment in relation to the functional independence recovery using an innovative approach based on an artificial neural network. Methods Adult patients with LSS and indication of neurosurgical treatment were enrolled in the study. Clinical evaluation was performed in the preoperative-phase (into the 48 h before surgery) and after two months. Clinical battery investigated the motor, functional, cognitive, behavioural, and pain status. Demographics and clinical characteristics were analysed via Artificial Neural Network (ANN) using 24 input variables, 2 hidden layers and a single final output layer to predict the outcome. ANN results were compared with those of a multiple linear regression. Results 108 patients were included in the study and 90 of them [66.5 ± 12.8 years; 27.8 % F] were submitted to surgery treatment and completed longitudinal evaluation. Statistically significant improvement was recorded in all clinical scales comparing pre- and post-surgery. The ANN results showed a prediction ability up to 81 %. Disability, functional limitations, and pain concerning clinical assessment and stature, onset and age about demographic characteristics are the main variables impacting on surgical outcome. Conclusions ANN can support clinical decision making, using clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with LSS identifying the characteristics of those who might benefit more from the surgical treatment in terms of global functional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, Sulmona, Italy
| | - Marco Iosa
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Cerasa
- Sant'Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council of Italy (IRIB-CNR), Messina, Italy
- Pharmacotechnology Documention and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Traslation Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health Science and Nutrition, University of Calabria, Arcavacata, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ricci
- Department of Neurosurgery, San Salvatore Hospital, ASL Avezzano-Sulmona-L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Irene Ciancarelli
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- Territorial Rehabilitation, ASL Avezzano-Sulmona-L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Barros A, Abel F, Kolisnyk S, Geraci GC, Hill F, Engrav M, Samavedi S, Suldina O, Kim J, Rusakov A, Lebl DR, Mourad R. Determining Prior Authorization Approval for Lumbar Stenosis Surgery With Machine Learning. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1753-1759. [PMID: 36752058 PMCID: PMC11268295 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231155844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Medical vignettes. OBJECTIVES Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition with a high prevalence in the elderly population, that is associated with a significant economic burden and often requires spinal surgery. Prior authorization of surgical candidates is required before patients can be covered by a health plan and must be approved by medical directors (MDs), which is often subjective and clinician specific. In this study, we hypothesized that the prediction accuracy of machine learning (ML) methods regarding surgical candidates is comparable to that of a panel of MDs. METHODS Based on patient demographic factors, previous therapeutic history, symptoms and physical examinations and imaging findings, we propose an ML which computes the probability of spinal surgical recommendations for LSS. The model implements a random forest model trained from medical vignette data reviewed by MDs. Sets of 400 and 100 medical vignettes reviewed by MDs were used for training and testing. RESULTS The predictive accuracy of the machine learning model was with a root mean square error (RMSE) between model predictions and ground truth of .1123, while the average RMSE between individual MD's recommendations and ground truth was .2661. For binary classification, the AUROC and Cohen's kappa were .959 and .801, while the corresponding average metrics based on individual MD's recommendations were .844 and .564, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that ML can be used to automate prior authorization approval of surgery for LSS with performance comparable to a panel of MDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaury De Barros
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier-INSERM, Toulouse, France
- Neuroscience (Neurosurgery) Center, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Raphael Mourad
- Remedy Logic, New York, NY, USA
- University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee S, Jung JY, Mahatthanatrakul A, Kim JS. Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances. Neurospine 2024; 21:474-486. [PMID: 38955525 PMCID: PMC11224760 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448388.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming spinal imaging and patient care through automated analysis and enhanced decision-making. This review presents a clinical task-based evaluation, highlighting the specific impact of AI techniques on different aspects of spinal imaging and patient care. We first discuss how AI can potentially improve image quality through techniques like denoising or artifact reduction. We then explore how AI enables efficient quantification of anatomical measurements, spinal curvature parameters, vertebral segmentation, and disc grading. This facilitates objective, accurate interpretation and diagnosis. AI models now reliably detect key spinal pathologies, achieving expert-level performance in tasks like identifying fractures, stenosis, infections, and tumors. Beyond diagnosis, AI also assists surgical planning via synthetic computed tomography generation, augmented reality systems, and robotic guidance. Furthermore, AI image analysis combined with clinical data enables personalized predictions to guide treatment decisions, such as forecasting spine surgery outcomes. However, challenges still need to be addressed in implementing AI clinically, including model interpretability, generalizability, and data limitations. Multicenter collaboration using large, diverse datasets is critical to advance the field further. While adoption barriers persist, AI presents a transformative opportunity to revolutionize spinal imaging workflows, empowering clinicians to translate data into actionable insights for improved patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungwon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Visual Analysis and Learning for Improved Diagnostics (VALID) Lab, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon-Yong Jung
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Visual Analysis and Learning for Improved Diagnostics (VALID) Lab, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand
| | - Jin-Sung Kim
- Spine Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abel F, Garcia E, Andreeva V, Nikolaev NS, Kolisnyk S, Sarbaev R, Novikov I, Kozinchenko E, Kim J, Rusakov A, Mourad R, Lebl DR. An Artificial Intelligence-Based Support Tool for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis from Self-Reported History Questionnaire. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e953-e962. [PMID: 37952887 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads to functional impairment and pain. While radiologic characterization of the morphological stenosis grade can aid in the diagnosis, it may not always correlate with patient symptoms. Artificial intelligence (AI) may diagnose symptomatic LSS in patients solely based on self-reported history questionnaires. METHODS We evaluated multiple machine learning (ML) models to determine the likelihood of LSS using a self-reported questionnaire in patients experiencing low back pain and/or numbness in the legs. The questionnaire was built from peer-reviewed literature and a multidisciplinary panel of experts. Random forest, lasso logistic regression, support vector machine, gradient boosting trees, deep neural networks, and automated machine learning models were trained and performance metrics were compared. RESULTS Data from 4827 patients (4690 patients without LSS: mean age 62.44, range 27-84 years, 62.8% females, and 137 patients with LSS: mean age 50.59, range 30-71 years, 59.9% females) were retrospectively collected. Among the evaluated models, the random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between model prediction and LSS diagnosis of 0.96, a sensitivity of 0.94, a specificity of 0.88, a balanced accuracy of 0.91, and a Cohen's kappa of 0.85. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that ML can automate the diagnosis of LSS based on self-reported questionnaires with high accuracy. Implementation of standardized and intelligence-automated workflow may serve as a supportive diagnostic tool to streamline patient management and potentially lower health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Abel
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Vera Andreeva
- Federal State Budgetary Institution, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Cheboksary, Russia
| | - Nikolai S Nikolaev
- Federal State Budgetary Institution, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Cheboksary, Russia; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov, Cheboksary, Russia
| | - Serhii Kolisnyk
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vinnitsa National Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | - Jack Kim
- Remedy Logic, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Raphael Mourad
- University of Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France; Remedy Logic, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Darren R Lebl
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foley D, Hardacker P, McCarthy M. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2028. [PMID: 37895410 PMCID: PMC10608700 DOI: 10.3390/life13102028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Foley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Pierce Hardacker
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|