Vastus lateralis muscle flap for infected hip defects: a report of four cases

Risk assessment and usefulness of musculocutaneous flap transposition for recurrent septic arthritis of the hip in adults

PURPOSE

Septic arthritis of the hip joint in adults often progresses to recurrent infections that require repeated surgeries for treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk of a recalcitrant hip infection and the usefulness of musculocutaneous flap transposition.

METHODS

15 adult patients who underwent surgeries for the treatment of hip infections were retrospectively analysed. Patients who recovered from infection by undergoing arthroscopy, open irrigation, debridement, continuous irrigation, resection arthroplasty, and/or the placement of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement were classified into Group A (n = 10). Patients who showed residual infection after multiple surgeries and ultimately recovered after undergoing musculocutaneous flap transposition were classified into Group B (n = 5). The age at onset, sex, incidence of multi-drug-resistant organisms, incidence of infection at other sites, compromising factors, peak preoperative C-reactive protein level, and period from onset to initial surgery were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in the period from onset to initial surgery (p = 0.024). The infections remained chronic after multiple surgeries in most patients who had complications and/or a poor general or local condition. All of the patients recovered after musculocutaneous flap transposition without the need for additional surgery and did not experience recurrence during the follow-up period in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed diagnosis and/or treatment and compromised host caused recurrent septic arthritis of the hip in adults. Musculocutaneous flap transposition may be a useful method for the treatment of recalcitrant hip infection.

Prosthetic mesh for infected abdominal wall defects? Report of a patient with a large full thickness abdominal wall defect and colostomy due to a gunshot wound

Reconstruction of large, infected abdominal wall defects is often difficult. Local factors, such as defect size, presence of infection, adequate skin coverage and presence of enteric fistulae dictate the reconstructive method that can be used. Placement of prosthetic mesh materials into infected defects was generally not recommended due to a high rate of extrusion and fistulae. We present a patient with a large infected abdominal wall defect, exposed intestines and colostomy due to a gunshot wound that was successfully treated with a polypropylene mesh reinforcement and free latissimus dorsi muscle flap coverage. Twelve months following abdominal wall reconstruction with stable soft tissue cover, the patient is without any signs of hernia or infection. We conclude that prosthetic mesh repair of infected abdominal wall defects of such characteristics that preclude other reconstructive procedures can be attempted provided there is coverage with a well vascularised tissue.