Coronal malposition effects in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

Finite element analysis of the effect of tibial osteotomy on the stress of polyethylene liner in total knee arthroplasty

AIM

To explore the effects of tibial osteotomy varus angle combined with posterior tibial slope (PTS) on the stress of polyethylene liner in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by building finite element model (FEM).

METHODS

Established the FEM of standard TKA with tibial osteotomy varus angle 0° to 9° were established and divided into 10 groups. Next, each group was created 10 FEMs with 0° to 9° PTS separately. Calculated the stress on polyethylene liner in each group in Abaqus. Finally, the relevancy between tibial osteotomy angle and polyethylene liner stress was statistically analyzed using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

As the varus angle increased, the area of maximum stress gradually shifted medially on the polyethylene liner. As the PTS increases, the percentage of surface contact forces on the medial and lateral compartmental of the polyethylene liner gradually converge to the same. When the varus angle is between 0° and 3°, the maximum stress of the medial compartmental surfaces of polyethylene liner rises smoothly with the increase of the PTS. When the varus angle is between 4° and 9°, as the increase of the PTS, the maximum stress of polyethylene liner rises first and then falls, forming a trough at PTS 5° and then rises again. Compared to the PTS, the varus angle has a large effect on the maximum stress of the polyethylene liner (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

When the varus angle is 0° to 3°, PTS 0° is recommended, which will result in a more equalized stress distribution of the polyethylene liner in TKA.

Comparison of tibial alignment parameters based on clinically relevant anatomical landmarks : a deep learning radiological analysis

AIMS

Accurate identification of the ankle joint centre is critical for estimating tibial coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the current study was to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to determine the accuracy and effect of using different radiological anatomical landmarks to quantify mechanical alignment in relation to a traditionally defined radiological ankle centre.

METHODS

Patients with full-limb radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included. A sub-cohort of 250 radiographs were annotated for landmarks relevant to knee alignment and used to train a deep learning (U-Net) workflow for angle calculation on the entire database. The radiological ankle centre was defined as the midpoint of the superior talus edge/tibial plafond. Knee alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) was compared against 1) midpoint of the most prominent malleoli points, 2) midpoint of the soft-tissue overlying malleoli, and 3) midpoint of the soft-tissue sulcus above the malleoli.

RESULTS

A total of 932 bilateral full-limb radiographs (1,864 knees) were measured at a rate of 20.63 seconds/image. The knee alignment using the radiological ankle centre was accurate against ground truth radiologist measurements (inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99 (0.98 to 0.99)). Compared to the radiological ankle centre, the mean midpoint of the malleoli was 2.3 mm (SD 1.3) lateral and 5.2 mm (SD 2.4) distal, shifting alignment by 0.34^o (SD 2.4^o) valgus, whereas the midpoint of the soft-tissue sulcus was 4.69 mm (SD 3.55) lateral and 32.4 mm (SD 12.4) proximal, shifting alignment by 0.65^o (SD 0.55^o) valgus. On the intermalleolar line, measuring a point at 46% (SD 2%) of the intermalleolar width from the medial malleoli (2.38 mm medial adjustment from midpoint) resulted in knee alignment identical to using the radiological ankle centre.

CONCLUSION

The current study leveraged AI to create a consistent and objective model that can estimate patient-specific adjustments necessary for optimal landmark usage in extramedullary and computer-guided navigation for tibial coronal alignment to match radiological planning.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):767-776.

Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Polyethylene Contact Pressure by Increasing the Contact Area, When Compared to Mechanical Alignment—A Finite Element Analysis

Unrestricted Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) replicates the joint line of each patient by adjusting the cuts based on the anatomy of the patient. Mechanical alignment (MA) aims to restore a neutral mechanical axis of the leg, irrespective of the joint line orientation. The purpose of the present study was to compare contact pressure and contact areas of the polyethylene (PE) bearing surface as well as von Mises stress of the PE-tibial tray interface for MA and KA in the same patient, using CT data and finite element analysis. Finite element models were created from lower leg CT scans of 10 patients with knee osteoarthritis with different phenotypes. Mechanical PE properties were experimentally determined by tensile tests on dumbbell specimens. For numerical simulation purposes an adjusted non-linear material model with the maximum load to failure of 30.5 MPa, was calibrated and utilized. Contact pressure points were the deepest parts of the polyethylene inlay. Contact pressures were either very similar or were increased for MA knees throughout the gait cycle. KA either increased or had a comparable contact area, compared to MA. KA and MA produced comparable von Mises stresses, although both alignments breached the failure point of 30.5 MPa in all 3 valgus knees. This might indicate a higher probability of failure at the inlay-tibial baseplate interface. By maintaining the joint line orientation, KA reduces or has comparable contact pressures on the PE bearing surface by increasing or maintaining the contact area throughout one gait cycle in a validated finite element analysis model in 10 different knee phenotypes. The von Mises stress on the PE-tibial component interface was comparable, except for the valgus knees, where the load to failure was achieved in both alignment strategies and slightly higher stresses were observed for KA. Further studies for different knee phenotypes are needed to better understand the pressure changes depending on the alignment strategy applied.

An optimization method for implantation parameters of individualized TKA tibial prosthesis based on finite element analysis and orthogonal experimental design

Background

Individualized and accurate implantation of a tibial prosthesis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can assist in uniformly distributing the load and reducing the polyethylene wear to obtain a long-term prosthetic survival rate, but individualized and accurate implantation of a tibial prosthesis during TKA remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to optimize and individualize the positioning parameters of a tibial prosthesis to improve its accurate implantation using a new method of finite element analysis in combination with orthogonal experimental design.

Methods

Ten finite element models of TKA knee joint were developed to optimize the implantation parameters (varus angle, posterior slope angle, and external rotation angle) of tibial prosthesis to reduce the peak value of the contact pressure on the polyethylene liner according to the method of finite element analysis in combination with orthogonal experimental design. The influence of implantation parameters on the peak value of the contact pressure on the polyethylene liner was evaluated based on a range analysis in orthogonal experimental design.

Results

The optimal implantation parameters for tibial prosthesis included 0° varus, 1° posterior slope, and 4° external rotation. Under these conditions, the peak value of the contact pressure on the polyethylene liner remained the smallest (16.37 MPa). Among the three parameters that affect the peak value of the contact pressure, the varus angle had the greatest effect (range = 6.70), followed by the posterior slope angle (range = 2.36), and the external rotation angle (range = 2.15).

Conclusions

The optimization method based on finite element analysis and orthogonal experimental design can guide the accurate implantation of the tibial prosthesis, reducing the peak value of the contact pressure on the polyethylene liner. This method provides new insights into the TKA preoperative plan and biomechanical decision-making for accurately implanting TKA prosthesis.

Insertion of the Ascension PyroCarbon PIP total joint in 152 human cadaver fingers: analysis of implant positions and malpositions

INTRODUCTION

The Ascension PyroCarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) total joint is used in osteoarthritis of the PIP finger joint. No systematic study of the positioning of this prosthesis and its relation to proximal and middle phalanx morphology has yet been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Positioning of the proximal and distal components of the Ascension PyroCarbon PIP total joint was radiographically analysed in 152 human cadaver fingers.

RESULTS

Ideal implant position in the axis of the phalanx and with contact of the implant head with bone in both the frontal and sagittal planes was seen in only 33 % of the phalanges. Implant malposition was observed in the remaining 67 % of phalanges.

CONCLUSION

The current design of the Ascension PyroCarbon PIP total joint can lead to malpositioning that we attribute to its incomplete accommodation of the morphology of the proximal and middle phalanx, the surgical challenges the design poses, or both acting together.