Knee dislocations: is reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament crucial?

The known and unknown reality of knee dislocations: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Knee dislocations (KD) are limb threatening injuries known to cause significant dysfunction and disability. This review aims to summarize KD knowledge and uncover areas where more research is needed.

METHODS

The published literature was queried according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible for inclusion were clinical studies of knee dislocations. Studies published before 1990, or that focused on patellofemoral dislocation were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 132 studies involving 43,869 knee dislocations were analyzed. The majority of patients were young adult males, with high-velocity trauma, particularly motor vehicle accidents, being the most common cause. Substance use and alcohol involvement were commonly reported. The predominant KD types were KD III (54.8 %) and KD IV (20.5 %). Meniscal tears were observed in over 50 % of cases, while cartilage injuries were present in 26.7 %. Neurovascular complications were significant, with popliteal artery injuries in 7.8 % and peroneal nerve injuries in 15.3 % of patients. Acute ligament repairs (64.2 %) were more common than delayed repairs (35.8 %), although the average time to repair was 56.1 days. Complications included amputations (2.3 %), fatalities (1.9 %), compartment syndrome (2.7 %), deep infection (5.3 %), and heterotopic ossification (21.6 %). Despite these severe injuries, a substantial loss to follow-up (19 %) and underreporting of functional outcomes were noted, limiting the comprehensive assessment of long-term recovery. A notable percentage of patients did not return to work or sports, with many requiring a change in profession due to their injuries, but these outcomes were only reported in 10 or fewer studies.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant gaps in understanding the treatment strategies, financial burden, and long-term outcomes of knee dislocations. The incomplete data, particularly the high loss to follow-up rates and underreported functional outcomes, hinders the ability to make comprehensive assessments. Available results should thusly be interpreted with an understanding of the gaps in data, however return to sport and prior employment is often not achieved. Additionally, the potential influence of socioeconomic factors and substance abuse on treatment decisions and outcomes remains inadequately explored. Future research should focus on these areas to improve the management and prognosis of patients with knee dislocations, ensuring more accurate and thorough evaluations of long-term recovery and quality of life.

Outcomes after multiligament knee injury worsen over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are devastating injuries that can have life-long consequences. A management plan requires the decision to perform surgery or not, timing of surgery, consideration of repair versus reconstruction, reconstruction technique and reconstruction graft choice. The purpose of this study was to analyze development of clinical outcomes of MLKIs over time at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Four databases were queried for surgical outcome-based studies of MLKIs published from 01/2000 through 09/2022 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Technique articles, nonoperative treatment, arthroplasty, pediatric and review articles were excluded. Study characteristics including design, number of patients, age, follow-up period, anatomical region and posterior-cruciate ligament (PCL)-based injury were collected. Primary outcomes were Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome scores and Tegner activity score. Random-effects model analysis was performed.

RESULTS

After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3571 patients in 79 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age at surgery was 35.6 years. The mean follow-up was 4.06 years (range 2-12.7). The mean Lysholm score at 2-year follow-up was 86.09 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.90-89.28], with a yearly decrease of -0.80 [95% CI: -1.47 -0.13], (p = 0.0199). The mean IKDC at 2 years was 81.35 [95% CI: 76.56-86.14], with a yearly decrease of -1.99 [95% CI: -3.14 -0.84] (p < 0.001). Non-PCL-based injuries had a higher IKDC 83.69 [75.55-91.82] vs. 75.00 [70.75-79.26] (p = 0.03) and Lysholm score 90.84 [87.10-94.58] versus 84.35 [82.18-86.52] (p < 0.01) than PCL-based injuries, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to the present systematic review and meta-analysis of MLKIs with minimum 2-year follow-ups, the patients who suffered an MLKI can expect to retain around 80-85% of knee function at 2 years and can expect a yearly deterioration of knee function, depending on the score used. Inferior outcomes can be expected for PCL-based injuries at 2 years postoperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV meta-analysis.

Higher success rate observed in reconstruction techniques of acute posterolateral corner knee injuries as compared to repair: an updated systematic review

PURPOSE

There remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi-ligament knee, and knee dislocation. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with level I-IV evidence, reporting on human patients with acute grade III PLC injuries undergoing operative management within 4 weeks from injury, with subjective and/or objective outcomes (including varus stress examinations or varus stress radiographs) reported at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two investigators independently performed the search by sequentially screening articles. Accepted definitions of varus stability on examination or stress radiographs and revision surgery were used to determine success and failure of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies, consisting of 288 patients were included. Ten studies reported primary repair, while reconstruction techniques were reported in seven studies. Overall, 43% (n = 125/288) of injuries involved the PLC, ACL and PCL. Staged reconstruction was reported in 25% (n = 3/12) of studies. The Lysholm score was the most commonly reported outcome measure. An overall failure rate of 12.4% (n = 35/282) was observed. Surgical failure was significantly higher in patients undergoing repair (21.9%; n = 21/96) compared to reconstruction (7.1%; n = 6/84) (p = 0.0058). Return to sport was greater in patients undergoing reconstruction (100%; n = 22/22) compared to repair (94%; n = 48/51) (n.s). The most common post-operative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (8.7%; n = 25/288). A total of 3.8% (n = 11/288) of patients underwent revision PLC reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

There remains substantial heterogeneity in the surgical techniques of acute, grade III PLC injuries with an overall failure rate of 12.4%. Failure rates were significantly lower, and return to sport rates higher in patients undergoing PLC reconstruction compared to repair. The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Single-Stage Surgical Treatment of Multi-ligament Knee Injuries Results in Lower Cost and Fewer Complications and Unplanned Reoperations Compared With Staged Treatment

Purpose

To compare complications, unplanned reoperations, and costs between single-stage and 2-stage treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries.

Methods

The MarketScan database was queried (2007-2016), identifying patients undergoing surgery for a multi-ligament knee injury. The single-stage cohort was defined as having at least 2 Current Procedural Terminology codes for ligament reconstruction at the index procedure without a Current Procedural Terminology code for ligament reconstruction appearing in the database for the following 12 months. The 2-stage cohort was defined as undergoing multiple ligament reconstruction procedures within a 12-month period with subsequent ligament procedure codes that differed from the index ligament reconstruction codes. Propensity score matching was performed using a greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm to match specific injury patterns between the 2 cohorts. Baseline demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were recorded. Complications, unplanned reoperations, and total health care expenditures were recorded for up to 5-year follow-up. Two-sample t tests, χ² tests, and Fisher exact tests were used with an α level of .05 set as significant.

Results

We identified 1,150 patients who underwent surgery for multi-ligament knee injuries (1,080 with single-stage approach and 270 with 2-stage approach). No significant differences in baseline characteristics or medical comorbidities were found between the cohorts. After propensity score matching, the single-stage group had fewer complications at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days (P < .05). Two-stage treatment increased the risk of reoperation at 1 year (5.5 times) and 2 years (4.9 times) after the index procedure. Health care expenditures were lower in the first 9 months for the staged cohort, but from 9 months ($31,210 vs $22,252, P < .0001) through 5 years, total costs were higher in this group.

Conclusions

Single-stage surgical treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries results in fewer complications and reoperations and lower total costs compared with 2-stage treatment, even after controlling for the number and combination of ligaments injured.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Primary repair of multiligament knee injury with InternalBrace ligament augmentation

Multiligament injury of the knee usually occurs as a result of high-energy trauma causing tibiofemoral dislocation. These are rare but potentially limb-threatening injuries, frequently involving nerve or arterial damage and often leading to severe complex instability. Management generally favours surgical reconstruction of the affected ligaments, with controversy regarding optimal treatment. We present a severe multiligament knee injury (Schenk classification KD-IV involving both cruciate and both collateral ligaments) in a competitive showjumper. A combined arthroscopic/open technique of single-stage surgical repair and suture augmentation was used, repairing all affected ligaments. The patient made an excellent recovery, returning to work after 12 weeks and riding after 22 weeks. After 5-year follow-up, she has regained her previous level of competition without subsequent injury. Multiligament repair with suture augmentation is a viable approach to the management of knee dislocation injuries. We propose that this could provide superior outcomes to traditional reconstruction techniques using autograft or synthetic reconstruction.

Acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments and staged surgery in multiple ligament knee injuries

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments with staged surgery for acute knee dislocations (KDs) and multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).

Materials and methods

Between January 2005 and May 2018, 61 consecutive patients diagnosed with MLKI or KD were referred to or visited our institution. Of these, 31 patients who underwent acute repair of extraarticular ligaments within 3 weeks of injury were included in this study. These patients were retrospectively classified into two groups: those who underwent only primary repair (repair group) and those who underwent staged reconstructive surgery (staged group). Follow-up examination included range of motion (ROM), knee joint stability (Lachman test, posterior drawer test, and varus and valgus stress test), Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS).

Results

Twelve of the 31 patients did not need or desire further surgery and were included in the repair group. No significant difference was observed in demographic data between the repair and staged groups. Although staged surgery decreased positive posterior drawer test results, no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding ROM, other knee joint stability tests, Lysholm scores, Tegner scale, or KOOS.

Conclusions

In this series, all patients returned to their activities of daily living and preinjury occupation levels. Acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments provides essential knee stability without varus/valgus instability and may reduce the need for subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective observational study.

Early surgery of multiligament knee injuries may yield better results than delayed surgery: a systematic review

Importance

Multiligament knee injuries are rare, but can lead to significant functional limitations. Surgery has been shown to improve outcomes, however, there remains considerable debate regarding the optimal timing of surgery.

Objective

We aimed to determine whether early surgery in the setting of a multiligamentous knee injury was associated with superior functional outcomes when compared with surgery on a delayed basis.

Evidence review

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases was conducted up to March 2018. We identified studies with a sample size greater than 10 that included subjects with an injury to at least two of the four major knee ligaments and compared outcomes between early and delayed surgery. We assessed the methodological quality of each included study using the Newstead-Ottawa Scale.

Findings

We identified 11 eligible studies, including a total of 320 patients (195 early and 125 delayed). The mean time to surgery among patients treated early was 11.2 days in comparison to 294.8 days for the delayed group. Early surgery was found to have a statistically significantly higher Lysholm score (p<0.0001) and Meyers rating (p=0.02) when compared with delayed surgery. No statistically significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Scale, total arc of motion, loss of extension or loss of flexion were demonstrated between early and delayed surgery. Early surgery was noted to have a statistically significantly higher odds of requiring a manipulation under anaesthesia or arthrolysis (p=0.04), however, subsequent subgroup analysis showed no difference between early and delayed surgery when only studies employing an early range of motion protocol were pooled.

Conclusions and relevance

Based on the current body of literature, which primarily consists of level IV evidence, early surgery in the setting of multiligament knee injury may provide better functional outcomes without compromising range of motion when using early postoperative mobilisation protocols. Further studies of higher quality are required to corroborate these findings.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review.

Sport and early osteoarthritis: the role of sport in aetiology, progression and treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Sports activities are considered favourable for general health; nevertheless, a possible influence of sports practice on the development of early osteoarthritis (OA) is a cause for concern. A higher incidence of OA in knees and ankles of former high-impact sports players than in those of the normal population has been shown and it is still debatable whether the cause is either to be recognized generically in the higher number of injuries or in a joint overload. The possibility to address knee OA in its early phases may be strictly connected to the modification of specific extrinsic or intrinsic factors, related to the patient in order to save the joint from further disease progression; these include sport practice, equipment and load. Non-surgical therapies such as continuative muscles reinforce and training play a strong role in the care of athletes with early OA, particularly if professional. There is an overall agreement on the need of an early restoring of a proper meniscal, ligament and cartilage integrity in order to protect the knee and resume sports safely, whereas alignment is a point still strongly debatable especially for professional athletes. Remaining questions still to be answered are the risks of different sports in relation to one another, although an actual protective effect of low-impact sports, such as walking, swimming or cycling, has been recognized on the appearance or worsening of OA, the effect of continuing or ceasing to practice a sport on the natural history of early OA, and even following appropriate treatment is still unknown.

The timing of surgical treatment of knee dislocations: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Traumatic knee dislocations (KDs) are unusual yet limb-threatening injuries; the timing of surgical intervention is still debated. A systematic review was performed to determine the optimal timing of surgery with respect to injury pattern.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed for studies published between 1 January 1974 and 20 April 2014 on the surgical management of "knee dislocation" and "multiligament knee injuries". Surgical timing was classified as acute, chronic, or staged. A systematic review was performed for patients with KD-III according to Schenck's classification using individual patient data.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 150 patients (153 knees) with KDs fulfilled the study requirements. Sixty-nine cases with KD-IIIM and 84 cases with KD-IIIL were identified. Excellent or good results were demonstrated in 79.1 % (34 cases) of cases managed with staged treatment versus 58.4 % (45 cases) of cases undergoing acute surgery (p = 0.02), and versus 45.5 % (15 cases) of cases undergoing chronic surgery (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of excellent or good results between the acute and chronic surgery groups (n.s.), or between the KD-IIIM and KD-IIIL groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Staged treatment yields the best clinical results for patients with KD-III. No statistically significant difference was shown in the clinical results between acute surgery and chronic surgery groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Surgical management of knee dislocations with ligament reconstruction associated with a hinged external fixator

INTRODUCTION

Knee dislocations are defined as ligament injuries involving at least two of the four most important knee ligaments. Results from recent studies have shown a tendency towards improvement of the functional outcomes with use of an articulated external fixator during the postoperative period following multiligament reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that good knee stability and early gain of range of motion could be achieved with the use of the external fixator after ligament reconstructions.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with knee dislocations were evaluated after multiligament reconstruction in association with use of a lateral monoplanar external fixator for six weeks. Reconstructions were performed using grafts from a tissue bank. Range of motion was measured after one, two, three, six, twelve months and at the final evaluation at a mean time of 49 months. The assessments were made using objective and subjective IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scales.

RESULTS

The mean scores were 71.7 for the subjective IKDC score, 81.5 for the Lysholm score. No patient was able to return to previous Tegner score. Out of the 45 ligament reconstructions performed, only four failed during the follow-up time. The mean range of motion of the knee presented a progressive increase from the first to the twelfth month, from 67.8° to 115.7°. Two cases of superficial infection on the site of the external fixator pins were observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of an external fixator enabled early rehabilitation with range of motion gains starting from the first postoperative month, a low rate of reconstruction failure and minimal complications. Nevertheless, none of the patients returned to the level of activity prevailing prior to the injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.