Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods

Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study

BACKGROUND

With the rise in elderly populations, the incidence of femoral trochanteric fractures has also increased. Although intramedullary nail therapy is commonly used, the incidence of peri-implant fractures (PIFs) as a complication and its associated factors are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of PIFs and treatment strategies and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study across 11 hospitals from 2016 to 2020 examined 1855 patients with femoral trochanter fracture. After excluding 69 patients treated without intramedullary nailing, 1786 patients were analyzed. Parameters studied included age, sex, body mass index, medical history, and treatment methods. PIFs were categorized using the Chan classification. Treatment outcomes and patient mobility were assessed using the Parker Mobility Score, and postoperative complications and one-year survival data were compiled.

RESULTS

The incidence of PIFs was 8 in 1786 cases. Chan classification showed 1 case of N1A, 6 of N2A, and 1 of N2B. Only the type N1 case was a transverse fracture, whereas all cases of type N2 were oblique fractures. Among these cases, five patients had fractures extending to the upper part of the femoral condyle. The patient with N1A and one bedridden patient with N2A fracture underwent conservative treatment, one patient with N2A in which the fracture did not extend to the condyle was treated with nail replacement, and 5 patients (N2A: 4, N2B: 1) with fractures extending to the condyle were treated with additional plate fixation. All patients had survived at one year after treatment for PIF, and no reoperations were required.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PIF was very low (0.45%). Of the 6 PIF cases, excluding the bedridden patients, the treatment of choice for PIF was an additional plate if the fracture line extended to the femoral condyle; otherwise, the nail was replaced. All patients achieved bony fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

High Rate of Undetected Infections in Failed Osteosynthesis of Pertrochanteric Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of infection in patients with cutout after proximal femur fracture (PFF) osteosynthesis.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Third-level trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients presenting with a cutout following PFF (OTA/AO 31A) osteosynthesis, between January 2007 and December 2020.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome was infection according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients presenting with a cutout were included, with mean age of 83.3 years (range 63-96), and 51 (76.1%) were women. Of all cases, 16 (24.7%) presented a concomitant infection. The presence of concomitant infection was suspected preoperatively in only 3 of the cases. A subgroup analysis was performed between the cases with infection and those without infection, the groups being comparable in terms of demographic data and postoperative radiological criteria. Patients with underlying infection had a higher rate of surgical wound complication (56.3% vs. 22%, P = 0.014) and higher rates of leukocytosis (11.560 vs. 7.890, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Faced with a cutout after osteosynthesis of a PFF, underlying infection should be considered as a possible etiological factor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of radiographic projections to guide cephalic screw position in pertrochanteric fracture: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Löwenstein Lateral view and the True Lateral view for the positioning of the cephalic hip screw, through a cadaveric study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We placed two Kirschner wires in eight femur specimens using an Antero-Posterior view, Löwenstein Lateral view and True Lateral view. The distances between the Kirschner wires and the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior cortex were measured in all projections. The head of the femur was then sectioned, and the same macroscopic distances were measured. Finally, we could calculate the accuracy of the two radiographic lateral projections.

RESULTS

When the Kirschner wire was placed in the center of the head using the Antero-Posterior and the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9705 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1479 and 1.1584, respectively. When the Kirschner wire was placed superior on the Antero-Posterior and centrally on the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9930 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1159 and 0.7224, respectively.

CONCLUSION

When the Kirschner wire was positioned proximal in Antero-Posterior view and central in True Lateral view, only the True Lateral view showed high accuracy.

Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nail: One or two cephalic screws?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of cut-out, cut-in, cut-through, Z-effect, and reverse Z-effect in two cephalomedullary nail (CMN) systems: one with single cephalic screw fixation and the other with dual-screw fixation using a lag screw and an anti-rotation screw.

METHODS

A retrospective study from a cohort of patients was conducted between January 2017 and August 2019 in patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with osteosynthesis using CMN.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six patients with intertrochanteric fractures who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The median age was 81 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12]. Seventy-six percent had fractures classified as Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (OTA/AO) 31A2. Twenty-one mechanical complications occurred, 8.7% (17) was cut-out with a single cephalic screw CMN and 2% (4) was Z-effect with a dual-screw CMN non-integrated. The median tip-apex distance (TAD) was 19.4 mm (IQR 10.8) in patients who experienced cut-out and 19 mm (IQR 10) in those who experienced Z-effect. The median time to cut-out occurrence was 39,5 days (IQR 47,5), while the median time to Z-effect was 90 days (IQR 86).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of osteosynthesis failure using CMN is more frequent in patients treated with a single cephalic screw CMN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Risk Factors Associated with Fixation Failure in Intertrochanteric Fracture Treated with Cephalomedullary Nail

Purpose

Cephalomedullary (CM) nailing is widely performed in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures. However, in cases of fixation failure, re-operation is usually necessary, thus determining factors that may contribute to fixation failure is important. In this study, we examined factors affecting the occurrence of fixation failure, such as age or fracture stability, after CM nailing in elderly patients.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted retrospectively using registered data. From April 2011 to December 2018, CM nailing was performed in 378 cases diagnosed with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, and 201 cases were finally registered. Cases involving patients who were bed-ridden before injury, who died from causes unrelated to surgery, and those with a follow-up period less than six months were excluded.

Results

Fixation failure occurred in eight cases. Comparison of the surgical success and fixation failure group showed that the mean age was significantly higher in the fixation failure group compared with the control group (81.3±6.4 vs. 86.4±6.8; P=0.034). A significantly high proportion of unstable fractures was also observed (139/54 vs. 3/5; P=0.040), with a significantly high ratio of intramedullary reduction (176/17 vs. 5/3; P=0.034). A significantly higher ratio of unstable fractures compared with that of stable fractures was observed in the intramedullary reduction group (132/49 vs. 10/10; P=0.033).

Conclusion

Fixation failure of CM nailing is likely to occur in patients who are elderly or have unstable fracture patterns. Thus, care should be taken in order to avoid intramedullary reduction.

Retrospective evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures utilizing TFNA

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with the TFN-Advanced™ Proximal Femoral Nailing system (TFNA¸ DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA) including intra- and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with an acute proximal femur fracture consequently treated with a TFNA between September 2014 and December 2018 were evaluated. Clinical and radiological data were assessed for intra- and postoperative complications, including treatment failure. In addition, intra- and postoperative X-rays were used to determine the position of the implant, and any migration, via tip-apex-distance (TAD) and the caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD). The accuracy of the fracture reduction was rated by both observers according to Baumgartners criteria.

RESULTS

275 consecutive patients (mean age 77.5 ± 14.1; 70.2% female) were included. The predominant OTA/AO fracture classification was 31A2 (140 cases, 50.7%). The average surgical time was 69 min (± 39.8). The reduction quality was good in 253 cases (92.0%) and acceptable in 22 cases (8.0%). In 18 cases, a pre-defined primary outcome parameter (6.5%) was recorded after a mean of 8.2 ± 8.0 months. During the observational period, 19 patients (6.9%) required a total of 23 additional surgeries. Implant removal was not considered a failure in the absence of pain. Significant group differences were observed with younger age (p = 0.001), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)-score (p = 0.041) and lower rate of osteoporosis (p = 0.015) in the failure group. There were no cases of cut-out or cut-through among the patients who underwent augmentation as part of osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal femur fractures treated with the TFNA show low complication rates and high levels of radiological healing. Implant-related complications might be more common in patients with younger age, a lower CCI-score and lower frequency of osteoporosis. Usage of cement augmentation could potentially be beneficial to reduce postoperative cut-through and cut-out.

Parallel K-Wire Placement Leads to Fusion and Midcarpal Settling in Scaphoid Excision Four-Corner Fusion

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid excision 4-corner fusion is a motion-sparing procedure in patients with advanced radioscaphoid arthritis. This study introduces an alternate technique for scaphoid excision 4-corner fusion using a parallel Kirschner wire (K-wire) construct across the midcarpal joints that leads to reliable fusion rates, and good patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a single-surgeon, retrospective study of patients who underwent scaphoid excision 4-corner fusion, using a parallel K-wire construct across the midcarpal joints. Once fusion was achieved, K-wires were removed. Radiographic union rate, time to union, capitolunate angle, capitolunate coverage, and amount of midcarpal settling are measured. Patient-reported outcome measures and descriptive statistics are presented.

RESULTS

Sixty-five wrists were included in this study with a mean age of 50.1 years. One patient was lost to follow-up. All 64 wrists (100%) fused at an average of 2.6 months. The mean capitolunate angle was 7°, and capitolunate coverage was 99.2%. Fifty-two patients (81%) had adequate radiographs for measurement. Average midcarpal settling was 1.1 mm. Thirty-two patients (51%) were available for long-term follow-up at an average of 5.3 years (0.7-10.2 years), and participated in patient reported outcomes (PRO) surveys. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 16.6, and numeric pain rating scale score was 1.8.

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel K-wire placement across the midcarpal joints with scaphoid leads to a high rate of fusion with good patient outcomes long term. Midcarpal settling that occurs through dynamic compression around the K-wires may have contributed to bony fusion. This technique may provide an alternative approach to achieving reliable fusion across the midcarpal joints.

Association of Hip Fracture With the Use of Walking Assistance Devices Post-surgery: A Retrospective Study Comparing Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures

Background Hip fractures, including intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, are among the most common types of fractures. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) and the cephalomedullary hip nail (CHN) are the two main techniques used for the fixation of these types of fractures. This study aims to explore the association of the fracture type with the use of walking assistance devices post-surgery, regardless of the fixation technique. Methodology This study is a retrospective study based on the review of de-identified patient data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients aged 65 years old or above who underwent fixation procedures for intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures using CHN or DHS techniques were included in this study. Results A total of 8,881 patients were included and divided into the following two groups: 876 (9.9%) patients treated for subtrochanteric fracture, and 8,005 (90.1%) patients treated for intertrochanteric fracture. No statistical significance was detected in the use of mobility aid postoperatively between the two groups. When compared to CHN, DHS was noted to be the most employed fixation technique among patients with intertrochanteric fractures. One main finding was that patients who underwent surgery using DHS for intertrochanteric fractures were more likely to use walking assistance devices postoperatively compared to those with subtrochanteric fractures treated with the same fixation technique. Conclusions Findings suggest that the use of walking assistance devices post-surgery is independent of the type of fracture and potentially dependent on the fixation technique employed. Future studies focused on the difference in the use of walking assistance devices based on fixation techniques for patients with distinctive sub-types of trochanteric fractures are highly encouraged.

Proposal and validation of a new classification for trochanteric fractures based on medial buttress and lateral cortical integrity

Background

Trochanteric fractures usually require surgical treatment. The currently used classification system, such as AO classification, cannot cover all variant types, and is poor in reliability, causing confusion in surgical decision making. This study describes a simple, well-covered, re-liable, accurate, and clinically useful classification.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 907 patients with trochanteric fractures treated by us from 1,999 to 2019 and proposed a new classification according to radiographs. Then, 50 records randomly selected in proportion were examined by 10 observers (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) independently according to AO and the new classification. After a 2-week interval, repeat evaluation was completed. The Kappa coefficient was used to investigate the intra-observer reliability, inter-observer reliability and the agreement between the observers and the "reference standard".

Results

The new classification system includes 12 types composed of 3 medial groups and 4 lateral groups. According to the medial buttress, the fractures are divided into group I (intact lesser trochanter, adequate but-tress), group II (incomplete lesser trochanter, effective cortical buttress after reduction) and group III (huge defect of the medial cortex). According to the penetration region of the lateral fracture line, the fractures are divided into group A (intact lateral cortex), group B (incomplete lateral cortex), group C (subtrochanteric fractures) and group D (multiple lateral fracture lines). All of the included cases can be classified according to the new classification, of which 34 (3.75%) cases are unclassifiable by the AO classification. Intra-observer: The experienced achieved substantial agreement using both AO [k = 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.46-0.76)] and new classification [k = 0.65 (0.55-0.76)]. The inexperienced reached moderate agreement using both AO [k = 0.48 (0.33-0.62)] and new classification [k = 0.60 (0.50-0.71)]. Inter-observer: The overall reliabilities for AO [k = 0.51 (0.49-0.53)] and for new classification [k = 0.57 (0.55-0.58)] were both moderate. The agreement between the experienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.61 (0.49-0.74)] and new classification [k = 0.63 (0.54-0.72)] were both substantial. The agreement between the inexperienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.48 (0.45-0.50)] and the new classification [k = 0.48 (0.41-0.54)] were both moderate.

Conclusion

Compared with AO classification, our new classification is better in coverage, reliability and accuracy, and has the feasibility of clinical verification and promotion.

The management of segmental femur fractures: the radiographic 'cover-up' test to guide decision making

BACKGROUND

Segmental femur fractures often pose management challenges regarding the optimal fixation choice and sequence of surgical events.

METHODS

Retrospective review of clinical records and radiographic data of adult patients with segmental femur fractures treated by a conceptual radiographic cover-up test to determine the ideal fixation method between January 2019 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Forty patients with 84 individual fractures underwent fracture fixation. The most consistent fracture combinations were intertrochanter-diaphysis (AO31A-AO32) fractures (25%, n = 10) and femur neck-diaphysis (AO31B-AO32) fractures (20%, n = 8). Compared to evidence-based fracture management, the gold standard treatment was used for the fixation of 78 fractures (93%). One patient required revision for fixation failure of a diaphyseal fracture, and two fractures, both open diaphysis injuries, developed fracture-related infections.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical alignment and high union rates are possible for segmental femur fractures treated by evidence-based fracture fixation principles. A conceptual radiographic cover-up test assists in matching the best possible implant for each fracture.

The effect of CKD on intertrochanteric fracture treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation: A 7-year study

Background

Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most burdensome osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Chronic kidney disease is associated with sarcopenia, especially in its advanced stages and, thus may impact functional status. Combining an intertrochanteric fracture with advanced CKD may diminish results after surgical fixation. This study aims to distinguish whether CKD affects the result of intertrochanteric fracture fixation in terms of mechanical and functional outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective study reviews all intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA fixation from 2012 to 2018. 445 patients were classified into 5 stages of CKD and divided by eGFR = 90 ml/min/1.73 m² into CKD and non-CKD group and by eGFR = 30 ml/min/1.73 m² into advanced CKD and non-advanced CKD group. The primary outcome was one year Harris Hip Score (HHS). Secondary outcomes were medical complications, surgical complications, and a 1-year mortality rate.

Results

Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were not different between non-CKD and CKD groups (eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m²). However, there was a difference between non-advanced CKD and advanced CKD groups (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) (p < 0.001). Medical complications were not different, except for sepsis in CKD stage 5 compared with stage 1 (p = 0.023). Even though AO/OTA types were more severe in the advanced CKD group, surgical complications and 1-year mortality were not different.

Conclusion

Advanced stage CKD treated with PFNA fixation is associated with lower functional outcomes at one year. Sepsis is more prone to occur after surgery in CKD stage 5.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective cohort study.

Late-Onset Hematoma Due to Bleeding of a Small Branch of the Lateral Circumflex Femoral Artery Following Proximal Femur Intramedullary Nailing

Intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fracture is not deprived of complications, although vascular complications are very rare and a high index of suspicion is required for timely diagnosis. This case report describes how a late-onset hematoma formation and bleeding of a small branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery can complicate intramedullary nailing after a pertrochanteric fracture. To the best of our knowledge, this complication has never been reported and should be considered among the possible vascular complications of intramedullary nailing. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the vascular complications that can occur even with late-onset presentation and even from small vessels, while administration of anticoagulants is an aggravating factor. Elderly patients with proximal femur fractures are more susceptible to vascular injury due to the structure of their vessels and the vicinity of the fracture to the arterial supply of the hip.

Fraturas intertrocantéricas fixadas com parafuso dinâmico de quadril: Ensaio clínico randomizado comparando a via lateral de Hardinge e o acesso minimamente invasivo

Objective  To compare the techniques for the osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screws (DHSs) through the Hardinge and minimally-invasive access routes of the hip, evaluating the operative time, the degree of pain in the immediate postoperative period, the hematimetric loss, and the functional aspects of active mobility.

Methods  A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in which 66 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were submitted to osteosynthesis by DHS. The patients were divided into a test group, submitted to the minimally-invasive access, and a control group, in whom the surgery was performed through the Hardinge route.

Results  Patients submitted to the minimally-invasive treatment presented a lower degree of postoperative pain compared to the group treated by the Hardinge lateral route ( p  < 0.001), as well as lower hematimetric loss ( p  < 0.001), shorter operative time ( p  < 0.001), and improvement in immediate postoperative active mobility tests ( p <0.05).

Conclusion  The study demonstrated the clinical superiority of the minimally-invasive access route parameters analyzed in relation to the Hardinge access for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures when DHS is the choice osteosynthesis method.

Level of evidence I.

Proximal Femoral Plate, Intramedullary Nail Fixation Versus Hip Arthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture in the Elderly: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple operative modalities are available for management of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This meta-analysis was conducted to find out if there is superiority of surgical fixation by proximal femoral plate or surgical fixation by intramedullary nail over hip arthroplasty for management of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

METHODS

A search for relevant studies that published from January 2000 to November 2018 through the electronic literature database of Cochrane library, Medline, Trip Database and Wiley online library.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies including 14 prospective RCTs, and five retrospective studies. This meta-analysis showed that nail group had shorter operative time than plate group (P < 0.0001), and less blood loss than the plate and arthroplasty groups (P < 0.0001), cut-out was higher in nail group than the plate group (P < 0.0001), mortality rate was higher in hip arthroplasty compared to other groups (P < 0.0001), Harris hip score within 6 months of the operation was higher in the arthroplasty group compared with the nail and plate groups, while within 1 year of the operation, nail group had higher Harris hip score than arthroplasty group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that the intramedullary nail fixation method is a preferred method for management of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly over hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral plate fixation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00426-1.

Conventional versus helical blade screw insertion following the removal of the femoral head screw: a biomechanical evaluation using trochanteric gamma 3 locking nail versus PFN antirotation

OBJECTIVE

When a hip screw needs to be changed, choosing between the conventional (C-type) and helical blade (H-type) types is difficult. In this biomechanical study, we compared these two screw types relative to the type of the initial screw used.

METHODS

C- or H-type screws were inserted (leading screw) in three types of polyurethane bone models (Sawbone, Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Washington, USA: 130 × 180 × 40 mm) of different bone mineral densities (pounds per cubic feet [PCF] 5, 80 kg/m³; PCF 10, 160 kg/m³; and PCF 15, 240 kg/m³), and then successively or alternately inserted (following screw) after the leading screw removal. An original model (original C and H) of a leading screw without removal was created as a control. The strengths of resistance to pullout (PO) and rotational stress were measured. For each experimental condition, there were 30 experimental models.

RESULTS

The original C screw was superior in PO strength, and the original H-type screw was superior in rotational strength. When the C- or H-type screw was the leading screw, using the C-type screw again as the following screw (C1-C2, H1-C2) showed the greatest resistance to PO, and using the H-type screw as the following screw (C1-H2, H1-H2) showed superior resistance to rotational strength. However, the rotational strength of the C2 screw decreased by more than 50% compared with that of the original C screw. Moreover, the PO and rotational strengths of the H2 screw decreased to less than 30% overall compared with those of the original H screw.

CONCLUSION

The H-type screw should be used for second-time screw insertion procedures in cases where it is difficult to choose between PO and rotational strengths.

Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population

INTRODUCTION

Intertrochanteric hip fractures pose a significant health problem. The proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA IIDePuySynthes) is the most commonly used implant for intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures at our institution. We aim to identify the risk factors predisposing to mechanical failure of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixation with PFNAII in our Southeast Asian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 295 consecutive patients who underwent PFNA fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur between January 2014 and June 2018 at our institution. Exclusion criteria included a follow-up period of less than 4 months and patients with polytrauma. 204 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 22 had mechanical failure of PFNAII. We compared these patients with respect to their demographics, medical co-morbidities, quality of reduction according to the Baumgartner scale, calcar restoration, blade position according to Cleveland Zones, the stability of fracture according to OTA/AO classification, neck-shaft-angle, tip-apex distance, as well as neck of femur bone mineral density T-score. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and until fracture union or complication had occurred. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds ratio for mechanical failure for selected variables.

RESULTS

Good quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure whilst posterior blade position in lateral hip X-ray predicted it, with odds ratios of 0.147 (95% confidence interval, 0.030-0.733; p = 0.019) and12.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.583-92.825; p = 0.016) respectively. On univariate analysis, the mechanical failure group were older, had poorer calcar restoration, more unstable fracture patterns, more varus neck-shaft angle, and trochanteric starting points that were lateral to or on the tip of the greater trochanter. However, these were not significant in multivariate analysis. Tip apex distance, the severity of osteoporosis, presence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease and serum vitamin D levels were not significant predictors of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid mechanical failure, one should aim to achieve a good quality of reduction and centre blade position on lateral hip X-ray. Tip apex distance did not predict mechanical failure in our study.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Extramedullary Versus Intramedullary Reduction in Unstable Femoral Trochanteric Fractures

Introduction:

The failure rate of operations involving the cephalomedullary nail technique for unstable femoral trochanteric fractures is 3-12%. Changing the reduction strategy may improve the stability. This study aimed to confirm whether reducing the proximal fragment with the medial calcar contact, as opposed to utilizing an intramedullary reduction, would improve the stability of such fractures.

Materials and Methods:

The unstable femoral trochanteric fracture model was created with fixation by cephalomedullary nails in 22 imitation bones. The 2 reduction patterns were as follows: one was with the proximal head-neck fragment external to the distal bone in the frontal plane and anterior in the sagittal plane as “Extramedullary,” while the other was the opposite reduction position, that is, bone in the frontal plane and sagittal plane as “Intramedullary.” We evaluated the tip-apex distance, compression stiffness, change in femoral neck-shaft angle, amount of blade telescoping, and diameter of the distal screw hole after the compression test. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results:

No significant differences were seen in compression stiffness (p = 0.804) and femoral neck-shaft angle change (p = 0.644). Although the “Extramedullary” tip-apex distance was larger than the “Intramedullary” distance (p = 0.001), it indicated clinically acceptable lengths. The amount of blade telescoping and the distal screw hole diameter were significantly larger in “Intramedullary” than in “Extramedullary” (p < 0.001, p = 0.019, respectively). Our results showed that “Intramedullary” had significantly larger blade telescoping and distal screw hole diameters than “Extramedullary,” and contrary to our hypothesis, no significant differences were seen in compression stiffness and femoral neck-shaft angle change.

Conclusions:

As opposed to the “Intramedullary” reduction pattern, the biomechanical properties of the “Extramedullary” reduction pattern improved stability during testing and decreased sliding.

Application of the reversed LISS-DF technique in an elderly patient to salvage infection-related failure of trochanteric fracture fixation

Failure of cephalomedullary fixation in geriatric trochanteric fractures is a potential complication. Attempts have been made to optimize the implant fixation (e. g. cement augmentation) and several factors (e. g. malreduction, tip apex distance) have been identified as risk factors for failure. Nevertheless, if intramedullary fixation fails, it is often associated with bone defects in mostly preexisting poor bone-stock. Accordingly, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recommended by some authors as the only valid treatment option. However, in specific situations (e. g. implant associated infection) conversion to THA might be less reasonable than an attempt to re-osteosynthesis. This article reports on the successful use of a reversed contralateral LISS-DF (LISS for the distal femur, DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) application after failed cephalomedullary fixation and failed re-osteosynthesis using a blade plate in a trochanteric fracture in an elderly patient with additional implant associated infection.

Single lag screw and reverse distal femur locking compression plate for concurrent cervicotrochanteric and shaft fractures of the femur: biomechanical study validated with a clinical series

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical management of concurrent cervicotrochanteric and shaft fractures of the femur has not been consensual. The authors investigated the reliability of combined single lag screw and reverse distal femur locking compression plate (LCP-DF) by finite element (FE) study and retrospectively described the present technique for these dual fractures.

METHOD

Intact femurs were derived from CT data, and the implant models were created by using CAD software. The fractured femur and implant models were virtually aligned based on the surgical techniques before converting to the FE model. In the FE model, applied boundary conditions included body weight, muscle forces, and constraint of the joints. Regarding clinical series, three patients with these dual fractures of the femur and 2 with cervicotrochanteric fractures with subtrochanteric extension were operated on by the proposed technique. The collected data include operative time, postoperative complications, union times, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Equivalent von Mises stress exhibited on dynamic hip screws with an anti-rotational screw was higher than the other techniques, close to the yield stress of the material. Multiple screw fixation produced better stability for transcervical fractures whereas the proposed technique of combined single lag screw and reverse LCP-DF provided better stability for intertrochanteric fractures. No significant difference in cortical bone stress was found between multiple screw construct and the proposed technique. The proposed technique presented a lower risk of secondary fractures, as the strain energy density (SED) in cancellous bone was lower than multiple screw construct. Regarding clinical series, all fractures were united with a mean union time of-16.1 weeks (range 12-20). There were no any postoperative complications. Regarding the Harris score, 1 was determined to be excellent value, and 4 to be good.

CONCLUSION

By the FE results, a combination of a single lag screw and reverse LCP-DF is an effective technique for fixation of cervicotrochanteric fractures. Empowered by the clinical results, this proposed technique could be an alternative for concurrent cervicotrochanteric and shaft fractures of the femur especially when either single-system or dual-system devices seem not to be suitable.

Early Experience with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFN-A): A Descriptive Review of Thirty-Four Cases from a Single Center

BACKGROUND

The Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFN-A) is offered as a "next-generation" solution to the ever-increasing incidence of pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures. It aims to build upon the success of earlier-generation proximal femur implants, while at the same time attempting to address complications, like varus collapse, cut-out, implant failure and anterior cortical perforation/impingement. It also aims to provide the surgeon with flexibility by offering varied options under a single implant system.

OBJECTIVES

This descriptive study looked at the early outcomes of the TFN-A as used in a single trauma centre. It attempts to shed light on the question of whether the TFN-A is at least equivalent to more established proximal femur implants in terms of fixation while reducing complication rates.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent fixation using the TFN-A at a single centre from October 2016 to July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed for this study. All surgeries were done by experienced orthopaedic surgeons. The decision for cement augmentation of the femoral head element was made on a case-to-case basis. Radiographs of the hip, pelvis and femora were taken to monitor fracture healing and evaluate post-fixation neck-shaft angle (NSA)/varus collapse, cut-out/cut-through, implant failure and anterior cortical impingement/perforation.

RESULTS

All thirty-four patients had neck-shaft angles within 5 degrees of the contralateral hip immediately post-surgery. Two patients had varus collapse > 5 degrees on follow-up but did not progress to cut-out. Two patients had broken distal locking screws, albeit their fractures healed uneventfully. There were four cases of cement augmentation with "retrograde filling", wherein most of the cement went into the femoral neck. No patients experienced distal anterior cortical impingement or perforation. All but one patient subsequently progressed to full weight-bearing.

CONCLUSION

Early experience with the TFN-A appears to suggest that it is at least comparable to preceding proximal femur nail devices in terms of fixation. Absence of anterior cortical impingement or perforation suggests that the TFN-A shows promise in addressing this issue. The incidence of "retrograde cement filling" is a previously unreported point of interest for head-neck element augmentation which requires further study.

Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis

Background

A meta-analysis to access the pros and cons of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures including available evidence extracted from literature.

Methods

According to the Cochrane systemic analysis method, randomized control trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative observational studies which were related to the comparison of PFNA and InterTAN nail in the treatment of the elderly with intertrochanteric fractures were retrieved. Data were independently extracted from the included studies by two reviewers and analyzed using RevMan 5.3, and the quality of the studies was assessed.

Results

Two RCTs and seven observational studies were recruited, which consisted of 681 patients with PFNA and 651 patients with InterTAN nail. The meta-analyses showed no significant differences between the two approaches on Harris Hip Score, operation time, blood loss, time to union, mean hospital stay, union problems, intraoperative complications, hematoma, infection, and other complications in both RCTs and observational studies. In terms of other outcomes, for the RCTs, results showed that there were shorter tip–apex distance and reduced pain at thigh or hip in InterTAN nail than in PFNA; however, InterTAN nail was not superior to PFNA in cutout, reoperation, and femoral shaft fracture; for observational studies, the risk of the screw migration (RR = 5.13, 95%CI [1.33,19.75], P = 0.02), cutout (RR = 3.26, 95%CI [1.64,6.47], P = 0.0008), the varus collapse of the femoral head (RR = 7.19, 95%CI [2.18,23.76], P = 0.001), femoral shaft fracture (RR = 5.73, 95%CI [2.24,14.65], P = 0.0003) treated by InterTAN nail were significantly decreased, compared with those by PFNA; however, no significant differences were observed in the aspects of tip–apex distance and pain at thigh or hip between these two groups.

Conclusion

Analysis of a large number of relevant clinical indicators available shows that InterTAN nail has better clinical manifestation than PFNA in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02031-8.

Procedure for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures using the "Three-Finger Method" Assisted by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Objective

To assess long‐term follow‐up evaluations for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with the “three‐finger method” assisted by proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).

Methods

From January 2010 to January 2017, 123 patients were selected and followed for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with PFNA assisted by the “three‐finger method” (application of the index finger, middle finger, and ring finger in the process of surgery to assist PFNA). There were 56 male patients and 67 female patients aged 52–93 years with an average age of 75.6 years, and 88 cases were due to a fall and 35 due to a traffic accident injury. The femoral necks were fixed with PFNA assisted by the “three‐finger method” applying the following procedure: traction reduction, determining the incision, inserting the needle, and placing screw. The Harris hip score, postoperative complications, hip pain and function status were statistically analyzed to evaluate the surgical efficacy and to discuss the surgical technique of the “three‐finger method” assisted by PFNA.

Results

According to the Harris scoring criteria, patients were followed for 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 years, and the good outcomes of patients were recorded. The excellent and good rate of 87% was the highest in the second year of follow‐up. Then, the rate decreased following the eighth year of follow‐up. The excellent and good rate of 82.7% was the lowest. The patients with incisions healed well, there were no instances of fat liquefaction or infection. There were three cases of effusion, the rate was 2.4%. The secretions were cultured, and no bacterial growth was found. After treatment of the wound, it healed, and the spiral blade used for the femoral head did not wear out. There was one case of femoral head necrosis. There was no significant correlation between hip pain and sex and age (P > 0.05), and the function of the hip joint was significantly correlated with the age of the patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The “three‐finger method” in the process of surgery to assist PFNA for the treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the femur simplified the operation steps, reduced the operation difficulty, shortened the operation time, improved the operation efficiency, and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications.

[A comparative study on effectiveness of closed reduction and internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture assisted with skeletal tractor and traction table]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and advantages of skeletal tractor in closed reduction and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture compared with traction table.

Methods

The clinical data of 86 patients with intertrochanteric fractures, who were treated with closed reduction and PFNA internal fixation between October 2016 and March 2018 and met the selection criteria, was retrospectively analysed. Among them, 44 cases were treated with skeletal tractor (trial group) and 42 cases were treated with traction table (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture side, AO classification, and degree of osteoporosis ( P>0.05). The preoperative position time, operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative Harris score were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation was successfully completed in both groups. Compared with the control group, the patients in the trial group had shorter preoperative position time and operation time, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and less intraoperative blood loss ( P<0.05). The patients were followed up 12-21 months in trial group (mean, 14.2 months) and 12-22 months in control group (mean, 14.3 months). Venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred in 8 patients (3 cases of trial group and 5 cases of control group) after operation. Internal fixation failure occurred in 5 patients (2 cases of trial group and 3 cases of control group) during 1 year after operation. All fractures healed except for those with internal fixation failure, the fracture healing time was (11.6±2.9) weeks in trial group and (12.4±3.6) weeks in control group; and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.250, P=0.214). At 1 year after operation, Harris score of the trial group was 86.2±5.9 and that of the control group was 84.1±6.1. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.768, P=0.080).

Conclusion

Compared with traction table, skeletal tractor in closed reduction and PFNA internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture can significantly shorten the preoperative position time and operation time, reduce the intraoperative fluoroscopy times, improve the operation efficiency, and have similar effectiveness.

Hip Replacement as Alternative to Intramedullary Nail in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hip replacement and intramedullary nails for treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare hip replacement with intramedullary nail in the management of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture were retrieved from Cochrane Library (up to January 2018), CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang Data, PubMed, and Embase. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, and relevant data was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed by Revman 5.3. Where possible, we performed the limited pooling of data.

Results

Fourteen trials including a total of 1067 participants aged 65 and above were included for qualitative synthesis and meta‐analysis. The methodological quality of the included study was poor. The meta‐analysis indicated that the hip replacement group benefited more than the intramedullary nail group in terms of the bearing load time (WMD ‐14.61, 95% CI −21.51 to −7.7, P < 0.0001), mechanical complications (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.57, P < 0.0001), and post‐operative complications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.93, P = 0.03). While the intramedullary nail was superior to arthroplasty regarding the intraoperative blood loss (WMD 58.36, 95% CI 30.77 to 85.94, P < 0.0001). However, there were no statistical significances in the length of surgery (WMD 5.27, 95% CI 4.23 to 14.77, P = 0.28), units of blood transfusion (WMD 0.34, 95% CI ‐0.16 to 0.85, P = 0.18), length of hospital stay (WMD ‐1.00, 95% CI ‐2.93 to 0.93, P = 0.31), Harris hip score (WMD 0.31, 95% CI ‐0.39 to 1.01, P = 0.38), and mortality (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.12 to 13.10, P = 0.86).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta‐analysis provided evidence for the efficacy and safety of hip replacement and intramedullary nail in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of methodological limitations and publication bias.

A rare complication of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after removal of the long Gamma nail in a healed intertrochanteric fracture

Ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after hardware removal in healed trochanteric fracture is a rare complication. We reported a case of a 79-year-old woman who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation for her left intertrochanteric fracture with a long Gamma nail about 1 year ago. She asked for implants removal due to local irritation. However, 5 days after implants removal, left subcapital femoral neck fracture occurred. Removal of implants under elective indications could lead to high complication rate. Orthopedic surgeons should perform the removal of hardware in healed intertrochanteric fracture for very selected cases.

Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intertrochanteric fractures are common fragility injuries in the elderly. Surgical fixation using intramedullary devices are one of the widely used management options. To date, evidence demonstrating the effects of lag screw configuration and the mode of lag screw locking in these devices is lacking. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the lag screw configuration (single vs integrated dual interlocking screw) and the mode of lag screw locking (static vs dynamic) of a femoral nail device result in differences in clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, pragmatic, single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a three-arm parallel group design is proposed. Nine-hundred patients with intertrochanteric fractures (A1 and A2 AO/OTA) will be randomised to fracture treatment using a Gamma3 nail (Stryker; proximally dynamic) or a Trigen Intertan nail (Smith & Nephew) in a dynamic or static lag screw configuration. The primary outcome measure consists of radiological evidence of construct failure within 6 months following surgery, with failure being defined as breakage of the femoral nail or distal locking screw, a change in tip-apex distance of more than 10 mm or lag screw cut-out through the femoral head. Secondary outcomes include surgical data (operation time, fluoroscopy time), complications (surgical site infection, reoperation, patient death), return to mobility and home circumstances, functional independence, function and pain. Patients who are able to walk independently with or without a mobility aid and are able to answer simple questions and follow instructions will be asked to participate in three dimensional gait analysis at 6 weeks and 6 months to assess hip biomechanics from this cohort. Additional secondary measures of gait speed, hip range of motion, joint contact and muscle forces and gross activity monitoring patterns will be obtained in this subgroup.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the protocol for this RCT (HREC/17/RAH/433). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12618001431213.

Finite element analysis of two cephalomedullary nails in treatment of elderly reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: zimmer natural nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation-ΙΙ

Background

More elderly patients are suffering from intertrochanteric fractures. However, the choice of internal fixation is still controversial, especially in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture; thus, previous implants continue to be improved, and new ones are being developed. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical advantages between the zimmer natural nail (ZNN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation-II (PFNA-II) in the treatment of elderly reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods

A three-dimensional finite element was applied for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fracture models (AO31-A3.1) fixed with the ZNN or PFNA-II. The distribution, peak value and position of the von Mises stress and the displacement were the criteria for comparison between the two groups.

Results

The stresses of the internal fixation and femur in the ZNN model were smaller than those in the PFNA-II model, and the peak values of the two groups were 364.8 MPa and 171.8 MPa (ZNN) and 832.3 MPa and 1795.0 MPa (PFNA-II). The maximum amount of displacement of the two groups was similar, and their locations were the same, i.e., in the femoral head vertex (3.768 mm in the ZNN model and 3.713 mm in the PFNA-II model).

Conclusions

The displacement in the two models was similar, but the stresses in the implant and bone were reduced with the ZNN. Therefore, the ZNN implant may provide biomechanical advantages over PFNA-II in reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures, as shown through the finite element analysis. These findings from our study may provide a reference for the perioperative selection of internal fixations.

Preoperative radiographic features of trochanteric fractures irreducible by closed reduction

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between the preoperative radiographic classification of trochanteric fractures and the success/failure of closed reduction. Identification of irreducible fractures would be important to proceed promptly to direct reduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our retrospective analysis included 141 trochanteric fractures, in 122 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 85.7 years (range, 45-101 years). Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures, as modified by Jensen, and the lateral view classification were used, based on preoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography images. Features predictive of irreducible fractures were identified.

RESULTS

Among the 141 fractures, 16 (11.3%) were irreducible by closed reduction. The position of the proximal fragment, relative to the shaft on lateral view, and the fracture pattern of the lesser and greater trochanters were predictive of the feasibility of obtaining a successful closed reduction. These criteria identified success/failure of closed reduction in 99.3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings should be useful for identifying patients in whom closed reduction would be suitable and for avoiding ineffectual manipulation in unsuitable patients.

A novel cerclage wiring technique in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nails in young adults

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs) in young adults, generally due to severe trauma, are increasingly presented. Different from IFFs in the geriatric population, these fractures in young adults are always comminuted and substantially displaced. Natural traction induced by musculature following IFFs determines closed reduction on a fracture table is extremely difficult.

METHODS

To achieve anatomical reduction before intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, we made an extended or a mini petrotrochantetic incision to facilitate temporary reduction using a pointed clamp. Subsequently, a curved and cannulated wire-passer was employed to pass through a multistrand cable to surround displaced fragments and strengthen intertrochanteric fixation. Afterward, a standard procedure was conducted to nail the fracture.

RESULTS

We used the surgical technique in 9 young patients with an age range of 28~ 48 years old. The fractures were categorized as AO/OTA 31-A2.2 (3 cases) and 31-A2.3 (6 cases). The injury-to-surgery interval was 2.5 days on average. Mean operation time was 55 min. All fractures achieved anatomical reduction and healed within 14 weeks postoperatively without cable breakage, implant irritation or deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the surrounding technique with cerclage wire in IFFs in young adults is an effective surgical technique with easily achieved anatomical reduction to facilitate operative maneuvers and fracture healing.

Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of hip osteoarthritis at the time of hip fracture increases treatment failure rates when using either a sliding hip screw (SHS) or proximal femoral nail (PFN) for fracture fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 455 women and 148 men (median age, 83.8 years) treated with SHS or PFN was performed. Osteoarthritis was evaluated based on pre-operative radiographs using the Kellgren and Lawrence grading system. Treatment failure, which was defined as non-union, avascular necrosis, backing out of the implant, cut out of the proximal screws, peri-prosthetic fracture, implant breakage, or conversion to hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, was evaluated for a follow-up period of four to seven years. Optimal placement of the implant (tip-apex distance (TAD) and 3-point fixation) and the effects of age, sex, the quality of reduction, implant type, fracture stability, fracture type, and time to failure were considered confounders of the relationship between failure and osteoarthritis (OA).

RESULTS

Among the 32 cases (5.3%) of treatment failure, 12 (2%) showed evidence of osteoarthritis. After controlling for age, sex, the quality of reduction, implant type, fracture stability, fracture type, and TAD, osteoarthritis was associated a greater than threefold increase in treatment failure compared with that of patients without pre-operative evidence of osteoarthritis (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.4-7.65; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for potential confounding factors, radiographic evidence of hip osteoarthritis at the time of hip fracture increases the incidence of treatment failure.

Reduction techniques for difficult subtrochanteric fractures

Subtrochanteric fractures can result from high-energy trauma in young patients or from a fall or minor trauma in the elderly. Intramedullary nails are currently the most commonly used implants for the stabilization of these fractures. However, the anesthetic procedure for the patients, the surgical reduction and osteosynthesis for the fractures are challenging. The anesthetic management of orthopedic trauma patients should be based upon various parameters that must be evaluated before the implementation of any anesthetic technique. Surgery- and patient-related characteristics and possible comorbidities must be considered during the pre-anesthetic evaluation. Adequate fracture reduction and proper nail entry point are critical. Understanding of the deforming forces acting on various fracture patterns and knowledge of surgical reduction techniques are essential in obtaining successful outcomes. This article discusses the intraoperative reduction techniques for subtrochanteric fractures in adults and summarizes tips and tricks that the readers may find useful and educative.

The medial femoral wall can play a more important role in unstable intertrochanteric fractures compared with lateral femoral wall: a biomechanical study

Background

The major objective of the present study is to investigate the differences in the load and strain changes in the intertrochanteric region of human cadaveric femora between the loss of medial or lateral wall and after treatment with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).

Methods

After measuring the geometry of the proximal femur region and modeling the medial or lateral wall defect femoral models, six pairs of freshly frozen human femora were randomly assigned in the medial or lateral wall group. According to a single-leg stance model, an axial loading was applied, and the strain distribution was measured before and after PFNA implantation. The strains of each specimen were recorded at load levels of 350, 700, and 1800 N and the failure load. Paired t test was performed to assess the differences between two groups.

Results

The failure mode of almost all defect model femora was consistent with that of the simulated type of intertrochanteric fractures. After the PFNA implantation, the failure mode of almost all stabilized femora was caused by new lateral wall fractures. The failure load of the lateral wall group for defect model femora was significantly higher than that of the medial wall group (p < 0.001). However, the difference disappeared after the PFNA was implanted (p = 0.990). The axial stiffness in all defect model femora showed the same results (p < 0.001). After the PFNA implantation, the axial stiffness of the lateral wall group remained higher than that of the medial wall group (p = 0.001). However, the axial stiffness of the lateral wall group showed that the femora removed from the lateral wall were higher than the PFNA-stabilized femora (p = 0.020). For the axial strain in the anterior wall after the PFNA implantation, the strain of the lateral wall group was significantly lower than that of the medial group (p = 0.003). Nevertheless, for the axial strain of the posterior wall after the PFNA implantation, the strain of the medial wall group was significantly lower than that of the lateral group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrated that PFNA is an effective intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Compared with the lateral wall, the medial femoral wall is a more important part in the intertrochanteric region. We suggest that in treating intertrochanteric femoral fractures with medial wall fractures, the medial wall fragment should be reset and fixed as much as possible.

Dual head screw hip nailing for trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

There are limited information and inconclusive results for dual head screw intramedullary hip nails for trochanteric fractures. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to evaluate the healing of fractures, and survival, function, and complications of patients operated with this implant.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 79 patients (61 women and 18 men; mean age: 84.7 years; range: 65-96 years) with a low-energy trochanteric fracture, treated with a dual head screw intramedullary hip nail from 2013 to 2016. The mean follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 1-3 years); seven patients were lost to follow up. This left 72 patients for further analysis. We evaluated the healing of fractures, and survival, function, and complications of patients.

RESULTS

Fracture healing was evident in 70 patients (97.2%) at 2-3 months postoperatively. One patient experienced cut-out and z-effect phenomenon of the head screws. Another patient experienced a periprosthetic femoral diaphysis fracture at the distal tip of the nail. A third patient experienced an acute postoperative superficial skin infection that was treated successfully with wound dressing changes and a course of antibiotics. Sixteen patients (22.2%) deceased within 12 months postoperatively. In the remaining patients, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively was excellent in 16 (28.6%), good in 23 (41.1%), fair in 10 (17.8%), and poor in 7 patients (12.5%). The function declined after the patients' fracture. Fair and poor results were related to age > 85 years, poor pre-fracture level of function, and AO/OTA-31-A3 fracture types.

CONCLUSION

The dual head screw intramedullary hip nail is associated with high healing and low complication rates for intertrochanteric fractures. The function of the patients is good or excellent in most cases; however, it declines, especially for those patients with age > 85 years, poor pre-fracture level of function, and AO/OTA-31-A3 fracture types.

Rewriting the tip apex distance for the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

INTRODUCTION

The proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland) is the most commonly used implant for intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in our centre. However, mechanical failure of the bone with respect to the implant is a cause of concern due to its significant morbidity especially in the elderly. To date, factors for fixation failures are not well defined in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the factors that predispose to cut out of the PFNA implant and to provide a guide for surgical fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of 340 patients who underwent PFNA-II insertion from 2011 to 2013 in our centre. Intraoperative image intensifier images were used for calculation of tip apex distance, neck shaft angles, determination of Cleveland zones. Demographic data was collected on patients age and gender. The fractures were classified based on AO-OTA classification (Marsh et al., 2007) [1]. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and union of the fracture or until a complication occurred. Risk ratio for cut out was also compared with each statistically significant variable to determine the cut-off point.

RESULTS

The incidence of cut out was 6.7% Tip apex distance, neck shaft angles and female gender were statistically significant for cut out. The study found that tip apex distance beyond 27mm increased the risk of cut out. Neck shaft angles less than 128° also increased the risk of cut out. Posterior and superior blade position in the femoral head and AO 31A3 fractures trended towards significance for cut out but were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

To avoid cut out, one should aim for a tip apex distance of not more than 27mm and preserve a neck shaft angle of more than 128°. Risk stratification of the patient allows the surgeon to take greater caution in the post-operative period to detect early cut out.

Comparison of intramedullary fixation and arthroplasty for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

More and more studies conduct to compare intramedullary fixation (IMF) with arthroplasty in treating intertrochanteric hip fractures, but it remains controversy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to find out whether IMF or arthroplasty was more appropriate for treating intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1980 to September 2016 with English language restriction. Surgical information and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 version.

RESULTS

A total of 1239 patients from 11 studies which satisfied the eligibility criteria were included. Compared with IMF, the use of arthroplasty reduced implant-related complications (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05, P = .02) and reoperation rate (OR: 7.06, P < .001), and had similar length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.41, P = .63). However, IMF reduced blood loss (WMD: -375.01, P = .001) and transfusion requirement (OR: 0.07, P < .001), shorter operation time (WMD: -18.92, P = .010), higher Harris hip score (WMD: 4.19, P < .001), and lower rate of 1-year mortality (OR: 0.67, P = .02) compared with arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

The main treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures is internal fixation using IMF. In the absence of concrete evidence, arthroplasty should be undertaken with caution in carefully selected patient and surgeon should be aware of the increased complexity of doing the arthroplasty in these elderly patients. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to provide robust evidence and evaluate the treatment options.

The treatment strategies of intertrochanteric fractures nonunion: An experience of 23 nonunion patients

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common, but the nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures is not. The purpose of this study was to divide intertrochanteric fracture nonunion into different types and give corresponding treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients with intertrochanteric fracture nonunion. The patients were divided into five groups and each group was treated with a different strategy. All patients had staged clinical and radiographic follow-ups and the mean follow-up was 16.0±4.6months.

RESULTS

Except for the patients treated with total hip arthroplasty, all patients achieved fracture union. The mean union time was 4.7±1.2months. The Harris hip function score differed significantly from preoperative (28.9±6.8) to postoperative (83.8±6.3; p<0.05). For the three patients who were classified as type III, the femoral neck shaft angle was corrected to a significant degree, from 97.3±6.4 to 127.3±2.5 (p<0.05). For the four patients who were classified as type V, the mean time from debridement to re-internal fixation was 3.7±1.5months.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several factors associated with the failure of intertrochanteric fracture treatments. We need to analyze the causes of fracture treatment failure carefully. Based on our five classifications and corresponding treatment strategies, the radiographic and functional treatment outcomes were satisfactory. Future larger comparative studies are needed to confirm our results.