The effect of sublaminar wires on the rib hump deformity during scoliosis correction manoeuvres

Assessment of the axial plane deformity in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its relationship to the frontal and sagittal planes

PURPOSE

Investigate the axial plane deformity in the scoliotic segment and its relationship to the deformity in the frontal and sagittal planes.

METHODS

Two hundred subjects with AIS (Cobb ≥ 20°) underwent low dose biplanar X-rays with 3D reconstruction of the spine and pelvis. All structural curves were considered and were distributed as follows: 142 thoracic (T), 70 thoracolumbar (TL), and 47 lumbar curves (L). Common 3D spino-pelvic and scoliosis parameters were collected such as: frontal Cobb; torsion index (TI); hypokyphosis/lordosis index (HI). Parameters were compared between each type of curvature and correlations were investigated between the 3 planes.

RESULTS

Frontal Cobb was higher in all T (45 ± 19°) and TL (41 ± 15°) curves compared to L curves (35 ± 14°, p = 0.004). TI was higher in T curves when compared to TL and L curves (TI: 15 ± 8°, 9 ± 6°, 7 ± 5°, p < 0.001). HI was similar between curve types. T curves showed significant correlations between the 3 planes: Cobb vs. TI (r = 0.76), Cobb vs. HI (r = - 0.54) and HI vs. TI (r = - 0.42). The axial plane deformity was related to the frontal deformity and the type of curvature (adjusted-R² = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Beside showing the most severe deformity frontally and axially compared to TL and L curves, the T curves showed strong correlations between the 3 planes of the deformity. Moreover, this study showed that the axial plane deformity cannot be fully determined by the frontal and sagittal deformities, which highlights the importance of 3D assessment in the setting of AIS.

Pre-operative angle of trunk rotation in prone position estimates postoperative correction results

This study investigated whether postoperative rotational deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients could be predicted by prone-position pre-operative angle of trunk rotation (ATR).Surgical rib hump correction is performed with the patient in a prone position. However, the association between pre-operative ATR in the prone position and postoperative ATR results is unknown.Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent skip pedicle screw fixation for Lenke type 1 or 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were retrospectively reviewed. All subjects were followed for a minimum of 1 year. ATR measurements were taken for the standing-flexion position with a scoliometer before surgery and at 1 year afterward. Pre-operative measurements were also taken for the prone position. Correlations between pre- and postoperative ATR were calculated by means of Pearson correlation coefficient. Associations between the correction angle from the standing-flexion position to prone position and postoperative standing-flexion correction angle were determined by linear regression analysis.Pre- and postoperative ATR for the standing-flexion position showed a moderate association (r = 0.64, P < .01). A similar correlation was seen for pre-operative prone-position ATR and postoperative standing-flexion ATR (r = 0.56, P < .01). In linear regression analysis, there was significant proportional error between the correction angle from the standing-flexion position to prone position and postoperative standing-flexion correction angle (β = 0.40, P < .01).In conclusion, pre-operative ATR in either standing-flexion or prone position and postoperative standing-flexion ATR displayed moderate associations. Linear regression analysis revealed that ATR correction angle could be estimated by calculating the correction gains of 0.4° per 1° of correction angle in the prone position.

Postoperative Spinal CT: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

During the past 2 decades, the number of spinal surgeries performed annually has been steadily increasing, and these procedures are being accompanied by a growing number of postoperative imaging studies to interpret. CT is accurate for identifying the location and integrity of implants, assessing the success of decompression and intervertebral arthrodesis procedures, and detecting and characterizing related complications. Although postoperative spinal CT is often limited owing to artifacts caused by metallic implants, parameter optimization and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques, including iterative reconstruction and monoenergetic extrapolation methods, can be used to reduce metal artifact severity and improve image quality substantially. Commonly used and recently available spinal implants and prostheses include screws and wires, static and extendable rods, bone grafts and biologic materials, interbody cages, and intervertebral disk prostheses. CT assessment and the spectrum of complications that can occur after spinal surgery and intervertebral arthroplasty include those related to the position and integrity of implants and prostheses, adjacent segment degeneration, collections, fistulas, pseudomeningoceles, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and surgical site infections. Knowledge of the numerous spinal surgery techniques and devices aids in differentiating expected postoperative findings from complications. The various types of spinal surgery instrumentation and commonly used spinal implants are reviewed. The authors also describe and illustrate normal postoperative spine findings, signs of successful surgery, and the broad spectrum of postoperative complications that can aid radiologists in generating reports that address issues that the surgeon needs to know for optimal patient management.^©RSNA, 2019.

How to Optimize Axial Correction Without Altering Thoracic Sagittal Alignment in Hybrid Constructs With Sublaminar Bands: Description of the "Frame" Technique

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective monocentric database study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the "frame" reduction technique and report the 3D quantitative analysis of postoperative corrections in a consecutive series of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posteromedial translation technique using sublaminar bands have been proved to be efficient and safe for 3D correction of the deformity and overall cosmetic aspect of the trunk. However, the ability to correct the axial plane may tend to rotate the vertebra clockwise instead of counterclockwise, thus increasing apical vertebra axial rotation (AVR) and the rib hump. A technical improvement was developed to emphasize axial correction.

METHODS

60 thoracic AIS patients consecutively operated by posteromedial translation using the "frame" reduction technique were included with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Precontoured rods were connected with fixed transverse connectors according to a personalized preoperative planning. Rods were first inserted distally in the pedicle screws to achieve lumbar correction, and then in the upper anchors, and finally sublaminar bands were connected to their corresponding rods to progressively bring the concave lamina to the concave rod to correct the thoracic deformity. Sagittal and coronal 3D measures were performed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up using SterEOS (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) to assess the efficiency of the technique.

RESULTS

The distance from the center of the apical vertebra to the reference axis in the frontal plane was reduced from 4.7 to 1.1 cm, traducing the efficient medial translation of the spine during correction. T1-T12 kyphosis significantly increased after surgery (28°-35°). 3D location of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) was not affected. The apical rotation was significantly reduced after surgery (19°-11°), and the AVR correction rate averaged 42.2%.

CONCLUSION

The "frame" technique is an innovative way of using polyester bands, optimizing axial correction while respecting sagittal alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Radiographic methods to estimate surgical outcomes based on spinal flexibility assessment in patients who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity recognized with lateral curvature of the spine as well as axial vertebral rotation. Surgical interventions are recommended when patients with AIS have severe curvature (Cobb angle >45^o). Spinal flexibility is one of important parameters for surgeons to plan surgical treatment. Few radiographic methods have been developed to assess spinal flexibility.

PURPOSE

A systematic review was performed to evaluate which preoperative radiographic methods should be used to estimate spinal flexibility based on the postoperative outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Studies which included any of the five radiographic methods: (1) supine side-bending (SBR), (2) fulcrum-bending (FBR), (3) traction, (4) push-prone, and (5) suspension were reviewed and compared to determine which method provided the most accurate estimation of the postoperative outcomes.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seven case series, one case control, and multiple cohort studies reported the flexibility assessment methods with the estimations of postoperative outcomes on patients with AIS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The flexibility index defined as a correction rate relative to flexibility rate was used to estimate the immediate and final follow-up postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Seven databases searched included MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Three independent reviewers were involved for abstracts and full-texts screening as well as data extraction. The Quality in Prognostic Studies quality appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias within the studies. Also, the GRADE system rate was used to assess the evidence level across the studies.

RESULTS

Forty-six articles were included. The distribution of the five flexibility methods in these 46 studies were SBR 38/46 (83%), fulcrum bending radiograph (FBR) 16/46 (35%), traction radiograph 5/46 (11%), push-prone 1/46 (2%), and suspension 1/46 (2%). Based on the overall assessment of flexibility indices, FBR had the best estimation of postoperative correction among the five methods. FBR method provided the best estimations of immediate and final follow-up postoperative outcomes for moderate (25°-45°) and severe (>45°) curves, respectively. For main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, the best estimations were traction, and FBR. However, in the reviewed articles, the risk of bias was rated moderate and the quality of evidence was rated very low to low so that a strong conclusive statement cannot be made.

CONCLUSIONS

SBR method was the most commonly used method to assess the spinal flexibility. The FBR method was the most accurate method to estimate the postoperative outcomes based on the limited evidence of the 46 articles.

Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities

Correction manoeuvres are as important as the other issues such as hardware selection, graft options, fusion and osteotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities.The property of materials demonstrating both viscous and elastic characteristics when undergoing deformation is called visco-elasticity. Purely elastic materials change in shape with a stress, and go back to their initial form when the stress is removed. However, visco-elastic materials, like the spine, may protect their new formation unless a back stress is applied. Time is a very important parameter during manoeuvre application to the spine because of its visco-elastic behavior.The most common correction manoeuvres that can be used for spinal deformities are rod de-rotation, distraction-compression, in situ rod bending, segmental de-rotation, en bloc de-rotation and cantilever.Spontaneous correction of a minor curve is possible after selective fusion of a major curve due to coupling phenomenon. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170002. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org.