Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a hook plate versus patients managed non-operatively

Editorial Commentary: Acute Treatment Including Cerclage Result in Best Surgical Outcomes for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separations

Despite years of research, optimal treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations remains controversial. ACJ separations occur in a "multiplanar" fashion and identification of horizonal plane instability is paramount to differentiate between high-grade versus low-grade injuries. As surgeons, we treat a self-selected group of patients referred for surgery, and our physiotherapy colleagues may rehabilitate many patients with both "low-grade" and "high-grade" separations who compensate. Of importance, ACJ separations stabilized <3 weeks after injury have the best chance of healing in a close-to anatomic position. The addition of the ACJ cerclage augmentation improves horizontal plane stability while the soft tissues heal and likely improves outcome.

Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review

Background

While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes.

Results

A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group.

Conclusion

Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Acromioclavicular joint injuries revisited: Pathoanatomy, pathomechanics, and clinical presentation

Multiple papers have described aspects of treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Most have emphasized aspects of surgical treatment, and some papers have addressed non-operative treatment. Few papers have highlighted the specific pathoanatomy of an AC joint injury or have described methods of evaluating the 3-dimensional pathomechanics resulting from the pathoanatomical injury. This paper is based on 3 observations: (1) AC joint injuries exist and present on a spectrum of pathoanatomy; (2) The effect of the pathoanatomy on normal AC joint mechanics to produce pathomechanics is dependent on the extent of the pathoanatomy; and (3) Treatment protocols should be developed to address the specific pathoanatomy to optimize the mechanics. A comprehensive clinical approach emphasizing the evaluation of the extent of the anatomic injury and understanding its mechanical consequences regarding shoulder and arm function is a key in the development of guidelines for developing operative or non-operative treatment protocols and for establishing outcomes of the treatment protocols.

Konservative Therapie von Verletzungen des Akromioklavikulargelenks

Niedriggradige Verletzungen (Grad I und II nach Rockwood) des Akromioklavikulargelenks (ACG) können in den meisten Fällen mit gutem Outcome konservativ behandelt werden. Hierbei gibt es keine Methode der Immobilisation, welche sich als Überlegen herausgestellt hätte. Höhergradige Verletzungen (Grad IV und V), welche eine relevante Instabilität und konsekutiv häufig eine Dyskinesie des skapulothorakalen Rhythmus zur Folge haben, profitieren von einer chirurgischen Rekonstruktion. Kein Konsens trotz breiter akademischer Diskussion besteht bei Grad-III-Verletzungen. In Langzeitstudien und im Rahmen von Metaanalysen zeigten sich keine Vorteile eines operativen Vorgehens gegenüber der konservativen Behandlung nach 1 bis 2 Jahren, während einzelne Fallserien Vorteile in der anatomischen Rekonstruktion aufzeigten, insbesondere wenn für das ACG spezifische Outcome-Scores verwendet wurden. In Grenzfällen sollte das individuelle Arbeits- und Sportprofil, insbesondere regelmäßige Überkopfaktivität, in die therapeutische Entscheidungsfindung einfließen. Sowohl bei niedrig- wie auch hochgradigen Verletzungen des ACG kann durch eine fokussierte Therapie zur Verbesserung der skapulothorakalen Mobilität und Stabilität eine Skapuladyskinesie in vielen Fällen (gelegentlich auch ≥ Grad III nach Rockwood) vermieden oder erfolgreich behandelt werden.

Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review

Background

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common cause of shoulder injury among athletes. High-grade injuries may require operative fixation, and comprehensive return-to-play guidelines have not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to summarize criteria for return to play after operative management of AC joint separation.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed from January 1999 to April 2020 to evaluate clinical evidence regarding criteria for return to play after operative management of isolated AC joint separation.

Results

Sixty-three studies with at least 1 explicitly stated return-to-play criterion were identified out of an initial database search of 1253 published articles. Eight separate categories of return-to-play criteria were identified, the most common of which was time from surgery (95.2%). Return-to-play timelines ranged from 2 to 12 months, the most common timeline being 6 months (37.8%). Only 4 (6.3%) studies used conditional criteria to guide return to play, which included range of motion, strength, clinical stability, radiographic stability, functional assessment, safety assessment, and hardware removal.

Conclusion

Most published studies use only time-based criteria for return to play after surgery for AC joint separation, and only a small number of studies use additional subjective or objective criteria. While this systematic review helps provide a foundation for developing a comprehensive return-to-play checklist, further investigation is needed to establish safe and effective guidelines that will enable athletes to safely return to sport and minimize the recurrence of injury.

Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Clinical Commentary with Clinical Practice Considerations

Traumatic injuries of the acromioclavicular joint result in pain and potentially long-term alterations in scapulohumeral rhythm that occurs due to disruption of the clavicular strut function which is integral to scapular kinematics. Nonoperative treatment remains a valid option in most acromioclavicular joint injuries with the potential of minimizing pain and restoring scapulohumeral rhythm. However, few studies have provided nonoperative treatment details. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to discuss the rationale, indications, and techniques of nonoperative treatment and present an organized approach for evaluating and managing such patients based on the best available evidence. Attention will be focused on identifying the treatment methods employed and the results/outcomes of such treatments.

Level of Evidence

5.

A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

Double-endobutton technique, as a widely accepted strategy for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, is undergoing constant improvement. This study aims to assess the clinical effect of a modified single-endobutton combined with the nice knot in the fixation of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2019, 16 adult patients (13 males and 3 females) with Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with a modified single-endobutton technique combined with the nice knot in our department. The age ranged from 18 to 64 years old with an average of 32.8 years old. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative clinical outcomes and radiographic results were recorded and analyzed. Preoperative and last follow-up scores in the Constant-Murley Scale, Neer score, Rating Scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and VAS scale and complications such as infection, re-dislocation, implant loosening, medical origin fracture and hardware pain were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months with an average of 10.3 months. The operative time was 50-90 min with an average of (62.5 ± 3.10) min. The intraoperative blood loss was 30-100 ml, with an average of (55.0 ± 4.28) ml. The complications, such as wound infection, internal fixation failure and fractures, were not found in these cases. According to Karlsson criteria, there were excellent in 14 cases, good in 2 cases at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score of the patients was 5.88 ± 0.26 preoperatively, compared with 0.19 ± 0.14 at the final follow-up evaluation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean Constant score was 45.5 ± 2.0 preoperatively, compared to 94.0 ± 0.73 at the final follow-up evaluation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Patients had statistically significant preoperative and postoperative AC (acromioclavicular distance) and CC (coracoclavicular distance) distances (P < 0.05); 6 months postoperatively the AC(P = 0.412) and CC(P = 0.324) distances were not statistically significant compared to the healthy side.

CONCLUSION

Nice knot provides a reliable fixation for the single-endobutton technique in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations. The modified single-endobutton technique combined with the nice knot can achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction

Purpose

To determine whether combined acromioclavicular (AC) ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction without bone tunnels would improve radiographic reduction maintenance and complication rates for type III to V AC dislocations.

Methods

This single-institution retrospective study analyzed all patients who underwent a hybrid synthetic/graft wrap CC reconstruction without tunnels with additional AC reconstruction/repair from January 2013 to August 2019. This 26-patient cohort was compared with a 1:1 sex- and age-matched control group who underwent CC reconstruction without AC reconstruction. CC distances on postoperative radiographs were compared with normal contralateral shoulders.

Results

Of the 93 patients who underwent AC reconstructive surgery during this time period, 26 patients (96% male) met the inclusion criteria. The AC/CC cohort had 23.5% type III injuries, 23.1% type IV injuries, and 53.8% type V injuries, similar to the control group. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s CC distance were (mean ± standard deviation) 0.9 ± 4.0 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (9.6 ± 8.7 mm) in the AC/CC cohort. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s coracoclavicular distance were 4.0 ± 4.7 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (13.3 ± 9.3 mm) in the CC control group, a significant difference (P = .014). The AC/CC reconstruction group had fewer patients with a loss of reduction >5 mm (11.5% versus 38.5%, P = .025). The complication rate in the CC control group was higher than in the AC/CC cohort (30.7% versus 7.7%, P = .035). The reoperation rate was also greater in the CC control group (8 versus 1, P = .010).

Conclusion

This cohort study shows that the addition of AC reconstruction to CC reconstruction using synthetic tapes/grafts or allograft tissues without bone tunnels significantly improves durable radiographic outcomes, diminishes complication rates, and improves reoperation rates.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

Return to sport after surgical treatment for high-grade (Rockwood III-VI) acromioclavicular dislocation

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are common in a young and active population, especially in people performing contact sports. Full recovery with a fast and high rate of return to sport is desirable. This systematic review aims to combine patient outcomes in order to help surgeons in addressing patient expectations regarding the return to sport after surgical intervention for AC dislocations.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review, the PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles were included if written in English or Dutch and evaluated return to sport after any type of surgical intervention for Rockwood types III to VI AC dislocations in patients practicing sports. Outcome parameters were return to sport, time to return to sport, level of sport, functional outcome scores and complications.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 498 patients were included, of which 462 patients practiced sports. 432 (94%) patients returned to sport. The weighted mean time to return to sport was 4.0 months. 338 out of 401 patients (84%) returned to the same level of pre-injury sport and 35 patients (9%) lowered their level of sport. The weighted mean Constant score was 92 out of 100.

CONCLUSION

The rate of return to sport after surgical intervention for Rockwood (RW) III-VI AC dislocations is high. However, the level of evidence was low and due to the methodological heterogeneity between studies, subgroup analyses of return to sport outcomes were not feasible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of level I-IV studies, level IV.

Fifteen-degree clavicular hook plate achieves better clinical outcomes in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation

OBJECTIVE

Clavicular hook plate application is one of the most commonly used treatment methods for acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, although it may cause multiple postoperative complications. We modified the regularly used 0° hook plate to 15° and compared the clinical outcomes of these two hook plates for treatment of AC joint dislocation.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with acute AC joint dislocation were randomly enrolled (0° hook plate, 20 patients; 15° hook plate, 23 patients). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analog scale for pain (VASP) scores were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 days and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the preoperative scores, the 6-month postoperative ASES score gradually increased but the VASP score decreased in both groups. Furthermore, the ASES and VASP scores were significantly different between the two groups at every postoperative time point.

CONCLUSION

The 15° hook plate is superior to the 0° hook plate in reducing shoulder pain and improving postoperative recovery in the treatment of AC joint dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Treatment study (retrospective comparative study).

Evolving Treatment Patterns of NFL Players by Orthopaedic Team Physicians Over the Past Decade, 2008-2016

Background:

Previous studies have analyzed the treatment patterns used to manage injuries in National Football League (NFL) players.

Hypothesis:

Treatment patterns for injuries in NFL players will have changed over the study period.

Study Design:

Descriptive epidemiology study.

Level of Evidence:

Level 5.

Methods:

The head orthopaedic team physicians for all 32 NFL teams were asked to complete a survey containing questions regarding experience as team physician, medical coverage of the team, and treatment preferences for some of the most common injuries occurring in football players. Responses from the current survey were compared with responses from the same survey sent to NFL team physicians in 2008.

Results:

Responses were received from 31 (31/32, 97%) NFL team physicians in 2008 and 29 (29/32, 91%) NFL team physicians between April 2016 and May 2017. The proportion of physicians preferring patellar tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction increased from 87% in 2008 to 97% in 2016 (P = 0.054). In 2008, 49% of physicians allowed return to contact after ACL reconstruction at 6 months or less as compared with only 14% of physicians in 2016 (P = 0.033). In 2008, 93% of physicians used Toradol injections prior to a game to help with nagging injuries. Toradol injection utilization decreased to 48% of physicians in 2016 (P < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of physicians would administer 5 or more Toradol injections prior to a game in 2008, as compared with 28% of physicians in 2016 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Orthopaedic physicians have changed their injury treatment preferences for professional football players. In particular, physicians have become more cautious with allowing players to return to play after ACL reconstruction and with the use of pregame Toradol injections.

Clinical Relevance:

Expert opinions can help guide treatment decisions and lead to better care of all athletes.

[Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint]

With 12% of all injuries concerning the shoulder, acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a common injury especially in young and active patients. The Rockwood classification is widely accepted, which differentiates between six types depending on the degree of injury and the vertical dislocation. Because the classification does not adequately address the horizontal instability, its benefits are questionable and there is currently no consensus. For this reason, the classification and the therapy of these injuries are increasingly becoming the subject of scientific investigations. Whereas conservative treatment for type I and II injuries and operative treatment for type IV-VI injuries are widely accepted, there is still no agreement in treating type III lesions. The goal of this review article is to present the current evidence for the diagnostics, different classifications and therapeutic possibilities.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Management of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations has been controversial. Recent studies suggest no difference in outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of Rockwood types III-V injuries. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations.

DATA SOURCES

Search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through October 2016. A broad search strategy was used to identify English, comparative studies of AC joint dislocations.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria included comparative studies of AC joint dislocations in adult patients with acute, high-grade AC dislocations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently reviewed and assessed for bias according to the U.S. Preventative Task Force Quality Rating Criteria. Data were extracted for validated functional scores, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nineteen studies (n = 954) were included in the meta-analysis. Operative group had better cosmetic outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05; P < 0.00001) and radiographic reduction (OR = 24.94; P < 0.0001). Constant scores favored the operative group, although the difference may not be clinically significant (MD = 3.14; P = 0.03). Nonoperative treatment was associated with faster return to work (MD = 4.17, P < 0.0001), lower implant complications (OR = 7.19, P < 0.0001), and reduced infection rate (OR = 3.65, P = 0.007). No difference was found for DASH Score, return to sport, radiologic evidence of osteoarthritis, and need for surgery after failed management.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinical difference in functional outcome scores was detected between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations. Patients in the nonoperative cohort had a more rapid return to work, but were associated with a poorer cosmetic outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation with that of hook plate fixation in patients with acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective case-control study of twenty-six patients with an acute ACJ dislocation who underwent surgical repair with either an arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation or a hook plate from 2013 to 2016. Clinical and radiological data were collected prospectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant Score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score as well as the visual analogue scale. Radiological outcomes were assessed with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation, while 10 patients underwent hook plate fixation. There were no significant differences in the preoperative variables except for the mean UCLA 4b infraspinatus score (TightRope^® 2.8 vs. hook plate 3.8; p = 0.030). Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the TightRope^® group. At 1 year post-operatively, the TightRope^® group had a significantly better Constant Score and CCD with no complications. All patients with hook plate fixation had to undergo a second procedure for removal of implant, and 3 patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation is a good option for the treatment of acute unstable ACJ dislocations. It has better short-term clinical and radiological outcomes as well as lesser complications when compared to hook plate fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.