Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed

Outcomes of arthroscopic coracoclavicular management for acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review

Introduction

Various surgical procedures for coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair have been described for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint dislocations, with none emerging as a clear gold standard. There has been increased interest in arthroscopic approaches. This systematic review evaluates clinical outcomes after arthroscopic surgeries used to treat chronic and acute AC joint dislocations.

Methods

We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID [MEDLINE]) from database inception to December 20, 2022. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: studies evaluating humans, English language studies, level of evidence I to IV, and studies investigating clinical outcomes in patients following arthroscopic surgery for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Studies on open reconstruction techniques only were excluded. Primary outcomes included function/pain scores, coracoclavicular distances, complications, and revision rates.

Results

Fifty-two studies were included. In 33 studies, postoperative Constant-Murley scores ranged from 82.8 to 99 points. Postoperative VAS scores ranged from 0.3 to 4.1 in 16 studies. In 46 studies, revision rates ranged from 0 % to 44.4 %. We did not observe a difference in revision rates between chronic and acute cases (P = 0.268). Complications were more common in chronic than acute cases (25.5 % vs. 16.4 %; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic surgery for chronic and acute CC ligament injuries exceeds the MCID and PASS for several outcomes, with low failure rates. Arthroscopic CC reconstruction is a safe and effective alternative for chronic AC joint dislocations.

Level of evidence

IV (Systematic Review of Level I-IV Studies).

An In Vitro Study Demonstrating the Significance of Acromioclavicular Ligament Repair in Restoring Horizontal and Rotational Acromioclavicular Joint Stability

BACKGROUND

The principle of joint reconstruction surgery is to try to recreate the native joint biomechanics and stability. With respect to acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) surgery, much focus to date has been on restoring the superoinferior stability. There is concern that persistent horizontal instability following ACJ reconstruction could lead to poorer patient outcomes; therefore, we evaluated whether acromioclavicular (AC) ligament repair offers improved horizontal stability in conjunction with ACJ reconstruction.

METHODS

A whole-body human cadaver was used. The ACJ was exposed and subjected to a constant 70N load on the lateral end of the clavicle to test the anteroposterior (AP), superoinferior (SI), and horizontal pivot angle (HPA) around the ACJ. The AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments were subsequently divided, and the above three parameters were re-tested. Ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (Corin Group, Cirencester, UK), LockDown (LockDown Medical Limited, Redditch, UK), Endobutton (Smith and Nephew Inc., London, UK), and Neoligament implant (Xiros Ltd., Leeds, UK) were used to reconstruct the CC ligaments and tested with and without AC repair.

RESULTS

The native ACJ allowed an average 2.48 mm AP and 3.88 mm SI translation with a 27° HPA. All synthetic implants significantly improved the vertical stability of the ACJ but allowed up to a four-fold increase in AP translation. Coupled with ACJ repair, all the reconstructions were far superior, especially in restoring horizontal stability.

CONCLUSION

The implants varied in their approach to fixation and concentrated primarily on the reconstruction of CC ligaments. Our study was able to demonstrate that AC repair significantly improves the stability of the construct and significantly reduces vertical and horizontal instability.

Anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization with chemically sterilized tendon allografts: A retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze whether chemically sterilized tendon allografts perform as well as other non-sterilized allografts and autografts as described in the literature for anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization for the treatment of Rockwood III-V. Allografts are still described as a factor for higher re-rupture rates.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 21 acromioclavicular joint stabilizations performed by a single surgeon and performed between 2011 and 2014 using sterilized semitendinosus allografts. The primary endpoints were re-rupture and complication rates. Secondary endpoints were AC-joint stability, pain level, return to work and sport and the range of motion.

Results

No re-ruptures occurred during the mean follow-up time of 33 months. Zero complications occurred directly after surgery, but three complications later than three weeks after surgery. All cases resolved without further surgery. After surgery, stability significantly improved for all patients. Post-surgery, 19 patients had stable acromioclavicular joints and only two patients showed minor instabilities. Range of motion returned to the range of the healthy shoulders for all patients.

Conclusion

Chemically sterilized semitendinosus allograft use for anatomic AC-joint stabilization is equivalent to the use of other allografts or autografts and required no hardware removal. No donor age or graft size dependence was observed, due to zero re-ruptures.

Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment

PURPOSE

Despite the available classifications, diagnostics and treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are still vague and challenging for trauma and shoulder surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the dynamic radiographic as well as clinical outcome of operatively and conservatively treated Rockwood (RW) type III and IV ACJ dislocations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with RW type III and IV ACJ dislocations between 2009 and 2016 (n = 226) were included in this retrospective data analysis with a prospective follow-up examination. According to their injury classification, patients were subdivided in an operative and conservative treatment group. Examiner blinded clinical evaluation including the constant score (CS), American shoulder and elbow surgery (ASES) score, the acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI) score, visual analog scale (VAS), bilateral force measurements, and posttraumatic/postsurgical sequelae were assessed. Fluoroscopic evaluations including dynamic stability assessment with functional axillary views were performed for every patient.

RESULTS

For follow-up examination (mean 4.8 years ± 0.3 SEM) 56 patients (29 RW type III, 27 RW type IV) were available. In patients with RW type III ACJ dislocations [operative (n = 10); conservative (n = 19)] prolonged duration of treatment was seen in operatively treated patients (p < 0.05). Clear improvement could be shown for the ACJI score (p < 0.05) and coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular (AC) distance (p < 0.05) in the operative group. In patients with RW type IV ACJ dislocations [operative (n = 18); conservative (n = 9)] superior clinical results were found in operated patients with highly significant differences for the ACJI score (p < 0.001). Radiographic dynamic horizontal analysis showed nearly normalized anteroposterior translation in operated patients (p < 0.05). No differences were found regarding arthroscopic or open procedures.

CONCLUSION

Accurate diagnostics including sufficient dynamic stability assessment with functional axillary views are strongly advised for patients with ACJ dislocations. Conservative treatment should be recommended for patients with RW type III ACJ dislocations, due to shorter duration of treatment with good clinical results but lacking operative risks. In patients with RW type IV ACJ dislocations, surgical treatment is recommended because of superior clinical and radiological results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Improved identification of unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries in a clinical population using the acromial center line to dorsal clavicle radiographic measurement

BACKGROUND

Accurate classification and subsequent management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains a contentious topic. The updated Rockwood classification acknowledges "stable IIIA" and "unstable IIIB" injuries, a watershed accepted by ISAKOS and important in guiding clinical management. Traditionally, the coracoclavicular distance is used to classify these injuries, despite well-documented limitations. This study aimed to evaluate displacement in AC joint injuries by measuring both coracoclavicular (CC) distance and the newly proposed acromial center line to dorsal clavicle (AC-DC) distance, in a cohort of patients, and correlate the results between the 2 measurements and relationship to Rockwood grade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety consecutive cases of AC joint injury were evaluated radiographically for Rockwood classification, CC distance on anteroposterior radiographs, and AC-DC distance on Alexander view radiographs. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for each measurement was calculated as well as correlation between the 2 measurement types and the degree to which each measurement accurately represented the Rockwood classification.

RESULTS

Although both CC and AC-DC measurements showed very high inter- and intraobserver reliability, the CC distance systematically underestimated the degree of AC joint displacement when compared with the AC-DC measurement as the severity of injury increased, particularly in the presence of posterior horizontal displacement such as that seen in Rockwood IV injuries.

CONCLUSION

The AC-DC measurement and use of the Alexander view provides the clinician with a more realistic appreciation of true AC joint displacement, especially in defining watershed cases (ie, IIIA/IIB/IV) and may better inform the decision-making process regarding management options and recommendations.

Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and should be suspected in patients who have shoulder pain in the region of the acromion and clavicle. Injuries to the AC ligament can cause horizontal instability and are often neglected or underdiagnosed, which can lead to poor patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of horizontal instability of the AC joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies that investigated diagnosis, treatment, and failure of operative management of acute and chronic AC separations. Studies that did not specifically evaluate AC joint injuries, were not written in English, or were specific only to vertical instability of the AC joint were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 articles met the inclusion criteria and were therefore included in this systematic review. Diagnosing horizontal AC instability is difficult using plain radiographs; dynamic views were shown in some cases to better detect horizontal instability than with static views. More than 60 procedures for treating AC joint injuries have been published, but many focus on vertical rather than horizontal instability. Modifications to current surgical procedures to incorporate reconstruction of the horizontal component showed improved patient outcomes. Such modifications included additional AC joint suture cord cerclage, combined AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, and the Twin Tail TightRope triple button technique. Failure after surgical stabilization of AC joint separation has been reported to occur in 15% to 80% of cases.

CONCLUSION

No consensus is available regarding the best practices for diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of acute or chronic horizontal instability of the AC joint. Moreover, horizontal instability injuries are often neglected or poorly understood, making diagnosis difficult, which may lead to high complication rates and failure after surgical stabilization.

Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction is a well-established and frequently performed procedure. Recent scientific and commercial interest has led to a drive to develop and perform surgical techniques that more reliably restore horizontal stability in order to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical evidence for procedures directed at restoring horizontal stability and determine whether they are associated with superior clinical results when compared to well-established procedures.

METHODS

A review of the online databases Medline and EMBASE was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines on the 23rd December 2017. Biomechanical and clinical studies reporting either static or dynamic horizontal displacement following acromioclavicular joint reconstruction (Coracoclavicular reconstruction or Weaver-Dunn) were included. In addition, biomechanical and clinical studies reporting outcomes after additional augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological index for non-randomised studies tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 18 studies eligible for inclusion: six biomechanical and 12 clinical studies. Comparative biomechanical studies demonstrated that acromioclavicular augmentation provided significantly increased horizontal stability compared to the coracoclavicular reconstruction and Weaver-Dunn procedure. Comparative clinical studies demonstrated no significant differences between coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without acromioclavicular augmentation in terms of functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon and Constant score), complication or revision rates. However, one comparative study did demonstrate an improvement in Taft (p = 0.018) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability scores (p = 0.0001) after acromioclavicular augmentation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, coracoclavicular reconstruction with augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint has been shown to provide improved horizontal stability in both biomechanical and clinical studies compared to isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction. However, comparative studies have shown no clinical advantage with respect to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon or Constant scores and, therefore, the results of this systematic review do not support acromioclavicular augmentation in routine clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the most accurate and reliable quantitative radiographic parameters for assessing vertical and horizontal instability in different Rockwood grades of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations. Furthermore, the effect of projectional variation on these parameters was investigated in obtaining lateral Alexander view radiographs.

METHODS

A Sawbone model of a scapula with clavicle was mounted on a holding device, and acromioclavicular dislocations as per the Rockwood classification system were simulated with the addition of horizontal posterior displacement. Projectional variations for each injury type were performed by tilting/rotating the Sawbone construct in the coronal, sagittal or axial plane. Radiographic imaging in the form of an anterior-posterior Zanca view and a lateral Alexander view were taken for each injury type and each projectional variation. Five newly defined radiographic parameters for assessing horizontal and vertical displacement as well as commonly used coracoclavicular distance view were measured. Reliability, validity and the effect of projectional variation were investigated for these radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

All radiographic parameters showed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. The validity was excellent for the acromial centre line to dorsal clavicle (AC-DC) in vertical displacement and for the glenoid centre line to posterior clavicle (GC-PC) in horizontal displacement, whilst the remaining measurements showed moderate validity. For AC-DC and GC-PC, convergent validity expressed strong correlation to the effective distance and discriminant validity demonstrated its ability to differentiate between various grades of ACJ dislocations. The effect of projectional variation increased with the degree of deviation and was maximal (3 mm) for AC-DC in 20° anteverted malpositioning and for GC-PC in 20° retroverted malpositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

AC-DC and the GC-PC are two novel quantitative radiographic parameters of vertical and horizontal instability in ACJ dislocations that demonstrate excellent reliability and validity with reasonable inertness to malpositioning. The use of AC-DC for assessing vertical displacement and GC-PC for assessing horizontal displacement in a single Alexander view is recommended to guide the appropriate management of ACJ dislocations. A better appreciation of the degree of horizontal instability, especially in lower Rockwood grades (II, III) of ACJ dislocations, may improve management of these controversial injuries.