Conservative treatment of distal fractures after the age of 65: a review of literature

Current Management and Volar Locking Plate Fixation with Bone Cement Augmentation for Elderly Distal Radius Fractures-An Updated Narrative Review

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common among all kinds of fractures with an increase in incidence due to the rapidly expanded size of the elderly population in the past decades. Both non-surgical and surgical treatments can be applied for this common injury. Nowadays, more and more elderly patients with DRFs undergo surgical treatments to restore pre-injury activity levels faster. However, optimal treatment for geriatric DRFs is still debated, and careful evaluation and selection of patients are warranted considering clinical and functional outcomes, and complications following surgical treatments. Furthermore, osteoporosis is a predominant factor in elderly DRFs mostly deriving from a low-energy trauma, so many treatment modalities are developed to enhance better bone healing. Among various options for bone augmentation, bone cement is one of the most widely used measures. Bone cement such as calcium phosphate theoretically improves fracture stability and healing, but whether the elderly patients with DRFs can significantly benefit from surgical fixation with bone cement augmentation (BCA) remains controversial. Hence, in the present review, the latest literature regarding current concepts of management and evidence about volar locking plate fixation (VLPF) with BCA for elderly DRFs was searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science; out of >1000 articles, full texts of 48 and 6 articles were then examined and analyzed separately for management and VLPF with BCA for elderly DRFs. We aim to provide the readers with updates concerning the above issues.

Using MaxDiff Analysis to Elicit Patients' Treatment Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older

PURPOSE

The objective of our study was to determine how the attributes of surgical and nonsurgical distal radius fracture (DRF) treatments affect patient treatment preferences.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty patients aged 60 years and older were contacted from a single-hand surgeon's practice, and 172 chose to participate. We built a series of best-worst scaling experiments for the MaxDiff analysis to determine the relative importance of treatment attributes. Hierarchical Bayes analysis was used to generate individual-level item scores (ISs) for each attribute that together have a total sum of 100.

RESULTS

One hundred general hand clinic patients without a history of a DRF and 43 patients with a history of a DRF completed the survey. For the general hand clinic patients, the most important attributes to avoid when choosing a DRF treatment (in descending order) were the longer time to full recovery (IS, 24.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.4-26.3), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 21.5-24.2), and higher complication rates (IS, 18.4; 95% CI, 16.9-19.8). Meanwhile, for patients with a history of a DRF, the most important attributes to avoid (in descending order) were a longer time to full recovery (IS, 25.6; 95% CI, 23.3-27.9), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 19.9-25.7), and abnormal alignment of the radius on x-ray (IS, 18.3; 95% CI, 15.4-21.3). For both the groups, the least concerning attributes based on the IS were appearance-scar, appearance-bump, and the need for anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making and advancing patient-centered care. As conceptualized in this MaxDiff analysis, when choosing a DRF treatment, patients mostly want to avoid a longer time to full recovery and a longer time in a cast, whereas patients have the least concern about appearance and need for anesthesia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making. Our results may provide guidance to surgeons in discussions on the relative benefits of surgical and nonsurgical DRF treatments, by quantifying the most and least important factors to patients.

Prospective Evaluation of Two Cohorts of Non-Operatively Treated Patients with Displaced vs. Minimally and Non-Displaced Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly are common. Recently, the efficacy of operative treatment of displaced DRFs in patients above 65 years of age has been questioned and it has been suggested that non-operative treatment should be the gold standard. However, the complications and functional outcome of displaced vs. minimally and non-displaced DRFs in the elderly has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the present study was to compare non-operatively treated displaced DRFs vs. minimally and non-displaced DRFs in terms of complications, PROMs, grip strength and range of motion (ROM) after 2 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 months and 12 months.

METHODS

We used a prospective cohort study that compared patients with displaced DRFs (n = 50), i.e., >10 degrees of dorsal angulation after two reduction attempts, with patients with minimally or non-displaced DRFs after reduction. Both cohorts received the same treatment of 5 weeks of dorsal plaster casting. Complications and functional outcomes (quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE), grip strength and EQ-5D scores) were assessed after 5 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-injury. The protocol of the VOLCON RCT and present observational study has been published (PMC6599306; clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716661).

RESULTS

One year after 5 weeks of dorsal below-elbow casting of low-energy DRFs in patients ≥ 65 years old, we found a complication rate of 6.3% (3/48) in minimally or non-displaced DRFs and 16.6% (7/42) in displaced DRFs (p = 0.18). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in functional outcomes in terms of QuickDASH, pain, ROM, grip strength or EQ-5D scores.

DISCUSSION

In patients above 65 years of age, non-operative treatment, i.e., closed reduction and dorsal casting for 5 weeks, yielded similar complication rates and functional outcomes after 1 year regardless of whether the initial fracture was non-displaced/minimally displaced or still displaced after closed reduction. While the initial closed reduction should still be attempted in order to restore the anatomy, failure to achieve the stipulated radiological criteria may not be as important as we thought in terms of complications and functional outcome.

Predictors of Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged >65 Years

BACKGROUND

Treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged >65 years is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify what patient and fracture characteristics may influence the decision to pursue surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in patients aged >65 years sustaining a DRF.

METHODS

We queried our institutional DRF database for patients aged >65 years who presented to a single academic, tertiary center hand clinic over a 5-year period. In all, 164 patients treated operatively were identified, and 162 patients treated nonoperatively during the same time period were selected for comparison (total N = 326). Demographic variables and fracture-specific variables were recorded. Patient and fracture characteristics between the groups were compared to determine which variables were associated with each treatment modality (operative or nonoperative).

RESULTS

The average age in our cohort was 72 (SD: 11) years, and 274 patients (67%) were women. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4.1 (SD: 2.1). The CCI is a validated tool that predicts 1-year mortality based on patient age and a list of 22 weighted comorbidities. Factors associated with operative treatment in our population were largely related to the severity of the injury and included increasing dorsal tilt (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < .001) and AO Classification type C fractures (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 2.35-11.61; P < .001). Increasing CCI was the only factor independently associated with nonoperative management (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.997; P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Fracture severity is a strong driver in the decision to pursue operative management in patients aged >65 years, whereas increasing CCI predicts nonoperative treatment.

Functional bracing in distal radius fractures: a cadaveric pilot study

Background

Extra-articular distal radius fractures are often treated by circular casting. A functional brace, however, may equally support the fracture zone but allows early mobilization of the radiocarpal joint. Since the amount of fracture movement for different types of fixation is currently unknown, a study was initiated to investigate the degree of bone displacement in extra-articular distal radius fractures fixated by regular circular casting, functional bracing, or no-fixation.

Methods

In four cadaveric arms, an extra-articular distal radius fracture was simulated and immobilized by the three ways of fixation. After creating an extra-articular distal radius fracture, the fracture was reduced anatomically and the cadaveric arm was strapped in a test frame. Hereafter, flexion, extension and deviation of the hand were then induced by a static moment of force of one newton meter. Subsequently CT scans of the wrist were performed and bone displacement was quantified.

Results

Immobilization of an extra-articular distal radius fracture by functional bracing provides comparable fixation compared to circular casting and no fixation, and shows significantly less extension-rotation displacement of the distal bone segment for the wrist in flexion and palmodorsal translation and extension-rotation for the wrist in extension.

Conclusion

Functional bracing of extra articular distal radius fractures in cadaveric arms provides significant less extension-rotation displacement in flexion and palmodorsal translation and extension-rotation in extension compared to circular casting and no fixation.

The Effect of Hand Dominance, Age, Gender, Fracture Comminution and ASA Status on Time to Fracture Healing Following Surgical Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Background: There is recent renewed interest in the effect of hand dominance on distal radius fractures. Current studies focus on functional or patient-reported outcomes, with lack of studies pertaining to radiological outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of hand dominance on time to fracture healing following surgical fixation of distal radius fracture. We also looked at the effect of age, gender, fracture comminution and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status on time to fracture healing.

Methods: Patients who underwent distal radius fracture fixation surgery in our department from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were included. Time to fracture healing was taken from the day of surgery to when radiographic union was present as evidence by bridging callus or osseous bone. We looked at the effect of hand dominance, age, gender, fracture comminution and ASA status on time to fracture healing.

Results: One hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (80 females and 65 males) had a mean period of 56.2 ± 41.8 days to fracture healing post-operatively. Patients with dominant hand injury had a shorter duration to fracture healing than patients with non-dominant hand injury (mean 47.3 ± 31.1 days versus 62.1 ± 46.8 days, p = 0.023). Patients ≥ 65 years and with pre-existing medical conditions (ASA Class II and above) had a longer duration to fracture healing (mean 63.7 ± 53.0 days versus 51.9 ± 33.4 days, p = 0.036 and mean 47.9 ± 30.0 days versus 62.0 ± 47.7 days, p = 0.016, respectively). In addition, patients with comminuted fractures took longer to heal than patients with non-comminuted fractures (mean 57.6 ± 33.4 days versus 48.3 ± 20.8 days, p = 0.038).

Conclusion: Time to fracture healing post distal radius fracture fixation surgery was significantly related to hand dominance, as well as age, ASA classification and fracture configuration. Dominant wrist injuries had shorter time to fracture healing.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)

Renal impairment and time to fracture healing following surgical fixation of distal radius fracture

INTRODUCTION

Despite the prevalence of renal impairments, the existing literature examining fracture healing in the upper limb in patients with renal impairment is sparse. This study hence aims to investigate the effect of renal impairment on time to fracture healing after distal radius fracture fixation surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients above 50 years old who underwent distal radius fracture fixation via volar plating were included. Time to fracture healing was defined as duration between day of surgery and presence of radiographic union as evidence by bridging of callus or osseous bone. To assess for renal impairment, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Pre-existing comorbidities were also collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine consecutive patients took mean 65.5 ± 8.0 days to fracture healing post-operatively. Patients with renal impairment had longer time to fracture healing than patients without (67.1 ± 50.4 days versus 50.4 ± 31.8 days, p = 0.044). Patients ≥ 65 years also had a longer duration to fracture healing compared to patients < 65 years (mean 63.7 ± 53.0 days versus 50.2 ± 27.2 days, p = 0.033). Similarly, patients with ASA Class I had a shorter mean time to fracture healing than patients with ASA Class II and above (mean 42.5 ± 22.8 days versus 62.8 ± 47.6 days, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Time to fracture healing post-distal radius fracture fixation was significantly related to renal impairment, age and ASA classification.

Magnitude, Direction, Temporal Patterns, and Frequency of Loss of Distal Radius Fracture Reduction in Women 50 Years and Older

PURPOSE

To determine the magnitude, direction, temporal patterns, and frequency of reduction loss following nonsurgical, closed treatment of distal radius fractures in women 50 years and older and correlate these observations with bone mineral density and age.

METHODS

We reviewed registry data on 1,148 patients 50 years and older with distal radius fractures managed by closed reduction and cast immobilization. Radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), and radial tilt (RT) were measured immediately and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after reduction. Magnitude, direction, frequency, and patterns of change were compared at each time point and correlated with bone mineral density T-scores and age using paired t tests in a mixed effects model.

RESULTS

Over 12 weeks, RI decreased by 3° ± 5°, the majority occurring in the first 2 weeks and significantly correlated with bone mineral density T-score and age. Unexpectedly, RI increased over time in 5% of patients. Ulnar variance increased by 2.3 ± 1.7 mm, the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and correlated with age. Radial tilt changed by 7° ± 11° in those displacing dorsally and 8° ± 12° in those displacing volarly at 12 weeks, with the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and significantly correlating with age. Ulnar variance and RT continued to change by small increments between weeks 3 and 6. Nearly 90% of our cohort experienced measurable loss of reduction and 50% changed at least 5° RI, 11° RT, and 2 mm UV.

CONCLUSIONS

Most distal radius fracture managed with closed reduction and casting have some loss of reduction, the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and correlated with increased age and osteoporosis. This guides clinicians in informing patients about expected reduction loss, frequency of clinical and radiographic follow-up, and timing of discussions regarding the need for surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Wrist Hemiarthroplasty for Complex Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture in a Patient with Manifest Osteoporosis

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures of the elderly. The higher the degree of joint surface destruction, and the more adverse factors are involved, the more challenging proper treatment becomes. In this regard, osteoporosis as underlying systemic disease, chondropathy or degeneration of adjacent wrist bones as well as incompliance significantly impair the success of the chosen primary therapy. Wrist hemiarthroplasty has already been reported as primary or secondary procedure for DRFs. In this case report, we present a patient with a severely comminuted DRF including posttraumatic degeneration of the lunate as well as manifest osteoporosis. Wrist hemiarthroplasty using the ReMotion radius component in combination with proximal row carpectomy was performed as secondary surgery. This procedure proved to be a viable treatment option in terms of achieving low pain levels, high range of motion values and stable osteointegration over a course of 6.5 follow-up years.

Lessons learned with the Cobra prosthesis in elderly patients with complex distal radius fractures-a retrospective follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the Cobra prostheses were introduced in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) of elderly patients. Fracture prostheses provide an alternative treatment option for complex fractures where conservative therapy seems not acceptable and osteosynthesis seems not possible. Data reporting the feasibility of the Cobra prosthesis are sparse. Therefore, this retrospective follow-up study investigated the clinical and radiological mid-term outcome of the Cobra implant in complex DRFs of elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients (mean age 73.5 years, range 65-87 years) were retrospectively evaluated with at least a 1-year follow-up after surgery. Objective and subjective clinical parameters as well as the radiological outcome and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 31.2 months. Seven cases required a cemented prosthesis. The mean relative range-of-motion compared to the healthy side was 72.3% and 51.8% for extension and flexion, respectively, and 87.9% and 85.7% for pronation and supination, respectively. The mean grip strength was 78.3% compared to the non-operated side. Eight patients were very satisfied, five patients were partly satisfied with the result. The DASH, PRWE, MHQ and Lyon-Scores averaged 39.1, 36.2, 64.9 and 63.3 points, respectively. The mean VAS-Score for pain was 1.1 at rest and 3.2 during activities. Perioperative complications included one dissection of the extensor pollicis longus tendon, one heterotopic ossification, one radiocarpal dislocation and two cases of an ulnar impaction syndrome due to implant subsidence.

CONCLUSION

The prosthetic treatment of complex DRFs in elderly patients with the Cobra implant led to clinically and radiologically satisfactory mid-term results. The Cobra prosthesis still does not represent a gold standard but can be regarded as a feasible salvage option for complex DRFs when osteosyntheses may not be possible and non-operative treatment will lead to further functional restrictions and wrist pain during performing activities of daily life in high functional demand patients.

What Is the Evidence in Treating Distal Radius Fractures in the Geriatric Population?

Distal radius fractures are common in the elderly population, second only to hip fractures in frequency. Historically, these injuries were treated almost exclusively without surgery, but an increase in operative management has occurred with development of volar locked plating in the early 2000s. Functional outcomes are similar between conservative and surgical treatment, but most studies assume low functional demands in older patients. Many elderly individuals today are active and independent. Decision-making in this higher-demand population is difficult. This article provides current evidence to facilitate informed, individualized decision-making when treating distal radius fractures in geriatric patients.

The Effect of Distal Radius Fractures on 3-Dimensional Joint Congruency

PURPOSE

Whereas the goal of distal radius fracture treatment is anatomical restoration, controversy exists as to whether it is the severity of the disruption of joint alignment at the time of fracture or residual malalignment after healing that determines outcome. The objective of this study was to compare joint contact mechanics bilaterally a minimum of 3 years following a distal radius fracture. Our hypothesis was that 3-dimensional joint space would be reduced in individuals following wrist fracture and that these changes in joint load lead to the development of degenerative arthritis. To test the hypothesis, an interbone spacing algorithm was used to determine whether 3-dimensional joint space and contact mechanics were altered in the distal radioulnar (DRUJ) and radiocarpal joints following a wrist fracture.

METHODS

In 16 subjects with previous unilateral wrist fractures, 3-dimensional interbone distance (joint space), a measure of joint congruency and 3-dimensional alignment, was quantified from reconstructed computed tomography bone models of the distal radius, ulna, scaphoid, and lunate.

RESULTS

At an average of 8 years following fracture, joint interbone spacing area was reduced in the radiolunate joint of the injured wrist in comparison with the uninjured wrist. The joint interbone spacing area was decreased in the DRUJ and radioscaphoid joint of the injured wrist compared with the uninjured wrist but this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the use of a noninvasive tool that can be used to examine joint loading and suggests that further investigation into the association between altered joint loading and the development of posttraumatic arthritis is needed, especially in the radiocarpal joints.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This paper provides a noninvasive image-based framework that can be used to examine joint contact area over time and provides preliminary data examining the effect of a distal radius fracture on the joint congruency of the DRUJ and radiocarpal joints.

Clinical Utility of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Images to Predict Conservative Treatment Outcomes of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) images can provide additional information on bone fractures, especially in patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). We aimed to identify possible risk factors for adverse outcomes using a 3D reconstruction technique.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent plaster immobilization with or without closed reduction for DRFs in our hospital between February 2016 and May 2019. The 3D reconstruction image of DRFs was viewed from multiple angles to determine the existence of gaps or steps. Then, a semiquantitative standard was used to assess the severity of fracture. The patients’ basic data and radiographic data were collected, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify possible risk factors associated with adverse outcomes.

Results

A total of 89 cases were analyzed in our study. There were 28, 39, and 22 patients with level 1, 2, or 3 fractures, respectively, based on the semiquantitative standard. In a multiple linear regression, preoperative severity degree (β, 0.393; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.260–0.526) and postoperative rehabilitation exercise (β, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.023–0.681) were associated with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation during follow-up.

Conclusions

Our study presents a new method based on 3D reconstruction images to assess the severity of intra-articular DRFs. Patients who were identified as having severe fractures based on this method were found to have worse functional outcome.

Surgical comfort and clinical outcomes of MIPO with an extra-short plate designed for distal radius fractures

OBJECTIVES

Volar locking plates (VLPs) are increasingly used for distal radius fractures (DRFs) with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), but surgery learning curves could be long. The purpose of this study was to assess a new extra-short plate with two locking diaphyseal divergent screws, specifically designed for MIPO, preserving the pronator quadratus muscle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of three phases: (i) the evaluation of surgical comfort with the incision size and the duration of 59 consecutive surgeries using the extra-short plate in DRFs; (ii) the verification of the implant ability to maintain radiographic indices compared immediately postoperatively and at consolidation. They included radial inclination (RI), volar tilt (VT) and ulnar variance (UV); (iii) the assessment of clinical outcomes at last follow-up through: pain measured on the visual analogue scale (VAS), QuickDASH score, patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, grip strength, range of motion and complications.

RESULTS

In the first phase: mean incision size was 32 mm, and mean operative time was 28.5 min. In the second phase, there was no statistical difference between the two measures of the indices studied. In the third phase, mean follow-up time was 14.2 months, VAS score was 1.1, QuickDASH score was 11.4/100, and PRWE score was 9.5/100. Flexion was 91%, extension was 94%, and grip strength was 86% compared to the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

The surgical comfort may be related to short operative time and incision. The implant allowed maintaining the radiographic indices without secondary displacement. Functional clinical outcomes were satisfactory. This extra-short plate design belongs to a novel generation of VLPs.

Management of Pain Associated with Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose is to review current literature on pain management strategies from initial presentation to postoperative care on common fracture types.

RECENT FINDINGS

- Hip fractures benefit from use of multimodal pain control for early mobility and decreased narcotic requirement. - Distal radius fracture pain during reduction can be managed with hematoma block. Postoperatively, a soft dressing is adequate, and use of a compression glove may improve pain control and edema. - Ankle fractures can be reduced with hematoma block, though use of procedural sedation may reduce reduction attempts for fracture dislocations. - Long bone fracture pain management is trending toward multimodal pain control. Though there is no high-quality evidence, concern that regional anesthesia may mask compartment syndrome has limited its use in high-risk fractures. - The effect of NSAIDs on bone healing has not been conclusively demonstrated. The literature is still inconclusive regarding superiority of either spinal or general anesthesia during operative treatment. Fracture pain control is complex and multifactorial, requiring nuanced clinical judgment in the face of mixed clinical findings.