The quadriceps active ratio: a dynamic MRI-based assessment of patellar height

No Correlation Exists Between Tibial- and Femoral-Based Measurements of Patella Alta in a Population With Chronic Patellofemoral Pain or Instability Undergoing Patella Distalization

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the patellotrochlear index (PTI) predicts patella alta as determined by tibial-based methods of Insall-Salvati (IS) and Caton-Deschamp (CDI) indexes in a pathological population (with patellofemoral pain and/or instability), in addition to determining whether PTI and sagittal patellofemoral engagement (SPE) correlate with trochlea length as determined by lateral condyle index (LCI).

METHODS

Patients with confirmed patella alta (IS/CDI ratio >1.2) undergoing tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral pain/instability with an available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included. Patients who had undergone previous soft-tissue realignment, previous surgery, or trauma to the extensor mechanism were excluded. Two raters measured the IS, CDI, PTI, SPE, LCI, and knee flexion angle (KFA) on MRI. Interobserver reliability and correlation between measurements were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 71 knees were included. PTI (0.73), SPE (0.836), LCI (0.701), and KFA (0.8) demonstrated good- to near-excellent interobserver reliability. IS (0.65) and CDI (0.66) demonstrated moderate interobserver reliability. PTI and SPE showed the strongest significant correlation (0.8112, P = 2.2 × 10-16). IS and CD (0.39, P = .0007) showed a moderate significant correlation. PTI and KFA (0.53, P = 1.685 × 10-6) and SPE and KFA (0.61, P = 1.991 × 10-8) had a significant moderate correlation. LCI and KFA (-0.37, P = .0017) showed a significant moderate negative correlation. All other measurement indices correlated poorly and were insignificant. A total of 94.4% of the knees were defined as having patella alta using IS, with the remaining 5.6% having a raised CDI. Only 14% of cases had an IS of >1.2, a CDI >1.2, and a PTI <0.125, which increased to 39% (28/71) when the threshold for PTI was increased to <0.28.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no correlation between tibial (IS and CD) and femoral methods (PTI and SPE) of quantifying patella alta. PTI and SPE did not correlate with trochlea length as measured by LCI. PTI, SPE, and LCI are significantly affected by the KFA during MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective diagnostic radiographic investigation.

Patella Alta: When to Correct and Impact on Other Anatomic Risk Factors for Patellofemoral Instability

Patella alta is described as abnormally high-riding patella in relation to the femur, the trochlear groove, or the tibia with decreased bony stability. Patella alta represents an important predisposing factor for patellofemoral instability. Different measurement methods are used to define patella alta. Despite the clinical importance of patella alta, there is only limited consensus on cutoff values, indications for treatment, and ideal correction. In addition, the impact of patella alta on other risk factors for lateral patellar instability is significant. This must be considered when assessing clinical complaints and choosing the best individual treatment. Combined surgical interventions may be necessary.

Dynamic changes in the infrapatellar knee structures with quadriceps muscle contraction. An in vivo study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of knee flexion and submaximal isometric quadriceps muscle (Q) contraction on the patellar tendon (PT), the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP), and the deep infrapatellar bursa (IPB) from extension to full flexion.

METHODS

In Study 1, the dominant knee of seven healthy subjects was studied in full extension and at 60° flexion during relaxation and Q contraction. Each knee was inspected and palpated, the transverse infrapatellar diameter was measured by plicometry, and measurements of the anteroposterior (AP) thickness of the IPFP were made by ultrasound (US). In Study 2, the dominant knee of seven healthy subjects was studied by US in full flexion, and then, at 15° decrements, down to 60° flexion during relaxation and Q contraction. Both studies had IRB approval. Results were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In Study 1, Q contraction caused straightening of the patellar tendon (PT), a statistically significant widening of the IPFP by plicometry, and an increased AP thickness of the IPFP by US, in both knee positions. In Study 2, in full knee flexion, the PT contacted the tibial cortex in all seven subjects. Upon increasing extension, the PT-tibial cortex contact was lost in all subjects nearing 90° flexion. The contraction of the Q made the concave PT straight, grew the width of the underlying IPFP, and the apron of the IPFP moved distally within the IPB in all knee positions. A small amount of bursal fluid was present in all seven subjects.

CONCLUSION

Q contraction makes the IPFP bulge anteriorly, on both sides of the PT, and distally into the IPB, with possible biomechanical implications. In full knee flexion, the PT contacted the tibia, confirming a fulcrum at this site.

Dynamic Evaluation of Patellofemoral Instability: A Clinical Reality or Just a Research Field? A Literature review

Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is one of the most disabling conditions in the knee, often affecting young individuals. Despite its not uncommon presentation, the underlying biomechanical features leading to this entity are not entirely understood. The suitability of classic physical examination manoeuvres and imaging tests is a matter of discussion among treating surgeons, and so are the findings provided by these means. A potential cause for this lack of consensus is the fact that, classically, the diagnostic approach for PFI has relied on statically obtained data. Many authors advocate for the study of this entity in a dynamic scenario, closer to the actual situation in which the instability episodes occur. In this literature review, we have compiled the available data from the last decades regarding dynamic evaluation methods for PFI and related conditions. Several categories are presented, grouping the related techniques and devices: physical examination, imaging modalities (ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and combined methods), arthroscopic evaluation, and others. In conclusion, although a vast number of quality studies are presented, in which comprehensive data about the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) are described, this evidence has not yet reached clinical practice universally. Most of the data still stays in the research field and is seldom employed to assist a better understanding of the PFI cases and their ideal treatment targets.