1
|
Burke Ó, Zeden MS, O'Gara JP. The pathogenicity and virulence of the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis. Virulence 2024; 15:2359483. [PMID: 38868991 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2359483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The pervasive presence of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci on the skin and mucous membranes has long underpinned a casual disregard for the infection risk that these organisms pose to vulnerable patients in healthcare settings. Prior to the recognition of biofilm as an important virulence determinant in S. epidermidis, isolation of this microorganism in diagnostic specimens was often overlooked as clinically insignificant with potential delays in diagnosis and onset of appropriate treatment, contributing to the establishment of chronic infection and increased morbidity or mortality. While impressive progress has been made in our understanding of biofilm mechanisms in this important opportunistic pathogen, research into other virulence determinants has lagged S. aureus. In this review, the broader virulence potential of S. epidermidis including biofilm, toxins, proteases, immune evasion strategies and antibiotic resistance mechanisms is surveyed, together with current and future approaches for improved therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Órla Burke
- Microbiology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - James P O'Gara
- Microbiology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alvarez Otero J, Karau MJ, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Abdel MP, Mandrekar J, Patel R. Evaluation of Sonicate Fluid Culture Cutoff Points for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae159. [PMID: 38715572 PMCID: PMC11075786 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Implant sonication is useful for recovery of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogens in culture, but exact cutoff points for definition of clinically significant sonicate fluid culture results vary from study to study. The aim of this study was to define ideal sonicate fluid culture cutoff points for PJI diagnosis. Methods Sonicate fluid cultures from hip and knee prosthesis components removed between February 2007 and December 2020 were studied. Prosthesis components were placed in solid containers in the operating room; in the clinical microbiology laboratory, 400 mL Ringer's solution was added, and containers subjected to vortexing, sonication and then vortexing, followed by centrifugation. Concentrated sonicate fluid was plated on aerobic and anaerobic solid media, and culture results reported semiquantitatively, as no growth, <20, 20-50, 51-100, or >100 CFU/10 mL sonicate fluid. Sonicate cultures from cement spacers and cultures yielding more than 1 microorganism were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point was evaluated. Results A total of 1448 sonicate fluid cultures were evaluated, 68% from knees and 32% from hips. PJI was present in 644 (44%) cases. Sensitivity of sonicate culture was 75.0% at <20 CFU/10 mL, 55.3% at ≥20 CFU/10 mL, 46.9% at >51 CFU/10 mL, and 39.8% at >100 CFU/10 mL. Specificity was 78.2%, 99.8%, 100%, and 100%, at the 4 cutoff points, respectively. Conclusions A cutoff point for sonicate fluid culture positivity of ≥20 CFU/10 mL is suitable for PJI diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Alvarez Otero
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Melissa J Karau
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew P Abdel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jay Mandrekar
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robin Patel
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watanabe S, Kamono E, Choe H, Ike H, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N. Differences in Diagnostic Sensitivity of Cultures Between Sample Types in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00232-8. [PMID: 38490568 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differences between the bacterial culture results of the preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid of implants in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are important issues in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify the differences in pooled diagnostic accuracy between culture sample types for diagnosing PJI by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Data extraction and study assessment using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated for each sample type. RESULTS There were thirty-two studies that were included in the analysis after screening and eligibility assessment. The pooled sensitivities of preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.70), 0.71 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.85), while the specificities were 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.98), 0.92 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.96), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95), respectively. The area under the curves for preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid were 0.86, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Sonication fluid culture demonstrated better sensitivity compared with the conventional culture method, and preoperative fluid culture provided lower sensitivity in diagnosing PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Watanabe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Emi Kamono
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hyonmin Choe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ike
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yutaka Inaba
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Naomi Kobayashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peng G, Liu Q, Guan Z, Liu M, Sun X, Zhu X, Chen J, Feng W, Li J, Zeng J, Zhong Z, Zeng Y. Diagnostic accuracy of sonication fluid cultures from prosthetic components in periprosthetic joint infection: an updated diagnostic meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:175. [PMID: 36890571 PMCID: PMC9996915 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03662-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and has a significant impact on patients and the national healthcare system. To date, the diagnosis of PJI is still confronted with dilemmas. The present study investigated the validity of sonication fluid culture (SFC) for removing implants in the diagnosis of PJI after joint replacement. METHODS From database establishment to December 2020, relevant literature was retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment and data extraction to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to evaluate the diagnostic value of overall SFC for PJI. RESULTS A total of 38 eligible studies including 6302 patients were selected in this study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of SFC for PJI diagnosis were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.79), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.96), 18.68 (95% CI, 11.92-29.28), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21-0.29), and 85.65 (95% CI, 56.46-129.94), respectively, while the AUC was 0.92. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that SFC was of great value in PJI diagnosis, and the evidence of SFC on PJI was more favorable but not yet strong. Therefore, improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of SFC is still necessary, and the diagnosis of PJI continues to warrant a multiplex approach before and during a revision procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanrong Peng
- The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 12#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Yudu People's Hospital, Huancheng North Road 2#, District Yudu, Ganzhou, 342300, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenhua Guan
- Yudu People's Hospital, Huancheng North Road 2#, District Yudu, Ganzhou, 342300, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Liu
- The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 12#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaobo Sun
- The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 12#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingyang Zhu
- The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 12#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinlun Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 16#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenjun Feng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 16#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 16#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianchun Zeng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 16#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhangrong Zhong
- Yudu People's Hospital, Huancheng North Road 2#, District Yudu, Ganzhou, 342300, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yirong Zeng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Jichang Road 16#, District Baiyun, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
JIANG N, HU YJ, LIN QR, CHEN P, WAN HY, HE SY, STOODLEY P, YU B. Implant surface culture may be a useful adjunct to standard tissue sampling culture for identification of pathogens accounting for fracture-device-related infection: a within-person randomized agreement study of 42 patients. Acta Orthop 2022; 93:703-708. [PMID: 36069480 PMCID: PMC9450250 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Identification of pathogens causing fracture-device-related infection (FDRI) is always a challenge as the positive rate of standard tissue sampling culture (TSC) remains unsatisfactory. This study evaluates the efficiency of implant surface culture (ISC) as an adjunct to standard TSC for identification of FDRI-associated microorganisms. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between November 2020 and March 2022, patients diagnosed with FDRI defined by the International Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group, and indicated for implant removal, underwent both methods for bacteria detection. The test order of ISC and TSC was randomly selected for each patient included, as a within-person randomized design. For ISC, the recovered implants were gently covered with tryptic soy agar after rinsing with normal saline twice, and then incubated at 37℃ 5% CO2 for up to 14 days. For TSC, 5 specimens were sampled and sent to the Clinical Laboratory of Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, for culture and identification. RESULTS 42 consecutive patients were included, with a mean age of 46 years. The most frequent infection site and implant type were the tibia (21 cases) and plates with screws (30 cases), respectively. Altogether 21 patients were found with positive outcomes by both methods, and the identified pathogens were consistent. ISC found an additional 15 patients showing positive results, which were negative by TSC. Furthermore, the mean culture time of ISC was shorter than that of TSC (1.5 days vs. 3.2 days). INTERPRETATION ISC may be a useful adjunct to TSC for detection of bacteria causing FDRI, with a relatively higher positive rate and a shorter culture time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan JIANG
- Division of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yan-jun HU
- Division of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Qing-rong LIN
- Division of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Peng CHEN
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Hao-yang WAN
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Si-ying HE
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Paul STOODLEY
- Departments of Microbial Infection and Immunity and Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA,National Centre for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS) and National Biofilm Innovation Centre (NBIC), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Bin YU
- Division of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fritsche T, Schnetz M, Klug A, Fischer S, Ruckes C, Hunfeld KP, Hoffmann R, Gramlich Y. Tissue sampling is non-inferior in comparison to sonication in orthopedic revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 143:2901-2911. [PMID: 35612616 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04469-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the role of sonication fluid cultures in detecting musculoskeletal infections in orthopedic revision surgery in patients suspected of having peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), fracture-related infections (FRI), or postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII). METHODS Between 2016 and 2019, 149 cases with a data set including sonication fluid cultures and tissue specimen and histological analysis were included. Accuracy of each diagnostic tool as well as the influence of antibiotic therapy was analyzed. Pathogens identified in the sonication cultures and in the associated tissue samples were compared based on the matching of the antibiograms. Therapeutic benefits were then assessed. RESULTS Of 149 cases, 43.6% (n = 65) were identified as PJI, 2.7% (n = 4) as FRI, 12.8% (n = 19) as PSII, 6.7% (n = 10) as aseptic non-union, and 34.2% (n = 51) as aseptic implant loosening. The sensitivity and specificity of tissue and synovial specimens showed no significant difference with respect to sonication fluid cultures (sensitivity/specificity: tissue: 68.2%/96.7%; sonication fluid cultures: 60.2%/98.4%). The administration of antibiotics over 14 days prior to microbiological sampling (n = 40) resulted in a lower sensitivity of 42.9% each. Histological analysis showed a sensitivity 86.3% and specificity of 97.4%. In 83.9% (n = 125) of the cases, the results of sonication fluid cultures and tissue specimens were identical. Different microorganisms were found in only four cases. In 17 cases, tissue samples (n = 5) or sonication (n = 12) were false-negatives. CONCLUSION Sonication fluid culture showed no additional benefit compared to conventional microbiological diagnostics of tissue and synovial fluid cultures. Preoperative administration of antibiotics had a clearly negative effect on microbiologic test accuracy. In over 83.9% of the cases, sonication fluid and tissue cultures showed identical results. In the other cases, sonication fluid culture did not further contribute to the therapy decision, whereas other factors, such as fistulas, cell counts, or histological analysis, were decisive in determining therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Fritsche
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Matthias Schnetz
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexander Klug
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - K P Hunfeld
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Infection Control, Northwest Medical Center, Medical Faculty Goethe University Frankfurt, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yves Gramlich
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aliyev O, Yıldız F, Kaya HB, Aghazada A, Sümbül B, Citak M, Tuncay İ. Sonication of explants enhances the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid and tissue cultures and can help determine the appropriate antibiotic therapy for prosthetic joint infections. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 46:415-422. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05286-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
8
|
Klasan A, Schermuksnies A, Gerber F, Bowman M, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Heyse TJ. Development of antibiotic resistance in periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:171-176. [PMID: 34053285 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b6.bjj-2020-1923.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. The correct antibiotic management remains elusive due to differences in epidemiology and resistance between countries, and reports in the literature. Before the efficacy of surgical treatment is investigated, it is crucial to analyze the bacterial strains causing PJI, especially for patients in whom no organisms are grown. METHODS A review of all revision TKAs which were undertaken between 2006 and 2018 in a tertiary referral centre was performed, including all those meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which organisms were identified. Using a cluster analysis, three chronological time periods were created. We then evaluated the antibiotic resistance of the identified bacteria between these three clusters and the effectiveness of our antibiotic regime. RESULTS We identified 129 PJIs with 161 culture identified bacteria in 97 patients. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were identified in 46.6% cultures, followed by Staphylococcus aureus in 19.8%. The overall resistance to antibiotics did not increase significantly during the study period (p = 0.454). However, CNS resistance to teicoplanin (p < 0.001), fosfomycin (p = 0.016), and tetracycline (p = 0.014) increased significantly. Vancomycin had an 84.4% overall sensitivity and 100% CNS sensitivity and was the most effective agent. CONCLUSION Although we were unable to show an overall increase in antibiotic resistance in organisms that cause PJI after TKA during the study period, this was not true for CNS. It is concerning that resistance of CNS to new antibiotics, but not vancomycin, has increased in a little more than a decade. Our findings suggest that referral centres should continuously monitor their bacteriological analyses, as these have significant implications for prophylactic treatment in both primary arthroplasty and revision arthroplasty for PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):171-176.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Klasan
- Department for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.,University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmed EA, Almutairi MK, Alkaseb AT. Accuracy of Tissue and Sonication Fluid Sampling for the Diagnosis of Fracture-Related Infection: Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2021; 13:e14925. [PMID: 34123624 PMCID: PMC8187062 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence shows that tissue sample culturing is the gold standard approach for diagnosing fracture-related infection (FRI). Sonication fluid sampling has also been reported to be efficacious and superior to tissue sample culturing with prosthetic joint infection. However, data from the current literature are not enough to validate this hypothesis for FRI. We conducted a meta-analysis to validate the diagnostic accuracy of tissue sample culturing and sonication fluid aspiration and to find which one is superior to the other. An extensive search through the relevant databases was conducted to obtain all the relevant studies. We have included 13 relevant studies, including nine retrospective cohorts and four prospective ones. The overall pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of tissue sampling culture in diagnosing fracture-related infections were 98% (95% CI, 92% to 99%), 38% (95% CI, 23% to 56%), and 25 (4 to 154), respectively. The overall pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of sonication fluid sample culture in diagnosing fracture-related infections were 86% (95% CI, 79% to 92%), 98% (95% CI, 93% to 100%), and 353 (78 to 1598), respectively. No significant risk of bias was found regarding the sensitivity and specificity among studies investigating both modalities, however, significant heterogeneity was noticed. Sonication fluid sampling can be used to confirm FRI while tissue sampling can be used to exclude it and both modalities should be combined for obtaining the most accurate outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsiddig A Ahmed
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Prince Mutaibb bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Sakaka, SAU
| | | | | |
Collapse
|