Is quadruple semitendinosus tendon strands autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3 years

The effectiveness of quadrupled semitendinosus graft technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A network meta-analysis assessing various graft preparation techniques

PURPOSE

This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of hamstring graft preparation techniques to enhance anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction guidelines and inform clinical decision-making in patients with primary ACL rupture.

METHODS

A review of the literature, from 1 January 1990, to 31 August 2023, was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, focusing on the clinical outcomes of various hamstring graft preparation techniques. Forty-six studies (over 4800 knees) were analysed. Eight graft compositions: doubled hamstring (ST/G)-1978 grafts, doubled hamstring with augmentation (ST/G+A)-586 grafts, tripled semitendinosus (3ST)-124 grafts, quadrupled semitendinosus (4ST)-1273 grafts, five-strand tripled semitendinosus + doubled gracilis (3ST/2GR-839 grafts, six-strand tripled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (3ST/3GR)-335 grafts, seven-strand quadrupled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (4ST/3GR)-11 grafts and ≥eight strands-24 grafts were compared, considering graft sizes, laxity, muscle strength, range-of-motion, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport (RTS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

The 4ST grafts fared better than the ST/G grafts in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport, KOOS Q and RTS (mean difference [MD], -1.69; p = 0.0159; MD, -1.55; p = 0.0325; MD, -1.93; p = 0.001; odds ratio: 3.13; p < 0.0001). The IKDC differed significantly between the 4ST and ST/G+A groups (MD, 1.88; p = 0.046). The ST/G+A resulted in the lowest knee laxity, surpassing the ST/G, 3ST and 4ST. The ST/G had the smallest diameter (ST/G vs. ST/G+A: MD, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.86, p < 0.0001). Reduced failure rates were noted with the 3ST/2GR (3ST/2GR vs. ST/G: MD, 6.93; p = 0.009) and 3ST/3GR (3ST/3GR vs. ST/G: MD, 53.64; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The ideal hamstring graft for ACLR should be individualized. A 4ST graft is likely to yield good PROMs. For high stability and rapid RTS, adding augmentation to the graft is advisable. The ST/G is the thinnest graft possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Network meta-analysis of level I-III studies.

Single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: current concepts

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, and huge variation exists in the surgical technique. Single bundle hamstrings autograft reconstruction is a common method and has good clinical outcomes. A criticism of the hamstrings autograft is a small graft diameter, often less than 8-mm, which has been associated with increased re-rupture rates. Several graft preparation techniques for single bundle hamstrings autograft exist. Perioperative decisions include the number of tendons utilized, number of graft strands, graft configuration, and femoral and tibial fixation methods. Awareness of the minimum tendon and graft length required to produce each graft variation is necessary to avoid common pitfalls. However, intraoperative graft modification is possible to maximize graft diameter, and obtain proper fixation. The objective of this current concepts review is to describe the indications, surgical anatomy, technique, intraoperative tips, clinical outcomes, and complications for single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques in ACLR.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a single hamstring tendon graft and tape locking screw (TLS) fixation leads to good clinical outcome in two years of follow-up

Background

There are many fixation methods for hamstring tendon autograft available for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The intention of this study was to report clinical follow-up data of the Tape Locking Screw (TLS) reconstruction technique.

Hypothesis

Does TLS method give good long term results in patient satisfaction and in clinical knee tests.

Patients and methods

We selected 119 prospectively collected patients with a two-year follow-up who had an ACL reconstruction using TLS technique. A total of 114 cases were available for follow-up two years postoperatively. The evaluation methods were instrumented laxity measurements, clinical examination and knee scores.

Results

The Lysholm and IKDC scores improved from preoperative 76 and 50 to 95 and 90, respectively. Tegner activity level before surgery was 3 and improved to 6 at 2 years postoperatively.

Discussion

ACL reconstruction with TLS technique showed good objective outcome at the 2-year follow-up. We confirmed improvement in all evaluation method variables.

Level of evidence

Case series; level of evidence, 4.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry, study ID ISRCTN34011837. Registered retrospectively April 29, 2020.

Comparative study of functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using anteromedial portal and translateral all-inside technique

Background

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are common in the active population of the Armed Forces. Symptomatic instability prompts individuals to seek a cure or a sheltered appointment. Despite the increasing numbers of ACL reconstructions performed, the outcomes have not been so spectacular with only a meager percentage of our patients returning to preinjury levels of activity. With the premise that an all-inside ACL reconstruction is likely to result in better functional outcomes, the aim of this study was to compare the short-term functional outcomes of a large consecutive series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using the translateral all-inside ACL reconstruction technique (AI) and standard anteromedial portal technique (AM) with a minimum follow-up of one year.

Methods

A total of 240 patients with isolated ACL tear underwent ACL reconstruction via the AI or AM technique. Their preoperative and postoperative scores were compared to look for any significant differences in functional outcomes.

Results

The two groups were matched for age, BMI, mechanism of injury, and interval from injury to surgery. There was no difference in their preoperative scores. Postoperatively, although there were significant improvements across both groups, there was no significant difference between the groups at any point of time.

Conclusion

The AI technique has garnered interest in recent literature in addressing ACL injuries. This study found no discernible benefit of the AI technique when compared to the AM technique in terms of functionality following an ACL reconstruction at any point of time up to 1 year following surgery.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a 4-Strand Semitendinosus Tendon Graft or a Doubled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Graft: A 4.5-Year Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study

BACKGROUND

Hamstring tendon grafts are the most common choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Previous studies have provided evidence that offers conflicting opinions concerning the most favorable graft choice.

PURPOSE

To identify whether the use of a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon (ST) or doubled semitendinosus tendon and gracilis tendon (ST/G) graft provides comparable anterior tibial translation (ATT) with similar functional results and similar donor site morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

This was a prospective, patient- and surgeon-blinded, randomized trial set in a busy orthopaedic and traumatology department at a university hospital. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 162 patients with ACL lesions were randomized to undergo ACLR with either a quadrupled ST or doubled ST/G graft. The primary endpoint was ATT assessed with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale.

RESULTS

Preoperative demographic data, ATT, and PROM scores showed no significant differences. At 4.5 years, no significant differences were found between the ST and ST/G groups with respect to PROM scores and KT-1000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test findings. Differences in functional results between groups were significant (muscle strength). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly increased ATT in female patients undergoing ACLR with a quadrupled ST graft during the 4.5-year observation period, as assessed by the KT-1000 arthrometer, as well as inferior KOOS, IKDC, Lysholm, and VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a significant increase in ATT as well as inferior results on PROMs during a 4.5-year observation period in female patients undergoing ACLR with a quadrupled ST graft. In male patients, the study provided evidence of the noninferiority of ACLR with an ST graft, with no influence on donor site morbidity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03626883.