Contouring the magnetically controlled growing rods: impact on expansion capacity and proximal junctional kyphosis

Reply to Tabeling et al. Comment on "Grabala et al. Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1529"

We are immensely gratified by the considerable interest our study has garnered [...].

Bivertebral pedicle-supralaminar autostable claw for proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in early-onset scoliosis

BACKGROUND

The various methods for the proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) are associated with high rates of mechanical complications related to material failure or proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). The bivertebral autostable claw (BAC) has been proven reliable in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis but has not been assessed when used with magnetic growing rods. The objective of this study was to describe the operative technique and outcomes of BAC proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in children with EOS.

HYPOTHESIS

The BAC provides stable and effective proximal fixation in children with early-onset scoliosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 24 patients who had surgery in 2015-2019 for early-onset scoliosis with magnetic growing rod implantation and BAC proximal fixation. Radiological variables were measured in the coronal and sagittal planes before surgery, during the early postoperative period (<3months) and at last follow-up (≥2years).

RESULTS

No neurological complications were recorded. At last follow-up, four patients had radiological PJK, including one patient with clinical PJK due to material failure.

DISCUSSION

BAC proximal fixation is both effective and sufficiently stable (4.2% pull-out) to withstand the forces applied during distraction sessions and daily activities in children with EOS. Moreover, the polyaxial connecting rods ensure better BAC adaptation to the local proximal kyphosis, which is often marked in this population.

CONCLUSION

The BAC is a reliable proximal fixation device that is well-suited to magnetic growing rod fixation in children with EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

The magnetic field strength and the force distance dependency of the magnetically controlled growing rods used for early onset scoliosis

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR's) have revolutionized the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) because painless lengthenings can be done in the outpatient clinic without anesthesia. Untreated EOS leads to respiratory insufficiency and reduced life expectancy. However, MCGR's have inherent complications like non-functioning of the lengthening mechanism. We quantify an important failure mechanism and give advice on how to avoid this complication. The magnetic field strength was measured on new/explanted rods at different distances between the external remote controller and the MCGR and likewise in patients before/after distractions. The magnetic field strength of the internal actuator decayed fast with increasing distances and plateaued at 25-30 mm approximating zero. Two new and 12 explanted MCGRs was used for the lab measurements of the elicited force using a forcemeter. At a distance of 25 mm, the force was reduced to approximately 40% (ca. 100 N) compared to zero distance (ca. 250 N), most so for explanted rods. This is used to point out the importance of minimizing the implantation depth to ensure proper functionality of the rod lengthening in clinical use for EOS patients. A distance of 25 mm from skin to MCGR should be considered a relative contraindication to clinical use in EOS patients.

Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years

PURPOSE

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as spinal curvature affecting children below 10 years of age. Non-operative treatment can consist of casting and bracing. When curvature progresses despite these treatments, operative intervention is indicated. Traditional growing rods (TGR) have been a mainstay of treatment. Unfortunately, TGR's require planned return to the operating room every 6-9 months. Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGR) ideally provide curve correction and allow the spine to grow without frequent surgeries. However, the ability to correct and maintain correction after MCGR has not been well-characterized. The purpose of this study is to evaluate maintenance of curve correction in patients treated primarily with MCGR and analyze the rate of complications including unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR).

METHODS

24 patients with EOS were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were subdivided into 4 subcategories: congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular (NMS), and syndromic. The major curve correction (%) and T1-S1 distance were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and return to the operating room for any reason were recorded. Patients were followed until conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent lengthening of MCGR.

RESULTS

There were 11 male and 13 female patients averaging 8 years at the time of index surgery. The average preoperative curve angle was 61.1°. Initial curve correction with MCGR obtained at the index procedure was 46.2%, reducing the mean curve angle to 32.7° (p < 0.05). Curve correction at a mean 6.2 years (2.4-7.4) follow-up was 36.1°, 40.9% curve correction. 75% of patients underwent conversion to PSF during the study period 4.8 years (2.4-7.0) after initial MCGR surgery. 15% of patients were still undergoing MCGR lengthening after 6.1 years. 54.2% of patients had at least one UPROR.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with EOS with curve progression, MCGRs can maintain curve correction well after 2 years. Furthermore, MCGR allowed patients to grow over time to safely delay timing to definitive fusion. On average, patients underwent conversion to PSF after 4.7 years at an average age of 13.5. Although the complication rate in the first 2 years is relatively low, 54.2% of patients underwent an UPROR. As the use of MCGR increases, surgeons should be aware of possible complications associated with this technology and counsel patients accordingly. Further research is needed to continue to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MCGR in this challenging patient population.

Unmatched rod contouring at the proximal end predisposes to occurrence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis patients undergoing traditional growing rods treatment

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether unmatched rod contouring at the proximal end predisposed to the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients after traditional growing rods (TGR) treatment. TGR treatment has become a mainstay of treatment for EOS patients. PJK is one of the most common alignment-related complications.

METHODS

A consecutive series of EOS patients who had undergone TGR treatment were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into PJK and non-PJK groups according to the occurrence of PJK or not. Demographic data, surgical strategies, and radiographic parameters were recorded and compared between groups. Proximal junctional angle (PJA) was defined as the angle between the caudal endplate of the UIV and the cephalad endplate of the second supradjacent vertebra above the UIV, while proximal rod contouring angle (PRCA) was defined as the angle of proximal rod contouring, which was represented by the angle between the cephalad endplate of the UIV and the caudal endplate of the second vertebra caudal to the UIV. Unmatched proximal rod contouring was regarded if the postoperative PRCA-PJA difference was greater than 5°.

RESULTS

This study finally included 73 patients. The mean age at the index surgery was 6.5 ± 2.2 years (range, 2-10 years). Mean follow-up lasted 5.0 ± 1.7 years (range, 2-9 years). They received mean 4.6 ± 1.6 lengthening procedures. There were 13 patients who were observed with PJK (18%). In comparison with the non-PJK group, the PJK group showed a larger preoperative major curve (82 ± 21° vs 70 ± 17°, P = 0.041) and global kyphosis (57 ± 6° vs. 44 ± 15°, P = 0.044). In addition, the PJK group had significantly larger postoperative PJA (10 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 3, P<0.001) and greater postoperative PJA-PRCA (6 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 3, P = 0.031). The proportion of patients with unmatched proximal rod contouring in PJK group was significantly higher than that in the non-PJK group (69% vs. 25%). Multiple logistic regression showed that preoperative GK>50°, postoperative PJA>10 and postoperative unmatched proximal rod contouring were the risk factors in predicting PJK after TGR treatment.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 18% EOS patients experienced PJK after TGR treatment. Unmatched proximal rod contouring may be an independent risk factor of PJK occurrence, in addition to greater preoperative GK and larger postoperative PJA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development

PURPOSE

Although distraction-based growing rods (GR) are the gold standard for the treatment of early onset scoliosis, they suffer from high failure rates. We have (1) performed a literature search to understand the deficiencies of the current protocols, (2) in vitro evaluation of GRs using our proposed protocol and performed a finite element (FE) model validation, and (3) identified key features which should be considered in mechanical testing setups.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published on (a) in vivo animal, in vitro cadaveric, and biomechanical studies analyzing the use of GRs as well as (b) failure mechanisms and risk factors for GRs. Both FE and benchtop models of a proposed TGR test construct were developed and evaluated for two cases, long tandem connectors (LT), and side-by-side connectors (SBS). The test construct consisted of five polymer blocks representing vertebral bodies, joined with springs to simulate spinal stiffness. The superior and inferior blocks accepted the pedicle screw anchors, while the three middle blocks were floating. After the pedicle screws, rods, and connectors were assembled onto this construct, distraction was performed, mimicking scoliosis surgery. The resulting distracted constructs were then subjected to static compression-bending loading. Yield load and stiffness were calculated and used to verify/validate the FE results.

RESULTS

From the literature search, key features identified as significant were axial and transverse connectors, contoured rods, and distraction, distraction being the most challenging feature to incorporate in testing. The in silico analyses, once they are validated, can be used as a complementing technique to investigate other anatomical features which are not possible in the mechanical setup (like growth/scoliosis curvature). Based on our experiment, the LT constructs showed higher stiffness and yield load compared to SBS (78.85 N/mm vs. 59.68 N/mm and 838.84 N vs. 623.3 N). The FE predictions were in agreement with the experimental outcomes (within 10% difference). The maximum von Mises stresses were predicted adjacent to the distraction site, consistent with the location of observed failures in vivo.

CONCLUSION

The two-way approach presented in this study can lead to a robust prediction of the contributing factors to the in vivo failure.