Can prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy prevent C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with and without posterior instrumented fusion with maximal expansion?

Bilateral phrenic nerve palsy after posterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: a rare event after surgery

INTRODUCTION

Delayed C5 weakness is a known entity in cervical spine surgery, although with varied clinical presentation and poorly understood mechanism of action. We describe the first case in the literature of a bilateral C5 palsy leading to bilateral phrenic nerve dysfunction following a posterior cervical decompression and fusion.

CASE REPORT

A 76-year-old male presented with low back pain and was diagnosed as myelopathic. On initial neurological examination, he could not ambulate without assistance and was unsteady on tandem gait. The initial cervical MRI and CT scan showed advanced multilevel degenerative changes of the cervical spine with severe cord compression and myelomalacia. The patient underwent C3-C6 posterior cervical decompression & fusion (PCDF). He awoke with his baseline examination without neurophysiological monitoring changes intraoperatively or C5 root EMG activity. Post-operative MRI of the cervical spine was performed and showed an excellent decompression. The patient was neurologically stable and discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Patient developed a delayed bilateral C5P on postoperative day (POD) 74. Delayed bilateral C5P and phrenic nerve damage was determined to cause this patient's dyspnea. PM&R consult recommended placement of diaphragmatic pacers. However, clinically his respiratory function, as well as motor deficits, have gradually improved.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, a severe complication of cervical spine surgery, may cause respiratory distress and upper limb weakness. C5P, the underlying cause, may arise from various factors. Early detection and management of diaphragmatic weakness with physical therapy and pacers are crucial, emphasizing the need for vigilance by healthcare professionals and surgeons.

Combined cervical laminoplasty and foraminotomy for coexistence of cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: case series and preliminary results

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes and radiographic changes of a one-stage procedure combining cervical laminoplasty and unilateral cervical foraminotomy for patients with coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy were evaluated.

METHODS

Seven patients (two females and five males) with coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral cervical radiculopathy were included in this study. The mean age was 58.4 years (range 45-77 years). Cervical laminoplasty and unilateral cervical foraminotomy were performed on the recruited patients in a single stage. The quantitative clinical changes between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative assessment were analyzed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOA-CMEQ), visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Moreover, the preoperative and 6-month postoperative radiographic changes were assessed using the C2-7 angle and range of motion (ROM) between flexion and extension angle.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in QOL in the JOA-CMEQ between the groups. Furthermore, the postoperative VAS values in the arms and hands generally improved, although not significantly, between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The aforementioned surgical procedure may be safe and efficient for patients with coexisting cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Can prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy prevent C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with and without posterior instrumented fusion with maximal expansion?

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively examine whether laminoplasty with maximal expansion induces C5 palsy, even with prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy underwent laminoplasty (n = 19: LP group) or posterior decompression and fusion (n = 16: PDF group) with maximal expansion. Prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy was performed alternately in consecutive five patients undergoing each type of surgery. In each type of surgery, the first and third consecutive five patients did not undergo foraminotomy (NF subgroup: 20 patients), while the second and fourth consecutive five patients underwent foraminotomy (F subgroup: 15 patients). The widths between the gutters was equivalent to the diameter of the spinal canal, and an inclination angle of the lamina of approximately 90° was created during laminoplasty. The incidence and severity of postoperative C5 palsy were investigated. Patients with a manual muscle testing score for the deltoid muscle and/or biceps brachii muscle of ≤ 2 were diagnosed with severe palsy.

RESULTS

The respective incidences of C5 palsy in the F and NF subgroups were 33% and 20% in the LP group and 50% and 20% in the PDF group. Severe palsy occurred in 67% and 0% of patients who had developed palsy in F and NF subgroups, respectively, in the LP group, and in 100% of patients in the PDF group. Furthermore, 40% of the patients with severe palsy took more than 6 months to recover.

CONCLUSIONS

Laminoplasty with maximal expansion induced C5 palsy in both the LP and PDF groups, even with the addition of prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy.