Short-term results and surgical technique of arthroscopic centralization as an augmentation for medial meniscus extrusion caused by medial meniscus posterior root tear

Arthroscopic Centralization of the Medial Meniscus Reduces Load on a Posterior Root Repair Under Dynamic Varus Loading: A Biomechanical Investigation

BACKGROUND

In addition to the integrity of the meniscal hoop function, both the anterior and posterior meniscus roots as well as the meniscotibial and meniscofemoral ligaments are crucial in restraining meniscal extrusion. However, the interaction and load sharing between the roots and these peripheral attachments (PAs) are not known.

PURPOSES

To investigate the influence of an insufficiency of the PAs on the forces acting on a posterior medial meniscus root repair (PMMRR) in both neutral and varus alignment and to explore whether meniscal centralization reduces these forces.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In 8 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, an arthroscopic transosseous root repair (step 1) was performed after sectioning the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The pull-out suture was connected to a load cell to allow measurement of the forces acting on the root repair. A medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed to change the mechanical axis from neutral to 5° of varus alignment. The meniscus was completely released from its PAs (step 2), followed by transosseous arthroscopic centralization (step 3). Each step was tested in both neutral and varus alignment. The specimens were subjected to nondestructive dynamic varus loading under axial compression of 300 N in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion. The changes in force acting on the PMMRR were statistically analyzed using a mixed linear model.

RESULTS

Axial loading in neutral alignment led to an increase of the force of root repair of 3.1 ± 3.1 N (in 0° flexion) to 6.3 ± 4.4 N (in 60° flexion). In varus alignment, forces increased significantly from 30° (3.5 N; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8 N; P = .01) to 60° (7.1 N; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5 N; P = .007) flexion, in comparison with neutral alignment. Cutting of the PAs in neutral alignment led to a significant increase of root repair forces in all flexion angles, from 7.0 N (95% CI, 1.0-13.0 N; P = .02) to 9.1 N (95% CI, 4.1-14.1 N; P = .003), in comparison with the intact state. Varus alignment significantly increased the forces in the cut states from 4.8 N (95% CI, 1.0-8.5 N; P = .02) to 11.1 N (95% CI, 4.2-18.0 N; P = .006) from 30° to 60° flexion, in comparison with the neutral alignment. Arthroscopic centralization led to restoration of the native forces in both neutral and varus alignment, with no significant differences between the centralized and intact states.

CONCLUSION

An insufficiency of the PAs of the medial meniscus, as well as varus alignment, led to increased forces acting on a PMMRR. These forces were reduced via an arthroscopic meniscal centralization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Performing arthroscopic meniscal centralization concomitantly with PMMRR may reduce failure of the repair by reducing the load of the root.

Patient-reported Outcomes After Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair Versus Other Medial Meniscus Repairs: An Exploratory Meta-analysis of Single-arm Cohorts

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients who underwent medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) repair and those who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair, and (2) identify factors associated with observed differences.

METHODS

A literature search identified studies reporting PROMs-knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) or visual analog scale (VAS) for pain-after repair of the medial meniscus. Studies were excluded if outcomes were not separated by tear type or reported graphically, different or no outcomes reported, no repair or repair with a sutureless method, follow-up greater than 72 months, case report, and systematic review. Patient-reported outcome measures and demographics were summarized as sample-weighted means and compared using t-tests. Mixed model linear regressions were fit predicting postoperative PROMs adjusted for tear type, preoperative PROMs, and follow-up time. F statistics of type III tests of fixed effects were compared.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included, n = 10 received MMRT repair and n = 8 other tear repairs. Postoperative values for all KOOS scores were less for the MMRT repair group compared with the other tear repair group, VAS pain was not statistically different. Tear type was a stronger predictor for postoperative PROMs than the preoperative score and duration of follow-up for all KOOS scores, but not VAS pain. On average, the MMRT repair group had shorter follow-up, more women, older age, and greater BMI.

DISCUSSION

All postoperative PROMs except for VAS pain were worse for patients who underwent MMRT repair compared with patients who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair. Tear type was a better predictor of postoperative PROMs despite intergroup differences in preoperative PROMs and duration of follow-up. Relative risk factors for MMRT compared with other types of medial meniscus tears include older age, greater BMI, and female sex.

[Refixation of a posterior medial root lesion in combination with centralization by a meniscotibial suture]

OBJECTIVE

Refixation of a posterior root lesion of the medial meniscus via a tibial drill tunnel and prevention of extrusion using a meniscotibial suture (centralization).

INDICATIONS

Posterior root lesion of the medial meniscus.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Grade 4 cartilage damage in the corresponding compartment, uncorrected varus or valgus deformities, symptomatic instabilities, extensive degenerative tears apart from the root region.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Knee arthroscopy via the high anterolateral standard portal. Diagnostic arthroscopy to check indication. Locate the insertion zone on the tibial plateau and local debridement until the bone of the tibial plateau is visible. Insertion of a targeting device and drilling of a targeting wire into the center of the insertion zone in the area of the intercondylar eminence. Overdrill the target wire with a 4.5 mm drill. Reinforcement of the medial meniscus posterior horn with braided suture material. The reinforcing thread is inserted into the bone tunnel via an eyelet wire with a thread loop. Optional additional centralization with incision in the middle part of the meniscus. Reinforcement of the meniscus base with braided suture material using the "outside in" technique and fixation of the inner meniscus base at the edge of the tibial plateau using a transosseous extraction suture or a suture anchor.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Six weeks nonweight-bearing (0 kg), then gradually increased load. Range of motion: 4 weeks E/F 0-0-60°, 2 weeks 0-0-90°, optionally use of a valgus brace (varus of < 5°).

RESULTS

In root lesions of the medial meniscus, transosseous refixation significantly improves knee function (Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analog scale for pain, Tegner, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores) and reduces osteoarthritis progression. However, a transosseous suture alone could not significantly reduce postoperative extrusion. However, previous studies have shown that additional centralization can significantly reduce extrusion.

Centralization reduces meniscal extrusion, improves joint mechanics and functional outcomes in patients undergoing meniscus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on meniscal centralisation procedures, analysing its impact on meniscal extrusion, joint biomechanics and clinical and radiological outcome measures.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Biomechanical studies on healthy animal or human cadaveric knee joints that assessed meniscal extrusion or tibiofemoral contact mechanics (contact area and pressure) following centralization for meniscal pathologies were included. For clinical studies, those that prospectively or retrospectively assessed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postoperative knee motion, complications and radiological extrusion following centralization for meniscal pathologies were included.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the analysis, comprising eight biomechanical, six clinical and one both. There were 92 knee specimens for biomechanical testing, of which 40 were human cadaveric and 52 porcine models. Biomechanical data revealed centralization to be commonly performed for posterior meniscal root tears and significantly reduced extrusion and contact pressure whilst improving contact area following a tear (p < 0.00001). Centralization restored extrusion to that of the native knee at all flexion angles described (0-90°, p = 0.25) and, compared to the torn state, brought tibiofemoral contact mechanics 3.2-5.0 times closer to the native state. Clinical data showed that 158 patients underwent centralization for extrusion. It improved postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) (p = 0.006) and Lysholm scores (p < 0.00001) at 25.0 months, maintained extrusion reduction at 17.1 months (p < 0.00001) and preserved knee motion.

CONCLUSION

Centralisation for various meniscal injuries associated with extrusion can reduce meniscal extrusion and improve joint biomechanics, along with clinical and radiological outcomes. Existing evidence is still scarce and exhibits a notable amount of methodological heterogeneity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Level IV evidence.

Review of the Development of Meniscus Centralization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With an aging population, extending healthy life expectancy is a global challenge. Maintaining healthy knee joint function is one of the essential factors to preserve the ability to walk and extend healthy life expectancy. Meniscus centralization was introduced in 2012 as a procedure for meniscus extrusion, one of the causes of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Initially, it was performed only for lateral meniscus (LM) extrusion, and favorable 2-year results were reported in 2016. Gradually, basic studies supporting the effectiveness of meniscus centralization have been reported, and it has also been performed for medial meniscus (MM) extrusion, with some positive results reported. Although the surgical procedures vary among the institutions, the basic concept is to reattach the loosened meniscotibial ligament to the edge of the tibial plateau to re-tension it. This review will discuss the history of development and the current status of meniscus centralization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows that meniscus centralization is not performed in isolation but is often used as an augmentation along with the conventional repair of meniscus injuries, particularly posterior root tears. Biomechanical studies demonstrated that MM centralization with a posteromedial anchor can better restore meniscus function.

CONCLUSION

Despite its relatively short publication history of just over ten years, meniscus centralization has shown potential as a treatment to curb the progression of knee OA and extend a healthy life. While more evidence is needed, this conclusion underscores the promising role for meniscus centralization, making it a topic of significant interest for knee surgeons and researchers.

Satisfactory Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Provisional Results of Meniscus Centralization with Medial Meniscus Root Repair for the Extruded Medial Meniscus at Mean 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To describe the patient-reported clinical outcomes following medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization and to identify common complications and detail provisional results.

METHODS

Patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization from 2020 to 2022 were identified using an institutional database. Patients were followed prospectively using postoperative Tegner Activity Scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and a Likert score for improvement, surgery satisfaction, and subsequent surgeries at minimum 1-year follow-up with mean 2-year follow-up. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical details were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (age: 50 ± 11 years; sex: 76% female; body mass index: 33 ± 8) were included in this study. Postoperative Tegner score was maintained at preoperative levels (P = .233), and VAS at rest, VAS with use, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, and International Knee Documentation Committee improved significantly postoperatively (P = .003; P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, respectively). Eighty-eight percent of patients reported subjective improvement in their knee at final follow-up. Postoperative radiographs did not show any significant osteoarthritis progression, and no patients had undergone a revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

At minimum 1-year follow-up and mean 2-year follow-up, patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, function, and quality of life and reported high rates of surgery satisfaction. There was no evidence of significant arthritic progression on postoperative imaging, and no patients underwent revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Factors associated with medial meniscal extrusion in non-osteoarthritic knees with medial meniscus tears: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) plays an important role in the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Exploring the factors associated with MME in non-osteoarthritic knees may assist in the prevention of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors associated with pathologic MME in non-osteoarthritic knees with medial meniscus tears (MMTs).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred fifty patients with non-osteoarthritic knees who underwent arthroscopic surgery for MMT. Patients were divided into a pathologic MME group (n = 54) and a control group (n = 96) based on whether a pathologic MME was present on magnetic resonance (MR) images.

SETTING

Tertiary medical institution.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The MME distance was measured on a coronal MR image obtained at the midpoint of the medial femoral condyle. An MME distance ≥3 mm was considered to indicate pathologic MME. Demographic and clinical data were collected as variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with pathologic MME.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, body mass index (BMI) and the type of MMT were associated significantly with pathologic MME in the multivariable logistic regression model. Each unit higher in BMI was associated with a 13% higher risk of pathologic MME (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.28, p = .04). The odds of pathologic MME were approximately four times and three times higher for radial tears (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.25-15.03, p = .02) and complex tears (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.17-8.05, p = .02) than for horizontal and longitudinal tears.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI and the type of MMT were independent factors associated with pathologic MME in non-osteoarthritic knees with MMT. A higher BMI, radial tears, and complex tears were predisposed to pathologic MME.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Reconstruction and Open-Wedge High-Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee Alignment: A Retrospective Study on Short-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

We describe 13 cases of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) with varus knee alignment treated with medial meniscus posterior root reconstruction (MMPR-R) and open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) to identify an optimal MMPRT treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients (mean age: 66.3 ± 8.0 years) who underwent MMPR-R and OWHTO. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), femorotibial angle (FTA), percentage mechanical axis (%MA) on radiography, and medial meniscus extrusion (MME) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the preoperative period and last follow-up were compared. Moreover, meniscus healing status and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification of the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau on arthroscopy between the initial surgery and second-look arthroscopy were compared.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 12.8 ± 2.2 months. At the last follow-up, the KOOS significantly improved (P < 0.01). Based on the FTA and %MA, the varus alignment was predominantly corrected at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). The MME was increased in nine (62.9%) patients, and the mean MME significantly increased at the last follow-up (P = 0.04). Second-look arthroscopy revealed improvements in the ICRS grade for the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau in six (46.2%) patients. However, the results did not significantly differ. Regarding meniscus healing, four (30.8%) patients presented with complete healing, eight (57.1%) with partial healing, and one (7.7%) with failed healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMPRT with varus knee alignment significantly improved with MMPR-R and OWHTO. However, the MME and meniscus healing were unsatisfactory.

Root Repair Has Superior Radiological and Clinical Outcomes Than Partial Meniscectomy and Nonoperative Treatment in the Management of Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compile and analyze structural and clinical outcomes after meniscus root tear treatment as currently described in the literature.

METHODS

A review was conducted to identify studies published since 2011 on efficacy of repair, meniscectomy, and nonoperative management in the treatment of meniscus root tears. Patient cohorts were grouped into treatment categories, with medial and lateral root tears analyzed separately; data were collected on patient demographics, structural outcomes including joint space width, degree of medial meniscal extrusion, progression to total knee arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria. Heterogeneity was measured using the I-statistic, and outcomes were summarized using forest plots without pooled means.

RESULTS

The 56 included studies comprised a total of 3,191 patients. Mean age among the included studies ranged from 24.6 to 65.6 years, whereas mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 125.9 months. Heterogeneity analysis identified significant differences between studies. Change in joint space width ranged from -2.4 to -0.6 mm (i.e., decreased space) after meniscectomy (n = 186) and -0.9 to -0.1 mm after root repair (n = 209); change in medial meniscal extrusion ranged from -0.6 to 6.5 mm after root repair (n = 521) and 0.2 to 4.2 mm after meniscectomy (n = 66); and event rate for total knee arthroplasty ranged from 0.00 to 0.22 after root repair (n = 205), 0.35 to 0.60 after meniscectomy (n = 53), and 0.27 to 0.35 after nonoperative treatment (n = 93). Root repair produced the greatest numerical increase in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores of the 3 treatment arms. In addition, root repair improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (range: 22-32), Sports and Recreational Activities (range: 23-36), Quality of Life (range: 22-42), and Symptoms subscales (range: 10-19), in studies with low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature reporting on the treatment of meniscus root tears is heterogenous and largely limited to Level III and IV studies. Current evidence suggests root repair may be the most effective treatment strategy in lessening joint space narrowing of the knee and producing improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Lead to Changes in Joint Contact Mechanics at Low Flexion Angles During Simulated Gait

BACKGROUND

Previous biomechanical studies evaluating medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are limited to low loads applied at specified loading angles, which cannot capture the effects of MMPRTs during the multidirectional forces and moments placed across the knee during physiological activities.

PURPOSE

To quantify the effects of MMPRTs on knee joint contact mechanics during simulated gait.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Six human cadaveric knees were mounted on a robotic simulator programmed to apply dynamic forces, moments, and flexion angles to mimic level walking. Twelve cycles of multidirectional and dynamic standard gait input waveforms, normalized to specimen-specific body weight, were applied to the following conditions: (1) native, intact meniscus and (2) MMPRT. Peak contact stress, contact area, and the position of the weighted center of contact across the medial tibial plateau throughout the stance phase of gait were quantified using an electronic sensor placed across the medial tibial plateau. The difference between the intact state and MMPRT condition was calculated for each metric, and then the means and 95% CIs were computed.

RESULTS

Despite heterogeneity in knee contact forces, MMPRTs significantly increased peak contact stress by a mean of 2 MPa across 20% to 37% of the simulated gait cycle and significantly decreased the contact area by a mean of 200 mm2 across 16% to 60% of the simulated gait cycle in comparison with the native state. There was no significant difference in the position of the weighted center of contact, in either the anterior-posterior or medial-lateral directions, after MMPRT.

CONCLUSION

MMPRTs led to both a significant increase in peak contact stress and decreased contact areas for a portion of the simulated gait cycle ranging from 20% to 37% of gait, during which time the femur was flexed <15°.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Contact mechanics are significantly affected after MMPRTs during early to midstance and at knee flexion angles lower than demonstrated previously. These data provide further biomechanical justification for treating MMPRTs.

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tear in early knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to detect medial meniscal posterior root tear (MMPRT) diagnostic methods with high sensitivity and specificity using dynamic ultrasonographic evaluation in patients with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) and demonstrate the usefulness of dynamic ultrasonographic medial meniscal extrusion (MME) evaluation in MMPRT diagnosis using a cutoff value.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, a total of 120 patients were diagnosed with early knee OA using clinical and radiographic findings. Dynamic ultrasonographic evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in all patients, and 47 patients who had and 73 patients who did not have MMPRT were classified into the MMPRT and non-MMPRT groups, respectively. Age, sex, femorotibial angle, MME of knee extension and flexion, and MME at weight-bearing were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of significant ultrasonographic findings were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The MMEs under knee extension-flexion and weight-loading in the MMPRT group were significantly larger than those in the non-MMPRT group. ROC curve analysis for each ultrasonographic evaluation condition to diagnose MMPRT indicated that the sensitivity was 72-88% and the specificity was 66-85% when the cutoff values of MME under knee flexion at 0°, 90°, and weight-loading were set at 2.55 mm, 2.00 mm, and 3.55 mm, respectively. The highest sensitivity (88%) and specificity (85%) were exhibited upon > 2 mm MME at a knee flexion of 90° and were the most useful indicators for MME diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonographic MME evaluations for MMPRT diagnosis showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity in patients with early knee OA. Dynamic ultrasonographic MME evaluation may lead to appropriate additional examinations, early diagnosis, and intervention for MMPRT in patients with early knee OA.

Augmentation of a Nonanatomical Repair of a Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Centralization Using Three Knotless Anchors May Be Associated With Less Meniscal Extrusion and Better Compressive Load Distribution in Mid-Flexion Compared With Non-Anatomical Root Repair Alone in a Porcine Knee Model

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanics of the centralization augmentation using knotless soft anchors to a nonanatomical transtibial pull-out root repair in a porcine medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) model.

METHODS

Porcine knee joints (N = 10) were used to perform one of the following procedures: (1) intact; (2) MMPRT; (3) nonanatomical root repair; (4) nonanatomical root repair with centralization using 2 anchors: anchors were inserted at the posterior medial collateral ligament (MCL) border and 10 mm anterior to the posterior MCL border; and (5) nonanatomical root repair with centralization using 3 anchors: another anchor was placed 10 mm posterior to the posterior MCL border. Contact area on the medial meniscus (MM), contact pressure in the MM and tibial cartilage, and MM extrusion were evaluated at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° knee flexions under 200 N compressive force.

RESULTS

MM extrusion at the posterior MCL border was significantly reduced after root repair with centralization using 3 anchors than after root repair alone at 30° (-0.063 mm vs 1.5 mm, P = .017), 45° (0.21 mm vs 1.7 mm, P = .018), and 60° (0.78 mm vs 2.3 mm, P = .019). There were no significant differences in MM extrusion between the root repair alone and root repair with centralization using 2 anchors at all flexion angles. The contact area in the middle and posterior MM was significantly greater after centralization with 3 anchors than after root repair alone at all flexion angles (except the posterior MM at 90°). The mean contact pressure in the tibial cartilage was significantly lower after centralization with 3 anchors than after root repair at all angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of a nonanatomical repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear with centralization using three knotless anchors may be associated with less meniscal extrusion and better compressive load distribution between 30° and 60° flexion compared with nonanatomical root repair alone in a porcine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biomechanical study at time zero suggests that the addition of centralization using 3 knotless anchors may reduce MM extrusion and restore the load-distributing function of the MM.

Meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology: A systematic review of normative values and cut-offs for diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Meniscus extrusion is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal injury, but the literature on this topic has not yet been systematized. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare diagnostic methods and summarize the data of medial and lateral meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies that measured meniscal extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). Meniscal extrusion data was summarized as weighted mean for medial and lateral meniscus, and stratified according to the method of measurement (MRI or US) and presence of knee osteoarticular pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Weighted mean values of meniscal extrusion were always higher for the medial than the lateral meniscus, regardless of the method of measurement. The medial meniscus extrusion was always higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology than those without. For the lateral meniscus extrusion, the mean values were higher in those knees without osteoarticular pathology. When classifying pathological meniscal extrusion with pre-defined cut-off values, the higher the cut-off used, the lower the percentage of knees classified as pathological meniscal extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial meniscus presents on mean higher extrusion and extrusion is higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology. Based on summary data, the most suitable cut-offs for pathological meniscal extrusion for both MRI and US seem to fall within >2 and >3 mm.

Meniscal Extrusion Measurements After Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Meniscal extrusion has become increasingly utilized when evaluating meniscus root abnormalities. However, no consensus definition or approach exists on how to measure extrusion.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of heterogeneity in meniscal extrusion measurement techniques and reported extrusion values in knees with posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs). We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion measurement techniques would vary considerably throughout reported studies, with resultant wide-ranging published extrusion values.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The inclusion criteria consisted of all clinical and cadaveric studies reporting on meniscal extrusion after PMMRTs, excluding studies lacking data in full extension, those presenting only semiquantitative analyses, articles reporting only differences in meniscal extrusion, and review articles.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were included. Imaging modality types included magnetic resonance imaging (89%), 3-dimensional reconstruction with computed tomography (7%), linear displacement transducers (2%), and a combination of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (2%). The 3 most commonly used landmarks to acquire coronal images for meniscal extrusion measurements were the medial collateral ligament (38%), the midpoint of the anterior-posterior length of the medial meniscus (23%), and the middle of the medial femoral condyle (19%). The pooled mean extrusion values according to the measurement location were 3.5 ± 0.7 mm, 3.9 ± 0.8 mm, and 4.5 ± 2.1 mm, respectively, with no significant differences noted between the modality types (P = .23). The pooled mean meniscal extrusion from all included studies was 3.2 ± 2.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation exists in measurement techniques for meniscal extrusion, particularly as it relates to the coronal cross-sectional reference location. Further studies should aim to provide clear descriptions of the measurement method and have uniform measurement methodology to allow comparisons and pooling between studies.

Top Ten Pearls for a Successful Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tears With a Concomitant Centralization Stitch

Although historically overlooked, medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are now increasingly recognized as a substantial cause of biomechanical impairment and morbidity. MMPR tears, when left untreated, are strongly correlated to meniscal extrusion and ultimately lead to altered kinematics and loading functionally equivalent to a total meniscectomy. To prevent progressive joint degeneration and alleviate pain while re-establishing native joint kinematics, MMPR repair is generally recommended in appropriately selected patients. In this Technical Note, the authors describe a detailed checklist with 10 crucial points of emphasis when performing the gold-standard transtibial pull-out repair of the MMPR, with an additional centralization stitch, providing technical pearls backed up by previous literature and ample experience treating this condition.

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)

Background

Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscus medial to the tibial rim. The paramount function of the meniscus is to provide load distribution across the knee joint. Meniscal extrusion will prevent the meniscus from properly fulfilling this function and eventually leads to progression of osteoarthritis1. Thus, root repair accompanied by arthroscopic meniscal extrusion repair (by a centralization technique) has been suggested for restoration of meniscal function2-5. There are various techniques to correct meniscal extrusion, including a dual-tunnel suture pull-out technique2 (to address extrusion and root tear2), a knotless suture anchor4,6 technique, and an all-inside suture anchor repair7. The indications for extrusion repair are not consistently reported in the literature, and the procedure is not always easy to perform. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the ideal technique. In the present article, we describe the steps for successful combined medial meniscal root repair with extrusion repair and centralization.

Description

Place the patient in the supine position with the knee supported in 90° of flexion and the feet at the edge of the operating table with foot-positioner support. First, meniscal root repair is performed with use of the suture pull-out technique, utilizing a cinch suture configuration to hold the root in place, and the suture tapes are fixed over the anterior cortex of the tibia with a suture button. Next, the meniscal body is arthroscopically assessed for residual extrusion from the medial tibial rim. Extrusion repair is indicated in cases with >3 mm of extrusion7-9, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. In our technique, any extrusion beyond the medial tibial rim is reduced and secured with use of a double-loaded 2.3-mm all-suture type of anchor.

Alternatives

Alternatives include surgical procedures in which the root repair is performed with use of suture-anchor fixation10,11 and the extrusion repair is performed with use of the transtibial suture pull-out method.

Rationale

Root repair performed with the most common fixation techniques does not always reduce meniscal extrusion or restore meniscal function12,13. Consequently, several augmentation techniques have been reported to address meniscal extrusion3,14, including those that use arthroscopy to centralize the midbody of the meniscus over the rim of the tibial plateau. The rationale for this combined procedure is to restore the hoop-stress distribution and maintain meniscal function by repairing the extrusion of the meniscus. Addressing all intra-articular pathologies in a single stage is a challenging situation, and the sequence of the repair is important to achieve optimal postoperative results.

Expected Outcomes

Several surgical techniques have been described for the operative treatment of extrusion repair with use of centralization sutures2,3,5,6, and each has its own distinctive pearls and pitfalls for each. To combine root repair and extrusion repair presents a challenge for surgeons. From our clinical experience, a methodical approach to understanding the pathoanatomy and sequential execution of repair techniques would yield desired results. Extrusion correction through the use of a peripheral suture anchor over the medial rim of the tibia and knot tying are relatively easier to perform than some other published extrusion-repair techniques. Although no consensus has been achieved yet regarding the best technique, recent literature has suggested that the use of centralization sutures is effective to restore the native biomechanical properties of the medial meniscus5.Mochizuki et al. assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of combined medial meniscal root repair and centralization in 26 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both Lysholm scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores improved significantly after surgery, with a significant reduction in extrusion distance from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively20. Koga et al21 assessed the 2-year outcomes of lateral arthroscopic meniscal centralization, finding significantly reduced meniscal extrusion at both 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that centralization can improve meniscal mechanics and potentially reduce the risk of osteoarthritis. The centralization suture technique for extrusion repair has the theoretical advantage of restoring meniscal function following meniscal root repair; however, there are also concerns regarding over-constraint of the meniscus. We believe that the medial meniscus, being less mobile than the lateral meniscus, can withstand the constraint created by the use of centralization. Meniscal centralization is a technically demanding surgical procedure, but with a systematic approach and meticulous technique, we have observed good short-term outcome in our patients.

Important Tips

A tight medial compartment is one of the most common problems encountered during a medial meniscal root repair. "Pie-crusting" of the superficial medial collateral ligament at the tibial insertion aids in improving the space, thereby reducing chondral damage during the root repair.It is challenging to achieve the correct inclination of insertion when inserting the suture anchor through a mid-medial portal. This limitation can be mitigated by utilizing a 16G or 18G needle before making the portal, as the needle direction, trajectory, and extent of accessibility within the joint will aid in proper portal placement and anchor insertion.Suture management is another technical challenge. Suture tape is first cinched to the root of the meniscus and then shuttled into the transtibial tunnel in order to discern the reducibility of the meniscus and the extent of possible extrusion correction. Then, extrusion repair is performed. This sequence allows the surgeon to avoid mixing of root-repair sutures and extrusion-repair sutures. Following insertion of the all-suture anchor, each suture limb is brought out through the anteromedial portal, passed through the nitinol loop from the lasso, and shuttled back through the mid-medial portal. Knot tying is performed through the mid-medial portal.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentICRS grading = International Cartilage Research Society system for classification of cartilage lesionsKL grade = Kellgren-Lawrence system for classification of osteoarthritisMRI = magnetic resonance imagingMC = medial femoral condyleMPTA = medial proximal tibial angleLC = lateral femoral condyleHTO = high tibial osteotomyMCL = medial collateral ligamentAM = anteromedialKOOS = Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreMME = medial meniscus extrusion.

Meniscal Extrusion: Diagnosis, Etiology, and Treatment Options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The concept of meniscal extrusion has recently been recognized as a hallmark of meniscus dysfunction. This review examines contemporary literature regarding the pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, treatment, and future directions for investigation regarding meniscus extrusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meniscus extrusion, defined as >3 mm of radial displacement of the meniscus, leads to altered knee biomechanics and accelerated knee joint degeneration. Meniscus extrusion has been associated with degenerative joint disease, posterior root and radial meniscal tears, and acute trauma. Meniscus centralization and meniscotibial ligament repair have been proposed as techniques to address meniscal extrusion with promising biomechanical, animal model, and early clinical reports. Further studies on the epidemiology of meniscus extrusion and associated long-term nonoperative outcomes will help to elucidate its role in meniscus dysfunction and resultant arthritic development. Understanding and appreciation for the anatomic attachments of the meniscus will help to inform future repair techniques. Long-term reporting on the clinical outcomes of meniscus centralization techniques will yield insights into the clinical significance of meniscus extrusion correction.

Meniscus tears treatment: The good, the bad and the ugly-patterns classification and practical guide

Over the years, several studies demonstrated the crucial role of knee menisci in joint biomechanics. As a result, save the meniscus has become the new imperative nowadays, and more and more studies addressed this topic. The huge amount of data on this topic may create confusion in those who want to approach this surgery. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for treatment of meniscus tears, including an overview of technical aspects, outcomes in the literature and personal tips. Taking inspiration from a famous movie directed by Sergio Leone in 1966, the authors classified meniscus tears in three categories: The good, the bad and the ugly lesions. The inclusion in each group was determined by the lesion pattern, its biomechanical effects on knee joint, the technical challenge, and prognosis. This classification is not intended to substitute the currently proposed classifications on meniscus tears but aims at offering a reader-friendly narrative review of an otherwise difficult topic. Furthermore, the authors provide a concise premise to deal with some aspects of menisci phylogeny, anatomy and biomechanics.

Arthroscopic centralization reduces extrusion of the medial meniscus with posterior root defect in the ACL reconstructed knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of arthroscopic meniscal centralization reinforcement for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root defect on knee kinematics and meniscal extrusion in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) knee. The hypothesis was that the medial meniscus centralization would reduce extrusion and anterior laxity in ACLR knee with a medical meniscal defect.

METHODS

Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic system under the following loading conditions: (a) an 89.0 N anterior tibial load, (b) 5.0 Nm internal and external rotational torques, (c) a 10.0 Nm valgus and varus loadings, and (d) a combined 7.0 Nm valgus moment and then a 5.0 Nm internal rotation torque as a static simulated pivot shift. The tested knee states included: (1) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with intact medial meniscus (MM Intact), (2) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus posterior root defect (MM Defect), (3) Anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization (MM Centralization). Medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization was performed using 1.4 mm anchors with #2 suture. The MM extrusion (MME) was measured using ultrasound under unloaded and varus loading conditions at 0° and 30° of flexion.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) increased significantly with MM posterior root defect compared to MM intact at all flexion angles. With MM centralization, ATT was not significantly different from the intact meniscus at 15° and 30° of flexion. Meniscus extrusion increased significantly with the root defect compared to intact meniscus and decreased significantly with meniscal centralization compared to the root defect at both flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACL reconstruction, cases involving irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Clinically, in ACL reconstruction cases with irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic meniscal centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Meniscal centralization decreases the extrusion of the MM and offers improvements in knee laxity.

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Current Controversies for Treatment of Meniscus Root Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of the meniscus in preserving the biomechanical function of the knee joint has been clearly defined. The hypothesis that meniscus root integrity is a prerequisite for meniscus function is supported by the development of progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA) following meniscus root tears (MRTs) treated either non-operatively or with meniscectomy. Consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the diagnosis and treatment of MRTs. This review examines the contemporary literature surrounding the natural history, clinical presentation, evaluation, preferred surgical repair technique and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgeons must have a high index of suspicion in order to diagnose a MRT because of the nonspecific clinical presentation and difficult visualization on imaging. Compared with medial MRTs that commonly occur in middle age/older patients, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger males with lower BMIs, less cartilage degeneration, and with concomitant ligament injury. Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee have been found to be associated with both MRTs and following arthroscopic procedures. Meniscus root repair has demonstrated good outcomes, and acute injuries with intact cartilage should be repaired. Cartilage degeneration, BMI, and malalignment are important considerations when choosing surgical candidates. Meniscus centralization has emerged as a viable adjunct strategy aimed at correcting meniscus extrusion. Meniscus root repair results in a decreased rate of OA and arthroplasty and is economically advantageous when compared with nonoperative treatment and partial meniscectomy. The transtibial pull-through technique with the addition of centralization for the medial meniscus is associated with encouraging early results.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair with Centralization Using Knotless Suture Anchors

Medial meniscus posterior root tears can lead to rapid progression of knee arthritis because of loss of the stress distribution function of the meniscus. Medial meniscus root repair can restore stress distribution and improve clinical outcome. In cases of medial meniscus root tears with meniscal extrusion, centralization may help reduce extrusion and protect the root repair. Presented here is a technique for transtibial medial meniscus root repair with centralization using knotless suture anchors, building on previously developed techniques.

Circumferential Rim Augmentation Suture Around the Perimeniscal Capsule Decreases Meniscal Extrusion and Progression of Osteoarthritis in Rabbit Meniscus Root Tear Model

BACKGROUND

We recently analyzed the joint capsule adjacent to the medial meniscus and found that the perimeniscal joint capsule has collagen fiber orientation similar to that of circumferential meniscal fibers, potentially playing a role in preventing extrusion.

PURPOSE

To analyze the meniscal extrusion prevention potential of the circumferential rim augmentation suture around the perimeniscal capsule in a rabbit root tear model and analyze the biomechanical function in a porcine cadaveric knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Rabbit medial meniscus root tear models were divided into 3 experimental groups: root tear, root tear and suture repair, and root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture. As for the circumferential rim augmentation suture procedure, a suture was placed to circumscribe the outer rim of the medial meniscus and passed through bone tunnels located at the tibial insertion of each root. After 4 and 8 weeks, meniscal extrusion was analyzed by micro-computed tomography, gross morphology, and histologic analysis of the medial femoral cartilage. For biomechanical analysis, porcine knees were divided into groups similar to rabbit experiments. Tibiofemoral contact parameters were assessed using a pressure mapping sensor system after applying a load of 200 N on the knee joint.

RESULTS

The root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group showed less meniscal extrusion, less gap within the tear site, and less cartilage degeneration compared with other groups after 4 and 8 weeks of surgery in the rabbit root tear model. Biomechanical analysis showed the root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group had larger contact area and lower peak contact pressure compared with root tear and root tear and suture repair groups.

CONCLUSION

The circumferential rim augmentation suture reduced the degree of meniscal extrusion while restoring meniscal function, potentially preventing progression of arthritis in a rabbit root tear model and porcine knee biomechanical analysis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The circumferential rim augmentation suture may be a novel augmentation option during root tear treatment.

Quantifying the differential functional behavior between the medial and lateral meniscus after posterior meniscus root tears

Meniscus tears of the knee are among the most common orthopedic knee injury. Specifically, tears of the posterior root can result in abnormal meniscal extrusion leading to decreased function and progressive osteoarthritis. Despite contemporary surgical treatments of posterior meniscus root tears, there is a low rate of healing and an incidence of residual meniscus extrusion approaching 30%, illustrating an inability to recapitulate native meniscus function. Here, we characterized the differential functional behavior of the medial and lateral meniscus during axial compression load and dynamic knee motion using a cadaveric model. We hypothesized essential differences in extrusion between the medial and lateral meniscus in response to axial compression and knee range of motion. We found no differences in the amount of meniscus extrusion between the medial and lateral meniscus with a competent posterior root (0.338mm vs. 0.235mm; p-value = 0.181). However, posterior root detachment resulted in a consistently increased meniscus extrusion for the medial meniscus compared to the lateral meniscus (2.233mm vs. 0.4705mm; p-value < 0.0001). Moreover, detachment of the posterior root of the medial meniscus resulted in an increase in extrusion at all angles of knee flexion and was most pronounced (4.00mm ± 1.26mm) at 30-degrees of knee flexion. In contrast, the maximum mean extrusion of the lateral meniscus was 1.65mm ± 0.97mm, occurring in full extension. Furthermore, only the medial meniscus extruded during dynamic knee flexion after posterior root detachment. Given the differential functional behaviors between the medial and lateral meniscus, these findings suggest that posterior root repair requires reducing overall meniscus extrusion and recapitulating the native functional responses specific to each meniscus.