The rate and associated risk factors for acute carpal tunnel syndrome complicating a fracture of the distal radius

Progression From Steroid Injection to Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients With Concurrent Ulnar Nerve Compression: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Steroid injections are a common treatment option in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study assesses various prognostic factors for progression to carpal tunnel release (CTR) after a first-time steroid injection for CTS with specific focus on concomitant ulnar nerve compression (UNC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 426 hands with CTS treated with a first-time steroid injection in the Long Island region of New York. The main predictor variable was UNC measured in two analytical models of positive UNC and location of UNC (wrist or elbow). Multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic, medical, and CTS-related variables for 2 study outcomes occurring within 1 year: (1) CTR; and (2) steroid reinjection.

RESULTS

Overall progression to CTR within 1 year of steroid injection was 23.0%. Ulnar nerve compression was present in 16.7% of patients and was significantly associated with increased odds for CTR but not with steroid reinjection. These results were further localized to be specific for UNC at the elbow. A moderate or severe result on electrodiagnostic studies was associated with increased odds for CTR. Increased age was associated with slightly increased odds of steroid reinjection while a history of distal radius fracture was associated with decreased odds of steroid reinjection.

CONCLUSIONS

Carpal tunnel syndrome patients with UNC may benefit from earlier definitive treatment with CTR rather than attempting steroid injections, as they are more likely to seek reintervention within 1 year of their initial injection.

Comparison of 2 Types of Local Anesthetic Techniques in the Reduction of Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of distal radius fractures may require manipulation of the fracture assisted by finger traction, causing pain both at the fracture site and at the fingers. The usual type of anesthesia used does not anesthetize the fingers.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study with two groups, hematoma block (HB) and hematoma with associated median nerve block (MHB). Characteristic variables of the patients were collected. The main variable for the analysis was pain, measured using the Visual Analogical Scale (VAS). It was measured prior to the injection (VAS1), during fracture reduction (VAS2), and 30 minutes after the injection (VAS3) in both groups.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 140 fractures (70 anesthetized with HB), 78% were women. There were no significant differences in the variables age, sex, Elixhauser index. and need for surgery between the groups. In the HB group, the VAS means were VAS1 5.23 cm (SD 2.31), VAS2 5.80 cm (SD 2.52), and VAS3 1.89 cm (SD 1.94); while in the MHB group, VAS1 5.13 cm (SD 2.36), VAS2 3.15 cm (SD 1.70), and VAS3 1.09 cm (SD 1.38). Area of greatest pain during fracture reduction in the HB group was finger traction in 78% cases (p < .05), while in the MHB group it was the manipulation of the fracture site in 71% cases (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that the use of hematoma with associated median nerve block decreases pain perception in patients with distal radius fracture that needs closed reduction, when compared to HB alone.

Prophylactic Carpal Tunnel Release During Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures: A Review

Purpose

Patients who fracture their distal radius are at risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs acutely; other patients may present with signs and symptoms of CTS weeks or months after the distal radius fracture. Because CTS may present in a delayed fashion after a distal radius fracture, some surgeons will perform carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients who undergo open reduction and internal fixation even in those patients who do not have clinical evidence of CTS-a prophylactic CTR. In the current systematic review, we evaluated the literature regarding prophylactic CTR in the setting of surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

Methods

We conducted our literature review based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The search strategy reflected "prophylactic CTR during treatment of distal radius fractures" and was conducted in February 2024. Included studies are summarized in the Table.

Results

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Publication dates ranged from 2001 to 2018. Five studies investigated clinical symptoms and/or electromyography: three of five studies found worsening or persistent median neuropathy, and two of five studies found improvement or no further development of symptoms in their respective patient cohorts. The sixth study found no difference in patient-reported outcomes between either approach.

Conclusions

There were no differences in wrist range of motion, postoperative grip strength, or patient-reported outcomes within each of the study cohorts. Based on the findings from the studies included in this review, we do not believe that there is sufficient evidence supporting prophylactic CTR in the setting of surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic 2a.

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment disorder worldwide. The epidemiology and risk factors, including family burden, for developing CTS are multi-factorial. Despite much research, its intricate pathophysiological mechanism(s) are not fully understood. An underlying subclinical neuropathy may indicate an increased susceptibility to developing CTS. Although surgery is often performed for CTS, clear international guidelines to indicate when to perform non-surgical or surgical treatment, based on stage and severity of CTS, remain to be elucidated. Neurophysiological examination, using electrophysiology or ultrasonography, performed in certain circumstances, should correlate with the history and findings in clinical examination of the person with CTS. History and clinical examination are particularly relevant globally owing to lack of other equipment. Various instruments are used to assess CTS and treatment outcomes as well as the effect of the disorder on quality of life. The surgical treatment options of CTS - open or endoscopic - offer an effective solution to mitigate functional impairments and pain. However, there are risks of post-operative persistent or recurrent symptoms, requiring meticulous diagnostic re-evaluation before any additional surgery. Health-care professionals should have increased awareness about CTS and all its implications. Future considerations of CTS include use of linked national registries to understand risk factors, explore possible screening methods, and evaluate diagnosis and treatment with a broader perspective beyond surgery, including psychological well-being.

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Median neuropathy at the wrist, commonly referred to as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), is the most common entrapment neuropathy. It is caused by chronic compression of the median nerve at the wrist within the space-limited carpal tunnel. Risk factors that contribute to the etiology of compression include female gender, obesity, work-related factors, and underlying medical conditions, such as hypothyroidism, pregnancy, and amyloidosis. The diagnosis is made on clinical grounds, although these can be confounded by anatomical variations. Electrodiagnostic studies, which are specific and sensitive in diagnosing CTS, support the diagnosis; however, a subgroup may present with normal results. The advent of imaging techniques, including ultrasound and MRI, further assists the diagnostic process. The management of CTS is divided into the nonsurgical approaches that include hand therapy, splinting and corticosteroid injection, and surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel. Although several surgical techniques have been developed, no one method is more effective than the other. Each of these management approaches are effective at providing symptom relief and are utilized at different severities of the condition. There is, however, a lack of consensus on standardized diagnostic criteria, as well as when and to whom to refer patients for surgery.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes With or Without Prophylactic Carpal Tunnel Release After Distal Radius Fracture Stabilization

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are frequently complicated by acute carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which, if unrecognized, can cause permanent median neuropathy. Some surgeons recommend "prophylactic" carpal tunnel release (CTR) during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of DRF. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety data regarding prophylactic vs symptomatic CTR strategies during DRF fixation are lacking. We conducted a retrospective review of two management strategies for DRFs at our institution (2017 to 2019). Group 1 consisted of patients operated on by two surgeons performing ORIF and symptomatic CTR only for acute CTS. Group 2 consisted of patients operated on by a third surgeon performing ORIF and prophylactic CTR on all patients irrespective of median nerve symptoms. The PROs included QuickDASH Wrist and PROMIS physical/mental health preoperatively vs at final follow-up. Demographic information, complications, and return to the operating room were recorded. Group 1 (36 patients) and group 2 (76 patients) were demographically similar. The mechanism of injury was more severe in group 1 (P<.05), but preoperative PROs were similar between the two groups. Eight patients (22.2%) in group 1 had symptomatic CTR for acute CTS. Significant improvement occurred within both groups from preoperative to final follow-up for PROMIS physical function and QuickDASH Wrist scores (P<.05). Intergroup PROs were not significantly different at either time point. One patient in group 1 (2.8%) and 2 patients in group 2 (2.6%) returned to the operating room due to median nerve symptoms (P>.05). A prophylactic CTR strategy is not associated with improved PROs compared with a symptomatic strategy during ORIF of DRF. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e362-e368.].

Management of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Purpose

This review aims to compare recovery outcomes of conservative, early operative, and a combination of conservative and operative management for acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS).

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from 1970 to 2022 was conducted using the keywords carpal tunnel syndrome and acute nerve compression. ACTS was defined as a case within 12 weeks of symptom onset. Primary data extracted included causes (traumatic or atraumatic), symptom duration (<1 day, 1-7 days, or 8-84 days), intervention (surgical, conservative, or conservative then surgical), follow-up duration, and outcome (full recovery or non-full recovery). Logistic regression analyses and χ2 tests were performed to investigate associations among these variables.

Results

A total of 197 patients involving 127 (64.5%) traumatic and 70 (35.3%) atraumatic cases were included. Forty-seven percent of patients were managed conservatively followed by surgery, 30% conservative only, and 23% surgery only. The traumatic group was associated with better recovery than the atraumatic group. Recovery outcomes were not associated with symptom duration or follow-up time. The choice of intervention was not associated with traumatic or atraumatic etiology, nor did it affect recovery outcomes in either group.

Conclusions

Traumatic ACTS is associated with better recovery outcomes than atraumatic etiologies. Surgical intervention was not found to be associated with better outcomes than conservative management, regardless of the etiologies. Further prospective studies are warranted to compare surgical versus conservative management.

Clinical Relevance

Currently, there are no guidelines for the best management of ACTS, and it is not known if early or delayed surgical treatment is optimal. This review compiles the current evidence and identifies gaps in the literature, highlighting the need for further investigation to provide the best clinical practice.

Utility of Ultrasound for Identifying Median Nerve Changes Indicative of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture

Purpose

Ultrasound offers a fast and inexpensive way to evaluate the median nerve. However, there is a paucity of data assessing ultrasound in acute trauma. Our study aimed to characterize median nerve changes indicative of acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS) in a cadaveric distal radius fracture (DRF) model.

Methods

We used 10 upper-extremity specimens. We induced ACTS (carpal tunnel pressure >40 mm Hg) in a distraction-only model and then used a DRF model as a neutral position, under traction, or wrist extension. We measured the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), height, and width with ultrasound in each model. We used a novel calculation, height-width ratio (HWR), to describe nerve shape. A low HWR indicates an elliptical shape; as the HWR increases toward one, the shape becomes more circular. The CSA measurements and HWR at pressures >40 mm Hg were used to calculate a 95% confidence interval, which defined the threshold for ACTS.

Results

Wrist distraction created carpal tunnel pressures >40 mm Hg in all specimens. Distraction increased CSA compared with baseline (9.1 ± 0.9 mm² vs 6.3 ± 1.2 mm², P < .001). Under ACTS-level pressures, the thresholds for CSA and HWR were 8.5 mm² and 0.41, respectively. HWR significantly increased with distraction compared with baseline (0.47 ± 0.10 vs 0.28 ± 0.09, P = .006). Most neutral DRF models (n = 8, 80%) met the CSA threshold for ACTS, whereas all specimens with a DRF extended or under traction had CSAs above the ACTS threshold. Compared to the baseline, the shape of the median nerve was more circular in all DRFs, including neutral (0.28 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.13), under traction (0.43 ± 0.09), and extended (0.45 ± 0.09).

Conclusions

ACTS should be suspected in patients with median nerves demonstrating increased CSA and adopting a more circular shape. Fracture positioning impacts median nerve CSA with wrist extension, causing the greatest change. Median nerve HWR may offer an easier ultrasonographic alternative to CSA.

Type of study/level of evidence

Diagnostic III.

Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Early Nerve Decompression and Surgical Stabilization for Bony Wrist Trauma

We undertook this study to investigate the outcomes of surgical treatment for acute carpal tunnel syndrome following our protocol for concurrent nerve decompression and skeletal stabilization for bony wrist trauma to be undertaken within 48 hours.

Carpal tunnel syndrome: updated evidence and new questions

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common entrapment neuropathy, affecting quality of life for many people. Although it is a well recognised condition, new insights into epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment have emerged in the past 6 years. The availability of disease-modifying treatments for rare systemic disorders associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (eg, amyloidosis) should alert clinicians to these diagnostic possibilities. Besides clinical evaluation and electrophysiology, the role of ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool has been confirmed and new ultrasound techniques have been applied, the clinical use and feasibility of which require further investigation. Surgical and non-surgical interventions are beneficial for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and several treatment options are now available, giving clinicians the possibility to choose the best approach for every patient. New diagnostic and therapeutic techniques require further validation.