What are the risk factors for complications after combined injury of the pelvic ring and acetabulum?

Late surgical correction after complex unstable pelvic fracture 61 C3 (OTA/AO) of an 18-year-old woman

Surgical fixation of pelvic fractures is often necessary to restore fracture stability and improve patient outcomes. However, early operative management of pelvis fractures is not widely available in many health systems, resulting in conservative treatment approaches. Conservative approaches can lead to uncorrected pelvic deformities, which are challenging to treat and increase the risk of serious complications such as malunion. Treatment of pelvic malunion requires specialized care, access to necessary equipment, and a clearly defined treatment protocol. However, there is a lack of literature describing treatment algorithms for pelvic fracture malunion. This case report aims to incrementally fill this gap in the literature and highlight a logical step-by-step approach for reconstruction of pelvic malunion. This report is a single case of an 18-year-old woman who sustained complex unstable pelvic fracture, indicated for a 3-step reconstruction at a hospital with limited resources but access to computed tomography scan and some specialized pelvis reduction instruments. Postoperative imaging of the pelvis indicated satisfactory reduction and stable fixation of the pelvic reconstruction. After surgery, the patient was able to perform full axial load with no reported pain. This report provides a detailed description of each step of the operative management of a pelvic malunion case with clearly defined sequences, reduction tools, and positioning maneuvers necessary. Demonstrated in this case report, strategic preoperative planning is critical to successfully treating pelvic malunion and improving patient outcomes. This case report provides the necessary information on the management of pelvic reconstruction to inform other surgeons in underserved regions.

A Countertraction Closed Reduction Technique in Minimally Invasive Fixation of Recent Type C Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVE

Closed reduction of pelvic injuries is a prerequisite and critical step in minimally invasive treatment. Achieving non-invasive closed reduction of pelvic injuries is a challenging clinical problem. This study demonstrated a non-invasive traction technique for closed reduction called countertraction closed reduction technique (CCRT) and evaluated its effectiveness for type C pelvic ring injuries.

METHOD

The data of patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated with CCRT and minimally invasive fixation were retrospectively reviewed from January 2017 to February 2022. Sacroiliac screws were placed to fix the posterior pelvic ring, and internal or external fixation was used to fix the anterior pelvic ring. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, fracture union and postoperative complications were recorded. Fracture reduction quality was evaluated using the Matta scoring criteria. Functional recovery and general quality of life were evaluated using the Majeed functional scoring criteria.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (nine males and four females), with an average age of 49.6 years were treated with CCRT and followed up for a mean of 18.5 months. The average operation time was 137.2 minutes (range 92-195 minutes), the average intraoperative blood loss was 31.2 mL (range 10-120 mL) and the average duration of hospital stay was 14.3 days (range 4-32 days). All patients achieved bony union with an average union time of 11.9 weeks (range 10-16 weeks). According to the Matta radiographic criteria, the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in eight patients, good in four, and fair in one. The average Majeed functional score was 89.7 (range 78-100). The functional evaluation revealed that the outcomes were excellent in nine patients, and good in four patients. Complications included incision fat liquefaction in one patient, and heterotopic ossification in another patient. There were no surgical complications as a result of CCRT.

CONCLUSION

CCRT is a non-invasive closed reduction method for minimally invasive fixation of fresh Tile C1 and C2 pelvic fractures. The advantages of CCRT combined with minimally invasive treatment include a small surgical incision, reduced intraoperative bleeding, satisfactory fracture reduction, bone healing and functional recovery.

Analysis of High-Risk Factors and Construction of a Nomogram Predictive Model for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture Patients Treated Conservatively

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop a predictive nomogram model to assist physicians in making evidence-based decisions and potentially reduce the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study, including patients admitted to the hospital from January 2014 to January 2022 with a closed, single pelvic or acetabular fracture. Comprehensive data were collected for each patient, encompassing demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidities, and results from laboratory tests and lower extremity ultrasounds. Potential risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The predictive model was constructed and then internally validated. Calibration accuracy was assessed using a calibration slope and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The discrimination of the nomogram model was evaluated using the C-statistic.

RESULTS

Out of 232 individuals who underwent conservative treatment, 57 (24.6%) were classified into the DVT group and 175 (75.4%) into the non-DVT group based on lower extremity ultrasound findings. Predominantly, patients were aged between 41 and 65 in both groups. Body mass index (BMI) comparison showed that 54.29% (95/175) of the non-DVT group fell within the healthy weight range, while 45.61% (26/57) in the DVT group were overweight. Notably, the proportion of obesity in the DVT group was more than double that in the non-DVT group, indicating a higher DVT risk with increasing BMI (P=0.0215). Lower red blood cell (RBC) counts were observed in DVT patients compared to non-DVT ones (P<0.001). A similar pattern emerged for D-dimer, a marker for blood clot formation and dissolution, with significant differences noted (P=0.029). Multivariable analysis identified age, BMI, associated organ injury (AOI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, hemoglobin (HGB), RBC, and D-dimer as candidate predictors. Significant variables included age (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.76-5.26; P<0.001), BMI (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.22-3.18; P=0.006), AOI (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.07-3.95; P=0.031), and HGB (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88; P=0.010). The discrimination was 0.787, with a corrected c-index of 0.753. Calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit (P=0.7729). Decision curve analysis revealed a superior net clinical benefit when the predicted probability threshold ranged from 0.05 to 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a nomogram predictive model, and it could act as a practical tool in clinical workflows to assist physicians in making favorable medical decisions, which potentially reduces the incidence of DVT in those patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures treated conservatively.