Thrombolysis via an Operatively Placed Mesenteric Catheter for Portal and Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: Report of a Case

Recanalization of port-superior mesenteric vein thrombosis with long-term anticoagulant therapy after failed early anticoagulant therapy

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant therapy with heparin is the first-line treatment for acute mesenteric vein thrombosis and is effective in improving outcomes. Conversely, patients with failed early anticoagulant therapy occasionally develop bowel infarction requiring surgery. The efficacy of long-term anticoagulant therapy on recanalizing mesenteric vein thrombosis in patients with failed early anticoagulant therapy remains unclear. Herein, we report a patient who achieved recanalization of port-superior mesenteric vein thrombosis treated with anticoagulant therapy for 10 years after failed early anticoagulant therapy, followed by bowel resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old male patient visited an outpatient clinic due to acute exacerbation of abdominal pain that had persisted for a month. He was diagnosed with port-superior mesenteric vein thrombosis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and was transferred to our institution. Although he presented with abdominal pain, his respiration and circulation were stable upon hospital arrival. Anticoagulant therapy with heparin was started, and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit. However, the patient's abdominal pain worsened, and he began to develop signs of peritonitis. Repeat CT scan revealed bowel infarction. Thus, the patient underwent bowel resection 6 h after admission. The initial surgery was completed with open abdomen management. Bowel anastomosis was performed on the second-look surgery on the first postoperative day. Finally, the abdomen was closed on the third postoperative day after confirming the absence of bowel ischemia progression. The patient had prolonged impaired bowel function with paralytic ileus, but was discharged on the 60th postoperative day. He was then diagnosed with protein C and S deficiency based on the tests performed. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin was initiated. He also received anticoagulant therapy in the outpatient setting. The patient's port-superior mesenteric vein thrombosis had improved gradually with warfarin during the follow-up period. At 10 years after surgery, total occlusion of the port-superior mesenteric vein was recanalized with improvement of the portal collateral vessels. In addition, no gastric or esophageal varices were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term anticoagulation therapy could affect the recanalization of extensive thrombus in multiple segments in patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on endovascular treatment as an attractive alternative for acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the published data on the efficacy and safety of therapies for superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (SMVT), aiming to provide a reference and set of recommendations for clinical treatment.

METHODS

Relevant databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to June 2020 on SMVT treated with conservative treatment, surgical treatment, or endovascular approach. Different treatment types were grouped for analysis and comparison, and odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The outcomes were pooled using meta-analytic methods and presented by forest plots.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles, including eight on SMVT patients treated with endovascular therapies, were enrolled. The treatment effectiveness was compared between different groups according to the change of symptoms, the occurrence of complications, and mortality as well. The conservative treatment group had better efficacy compared to the surgery group (89.0% vs. 78.6%, P <0.05), and the one-year survival rate was also higher (94.4% vs. 80.0%, P >0.05), but without statistical significance. As for endovascular treatment, the effectiveness was significantly higher than the surgery group (94.8% vs. 75.2%, P <0.05), and the conservative treatment group as well (93.3% vs. 86.3%, P >0.05), which still requires further research for the lack of statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Present findings indicate that anticoagulation, as conservative treatment should be the preferred clinical option in the clinic for SMVT, due to its better curative effect compared to other treatment options, including lower mortality, fewer complications, and better prognosis. Moreover, endovascular treatment is a feasible and promising approach that is worth in-depth research, for it is less invasive than surgery and has relatively better effectiveness, thus can provide an alternative option for SMVT treatment and may be considered as a reliable method in clinical.

Efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant drug, danaparoid sodium, in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant drug, danaparoid sodium, in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A consecutive 26 cirrhotic patients with PVT were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The etiologies of cirrhosis were hepatitis B virus-related, hepatitis C virus-related, alcoholic and cryptogenic in five, 14, three and four patients, respectively. Child-Pugh grade A, B and C was noted in 13, eight and five patients, respectively. Patients were treated with 2 weeks' administration of danaparoid sodium followed by the evaluation of PVT reduction and adverse events.

RESULTS

All patients experienced reduction of PVT through the treatment. The median volume of PVT before and after treatment was 2.40 cm(3) (range, 0.18-16.63) and 0.37 cm(3) (range, 0-5.74), respectively. The median reduction rate of PVT volume was 77.3% (range, 18-100%). According to the reduction rate, complete reduction (CR), partial reduction (PR, ≥50%) and stable disease (SD, <50%) were observed in four (15%), 16 (62%) and six patients (23%), respectively. The median volume of PVT before treatment was significantly different between CR + PR and SD (2.09 vs 4.35 cm(3) , P = 0.045). No severe adverse events such as bleeding symptoms (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding and cerebral hemorrhage) and thrombocytopenia were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Danaparoid sodium for the treatment of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis was safe and effective. Therefore, anticoagulation therapy with danaparoid sodium could have potential as one of the treatment options in PVT accompanied by cirrhosis.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis through the operatively recanalized umbilical vein for acute extensive portal vein thrombosis: report of a case

Acute portal vein thrombosis is a rare but severe complication of intra-abdominal infection. It can be life-threatening, given the risk of developing liver abscess and subsequent liver failure. Various types of hereditary thrombophilia are known risk factors for acute portal vein thrombosis. In addition to surgical treatment and potent antibiotic therapy, systemic administration of anticoagulants and locoregional trans-catheter delivery of thrombolytic agents are known to be effective. We present a case report of acute portal vein thrombosis with pylephlebitis caused by acute appendicitis, successfully treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis through the operatively recanalized umbilical vein. The umbilical vein is a promising access route to the portal vein. Therefore, this procedure is an effective and preferred treatment option for portal septic thrombosis, particularly because it does not require puncture of the liver parenchyma or catheterization through an infected peritoneal cavity.

Modern treatment of acute mesenteric ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischaemia in the early stages is now possible with modern computed tomography (CT), using intravenous contrast enhancement and imaging in the arterial and/or portal venous phase. The availability of CT around the clock means that more patients with acute mesenteric ischaemia may be treated with urgent intestinal revascularization.

METHODS

This was a review of modern treatment strategies for acute mesenteric ischaemia.

RESULTS

Endovascular therapy has become an important alternative, especially in patients with acute thrombotic superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion, where the occlusive lesion can be recanalized either antegradely from the femoral or brachial artery, or retrogradely from an exposed SMA after laparotomy, and stented. Aspiration embolectomy, thrombolysis and open surgical embolectomy, followed by on-table angiography, are the treatment options for embolic SMA occlusion. Endovascular therapy may be an option in the few patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis who do not respond to anticoagulation therapy. Laparotomy is needed to evaluate the extent and severity of visceral organ ischaemia, which is treated according to the principles of damage control surgery.

CONCLUSION

Modern treatment of acute mesenteric ischaemia involves a specialized approach that considers surgical and, increasingly, endovascular options for best outcomes.

Omental vein catheter thrombolysis for acute porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis

Mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is an uncommon clinical condition with potential high morbidity. We report here a patient who presented with acute-onset MVT and bowel infarction, which was successfully ameliorated with intramesenteric vein thrombolytic therapy.

Single-session treatment of portal vein thrombosis using combined pharmacomechanical thrombolysis

A patient with portal hypertension developed thrombosis of her transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and the portal vein. The Trellis device (Bacchus Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) was used to achieve rapid lysis of the portal vein thrombus and help restore portal and TIPS patency in a single session.

Mesenteric venous thrombosis

First differentiated from arterial causes of acute mesenteric ischemia 75 years ago, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is an uncommon disorder with non-specific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of which requires a high index of suspicion. The location, extent, and rapidity of thrombus formation determine whether intestinal infarction ensues. Etiologies, when identified, usually can be separated into local intra-abdominal factors and inherited or acquired hypercoagulable states. The diagnosis is most often made by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, though angiography and exploratory surgery still have important diagnostic as well as therapeutic roles. Anticoagulation prevents clot propagation and is associated with decreased recurrence and mortality. Thrombectomy and thrombolysis may preserve questionably viable bowel and should be considered under certain circumstances. Evidence of infarction mandates surgery and resection whenever feasible. Although its mortality rate has fallen over time, acute MVT remains a life-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis and aggressive management. Chronic MVT may manifest with complications of portal hypertension or may be diagnosed incidentally by noninvasive imaging. Management of chronic MVT is directed against variceal hemorrhage and includes anticoagulation when appropriate; mortality is largely dependent on the underlying risk factor.

Epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors in mesenteric venous thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological reports on risk and prognostic factors in patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) are scarce.

METHODS

Patients with MVT were identified through the inpatient and autopsy registry between 2000 and 2006 at Malmö University Hospital.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients had MVT, diagnosed at autopsy in six. The highest incidence (11.3 per 100,000 person-years) was in the age category 70-79 years. Activated protein C resistance was present in 13 of 29 patients tested. D-dimer at admission was raised in all five patients tested. Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) in the portal venous phase was diagnostic in all 20 patients investigated, of whom 19 were managed conservatively. The median length of resected bowel in 12 patients who had surgery was 0.6 (range 0.1-2.2) m. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 20 percent; intestinal infarction (P = 0.046), treatment on a non-surgical ward (P = 0.001) and CT not done (P = 0.022) were associated with increased mortality. Cancer was independently associated with long-term mortality: hazard ratio 4.03, 95 percent confidence interval 1.03 to 15.85; P = 0.046.

CONCLUSION

Portal venous phase CT appeared sensitive in diagnosing MVT. As activated protein C resistance was a strong risk factor, lifelong anticoagulation should be considered.

Idiopathic mesenteric venous thrombosis: report of a case

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic mesenteric venous thrombosis is a rare entity. An early diagnosis and thrombolytic and anticoagulant therapy are very important.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We report a case of a patient, without any specific known risk factor, with small intestinal ischemia secondary to superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (SMVT).

RESULTS

In our case, only a computed tomography (CT) abdominal scan permitted the diagnosis of SMVT. The patient was successfully treated by resection of the infarcted bowel with primary anastomosis and immediate postoperative anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of intestinal ischemia from mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is often delayed because the symptoms are nonspecific. Moreover, when there is not any known predisposing factor, the diagnosis may become even more difficult with significant morbidity and mortality. CT abdominal scan done early in case of nonspecific abdominal pain, since the patients had a previous history of venous thrombosis, may not require a surgical treatment of MVT.