Usefulness of staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer

Diagnostic laparoscopy is underutilized in the staging of gastric adenocarcinoma regardless of hospital type: An US safety net collaborative analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is a key component of staging for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). We hypothesized that utilization of DL varied between safety net (SNH) and affiliated tertiary referral centers (TRCs).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with primary GA eligible for DL were identified from the US Safety Net Collaborative database (2012-2014). Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed for association with use of DL and findings on DL. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 233 eligible patients, 69 (30%) received DL, of which 24 (35%) were positive for metastatic disease. Forty percent of eligible SNH patients underwent DL compared to 21.5% at TRCs. Lack of insurance was significantly associated with decreased use of DL (OR 0.48, p < 0.01), while African American (OR 6.87, p = 0.02) and Asian race (OR 3.12, p ≤ 0.01), signet ring cells on biopsy (OR 3.14, p < 0.01), and distal tumors (OR 1.62, p < 0.01) were associated with increased use. Median OS of patients with a negative DL was better than those without DL or a positive DL (not reached vs. 32 vs. 12 months, p < 0.005, Figure 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from DL are a strong predictor of OS in GA; however, the procedure is underutilized. Patients from racial minority groups were more likely to undergo DL, which likely accounts for higher DL rates among SNH patients.

Usefulness of Diagnostic Staging Laparoscopy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

For advanced gastric cancer (AGC), peritoneal metastasis is the most common determinant of unresectability, but accurate preoperative diagnosis for peritoneal metastasis is challenging. Staging laparoscopy (SL) can detect unsuspected peritoneal metastasis. This study retrospectively evaluated the utility of SL and its indication in patients with AGC.

METHODS

In this study, we enrolled 114 patients with pathologically diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent SL.

RESULTS

Of the 114 patients, 43 (37.7%) had peritoneal metastasis (P1 or CY1). Higher age, larger tumor size, type 4 GC, deeper tumor depth, elevated CA125, and ascites findings in preoperative CT were found to be significant predictors of peritoneal metastasis. In multivariate analysis, peritoneal metastasis was associated with type 4 GC (odds ratio [OR]: 6.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.87-19.8; P < .01) and ascites in CT (OR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.48-12.1; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Staging laparoscopy is an effective tool to detect peritoneal metastasis from AGC. It can increase the curative resection rate and decrease unnecessary laparotomies.

Peritoneal dissemination of breast cancer diagnosed by laparoscopy

The accuracy of modern imaging techniques for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis is poor. A breast cancer patient with a high serum CA15-3 level did not receive a definitive diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination by imaging examination and then underwent laparoscopy. Pathological examination showed peritoneal dissemination of breast cancer, but the biological markers were different from the primary lesion: ER(−), PgR(−), and Her2:3 +. T-DM1 therapy was very effective, and her systemic symptoms disappeared. Since biomarkers of metastatic lesions may sometimes change, laparoscopic biopsy is very important and useful.

Gastric Cancer with Radiographically Occult Metastatic Disease: Biology, Challenges, and Diagnostic Approaches

Gastric adenocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer that demonstrates heterogeneous biology depending on patient ethnicity, tumor location, tumor type, and genetic profile. It remains the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and was estimated to result in 782,000 deaths in 2018. Challenges exist in accurately assessing the disease burden, as available radiological staging often underestimates metastatic disease. This diagnostic handicap, along with the poor understanding of the heterogeneous biology of gastric cancer, has hindered the development of effective therapeutic solutions and thus halted improvement in patient outcomes over the last few decades. The management of occult peritoneal disease is complicated, as most patients are understaged by standard imaging studies and therefore thought to have local diseases. In this article, we systematically review recent literature on the limitations that are associated with standard radiographic staging, discuss recent molecular biology advances to better identify and diagnose occult peritoneal disease, and propose possible management strategies to approach this complicated clinical problem.

Role of staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer patients

Staging laparoscopy (SL) is frequently carried out in patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, some clinical questions are being debated and consensus must be obtained. With this aim, a literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out using the keywords "gastric cancer," "SL," and "diagnostic laparoscopy". Articles published online up to February 2019 were analyzed, focusing on the following questions. (i) What is an adequate indication for SL? (ii) How do you carry out SL? (iii) Does SL provide accurate information about peritoneal dissemination? (iv) Is the yield of SL different by tumor location? (v) Is SL a safe procedure? (vi) Is "repeat SL" needed? (vii) Does SL provide oncological benefit? Results provided the following responses: (i) In Western countries, clinically resectable advanced tumor is an indication for SL. Terms to be introduced for adequate indication include "location," "type 4 (linitis feature)," "large tumor," "equivocal computed tomography (CT] findings," and "lymph node swelling". (ii) Exploration of the entire peritoneal cavity is preferable. (iii) Detection rate of peritoneal disease is 43%-52% in Japanese institutions and 7.8%-40% in other countries. False-negative findings during SL were 0%-17%, and 10%-13% when limited to cytology. (iv) Yield of SL was higher in gastric cancer compared with esophagogastric junctional tumor. (v) SL-related complications were estimated to occur in 0.4%. (vi) Repeat SL is important after treatment. (vii) If the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with P0CY1 is established, SL can provide oncological benefit. SL can be carried out safely and effectively. Considering the prevalence of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of SL will become more important.

The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of peritoneal metastasis during staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of staging laparoscopy (SL) has become widespread in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for the presence of peritoneal metastasis during staging laparoscopy in patients with advanced GC.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed in 35 patients with advanced GC who underwent SL at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2017. Clinicopathological characteristics were examined and multivariate analyses were performed to identify preoperative laboratory parameters that were independently associated with the presence of peritoneal metastasis or cytological malignancy (P/CY positive) during SL.

RESULTS

A P/CY-positive result was confirmed during SL in 16 patients (45.7%). Patients with type 4 or diffuse type 3 tumors showed a significantly higher P/CY-positive rate than those with other tumor types (58.3% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.02). In the univariate analysis for preoperative laboratory parameters, NLR (P < 0.0001) and total protein (P = 0.03) and albumin (P = 0.04) levels were significantly correlated with a P/CY-positive result. On multivariate analysis, NLR was significantly correlated with a P/CY-positive result (P = 0.0002). In patients with type 4 or diffuse type 3 tumors, a high NLR (> 3.5) was associated with a significantly higher P/CY-positive rate than a low NLR (≤ 3.5) (83.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.01). Moreover, in patients without type 4 or diffuse type 3 tumors, the P/CY-positive rates were 100% and 0% in patients with NLR > 3.5 and NLR ≤ 3.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative NLR was a significant independent predictor of the presence of peritoneal metastasis during SL. Regardless of tumor type, patients with a high NLR could be reasonable candidates for SL. On the other hand, non-diffuse type tumor accompanied by a low NLR may not need to undergo SL.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal cytology has been used as a part of the cancer staging of gastric cancer patients. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the value of peritoneal cytology as part of the staging of gastric cancer and survival prediction. The second aim was to establish if positive cytology may be modified by neoadjuvant therapy, to improve prognosis.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases up to January 2016. The logarithm of the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used as the primary summary statistic. Comparative studies were used, and the outcome measure was survival in three groups: (1) positive versus negative cytology at staging laparoscopy immediately preceding surgery; (2) effect of neoadjuvant therapy on cytology and survival; and (3) positive cytology in the absence of macroscopic peritoneal disease was compared with obvious macroscopic peritoneal disease.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis demonstrated that positive cytology was associated with significantly reduced overall survival (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.77-4.31; P < 0.0001). Interestingly, negative cytology following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31-0.57; P < 0.0001). The absence of macroscopic peritoneal disease with positive cytology was associated with significantly improved overall survival (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.73; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients with initial positive cytology may have a good prognosis following neoadjuvant treatment if the cytology results change to negative after treatment.

The Yield of Staging Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer is Affected by Racial and Ethnic Differences in Disease Presentation

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with variable presentation between racial and ethnic groups. Staging laparoscopy (SL) detects occult metastases not visible on cross-sectional imaging and therefore improves staging. It remains unclear how differences in race and ethnicity affect disease presentation and the yield of SL.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with gastric cancer treated with curative intent at our institutions from 2008 to 2015.

RESULTS

Hispanic patients presented at an earlier mean age (55.5 ± 11.9 years) compared with Asian (59.8 ± 13.9 years), African American (61.0 ± 10.0 years), and white patients (61.7 ± 12.5 years; p = 0.046) and with more locally advanced disease (clinical stage T3/T4 or node positive; Hispanic 87%; African American 79%; white 68%, Asian 55%; p = 0.03). SL identified 42 patients (34%) with occult metastatic disease. Hispanics were more likely to have a positive SL (44%) than white patients (21%; p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, Hispanic ethnicity, clinical T3/T4, positive nodal disease, signet ring cells, and poor differentiation were predictors of a positive SL. On multivariable analysis, clinical T3/T4, signet ring cells, and poor differentiation independently predicted radiographically occult disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic patients presented with more locally advanced disease and were more likely to have occult disease found on SL compared with white patients. Laparoscopy should be used routinely as part of the pretreatment staging evaluation for patients with locally advanced disease as it alters the management in a significant proportion of patients.

Seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging of gastric cancer: Five-year follow-up

Seventh tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification for gastric cancer, published in 2010, introduced changes in all of its three parameters with the aim to increase its accuracy in prognostication. The aim of this review is to analyze the efficacy of these changes and their implication in clinical practice. We reviewed relevant Literature concerning staging systems in gastric cancer from 2010 up to March 2016. Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction still remains a debated entity, due to its peculiar anatomical and histological situation: further improvement in its staging are required. Concerning distant metastases, positive peritoneal cytology has been adopted as a criterion to define metastatic disease: however, its search in clinical practice is still far from being routinely performed, as staging laparoscopy has not yet reached wide diffusion. Regarding definition of T and N: in the era of multimodal treatment these parameters should more influence both staging and surgery. The changes about T-staging suggested some modifications in clinical practice. Differently, many controversies on lymph node staging are still ongoing, with the proposal of alternative classification systems in order to minimize the extent of lymphadenectomy. The next TNM classification should take into account all of these aspects to improve its accuracy and the comparability of prognosis in patients from both Eastern and Western world.

Staging Laparoscopy for Patients with cM0, Type 4, and Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Staging laparoscopy (SL) is considered useful for detecting peritoneal metastasis, a task that is difficult using conventional imaging modalities. However, indications for the procedure remain unclear, with differences evident across reports. The present study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and limitations of SL for patients with type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We included 88 patients with cM0, type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer who underwent SL at the Shizuoka Cancer Center from August 2008 to June 2014, to determine the detection rate of peritoneal metastasis by SL. In addition, we calculated the false-negative rate of SL by recruiting patients who were diagnosed as P0 at SL and underwent laparotomy within 28 days after the SL.

RESULTS

P0CY0, P0CY1, P1CY0, and P1CY1 were diagnosed in 41 (46.6 %), 15 (17.0 %), 15 (17.0 %), and 17 (19.3 %) patients, respectively. Accordingly, clinically non-evident peritoneal metastasis was found in 36.3 % of patients, and 53.4 % of patients were diagnosed with stage IV. In addition, 29 patients diagnosed as P0 at SL underwent laparotomy within 28 days after the SL. Among them, peritoneal metastasis was found in five patients. Thus, the false-negative rate was 17.2 % (5/29, 95 % CI 7.6-34.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SL is useful for detecting previously unsuspected peritoneal metastasis and for avoiding unnecessary laparotomy, although the high false-negative rate cannot be ignored. Patients with cM0, type 4, and large type 3 gastric cancer are considered suitable candidates for SL.

The role of staging laparoscopy in treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of videolaparoscopy (VLP) in gastric cancer staging, particularly for the detection of peritoneal cancer, to verify its impact in changing the therapeutic conduct, as well as defining the characteristics of the group that can benefit from VLP as staging method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted from May 2011 to March 2013. Thirty-two patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent conventional staging together with VLP staging.

RESULTS

VLP identified peritoneal disease in 22.6% of patients. Sensitivity was 86%, and specificity was 100%. In the group with non-Borrmann IV, <8 cm tumors, and without evidence of lymphadenomegaly, VLP identified peritoneal implants in 23.1% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

VLP is a safe procedure capable of improving the accuracy of gastric cancer staging. There is no justification for failing to perform laparoscopy in patients with <8 cm, non-Borrmann type IV tumors and without evidence of lymphadenomegaly on preoperative examinations.

Three-port laparoscopic exploration is not sufficient for patients with T4 gastric cancer

Gastric cancer continues to be a leading cause of cancer death. The majority of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in China present with advanced disease. Ruling out unresectable cancers from an unnecessary ''open'' exploration is very important. The aim of this study was to assess the value of five-port anatomical laparoscopic exploration in T4 gastric cancer in comparison with three-port laparoscopic exploration and laparotomy exploration. We conducted a retrospective study on 126 patients with T4 stage scheduled for D2 curative gastrectomy based on computed tomography (CT) staging at Department of Gastric Cancer and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, from Apr. 2011 to Apr. 2013. Laparotomy exploration (Group I), three-port laparoscopic exploration (Group II) or five-port anatomical laparoscopic exploration (Group III) were performed prior to radical gastrectomy. Accuracy rate for feasibility of D2 curative gastrectomy in laparotomy exploration and five-port anatomical laparoscopic exploration groups was higher than that in the three-port laparoscopic exploration group. Five-port anatomical laparoscopic exploration group had the highest accuracy resection rate (Group I vs Group II vs Group III,92.6% vs78.6% vs 97.7%; p<0.05) and shorter length of hospitalization (Group I vs Group II vs Group III, 9.58±4.17 vs 6.13±2.85 vs 5.00±1.81; p<0.001). Three-port laparoscopic exploration has low accuracy rate for assessing feasibility of D2 curative gastrectomy and five-port anatomical laparoscopic exploration should be performed on patients with T4 gastric cancer.

The clinical significance of potentially curative resection for gastric cancer following the clearance of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity by induction chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of the conversion of the peritoneal cytology from positive to negative following induction chemotherapy in relation to the prognosis after subsequent resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database. A total of 47 patients with free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity, as evaluated by staging laparoscopy, but no other evidence of distant metastasis, who underwent induction chemotherapy followed by surgery were enrolled in the study. Then, the clinicopathological factors and survival in the study subjects were assessed.

RESULTS

The median survival time and 5-year overall survival rate of the 47 study participants were 20.4 months and 25.0 %, respectively. In 23 of the patients, the peritoneal cytology converted from positive to negative after the induction chemotherapy, and a microscopically margin-negative gastrectomy was performed. The median survival time of 30.4 months and the 5-year survival rate of 34.6 % of these patients was significantly more favorable than the corresponding values of 15.0 months and 17.6 % in the patients who had persistently positive cytology (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, the clearance of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity by induction chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients following subsequent gastrectomy.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of laparoscopic staging for gallbladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of staging laparoscopy in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).

METHODS

From January 2007 through December 2010, 79 GBC patients without evidence of metastatic disease on preoperative imaging underwent staging laparoscopy. Peritoneal and liver metastases were assessed by a single surgeon in a systematic manner. Resection rate, safety, and survival analysis were compared between the laparoscopy group and no laparoscopy group.

RESULTS

Disseminated disease was detected in 27 patients and no further surgery was performed; the overall accuracy for detecting unresectable disease was 67.5% (27/40), with 39 (75%) and 27 (51.9%) receiving resection and curative resection. In 203 GBC patients undergoing laparotomy, 90 (44.3%) and 53 (26.1%) patients received resection and curative resection; therefore, the resection rate and curative resection rate were significantly much higher in the laparoscopy group (p < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Staging laparoscopy in GBC is sensitive in detecting disseminated disease and increases the curative resection rate, shortens the recovery time, and has no negative implications on overall survival; therefore, we suggest the routine use of staging laparoscopy in patients with GBC without evidence of disseminated disease on preoperative imaging.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer

Gastric cancer is common worldwide. Tumor location and disease stage differ between Asian and Western countries. Western patients often have higher BMIs and comorbidities that may make laparoscopic resections challenging. Multiple trials from Asian countries demonstrate the benefits of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer while maintaining equivalent short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes compared with open surgery. The outcomes of laparoscopy seem to offer equivalent results to open surgery. In the United States, laparoscopic gastrectomy remains in its infancy and is somewhat controversial. This article summarizes the literature on the epidemiology, operative considerations and approaches, and outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology

PURPOSE

The role of gastrectomy for patients with positive peritoneal cytology, but a negative macroscopic peritoneal implant (P-/cy+), remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic gastrectomy for P-/cy+ patients.

METHODS

This study reviewed a prospectively maintained gastric cancer database of gastric-cancer patients those underwent surgical resection. P-/cy+ gastric cancer that had invaded the subserosa, or deeper layers, of the stomach wall without distant organ metastases was considered operable in this institution. P-/cy+ patients underwent either open or laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The short-term results were examined to assess differences in outcome between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighteen P-/cy+ patients without distant organ metastases underwent surgery between 2000 and 2010. Laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in nine patients and open gastrectomy in nine patients. The estimated blood loss was significantly smaller, the resumption of food intake earlier, and the length of postoperative hospital stay shorter in the patients that underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy than in the patients that underwent open gastrectomy. There were no significant differences in the 2-year survival rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for P-/cy+ patients is a minimally invasive and safe oncologic procedure with good short-term results.

Clinical outcomes according to primary treatment in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding

Purpose

Peritoneal seeding of gastric cancer is known to have a poor prognosis. With the diagnosis of peritoneal seeding, there is no effective treatment modality. Gastrectomy with chemotherapy or primary chemotherapy is basically one of major options for this condition. This study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of these treatments and to identify the better way to improve the prognosis of patients with peritoneal seeding.

Materials and Methods

Between 2001 and 2007, gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding by preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. The enrolled patients were divided as primary gastrectomy and primary chemotherapy group. Clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

Fifty-four patients were enrolled. 21 patients belonged to the group of primary gastrectomy and 33 patients were to the primary chemotherapy group. Among 33 patients of the primary chemotherapy group, 17 patients were received only chemotherapy and 16 patients were received gastrectomy due to the good responses of primary chemotherapy. The 3 years survival rates were 14% in primary gastrectomy group, 55% in patients who received gastrectomy after primary chemotherapy, and 0% in patients with primary chemotherapy only.

Conclusions

Although this study had many limitations, some valuable information was produced. In terms of survival benefits for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding, primary gastrectomy and additional gastrectomy after primary chemotherapy revealed the better clinical outcomes. But, prospective randomized clinical study and multi-center study are should be performed to decide proper treatment for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.