Evaluation of the efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation in Japan

Prevalence of venous thromboembolism after lung surgery in China: a single-centre, prospective cohort study involving patients undergoing lung resections without perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis†

OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication. Previous studies have shown that the incidence of VTE after major thoracic surgery ranges from 2.3% to 15%. However, there have been no such data from China so far. To evaluate the incidence of postoperative VTE, we conducted a single-centre, prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lung resections between July 2016 and March 2017 were enrolled in this study. None of the patients received any prophylaxis perioperatively. All patients were screened for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) using non-invasive duplex lower-extremity ultrasonography 30 days before surgery and within 30 days after surgery and before discharge. Chest tomography, pulmonary embolism protocol was carried out if patients had one of the following conditions: (i) typical symptoms of pulmonary embolism, (ii) high Caprini score (≥9 points) and (iii) newly diagnosed postoperative DVT.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing lung surgery were enrolled, including 115 benign and 147 malignant disease cases. The procedures included 84 sublobar lung resections, 161 lobectomies, 5 pneumonectomies and 12 mixed procedures. The overall postoperative incidence of VTE was 11.5% (30 of 262). Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with DVT (80.0%) and 6 with DVT + pulmonary embolism (20.0%). None of the patients diagnosed with VTE had obvious symptoms of VTE. The median time for VTE detection was 5 days postoperatively. The incidence of VTE was 7.0% in patients with benign lung diseases and 15.0% in those with malignant lung diseases (P < 0.05). Using the Caprini risk assessment model, 63 cases were scored as low risk, 179 as moderate risk and 20 as high risk, and each group had an incidence of postoperative VTE of 0%, 12.3% (22 of 179) and 40.0% (8 of 20), respectively (P < 0.05). In patients with lung cancer, 98% were moderate or high risk, and only 3 patients were scored in the low risk category. The incidence of VTE in patients at moderate risk and high risk was 12.0% and 36.8%, respectively, while it was 0 in low-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions were drawn: (i) the overall incidence of postoperative VTE after lung surgery without VTE prophylaxis is substantial; (ii) lower-extremity ultrasonography was helpful in detecting asymptomatic DVT in symptomatic or high-risk patients; and (iii) VTE prophylaxis should be considered as a mandatory part of perioperative care.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-EOC-17010577.

Donor Selection and Prophylactic Strategy for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Living Donors of Liver Transplantation Based on Results of Thrombophilia Screening Tests

Background

We reported a strategy of thrombophilia testing-guided venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis for living donors of liver transplantation in 2011. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this protocol for VTE prophylaxis.

Material/Methods

Thrombophilia testing, including protein S (PS), protein C (PC), antithrombin (AT) III, and anti-phospholipid antibody (APLA), was performed in 306 living donor candidates between July 2005 and June 2016. Donors who met any of the criteria of PS <60%, PC <64%, AT-III <70%, and positive APLA were classified into the borderline group and received continuous venous infusion of heparin immediately after surgery, in addition to use of elastic stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) until patients were ambulatory. Other donors who were classified into the normal group used elastic stockings and IPC with no anticoagulants. The efficacy and safety endpoints were VTE occurrence and bleeding events, respectively.

Results

PS was considerably decreased in 3 candidates and PC was considerably reduced in 1 candidate, and they were excluded for high risk of VTE. Seventeen candidates in the borderline group and 137 in the normal group underwent donor surgery. One donor in the borderline group developed a wound hematoma. Postoperative complications were similar between the 2 groups. None of the donors in either group developed VTE.

Conclusions

Thrombophilia testing-guided VTE prophylaxis is safe and may contribute to reduced VTE risk in donors, although further investigations are warranted to assess the necessity of thrombophilia testing prior to surgery among living donors.

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism After Oral Oncologic Surgery With Simultaneous Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Patients with oral cancer who undergo resection with simultaneous reconstruction are presumed to be at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) according to current criteria. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to report the incidence of VTE after oral cancer surgery requiring primary reconstruction and to identify the potential risk factors for VTE in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 133 consecutive patients who had undergone oral cancer resection with simultaneous reconstruction from April 2007 through December 2014. Bilateral lower-extremity venous duplex ultrasonography (VDUS) was routinely performed 2 days after surgery. Pulmonary embolism was confirmed with computed tomography. The Caprini risk score (CRS) was obtained for each patient. Patients with and without VTE were compared using the χ2 test and Student t test with some variables. Univariate predictors associated with VTE were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. A P value less than .05 was regarded as indicating statistical significance.

RESULTS

The incidence of VTE after oral oncologic surgery with simultaneous reconstruction was 26.3% (35 of 133 patients): deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism occurred in 2.3% (3 of 133) and DVT alone was found in 24.0% (32 of 133). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only a high CRS was statistically relevant to VTE occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Because a high incidence of VTE was found after major oral and maxillofacial surgery, lower-extremity VDUS should be undertaken in patients who undergo oral cancer surgery with simultaneous reconstruction, especially those with a high CRS.