Conservative treatment for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection

Management of Spontaneous Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review

Background and Aims:

There are increasing reports on case series on spontaneous isolated mesenteric artery dissection, that is, dissections of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery, mainly due to improved diagnostic capacity of high-resolution computed tomography angiography performed around the clock. A few case–control studies are now available, while randomized controlled trials are awaited.

Material and Methods:

The present systematic review based on 97 original studies offers a comprehensive overview on risk factors, management, conservative therapy, morphological modeling of dissection, and prognosis.

Results and Conclusions:

Male gender, hypertension, and smoking are risk factors for isolated mesenteric artery dissection, while the frequency of diabetes mellitus is reported to be low. Large aortomesenteric angle has also been considered to be a factor for superior mesenteric artery dissection. The overwhelming majority of patients can be conservatively treated without the need of endovascular or open operations. Conservative therapy consists of blood pressure lowering therapy, analgesics, and initial bowel rest, whereas there is no support for antithrombotic agents. Complete remodeling of the dissection after conservative therapy was found in 43% at mid-term follow-up. One absolute indication for surgery and endovascular stenting of the superior mesenteric artery is development of peritonitis due to bowel infarction, which occurs in 2.1% of superior mesenteric artery dissections and none in celiac artery dissections. The most documented end-organ infarction in celiac artery dissections is splenic infarctions, which occurs in 11.2%, and is a condition that should be treated conservatively. The frequency of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery dissection is very rare, 0.4%, and none of these patients were in shock at presentation. Endovascular therapy with covered stents should be considered in these patients.

Mid-term outcomes of symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection with endovascular management

OBJECTIVES

The clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of endovascular management are explored for symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 51 consecutive patients with symptomatic ISMAD received endovascular management from three institutions between January 2011 and December 2019.These patients were categorized into group A (endovascular treatment was used as the first-line therapy) and group B(endovascular treatment was used as the second-line therapy). The general epidemiological data, clinical manifestations, first-episode symptoms, treatment process, imaging findings, follow-up outcomes were analyzed from the medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients with endovascular management were collected in this study. Significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to the course (150 h vs. 57 h; p < 0.001), intestinal ischemia (26.32% vs. 6,25%; p = 0.04) and dissection length (45.26 ± 13.78 mm vs. 63.37 ± 12.73 mm; p < 0.001). Technical success rate was 90.2% (46/51). There was significant difference in the MOD (42.27 ± 23.41 min vs. 76.63 ± 28.62 min p < 0.001), MPSRT (4.67 ± 2.65 h vs. 7.32 ± 2.49 h, p = 0.02), LOS (9.52 ± 3.72 days vs. 11.86 ± 4.13 days; p = 0.01) between the two groups. The bleeding complication rate was 7.84% (one patient in group A and three patients in group B). A total of 48 (94.12%, 48/51) patients were followed up for a median of 36.51 months (range, 4-87 months). Positive events of the SMA were achieved in 81.25% (39/48), and negative events of the SMA were achieved in 18.75% (8/48) based on the follow-up contrast-enhanced CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular management of symptomatic ISMAD has a high technical success rate and efficient at controlling symptoms. Furthermore, as more positive events occur, endovascular management should be encouraged early when pain persists after conservative management or there are signs of disease progression.

A modified endovascular technique for treating spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection and the early to medium-term outcomes

Purpose

The spontaneous isolated dissection of superior mesenteric artery (SIDSMA) is a rare medical condition and the treatment remains controversial. This study is to present our refined technique with a Flexor introducer to facilitate stent advancement and its early to medium-term outcomes.

Methods

A total of 16 patients diagnosed with SIDSMA and repaired with endovascular stenting from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively identified. All patients were male, and the average age was 56 years old (range from 48 to 72 years old). Diagnosis was preoperatively confirmed using computed tomography angiography and their morphologic features were measured. A long Flexor introducer was delivered to the true lumen of dissected superior mesenteric artery prior to coaxially advancing a stent. Patient demographics, endovascular procedures and postoperative outcomes were collected for analysis.

Results

Total technical success was 87.5%. Endovascular attempt was unsuccessful in two patients with extensive thrombus, and the guidewire failed to pass through the true lumen. The remaining 14 SMA dissections were successfully repaired with the modified method. Four patients were repaired using bare stents and 10 with covered stents. The average operative duration was 44 ± 18 minutes. Abdominal pain was relieved postoperatively in all cases except one patient with no identified reasons. The median follow-up duration was 17 months (2–63 months). No procedure- or dissection-related symptoms was present during follow up, and postoperative computed tomography angiography showed all stented SMAs were patent.

Conclusions

Coaxial delivery of stents within the introducer can yield high technical success and good clinical outcomes in early to medium term. Extensive thrombus inside SIDSMA is the exclusive cause for endovascular failure with this technique.

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) is a rare disease with an incidence of 0.06%. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to identify the outcomes associated with the various treatment options in the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with SISMAD.

METHODS

Eligible studies were selected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Endpoints were outcome of asymptomatic patients treated conservatively, resolution of symptoms according to the treatment approach, rate of symptomatic patients switched from conservative to the endovascular and/or open repair, characteristics of the dissected lesion, and findings regarding the remodeling of superior mesenteric artery.

RESULTS

We identified 30 studies including 729 patients. Among them, 608 (83.4%) were symptomatic and were managed with conservative (438/72%), and/or endovascular (139/22.8%) and/or open treatment (31/5%). The remaining were asymptomatic and they were treated solely conservatively. A high rate of resolution of symptoms (92.8%) was noted for patients treated conservatively. Conversion from conservative treatment to either endovascular or open procedure was required in 12.3% and 4.4%, respectively. Resolution of symptoms was observed in 100% for those treated with open procedure and 88.8% for those treated endovascularly. The pooled rate of bowel ischemia in patients treated conservatively was 3.75% (95% confidence interval = 1.15-7.27). Complete remodeling was achieved in 32% and partial in 26% of those who were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of symptomatic patients with SISAMD were treated conservatively and showed an uncomplicated course and only a small percentage required conversion to endovascular or open repair. This might highlight the benign course of the disease.

Strategy for the treatment of spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection

Objectives

To determine the incidence of rare spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection (SIVAD), characterize its pathogenesis, and suggest treatment strategies.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed abdominal contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CE-CT) scans from January 2005 to December 2016 retrospectively in our institution, identified 47 SIVAD patients and classified them into a symptomatic (n = 22) or asymptomatic group (n = 25). Further, we classified the five types based on the CE-CT images. Patient characteristics, incidence, vascular risk factors, complications, symptoms, treatments outcomes, and morphology features on CE-CT images were analyzed.

Results

SIVAD was seen on 0.09% of all abdominal CE-CT scans, and 0.68% of all abdominal CT-CT scans obtained for the evaluation of acute abdominal symptoms. The asymptomatic group had significantly fewer patients with periarterial fat stranding or branch vessel involvement on CE-CT images (p < 0.01). The mean length of the dissection was longer in the symptomatic group (p < 0.05). In the asymptomatic group, dissection-related abdominal symptoms and complications did not develop; followed-up CE-CT scans showed improvement in the dissection lesions in 1 (4.0%) patient, no changes in 22 (88.0%), and complete remodeling in 2 (8.0%). In the symptomatic group, one patient presented with organ ischemia at diagnosis and five patients developed organ ischemia underwent endovascular intervention. In the remaining 16 patients received nonoperative intervention only, followed-up CE-CT scans showed improvement in 13 (86.7%), and complete remodeling in 2 (13.3%).

Conclusions

Symptomatic SIVAD patients should be hospitalized because some of those may experience organ ischemia or aneurysm formation. Endovascular intervention is a feasible treatment for complications of SIVAD.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in spontaneous isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) and spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) represent the major types of spontaneous visceral artery dissection. However, no quantitative meta-analysis of SICAD and SISMAD is available. The aim of our study was to pool current evidence concerning basic profiles, treatment strategies, long-term adverse events, and morphologic changes of lesioned vessels in SICAD and SISMAD patients.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Databases (January 1, 1946-September 21, 2017) for studies of SICAD and SISMAD. Related cohort studies or case series with sample size larger than 10 were included. Two reviewers independently extracted and summarized the data. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 43 studies were included. An estimated 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.21) symptomatic SICAD and 12% (95% CI, 0.06-0.19) symptomatic SISMAD patients with initial conservative management required secondary intervention during follow-up, whereas none of the asymptomatic patients treated conservatively required secondary intervention. As for morphologic changes during follow-up, a higher proportion of SICAD patients (64%; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) achieved complete remodeling compared with SISMAD patients (25%; 95% CI, 0.19-0.32), and an estimated 6% (95% CI, 0.00-0.16) of SICAD and 12% (95% CI, 0.05-0.20) of SISMAD patients had morphologic progression. Overall, the pooled estimate of long-term all-cause mortality was 0% (95% CI, 0.00-0.03) in SICAD and 1% (95% CI, 0.00-0.02) in SISMAD. When stratified by symptoms, symptomatic patients were associated with a significantly increased probability of accomplishing complete remodeling (odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.31-11.85) compared with asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial conservative treatment is safe for asymptomatic SICAD or SISMAD patients. Symptomatic patients managed conservatively have relatively high occurrence of late secondary intervention, which may require closer surveillance, especially in SISMAD because of a lower rate of remodeling.

Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Symptomatic Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: To analyze the published treatment experience with symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD). Methods: A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles on symptomatic SISMAD published in English from January 2007 to January 2018. Case series reporting on both treatment modalities and outcomes were included, while those on traumatic or iatrogenic SMA dissection or SMA dissection accompanied by aortic or other visceral artery dissection were excluded. Overall event rates for treated symptomatic SISMAD were calculated using pooled analyses. The rate of initial conservative treatment, the success rate, the rate of conversion to intervention, and the failure rate in patients with vs without antithrombotic therapy were calculated for each study and compared using a meta-analysis of proportions. Results: The 25 articles selected encompassed 616 SISMAD cases, of which 514 were symptomatic cases eligible for the analysis. Among the latter, initial treatment consisted of conservative therapy in 447 (87.0%) patients and surgical interventions in 67 (13.0%) patients [45 (8.7%) endovascular procedures and 22 (4.3%) open surgeries]. Among conservative cases, 238 (53.2%) received antithrombotic therapy while 172 (38.5%) did not; 50 (11.2%) cases were converted to intervention [42 (84%) endovascular]. Conservative treatment was initially used in 85.2% of pooled cases with an 84.7% success rate, a 14.3% rate of conversion to intervention, and conservative treatment failure rates of 17.8% and 10.1% in patients treated with vs without antithrombotic therapy, respectively (p=0.103). Conclusion: Conservative treatment appeared safe and effective in >80% of symptomatic SISMAD cases, without apparent benefit for antithrombotic agent use. Initial or secondary intervention was more often endovascular, with favorable success rates and short-term outcomes. Large, prospective randomized trials with long-term follow-up are warranted on the treatment for symptomatic SISMAD.

Conservative Management of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Purpose

We report the clinical outcomes of patients with spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SIDSMA) who were treated conservatively.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was performed in 14 patients from 2006 to 2016 with SIDSMA. Their clinical features and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) characteristics, treatment methods, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. The mean age was 53.6 (range, 41–73) years, and the mean follow-up duration was 20.6 (range, 1–54) months. Conservative management was the primary treatment if no bowel ischemia or arterial rupture was noted.

Results

The mean initial abdominal visual analog pain score was 7 (range, 5–9) in seven patients. The mean total duration of abdominal pain was 10.2 days (range, 2–42 days) in 10 patients. The mean percentage stenosis of the dissected SMA at the initial presentation was 78.8% in 14 patients. Complete obstruction of the SMA at the initial presentation was evident in 4 of the 14 patients (28.6%). Conservative management was successful in all 14 patients. None of the 14 patients developed bowel ischemia or an infarction. Abdominal pain did not recur in any patient during follow-up (mean, 20.6 months; range, 1–54 months).

Conclusion

Conservative management was successful for all SIDSMA patients, even those with severe compression of the true lumen or complete obstruction of the dissected SMA.

Conservative treatment for isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery: Report of two cases

•

Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery is very rare condition.

•

Imaging studies are effective for diagnosis.

•

Common treatment strategy consists of three methods as follows; conservative therapy, endovascular treatment, and surgery.

•

The etiology and the best treatment have not been established yet.

Introduction

Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is rare and a treatment strategy has not been established yet. In this paper, we present our experience with two cases and review the literature.

Presentation of case

Both cases were treated conservatively as they did not show signs of bowel ischemia. They were symptom free with no evidence of disease progression after a median follow-up of 3.5 years.

Discussion

There are three methods for the treatment of isolated SMA dissection; observation with medical therapy, endovascular surgery, and open surgery. Most patients with isolated SMA dissection can be treated with observation alone. Although the indications for surgery are still controversial, patients with bowel ischemia should undergo invasive treatment in the form of either endovascular or open surgery.

Conclusion

We recommend observation with medical therapy as the first choice for isolated SMA dissection. However, long term follow-up is necessary as the extent of the dissection may change over time.

Isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery treated using open emergency surgery

Background

Isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (IDSMA) remains a rare diagnosis. However, new diagnostic means such as computed tomography makes it possible to detect even asymptomatic patients. If patients present symptomatic on admission, the risk of bowel infarction makes immediate therapy necessary. Today, endovascular techniques are often successfully used; however, open surgery remains important for special indications. In this paper, we present two cases with IDSMA and show why open surgical repair is still important in current treatment concepts.

Methods

Two cases with ISDMA that presented in our department from January 1, 2014 to June 1, 2014 are described. Data collection was performed retrospectively. Additionally, a review of articles which reported small cases series on patients with IDSMA within the past five years is provided.

Results

Both patients underwent open surgical repair following interdisciplinary consultation. Both patients were transferred to the intensive care unit after surgical repair and needed bowel rest, nasogastric suction and intravenous fluid therapy. CT scans were performed within the first week after operation. Platelet aggregation inhibitors were used in both cases as postoperative medication. Both patients survived and are able to participate in everyday activities.

Conclusion

Open surgical repair remains important in cases of anatomic variants of visceral arteries and suspected bowel infarction. Therefore, it is important that knowledge about open surgical techniques still be taught and trained.