Surgical treatment of neuroblastoma: twenty-three years of experience at a single institution

Gadolinium-based contrast media does not improve the staging of neuroblastoma image-defined risk factors at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Neuroblastoma risk stratification relies on prognostic risk factors and image-defined risk factors (IDRFs). Evaluating neuroblastoma typically involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM, "contrast"). However, there are concerns regarding adverse effects and cost of GBCM. We aimed to assess the impact of intravenous GBCM on interobserver agreement for neuroblastoma staging on baseline MRI.

PROCEDURE

We reviewed baseline MRI scans of 50 children with abdominopelvic neuroblastomas confirmed by histopathology. Duplicate sets of images were created, with post-contrast T1-weighted sequences removed from one set. Four pediatric radiologists independently analyzed the scans in a randomized manner. They recorded primary tumor size, presence of IDRFs, and metastatic lesions. Agreement among the reviewers was measured using kappa and Fleiss kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Mean age of included children was 3.3 years (range: 0.01-14.9 years), and 20 [40%] were females. Mean tumor size was 5.7 cm in greatest axial diameter. Pre-contrast versus post-contrast MRI showed excellent agreement for tumor measurement. Overlapping confidence intervals (CIs) were seen in nearly all categories of interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of individual IDRFs, with agreement ranging from poor to substantial, regardless of the presence of contrast. The overall interobserver agreement on the presence of at least one IDRF was substantial with contrast (kappa = .63; 95% CI: .52-.75) and moderate without contrast (kappa = .5; 95% CI: .39-.61); although the overlapping CIs suggest a lack of meaningful difference. Similarly, interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of individual sites of metastatic disease ranged from poor to substantial. The interobserver agreement on the overall determination of presence of metastatic disease was fair with contrast (kappa = .49; 95% CI: .38-.61) and moderate without contrast (kappa = .71; 95% CI: .59-.826).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast does not improve tumor size measurement or radiologist agreement on the presence or absence of IDRFs or metastatic disease in children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma.

Stage 4S Neuroblastoma: What Are the Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Published Studies

INTRODUCTION

 The prognosis of stage 4S/MS neuroblastoma has traditionally been reported as excellent, yet conflicting treatment protocols exist for this enigmatic disease. To critically address this question, we have undertaken a systematic review of published studies to accurately determine outcomes for infants with stage 4S/MS neuroblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the relevant search terms. Literature reviews, case reports, and adult studies were excluded. Data were extracted independently following article selection by three authors and reviewed by the senior author.

RESULTS

 The original search retrieved 2,325 articles. Following application of exclusion criteria and removing duplicate data, 37 studies (1,105 patients) were included for final review. Overall patient survival was 84%. Twelve studies (544 patients) recorded MYCN status. Mortality in MYCN amplified tumors was 56%. Chromosome 1p/11q status was reported in four studies and 1p/11q deletion carried a 40% fatality rate. Management included observation only (201 patients, 8.5% mortality), surgical resection of primary tumor only (153 patients, 6.5% mortality), chemotherapy only (186 patients, 21% mortality), radiotherapy (5 deaths, 33% mortality), chemotherapy with surgery (160 patients, 10% mortality), surgery with radiotherapy (21 patients, 19% mortality), radiotherapy with chemotherapy (42 patients, 29% mortality), and surgery with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (27 patients, 33% mortality).

CONCLUSION

 There is a significant mortality observed in stage 4S/MS neuroblastoma infants with a dismal outcome observed in those patients with MYCN amplification and 1p/11q deletion. Those patients suitably amenable for conservative management or surgery to excise the primary tumor carry the best prognosis.

Use of quality indicators in neuroblastoma treatment: A feasibility assessment

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators (QIs) may be used to monitor the quality of neuroblastoma (NBL) care during treatment, in addition to survival and treatment toxicity, which can only be evaluated in the years after treatment. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of a new set of indicators for the quality of NBL therapy.

PROCEDURE

Seven QIs have been proposed based on literature and consensus of experts: (a) duration of complete diagnostic work-up, (b) prescription of thyroid prophylaxis before metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging, (c) treatment intensity, (d) use of tumor board meetings, (e) number of outpatient visits and sedation procedures during follow-up, (f) protocolled follow-up, and (g) required apheresis sessions. A retrospective data analysis from October 2014 to November 2017 including all patients with NBL in the centralized Princess Máxima Center in the Netherlands was performed to assess these parameters and determine practicality of measurement.

RESULTS

A total number of 72 patients (aged between 2 weeks and 15 years) were analyzed. Adherence to all QIs could be determined for all eligible patients using their electronic medical records. Three indicators were compared over time, and an increase in adherence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of QIs in neuroblastoma treatment is feasible. Seven new QIs were found to be feasible to measure and showed improvement over time for three indicators. Monitoring of these QIs during treatment may provide tools for quality improvement activities and comparisons of treatment quality over time or between centers. Further study is required to investigate their association with long-term outcomes.

How well do image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) predict surgical outcomes and survival in patients with neuroblastoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Since their introduction to the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system in 2009, the role of Image-Defined Risk Factors (IDRFs) in predicting outcomes has been studied in heterogeneous populations with varying results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to determine quantitative measures of precisely how well pre-treatment IDRFs predict surgical outcomes and survival.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for studies between January 1990 and July 2019 that compared surgical outcomes and/or survival in pediatric neuroblastoma patients with one or more IDRFs to patients without IDRFs. Summary risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

19 retrospective cohort studies were included, representing data from 1132 patients. The risk ratio (RR) of incomplete surgical resection in IDRF-positive patients compared to IDRF-negative patients was 2.45 (95% CI 1.51-3.97). The RR of surgical complications was 2.30 (95% CI 1.46-3.61). The hazard ratio (HR) for 5-year EFS was 2.08 (95% CI 2.93-4.13) while the 5-year HR for OS was 2.44 (95% CI 1.46-4.08).

CONCLUSION

IDRF-positive neuroblastoma patients have a higher risk of incomplete surgical resection, surgical complications, and 5-year mortality and/or relapse. Our results affirm that IDRFs remain a useful prognostic tool for neuroblastoma patients both for short and long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Impact of extent of resection on survival in high-risk neuroblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of new treatment options, the prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma patients is still poor. Many studies designed to elaborate the association between the extent of resection (EOR) and outcome have reported conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether greater EOR is associated with improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, and conference proceedings were searched between March 10 and October 1, 2017. Studies of pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma comparing various EOR and presenting objective overall or event-free survival data were included. Primary outcomes were relative risk (RR) for mortality at 3 and 5 years. Secondary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year EFS rates.

RESULTS

19 retrospective studies including a total of 2358 cases were identified. Compared with subtotal resection (STR), patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) had significantly decreased mortality at 3 years (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.82; P < 0.001; I² = 27%) and 5 years (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P < 0.001; I² = 38%). A similar decrease was revealed in the 3-year risk for mortality for STR compared with biopsy (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95; P = 0.02; I² = 0%). When comparing any resection with biopsy, resection group also showed a decreased risk for mortality at 3 years (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.83; P < 0.001; I² = 8%) and 5 years (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = 0.009; I² = 61%). With respect to the risk ratio for EFS, there were no significant differences in any comparisons.

CONCLUSION

This literature highlights the importance of "extent of resection" in treating high-risk neuroblastoma, and when feasible, the currently available evidences in favor of the use of GTR for high-risk neuroblastoma for reducing 3- and 5-year mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3A.

A single center clinical analysis of children with high-risk neuroblastoma

The current multidisciplinary treatment for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) is the common census. However, protocols and opinions are different in different regions and institutions. We aimed to assess the protocol formulated by Chinese Children's Cancer Group study in 2009, and the impact of surgery extent was highlightly evaluated.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients with high-risk neuroblastoma between 2009 and 2014 in Department of Pediatric Oncology of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. The clinical characteristics of patients were illustrated and surgery extent was evaluated by the impact on survival rate.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.2% and 50.5%, respectively. LDH (P<0.001), bone marrow metastasis at time of diagnosis (P=0.001), bone marrow negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001), radiotherapy (P<0.001) were significant predictors of OS and PFS. And surgery extent had no impact on the enhancement of high-risk neuroblastoma patients in short time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no substantial survival benefit in patients with high-risk NB undergoing gross total tumor resection. Multidisciplinary intensive treatment was essential, especially for patients received subtotal tumor resection. Longer term follow-up is needed to survey complications in surviving patients who received intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Laparoscopic resection of neuroblastomas in low- to high-risk patients without image-defined risk factors is safe and feasible

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) might be considered for resecting neuroblastomas without image-defined risk factors (IDRFs); however, there are no studies comparing the outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopy in IDRF-negative patients. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery and compared the two abovementioned approaches.

METHODS

To compare the effects of laparotomy with those of laparoscopy in patients with neuroblastomas without IDRFs, the following items were retrospectively compared: largest tumor dimension, volume of blood loss, time required to initiate postoperative feeding, locoregional recurrence rate, survival, etc.

RESULTS

Nine patients without IDRFs (three at low-to-medium risk and six at high risk) underwent laparotomy, and seven patients without IDRFs (two at low-to-medium risk and five at high risk) underwent laparoscopy. Median duration of surgery was 221 (130-304) and 172 (122-253) min in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively, showing no significant difference. Median postoperative time required for resuming meal consumption was significantly longer in the laparotomy (4 days; 2-5) group than that in the laparoscopy group (3 days; 2-3; p = 0.023). Median blood loss was significantly higher in the laparotomy group (5 ml/Kg;2.6-16) than that in the laparoscopy group (2.1 ml/Kg;0.1-4.0; P = 0.037). Median follow-up period was 81 (52-94) and 21 (17-28) months, locoregional recurrence rates were 22 and 0% at 1 year, 1-year progression-free survival rates were 78 and 100%, and overall survival rates were 67 and 100% in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS for the treatment of neuroblastomas without IDRFs in low- to high-risk patients is safe and feasible and does not compromise the treatment outcome.

Does aggressive surgical resection improve survival in advanced stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of surgery in the management of advanced staged neuroblastoma (NBL) is controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis is reported to address robust evidence for curative "gross total tumor resection" (GTR) in Stage 3 and Stage 4 neuroblastoma. Studies were identified using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases using pre-specified search terms. Primary outcomes were 5-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after GTR and subtotal resection (STR) in Stage 3 or 4 NBL. Data were analyzed using Review Manager. The Mantel-Haenszel method and a random effects model was utilized to calculate odds ratios (95% CI). Fifteen studies (five Stage 3 and 13 Stage 4) met full inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio for 5 year OS in Stage 3 following GTR compared to STR was 2.4 (95% CI 1.19-4.85). In Stage 4 disease, the pooled odds ratio for 5 year overall survival (OS) following GTR compared to STR was 1.65 (95% CI 0.96-1.91); a pooled odds ratio for 5 year DFS following GTR compared to STR was 1.55 (95% CI 1.12-2.14). A clear survival benefit is shown for GTR over STR in Stage 3 NBL only. Though some advantage can be demonstrated for GTR as defined by DFS in Stage 4 NBL GTR did not significantly improve OS in Stage 4 disease.