Hemorrhage from the pancreatic cut end into the jejunum after binding pancreaticojejunostomy: report of a case

Clinical impact of atrophic changes in remnant pancreas on the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with a special focus on remnant pancreatic volume (RPV) as assessed using computed tomography (CT).

Methods

From February 2004 to June 2017, 101 patients who underwent PD in our institution were enrolled. We defined a CT attenuation value of less than 40 HU as hepatic steatosis and measured RPV at 7 days, 3 months, and 1 year after PD using the SYNAPSE VINCENT system. The incidence of NAFLD and RPV were compared between the two groups according to reconstruction with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ).

Results

The incidence of NAFLD at 3 months after PD was 39.6% (40/101). The RPV ratio (RPV at 3 months or 1 year divided by RPV at 7 days after PD) at both 3 months and 1 year was significantly smaller in the PG group than in the PJ group (59% vs 73%, P < .001 and 53% vs 67% P < .01, respectively). A positive correlation between the RPV ratio and liver CT value at 3 months was found. The multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for NAFLD: female sex (odds ratio [OR] 8.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.27‐35.9, P < .001), PG reconstruction (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.04‐15.6, P = .04), and RPV ratio ≤60% (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.06‐11.8, P = .001).

Conclusion

Atrophic change in the remnant pancreas is significantly associated with the development of NAFLD, and PJ reconstruction may be superior to PG from the viewpoint of NAFLD development.

Bleeding from the pancreatic cut surface post pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhage from the pancreatic cut surface after pancreaticoduodenectomy is uncommon. The optimal treatment for post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) from the pancreatic cut surface remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis including all patients who underwent a pancreatiocoduodenectomy between 2008 and 2018 at a single tertiary institution in Melbourne, Australia, to analyse the incidence, potential risk factors, treatment and outcomes of cut surface PPH.

RESULTS

A total of 168 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed during the study period with pancreaticogastrostomy being the most common method of reconstruction at our institution (84.5%). There were 12 instances of cut surface PPH (7.1%). The majority of cases of cut surface PPH occurred within 48 h following pancreaticoduodenectomy (67%) with 41.7% occurring in the first 24 h. All but one patient required surgical intervention but length of stay did not appear to be increased compared to those without cut surface PPH. There was a trend towards patients with cut surface PPH being more likely to have a non-dilated pancreatic duct (75% versus 49%; P = 0.079). No significant differences were noted between patient with and without cut surface PPH with regards to abnormalities in platelet counts (3.2% versus 0%; P = 0.529), international normalized ratio (4.5% versus 8.3%; P = 0.694) and prophylactic anticoagulant administration or continuing antiplatelet use (28.2 versus 16.7%; P = 0.630).

CONCLUSION

We believe that an unobstructed pancreas, in combination with the acidic environment associated with a dunking pancreaticogastrostomy anastomosis, may predispose to bleeding from the cut surface of the pancreas.