Non-rigid reconstruction of chest wall defects after resection of musculoskeletal tumors

Complications of chest wall around malignant tumors: differences based on reconstruction strategy

BACKGROUND

Malignant chest wall tumors need to be excised with wide resection to ensure tumor free margins, and the reconstruction method should be selected according to the depth and dimensions of the tumor. Vascularized tissue is needed to cover the superficial soft tissue defect or bone tissue defect. This study evaluated differences in complications according to reconstruction strategy.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with 52 operations for resection of malignant tumors in the chest wall were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as having superficial tumors, comprising Group A with simple closure for small soft tissue defects and Group B with flap coverage for wide soft tissue defects, or deep tumors, comprising Group C with full-thickness resection with or without mesh reconstruction and Group D with full-thickness resection covered by flap with or without polymethyl methacrylate. Complications were evaluated for the 52 operations based on reconstruction strategy then risk factors for surgical and respiratory complications were elucidated.

RESULTS

Total local recurrence-free survival rates in 45 patients who received first operation were 83.9% at 5 years and 70.6% at 10 years. The surgical complication rate was 11.5% (6/52), occurring only in cases with deep tumors, predominantly from Group D. Operations needing chest wall reconstruction (p = 0.0016) and flap transfer (p = 0.0112) were significantly associated with the incidence of complications. Operations involving complications showed significantly larger tumors, wider areas of bony chest wall resection and greater volumes of bleeding (p < 0.005). Flap transfer was the only significant predictor identified from multivariate analysis (OR: 10.8, 95%CI: 1.05-111; p = 0.0456). The respiratory complication rate was 13.5% (7/52), occurring with superficial and deep tumors, particularly Groups B and D. Flap transfer was significantly associated with the incidence of respiratory complications (p < 0.0005). Cases in the group with respiratory complications were older, more frequently had a history of smoking, had lower FEV1.0% and had a wider area of skin resected compared to cases in the group without respiratory complications (p < 0.05). Preoperative FEV1.0% was the only significant predictor identified from multivariate analysis (OR: 0.814, 95%CI: 0.693-0.957; p = 0.0126).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical complications were more frequent in Group D and after operations involving flap transfer. Severe preoperative FEV1.0% was associated with respiratory complications even in cases of superficial tumors with flap transfer.

Surgical management of sternal tumours-a decade of experience from a tertiary care centre in India

Tumours of the sternum can be either primary or secondary with malignancy being the most common etiology. Wide local excision of these tumours results in a midline defect which pose a unique challenge for reconstruction. As limited data on the management of these tumours exists in the literature, we hereby report 14 consecutive patients who were treated at our institute between January 2009 to December 2020. Most of them were malignant with majority of them, 11 (78%) patients, with manubrial involvement requiring partial sternectomy. Overall, the average defect size was 75 cm2. Reconstruction of the chest wall defect was done using a semi-rigid fixation: mesh and suture stabilization in 3 (21%) or suture stabilization in 7 (50%) and without mesh or suture stabilization in 3 (21%) patients. Rigid fixation with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was done for one patient (7%). Pectoralis major advancement flap was most commonly used for soft tissue reconstruction with flap necrosis noted in one patient (7%). There was no peri-operative mortality and one patient required prolonged post-operative ventilation. On a median follow-up of 37.5 months, one patient (7%) had a recurrence. Sternal defects after surgical resection reconstructed with semi-rigid fixation and suture stabilization render acceptable post-operative outcomes.

Full-thickness chest wall resection for malignant chest wall tumors and postoperative problems

Background

Chest wall malignant tumor (including primary and metastatic lesions) is rare, representing less than 5% of all thoracic malignancies. Local control of chest wall malignancies requires wide resection with tumor-free margins. These requirements increase the risk of thoracic cavity failure and subsequent pulmonary failure. The restoration strategy for chest wall defects comprises chest wall reconstruction and soft-tissue coverage. Various reconstruction methods have been used, but both evidence and guidelines for chest wall reconstruction remain lacking. The purposes of this study were to collate our institutional experience, evaluate the outcomes of full-thickness chest wall resection and reconstruction for patients with chest wall malignant tumor, and identify problems in current practice for chest wall reconstruction with a focus on local control, complications, pulmonary function and scoliosis.

Methods

Participants comprised 30 patients with full-thickness chest wall malignant tumor who underwent chest wall resection and reconstruction between 1997 and 2021 in Mie University Hospital. All patients underwent chest wall resection of primary, recurrent or metastatic malignant tumors. A retrospective review was conducted for 32 operations.

Results

Recurrence was observed after 5 operations. Total 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 79.3%. Diameter ≥5 cm was significantly associated with poor RFS. The postoperative complication rate was 18.8%. Flail chest was observed with resection of ≥3 ribs in anterior and lateral resections or with sternum resection without polyethylene methylmethacrylate reconstruction. Postoperative EFV1.0% did not show any significant decrease. Postoperative %VC decreased significantly with resection of ≥4 ribs or an area of >70 cm2. Postoperative scoliosis was observed in 8 of 28 patients. Posterior resection was associated with a high prevalence of scoliosis (88.9%).

Conclusion

With chest wall reconstruction, risks of pulmonary impairment, flail chest and scoliosis were significantly increased. New strategies including indications for rigid reconstruction are needed to improve the outcomes of chest wall reconstruction.

Chest wall reconstruction in benign and malignant tumors with non-rigid materials: An overview

Several materials and techniques have been described for the procedure of chest wall reconstruction: the choice of using a technique or a material over another relies mainly on the surgeon's experience as well as thoracic defect localization and dimension, local availability of materials, and costs. From a technical point of view, autologous and alloplastic reconstruction are available, and, in both cases, rigid and non-rigid prostheses are found. Each material has its peculiarities, with advantages and disadvantages; thus, it is mandatory to be confident when planning the intervention to foresee possible complications and minimize them. We have reviewed the literature on chest wall reconstruction in chest wall tumors (both malignant and non malignant) with non-rigid prosthetic materials, focusing on safety outcomes.

The Best of Chest Wall Reconstruction: Principles and Clinical Application for Complex Oncologic and Sternal Defects

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appraise and evaluate risk factors for respiratory compromise following oncologic resection. 2. Outline and apply an algorithmic approach to reconstruction of the chest wall based on defect composition, size, and characteristics of surrounding tissue. 3. Recognize and evaluate indications for and types of skeletal stabilization of the chest wall. 4. Critically consider, compare, and select pedicled and free flaps for chest wall reconstruction that do not impair residual respiratory function or skeletal stability.

SUMMARY

Chest wall reconstruction restores respiratory function, provides protection for underlying viscera, and supports the shoulder girdle. Common indications for chest wall reconstruction include neoplasms, trauma, infectious processes, and congenital defects. Loss of chest wall integrity can result in respiratory and cardiac compromise and upper extremity instability. Advances in reconstructive techniques have expanded the resectability of large complex oncologic tumors by safely and reliably restoring chest wall integrity in an immediate fashion with minimal or no secondary deficits. The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with current evidenced-based knowledge to optimize care of patients requiring chest wall reconstruction. This article discusses the evaluation and management of oncologic chest wall defects, reviews controversial considerations in chest wall reconstruction, and provides an algorithm for the reconstruction of complex chest wall defects. Respiratory preservation, semirigid stabilization, and longevity are key when reconstructing chest wall defects.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Primary Chest Wall Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Background

This study investigated the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of primary chest wall soft tissue sarcoma (CW-STS).

Methods

Thirty-one patients who underwent surgery for CW-STS between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The disease-free and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 65.6 months. The most common histologic type of tumor was malignant fibrous histiocytoma (29%). The resection extended to the soft tissue in 14 patients, while it reached full thickness in 17 patients. Complete resection was achieved in 27 patients (87.1%). There were 5 cases of local recurrence, 3 cases of distant metastasis, and 5 cases of combined recurrence. The 5-year disease-free rate was 49%. Univariate analysis indicated that incomplete resection (p<0.001) and stage (p=0.062) were possible risk factors for recurrence. Multivariate analysis determined that incomplete resection (p=0.013) and stage (p=0.05) were significantly associated with recurrence. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 86.8% and 64.3%, respectively. No prognostic factor for survival was identified.

Conclusion

Long-term primary CW-STS surgery outcomes were found to be favorable. Incomplete microscopic resection and stage were risk factors for recurrence.

Surgical complication and postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing tumor surgery with thoracic wall resection

Postoperative complications of thoracic wall resection include respiratory complications, skin necrosis and infection. The aim of the present study was to examine postoperative complications in patients who required combined thoracic wall resection during the surgical removal of a tumor. The present study included 68 patients; there were 50 patients with lung tumors and 18 patients with musculoskeletal tumors. The clinical factors associated with complications were compared between the two groups. Preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests were performed to examine the residual pulmonary function in 16 patients. Thoracic cage reconstruction was performed in 46 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 30 (44.1%) patients, and one patient died from postoperative pneumonitis. Compared with the pulmonary function preoperative test results, the postoperative results revealed a decrease in the mean vital capacity percentage and an increase in the mean forced expiratory volume within 1 sec as a percent of the forced vital capacity. In patients with lung tumors, pneumonectomy can result in an increased rate of complications following thoracic wall resection. Residual pulmonary function is affected by impaired thoracic cage expansion and removal of the lung. However, the results of the present study demonstrated that these complications can be somewhat stabilized by thoracic wall reconstruction.

A new minimally invasive technique of combined chest wall resection for lung cancer

We describe our technique of minimally invasive chest wall resection for primary lung cancer. We used this technique to perform two lobectomies combined with chest wall resection using thoracoscopic assistance. The intercostal muscles and vessels were divided using a vessel-sealing device, which was easy to maneuver through the access incision, achieving reliable hemostasis. In one patient, adding the utility port just over the dorsal edge of the chest wall proved useful for dissecting the distal area of the chest wall. This approach required only minimal incision without cutting the uninvolved extrathoracic musculature of the chest.

Post-operative pulmonary and shoulder function after sternal reconstruction for patients with chest wall sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Sternal resection is occasionally required for patients with malignant tumors, particularly sarcomas, in the sternal region. Few reports have described post-operative respiratory and shoulder function after sternal resection for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Eight consecutive patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas requiring sternal resection were the focus of this study. Chest wall was reconstructed with a non-rigid or semi-rigid prosthesis combined, in most cases, with soft tissue flap reconstruction. Clinical outcomes investigated included complications, shoulder function, evaluated with Musculoskeletal Tumor Society-International Symposium of Limb Salvage system, and respiratory function, evaluated by use of spirometry.

RESULTS

The anterior chest wall was reconstructed with non-rigid strings for 3 patients and with polypropylene mesh for 5. There were no severe post-operative complications, for example surgical site infection or pneumonia. All 3 patients with non-rigid reconstruction experienced paradoxical breathing, whereas none with polypropylene mesh did so. Post-operatively, FEV(1)% was unchanged but %VC was significantly reduced (p = 0.01), irrespective of the reconstruction method used (strings or polypropylene mesh). Shoulder function was not impaired.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing sternal resection, post-operative shoulder function was excellent. Pulmonary function was slightly restricted, but not sufficiently so to interfere with the activities of daily living (ADL). Paradoxical breathing is a slight concern for non-rigid reconstruction.