Diagnostic laparoscopic biopsy for intraabdominal tumors

Liver biopsy for hepatoblastoma: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatoblastoma diagnoses require liver biopsies. We aimed to investigate factors affecting the success of liver biopsy for hepatoblastoma diagnoses.

METHODS

Data from patients with hepatoblastoma, including their demographic and clinical data, biopsy procedure information, pathologic diagnoses and subclassification, and surgical complications, were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 153 patients who underwent liver biopsy, 28, 93, and 31 underwent computed tomography-guided, digital subtraction angiography-guided, and ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsies, respectively, and one underwent a laparoscopic liver biopsy. One patient developed postoperative bleeding requiring a blood transfusion. The median number of specimens collected was 3. One-hundred and forty-four (94.1%) patients' HB diagnoses were confirmed through biopsies, and 96 (62.7%) patients' HB diagnoses were subclassified. Seven surgeons and eight interventional radiologists performed the biopsies. The diagnostic success rate did not correlate with the biopsy technique or the specialist who performed the biopsy. Significantly more specimens were biopsied from the patients whose diagnoses were subclassified (3.34 ± 1.08) than from those whose diagnoses were not subclassified (2.81 ± 0.79). Surgeons tended to collect more specimens than the interventional radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and effective for diagnosing hepatoblastoma, and its complication rate is very low. Collecting >3 pieces of tissue is preferred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Laparoscopic Resection of Subclinical Functioning Para-aortic Paraganglioma

Introduction:

Extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas (paragangliomas) are neuroendocrine tumors derived from extra-adrenal chromaffin cells. Although laparoscopic resection of adrenal pheochromocytomas is a common procedure, there are few reports of the use of this approach in extra-adrenal para-aortic paragangliomas. Here, we report the case of a patient with a subclinical functioning para-aortic paraganglioma that was successfully resected laparoscopically.

Case presentation:

A 58-year-old man was referred to our department for treatment of a para-aortic tumor after endoscopic submucosal dissection of early-stage colorectal cancer. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography showed abnormal accumulation by the para-aortic tumor. During its laparoscopic resection, the patient's blood pressure unexpectedly rose to over 180 mmHg, which suggested that the tumor was a paraganglioma. The diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining, which showed chromogranin-positive cells forming a Zellballen pattern. The operation was successfully completed, and the patient's postoperative course was uneventful.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic resection may be a suitable procedure for the treatment of retroperitoneal paraganglioma.