Lymphatic vessel invasion in pathologic stage I and II non-small cell lung tumors

Comparison of survival results of patients with T0 and T1-2-3 in pathological T staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment

Aim

In this study, we aimed to compare the survival results of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with NSCLC between March 1997 and August 2014 and were found to have T0N0 and T1-2-3/N0.

Material and methods

A hundred ninety-five patients who had complete neoadjuvant therapy, complete lung resection and lymph node dissection, and pathologically diagnosed as T0 or T1-2-3/N0, M0 were included in the study.

Results

Of the 195 patients included in the study, 181 were male, 14 were female and the mean age of the patients was 57.9. The mean age of the groups was as follows: group 1: 58.1, group 2: 57.7, group 3: 59.7 and group 4: 56.8. In our series the most common complication was atelectasis (n = 19). Others were prolonged air leak (n = 16), pneumonia (n = 12), apical pleural space (n = 6), wound infection (n = 3), cardiac problems (n = 3), hematoma (n = 3), bronchopleural fistula (n = 3), empyema (n = 2), chylothorax (n = 1). The 5-year survival rate for patients in the T0N0 group was 76.3%. This rate was 71.8% in group 2, 63.6% in group 3 and 44.1% in group 4.

Conclusions

Survival was found to be better in patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and had a complete pathological response. We believe that we can provide better results with the increase in the number of cases detected as TxN0 after the neoadjuvant treatment and prolongation of the follow-up period.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Prognosis of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate the effect of preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods: Observational studies comparing the prognosis of NSCLC patients with and without diabetes were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We searched for studies that published in English from inception to March 30, 2019, using search terms related to diabetes and NSCLC. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by a random-effect model and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results: In all, 17 of 1475 identified studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. The result revealed that preexisting diabetes had a significantly negative impact on the overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12–1.54), especially in patients undergoing surgical treatment (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02–2.09) in comparison with those receiving only non-surgical treatment (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.87–2.03). In addition, preexisting diabetes was more likely to be associated with a worse prognosis among Asian NSCLC patients than Western patients. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the main result was robust, and no evidence of publication bias was found.

Conclusion: Preexisting DM has a negative impact on diabetic NSCLC patients’ prognosis.

Diabetes mellitus and survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgery: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities in surgically treated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and has a negative impact on short‐term outcomes. However, the impact of DM on long‐term survival of such patients remains controversial; therefore, we conducted a comprehensive updated meta‐analysis.

Methods

We systematically searched relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 6 September 2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the impact of DM on overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of patients with surgically treated NSCLC were extracted and analyzed using the STATA 12.0 package.

Results

We included 13 cohort studies consisting of 4343 patients (730 patients with DM and 3613 patients without) with surgically treated NSCLC. Meta‐analysis showed that patients with DM had significantly poorer OS (random effects: HR 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.60; P = 0.016) than those without. However, with a limited sample size, there was no significant difference in RFS (random effects: HR 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.71–1.58; P = 0.786) between patients with and without DM after surgical resection of NSCLC.

Conclusion

DM is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with surgically treated NSCLC. High‐quality studies with appropriate adjustment for confounding factors are needed to confirm our conclusions.