Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy appropriate for patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery as the initial treatment for patients with resectable, synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although perioperative chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for colorectal cancer with resectable liver metastases (CRLM), studies that have compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and upfront surgery, especially in the setting of synchronous metastases are rare.

METHODS

We compared perioperative outcomes, overall survival (OS) and overall survival after recurrence (rOS) in a retrospective study of 281 total and 104 propensity score-matched (PSM) patients who underwent curative resection, with or without NAC, for synchronous CRLM, from 2006 to 2017. A Cox regression model was developed for OS.

RESULTS

After PSM, 52 NAC and 52 upfront surgery patients with similar baseline characteristics were compared. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and 5-year OS rate (NAC: 78.9%, surgery: 64.0%; p = 0.102) were similar between groups; however, the NAC group had better rOS (NAC: 67.3%, surgery: 31.5%; p = 0.049). Initial cancer stage (T4, N1-2), poorly differentiated histology, and >1 hepatic metastases were independent predictors of worse OS. Based on these factors, patients were divided into low-risk (≤1 risk factor, n = 115) and high-risk (≥2 risk factors, n = 166) groups. For high-risk patients, NAC yielded better OS than upfront surgery (NAC: 74.5%, surgery: 53.2%; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Although NAC and upfront surgery-treated patients had similar perioperative outcomes and OS, better postrecurrence survival was shown in patients with NAC. In addition, NAC may benefit patients with worse prognoses; therefore, physicians should consider patient disease risk before initiating treatment to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

Impact of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index on prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis

AIM

The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel inflammation-based biomarker. We aimed to investigate whether the CALLY can predict the prognosis in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatic resection.

METHODS

We included 183 patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy. The CALLY index was defined as (albumin × lymphocytes)/(CRP × 10⁴). We investigated the association of the CALLY index with overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 101 (55%) patients had a low CALLY index (<4). In the univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly worse in patients with lymph node metastases (p = 0.02), extrahepatic lesions (p < 0.01), and a low CALLY index (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, independent and significant predictors of overall survival were lymph node metastases (p = 0.04), extrahepatic lesions (p = 0.03), and a low CALLY index (p = 0.03). Patients with a low CALLY index had significantly more postoperative complications than those with a high CALLY index (29% vs. 11%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The CALLY index may be an independent and significant indicator of outcomes in patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM.

Metachronous colorectal liver metastasis that occurred 10 years after laparoscopic colectomy: a case report

Background

Delayed onset of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) > 5 years after primary colorectal surgery is rare. Herein, we report a case of delayed-onset CRLM that occurred 10 years after primary surgery, for which laparoscopic hepatectomy was performed.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old man was admitted to the hospital. His medical history revealed double colon cancer detected 10 years ago, for which laparoscopic colectomy was performed. The pathological tumor–node–metastasis stages were stages I and II. Thereafter, oral floor cancer occurred 7 years after the primary surgery and was curatively resected. The annual follow-up with positron emission tomography–computed tomography (CT) identified a tumor at segment 7/8 (S7/8) of the liver with an abnormal accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose. Dynamic CT showed a 23-mm tumor, with ring enhancement in the early phase. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium–ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid demonstrated that the tumor had high intensity in T2 weighted sequences and low intensity in the hepatobiliary phase. With a preoperative diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or delayed liver metastasis, laparoscopic S7/8 partial resection was performed. The operative time was 324 min, and the intraoperative bleeding volume was 35 mL. The patient was discharged on day 15 without any postoperative complications. Upon histopathological examination, the final diagnosis was CRLM. The patient has survived for 1 year without any recurrence.

Conclusions

It is important to pay attention to the occurrence of delayed-metachronous CRLM.

Liver regeneration after extensive hepatectomy in rats: effect of preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravenous chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration in an experimental model of major hepatectomy in rats.

METHODS

Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 20 animals each and submitted to 70% hepatectomy 24 h after intravenous injection of 5-fluorouracil 20 mg/kg (fluorouracil group, FG) or 0.9% saline (control group, CG). After hepatectomy, each group was subdivided into two subgroups of 10 animals each according to the day of sacrifice (24 h or 7 days). Liver weight during regeneration, liver regeneration rate using Kwon formula, and the immunohistochemical markers proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 were used to assess liver regeneration.

RESULTS

At early phase (24 h after hepatectomy) it was demonstrated the negative effect of 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration when assessed by Kwon formula (p < 0.0001), PCNA analysis (p = 0.02). With regeneration process complete (7 days), it was possible to demonstrate the sustained impairment of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on hepatocytes regeneration phenomenon when measured by Kwon formula (p = 0.009), PCNA analysis (p = 0.0001) and Ki-67 analysis (0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil negatively affected the mechanisms of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats.

Oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A result from a propensity score matching study

Background

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in treating resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial.

Methods

Data from CRLM patients who underwent simultaneous liver resection between January 2015 and December 2019 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (SEER cohort, n=305) and a single Chinese Cancer Center (NCC cohort, n=268). Using a 1:2 ratio of propensity score matching (PSM), the prognostic impact of NAC for patients who underwent NAC before surgical treatment and patients who underwent surgical treatment alone was evaluated.

Results

After PSM, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NAC prior to CRLM resection and those undergoing surgery only, in both the NCC and SEER cohorts (each P &gt; 0.05). Age was an independent predictor of OS only in the SEER cohort (P = 0.040), while the pN stage was an independent predictor for OS only in the NCC cohort (P = 0.002). Furthermore, Disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between the two groups in the NCC cohort. In a subgroup analysis, the DFS and OS in the NAC- group were significantly worse than those in the NAC+ group for patients with more than two liver metastases in the NCC cohort (P &lt; 0.05 for both).

Conclusion

NAC did not have a significant prognostic impact in patients with resectable synchronous CRLM. However, patients with more than two liver metastases could be good candidates for receiving NAC.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially resectable colorectal liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most common metastatic site of colorectal cancer. Hepatectomy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). However, there are cases of early recurrence after upfront hepatectomy alone. In selected high-risk patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may improve long-term survival.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of NAC for initially resectable CRLMs.

METHODS

Among 644 patients who underwent their first hepatectomy for CRLMs at our institution, 297 resectable cases were stratified into an upfront hepatectomy group (238 patients) and a NAC group (59 patients). Poor prognostic factors for upfront hepatectomy were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was used to compare clinical outcomes between the upfront hepatectomy and NAC groups, according to the number of poor prognostic factors. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels (≥ 10 ng/mL) (P = 0.003), primary histological type (other than well/moderately differentiated) (P = 0.04), and primary lymph node metastases (≥ 1) (P = 0.04) were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in the upfront hepatectomy group. High-risk status was defined as the presence of two or more risk factors. After propensity score matching, 50 patients were matched in each group. Among high-risk patients, the 5-year OS rate was significantly higher in the NAC group (13 patients) than in the upfront hepatectomy group (18 patients) (100% vs 34%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

NAC may improve the prognosis of high-risk patients with resectable CRLMs who have two or more risk factors.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: a Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is widely used, but its efficacy lacks clear evidence. This retrospective cohort study investigated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared to upfront surgery for CRLM.

METHODS

Data from patients with resectable CRLM were analyzed. Short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis were analyzed using propensity score matching. CRLM was stratified according to the H-classification (H1 and H2), and the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

We analyzed 599 cases that were matched into an NAC group (n = 136) and an upfront surgery group (n = 136). The proportion of synchronous metastases, H2-classification, and postoperative chemotherapy rate did not differ between the groups. Overall survival (OS) after initial treatment was significantly worse in the NAC group than in the upfront surgery group (P = 0.029). The 5-, 7-, and 10-year OS rates for H1 patients were significantly better in the upfront surgery group than in the NAC group (64%, 51%, and 44% vs. 50%, 31%, and 18%, respectively) (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with resectable CRLM should undergo upfront surgery, because NAC did not improve OS after initial treatment in these patients.

Treatment strategy for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases from the viewpoint of time to surgical failure

PURPOSE

The efficacy of pre or postoperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is disputed. This study aimed to examine the risk factors for time to surgical failure (TSF) and analyze the efficacy of pre or postoperative chemotherapy prior to liver resection for CRLM.

METHODS

The clinicopathological factors of 567 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM at 7 university hospitals between April 2007 and March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic factors were identified and then stratified into two groups according to the number of preoperative prognostic factors: the high-score group (H-group, score 2-4) and the low-score group (L-group, score 0 or 1).

RESULTS

Patients who experienced unresectable recurrence within 12 months after initial treatment had a significantly shorter prognosis than other patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 70 (p = 0.001), pT4 (p = 0.015), pN1 (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥ 37 U/ml (p = 0.002), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (p = 0.013), and postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.006) as independent prognostic factors. In the H-group, patients who received chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those who did not (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative chemotherapy is beneficial in colorectal cancer patients with more than two of the following factors: age ≥ 70, carbohydrate antigen 19-9-positivity, pT4, and lymph node metastasis.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk resectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The role of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains undetermined. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM, especially in high-risk subgroups for recurrence, with special reference to synchronicity and the CRLM grade in the Japanese classification system.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional cohort who was diagnosed with resectable CRLM was performed. CRLM was classified into three grades (A, B, and C) according to the combination of H stage (H1: ≤ 4 lesions and ≤ 5 cm, H2: ≥ 5 lesions or > 5 cm, H3: ≥ 5 lesions and > 5 cm), nodal status of the primary tumor (pN0/1: ≤ 3 metastases, pN2: ≥ 4 metastases), and the presence of resectable extrahepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Among 222 patients with resectable CRLM, 97 (43.7%) had synchronous CRLM. The surgical failure-free survival (SF-FS) of patients with synchronous CRLM (without NAC) was significantly worse than that of patients with metachronous CRLM (P = 0.0264). The SF-FS of patients with Grade B/C was also significantly worse than that of Grade A (P = 0.0058). Among the 53 patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM, 31 were assigned to NAC, and all of them underwent liver surgery. In this high-risk subgroup, the SF-FS and OS in the NAC group were significantly better than those in the upfront surgery group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM could be good candidates for indication of NAC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been increasingly used in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. However, the efficacy and safety of NAC in the treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are still controversial.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and application value of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2020 to collect clinical studies comparing NAC with non-NAC. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.0 software.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies involving 11236 patients were included in this analysis. We divided the patients into two groups, the NAC group (that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and the non-NAC group (that received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The meta-analysis outcome showed a statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between the two groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were HR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.39-0.61, P = 0.000 and HR = 0.48 95%CI: 0.36-0.63, P = 0.000. The duration of surgery in the NAC group was longer than that of the non-NAC group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.01-0.82, P = 0.044)]. The meta-analysis showed that the number of liver metastases in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.02-1.43, P = 0.043). The lymph node metastasis in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.07-1.43, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We found that NAC could improve the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable CRLM. At the same time, the NAC group did not increase the risk of any adverse event compared to the non-NAC group.

Mesothelin Expression is Correlated with Chemoresistance in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mesothelin (MSLN) is a cell-surface glycoprotein present on mesothelial cells; its expression in several epithelial cancers generally portends an unfavorable prognosis. We investigated MSLN as a surrogate chemopredictive biomarker and examined the impact of MSLN expression in stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We recruited 254 patients with CRC who received systemic chemotherapy following primary tumor resection between 2000 and 2019. Resected specimens were immunostained for MSLN and stratified by MSLN expression. The associations of tumor MSLN expression with tumor response in metastatic lesions and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 247 patients with stage IV CRC, 41 (16.1%) and 213 (83.9%) had high and low MSLN expression, respectively. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria, the investigator-assessed objective response rate was 22.0% in the high MSLN expression group and 45.5% in the low MSLN expression group (p = 0.0050). The disease control rates in these groups were 65.9% and 85.9%, respectively (p = 0.00019). In the patients with high MSLN expression, the conversion rate among those with initially unresectable metastases was 0% versus 14% in the patients with low MSLN expression (p = 0.0053). The median overall survival (OS) was 1.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.8) in the high MSLN expression group versus 2.6 years (95% CI 2.2-3.0) in the low MSLN expression group. The 3-year OS rates in these groups were 23.5 and 41.5%, respectively (p = 0.0120).

CONCLUSIONS

High MSLN expression is correlated with chemoresistance and poor prognoses in stage IV CRC.

What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?

Background

The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles.

Methods

One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles.

Conclusions

Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses.

From the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: What is the optimal timing?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been widely performed in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients, but the optimal timing of surgery after NAC is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal timing of surgery.

METHODS

From December 2010 to May 2018, 101 consecutive patients who received NAC followed by liver resection for CRLM were included in this study. The main outcome parameters were pathological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The effect of time to surgery (TTS) on patient outcomes, defined as a high TTS and a low TTS according to an X-tile analysis, was investigated. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching at 1:2 was performed with two high TTS patients matched to one low TTS patient. Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression analyses, and Cox regression models were used for the data analysis.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for the TTS was 5 weeks by X-tile analysis. The patients in this study were divided into low (≤5 weeks, n = 27) and high (>5 weeks, n = 74) TTS groups. Patients with a high TTS were more likely to have an unfavorable pathological response (75.7% vs 48.1%, P = .008). In multivariate analysis, a low TTS significantly predicted a better pathological response (OR = 3.397, 95% CI: 1.116-10.344, P = .031). Compared to patients with a high TTS, patients with a low TTS had significantly better PFS (P < .001, mPFS: 16 months vs 7 months) and better OS (P = .037, mOS: not reached vs 36 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that a TTS > 5 weeks was an independent predictor of decreased PFS (HR = 2.041, 95% CI: 1.152-3.616, P = .014) but not OS. After propensity matching, the patients with a low TTS had significantly better PFS (P < .001, mPFS: 18.2 months vs 10 months) and an equivalent OS (P = .115, mOS: not reached vs 41 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that a TTS > 5 weeks was an independent predictor of decreased PFS (HR = 3.031, 95% CI: 1.494-6.149, P = .002) but not OS.

CONCLUSION

The longer TTS after the completion of NAC may be disadvantageous for a favorable pathological response and long-term PFS. These results should be validated prospectively in a randomized trial.

Initial systemic chemotherapeutic and targeted therapy strategies for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases

Introduction: The liver is the most common metastatic site in colorectal cancer with more than half the patients developing a liver metastasis either at the time of their diagnosis (synchronous) or later (metachronous). Surgical resection remains the principal curative approach that offers significant survival improvements. However, upfront surgery is only possible in about 10-20% of patients at the time of diagnosis, making the consideration of other treatment modalities essential. Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of the standard approaches for the initial management of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases. They then provide an up-to-date discussion of first-line systemic chemotherapy/targeted therapy options in the contexts of initially resectable and unresectable disease and review toxicities and complications following these options. Expert opinion: Advances in chemotherapeutic agents and biological targeted therapies have improved the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. However, there is still no 'single best approach', making further trials necessary to provide more evidence.