The quality of life after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with closure and non-closure of fascial defect

Increased risk of incisional hernia after stoma closure in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Stoma construction and closure are common surgical strategies in patients with colorectal cancer. The present study evaluated the influence of multiple incisional sites resulting from stoma closure on incisional hernia after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

The study included 1681 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. Multiple incisional sites were defined as the coexistence of incisions at the midline and stoma closure sites. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between the presence of multiple incisional sites and incisional hernia development in patients with colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Among the 1681 patients, 420 (25%) underwent stoma construction, with a stoma closure-to-construction ratio of 33% (139/420), and 155 (9.2%) developed incisional hernias after colorectal cancer surgery. In the multivariate analysis, female sex (p < 0.001), body mass index (p < 0.001), multiple incisional sites (p = 0.001), wound infection (p = 0.003), and postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.030) were independent predictors of incisional hernia. In the multiple incisional sites group, the age (p < 0.001), surgical approach (laparoscopic) (p = 0.013), wound infection rate (p = 0.046), small bowel obstruction rate (p < 0.001), and anastomotic leakage rate (p = 0.008) were higher in those in the single incisional site group.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple incisional sites resulting from stoma closure are associated with the development of incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery.

Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The eTEP technique is a new approach that has recently gained popularity in abdominal wall hernia surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the eTEP-RS and IPOM-plus procedures in W1 and W2 midline incisional abdominal wall hernia (IAWH) repairs performed by the same surgeon.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of laparoscopic abdominal wall repairs performed on 61 patients with eTEP between November 2018 and April 2022 and on 67 patients with IPOM-plus between January 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 74 out of 128 patients, 30 in the eTEP-RS group and 44 in the IPOM-plus group, who underwent W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 24 months in the eTEP-RS group and 45 months in the IPOM-plus group.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, or active smoking. No difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the mean defect area (MDA, 28.17 cm² vs. 27.41 cm², p = 0.84), but the mean mesh area (MMA) and mesh/defect (M/D) ratio were higher in the eTEP-RS group (404.11 cm² vs. 267.85 cm², p < 0.001 and 20.96 vs. 12.36, p = 0.004). In the eTEP-RS group, the hospital length of stay (LOS) (1.48 days vs. 2.58 days, p < 0.001) and pain on the first and 10th postoperative days were significantly lower (p < 0.001), while the operative time was significantly longer (204.07 min vs. 88.33 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative complications (p = 0.56), seroma formation (p = 0.83), or recurrence (p = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

The eTEP-RS technique has advantages over the IPOM-plus approach, such as a shorter LOS and less early postoperative pain with W1-W2 midline IAWH repair. However, the eTEP technique has a longer operative time.

Robotic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty: Early Experience of a New Surgical Technique for Ventral Hernia Repair

Introduction: The laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) was developed as an alternative for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair. This technique allows the closure of the defect and restoration of the midline without tension by plication of both aponeurosis of the abdominal rectus muscles combined with a minimally invasive intraperitoneal underlay mesh repair. The objective of this study is to report our early experience with the Robotic-LIRA (R-LIRA) technique and its safety and short-term efficacy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing R-LIRA repair for ventral hernias from March 2019 to April 2022. Results: Eight patients underwent R-LIRA from March 2019 to April 2022. Median age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 34.5-62.8). Median body mass index was 34.2 kg/m² (IQR 29.9-35.2). Four patients (50%) had a primary ventral hernia being one M2, two M3, and one M2/M3. There were three incisional hernias, being one recurrent, 6 patients (75%) had associated diastasis of the rectus muscle and 1 patient presented pure diastasis. The median hernia width was 4 cm (IQR 2-6), and the median defect area was 16 cm² (IQR 4-42). The median mesh area was 290 cm² (IQR 211.2-300). In all cases, a barbed suture was also used for mesh fixation, and tackers were added in 4 cases. The median operative time was 172 minutes (IQR 139.8-293.3). The median length of stay was 0.5 days (IQR 0-1.8), and the median follow-up was 20 days (IQR 16-46). Conclusion: The R-LIRA has been shown to be safe and feasible for ventral and incisional hernia repairs with or without Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in the short term.

A case of successful laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique repair for perineal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

The frequency of secondary perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection has been reported as 0.83%-26%. The optimal surgery for secondary perineal hernia and surgical indication remains controversial. An 87-year-old woman diagnosed with lower rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Follow-up computed tomography at 6 months postoperatively revealed secondary perineal hernia. She reported no discomfort and no incarceration was apparent, but she complained of perineal discomfort 3 months later. Laparoscopic repair surgery was performed using an intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique with VENTRALIGHT® ST mesh (Medicon, Osaka, Japan), a non-absorbable mesh with a biodegradable coating. No recurrence of peritoneal hernia was seen as of 3 months postoperatively. A time lag can exist between imaging findings and symptom appearance. This laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique might become the optimal treatment for perineal hernia.

Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia and recurrence: Retrospective analysis of the French national database

AIM

The aim of this work was to determine the rate of incisional hernia (IH) repair and risk factors for IH repair after laparotomy.

METHOD

This population-based study used data extracted from the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Informations (PMSI) database. All patients who had undergone a laparotomy in 2010, their hospital visits from 2010 to 2015 and patients who underwent a first IH repair in 2013 were included. Previously identified risk factors included age, gender, high blood pressure (HBP), obesity, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

RESULTS

Among the 431 619 patients who underwent a laparotomy in 2010, 5% underwent IH repair between 2010 and 2015. A high-risk list of the most frequent surgical procedures (>100) with a significant risk of IH repair (>10% at 5 years) was established and included 71 863 patients (17%; 65 procedures). The overall IH repair rate from this list was 17%. Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery represented 89% of procedures, with the majority of patients (72%) undergoing lower GI tract surgery. The IH repair rate was 56% at 1 year and 79% at 2 years. Risk factors for IH repair included obesity (31% vs 15% without obesity, p  < 0.001), COPD (20% vs 16% without COPD), HBP (19% vs 15% without HBP) and diabetes (19% vs 16% without diabetes). Obesity was the main risk factor for recurrence after IH repair (19% vs 13%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

From the PMSI database, the real rate of IH repair after laparotomy was 5%, increasing to 17% after digestive surgery. Obesity was the main risk factor, with an IH repair rate of 31% after digestive surgery. Because of the important medico-economic consequences, prevention of IH after laparotomy in high-risk patients should be considered.

A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery

Background

The incidence of incisional hernia is up to 20 per cent after abdominal surgery. The management of patients with incisional hernia can be complex with an array of techniques and meshes available. Ensuring consistency in reporting outcomes across studies on incisional hernia is important and will enable appropriate interpretation, comparison and data synthesis across a range of clinical and operative treatment strategies.

Methods

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies documenting clinical and patient-reported outcomes for incisional hernia were included.

Results

In total, 1340 studies were screened, of which 92 were included, reporting outcomes on 12 292 patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Eight broad-based outcome domains were identified, including patient and clinical demographics, hernia-related symptoms, hernia morphology, recurrent incisional hernia, operative variables, postoperative variables, follow-up and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence rates were reported in 80 studies (87 per cent). A total of nine different definitions for detecting hernia recurrence were identified. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 31 studies (34 per cent), with 18 different assessment measures used.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates the significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting in incisional hernia studies, with significant variation in outcome assessment and definitions. This is coupled with significant under-reporting of patient-reported outcomes.

Subcutaneous switching suture technique for hernia defect closure during laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

A vertical penetration of the thread through the abdominal wall for the hernia defect closure in laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) is difficult especially in the large defect cases when applying the existing techniques.

MATERIALS

Sixteen LVIHRs were performed using the suture technique for defect closure we newly developed.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

With the subcutaneous switching, our technique only requires the suture-passer and easily enables the vertical penetration of the thread through the abdominal muscular wall even in the large defect cases.

DISCUSSION

The defect closure in LVIHR tends to be complicated in the large defect cases. Thus, we devised this technique for the easy, reliable, and firm closure even in the large defect cases. Although the sample size was currently very small, we consider that the favorable outcomes have been obtained through our technique because any noticeable complications, such as mesh bulging or recurrence, have not been observed currently.

Quality of Life Using the Carolinas Comfort Scale for Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: A 12-Year Experience in a Retrospective Observational Study

Background: Incisional hernias are a common complication of abdominal surgery (10%-35%) and are notorious for recurrence. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) was first performed in 1991 and is reported to have lower recurrence rates. Few studies to date have assessed quality of life (QoL) resulting from a repair. The purpose of this observational study was to present a 12-year experience performing LIHR, with a focus on the impact on QoL. Methods: All adult patients undergoing elective LIHR performed by a single surgeon, whether primary or recurrent, were included in the study. The data collection was performed prospectively between 2007 and 2019 to include demographic details, intraoperative findings and postoperative short- and longterm outcomes. We used the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) to assess QoL following surgery. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included in the study. Patients had a median age of 57 years, body mass index of 32 kg/m², 35% were male and 88% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. The duration of surgery was 90 minutes*. Nineteen percent of patients had complications during or after surgery; 1 (1%) had recurrence. length of stay in hospital was 1* (0-12) days and long-term follow-up period was 42* (2-140) months after surgery. Time of return to daily activities was 14* (1-365) days. Eighty-six percent of patients rated their experience undergoing LIHR as "Excellent" or "Good". Regarding QoL after surgery, scores on the CCS indicated that 82% of patients had minimal or no discomfort following surgery, and only 1% had significant discomfort. *Presented as median. Conclusions: The technique for LIHR displayed in this study is safe and effective. There was an acceptable rate of complications, with a low recurrence rate. Patients were highly satisfied and had a good QoL after the procedure. Research Registry ID Number: researchregistry6056.