Lung-diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide predicts early complications after cardiac surgery

Evaluation of Different Pain-Control Procedures for Post-cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

To identify superior pain-control procedures for postoperative patients who undergo cardiac surgeries.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in globally recognized databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pain-control procedures after cardiac surgeries. The parameters evaluating analgesic efficacy and postoperative recovery, namely, the pain score and ICU stay, were quantitatively pooled and estimated using Bayesian methods. The values of the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities regarding each parameter were calculated to enable the ranking of various pain-control procedures. Node-splitting analysis was performed to test the inconsistency of the main results, and the publication bias was assessed by examining the funnel-plot symmetry.

Results

After a detailed review, 13 RCTs containing 7 different procedures were included in the network meta-analysis. After pooling the results together, an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and a local parasternal block (LPB) plus target-controlled infusion (TCI) presented the best analgesic effects for reducing pain at rest (SUCRA, .47) and during movement (SUCRA, .52), respectively, while the former also achieved the shortest ICU stay (SUCRA, .48). Moreover, the funnel-plot symmetries showed no inconsistencies or obvious publication bias in the current study.

Conclusions

The current evidence indicates that ESPB is a potential superior analgesic strategy for post-cardiac surgery patients. To verify this conclusion further, it is imperative to obtain more high-quality evidence and conduct relevant investigations in the future.