Staging laparoscopy is mandatory for the treatment of pancreatic cancer to avoid missing radiologically negative metastases

Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy During Pancreatic Cancer Surgery in the Modern Era

INTRODUCTION

Despite improvements in preoperative image resolution, approximately 10% of curative-intent resection attempts for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are aborted at the time of operation. To avoid nontherapeutic laparotomy, many surgeons perform intraoperative diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) to identify radiographically occult metastatic disease. There are no consensus guidelines regarding DL in pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of same-procedure DL at avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2016 to 2022, identifying 196 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who were taken to the operating room for open curative-intent resection. Patient demographic, tumor characteristic, treatment, and outcome data were abstracted. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated to identify number of DLs necessary to avoid one nontherapeutic laparotomy.

RESULTS

Curative-intent resection was achieved in 161 (82.1%) patients. One hundred twenty six (64.0%) patients received DL prior to resection and DL identified metastatic disease in three (2.4%) patients with an NNT of 42. NNT of DL in a subgroup analysis performed on clinically high-risk patients (defined by preoperative or preneoadjuvant therapy carbohydrate antigen 19-9 > 500 U/mL) is 11. Receipt of DL did not prolong operative times in patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy when accounting for completed versus aborted resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although intraoperative DL is a short procedure with minimal morbidity, these data demonstrate that same-procedure DL has potential efficacy in avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy only in a subgroup of clinically high-risk patients. Focus should remain on optimizing preoperative patient selection and further investigating novel diagnostic markers predictive of occult metastatic disease.

Scoring system to predict positive peritoneal cytology in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate factors to predict positive peritoneal cytology, whcih would determine the indication for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A total of 430 patients that underwent pancreatectomy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 430 patients, 36 had positive cytology (8.4%). Median survival time in negative cytology was 24.7 months, compared with 15.1 months in positive cytology (p = .004). Factors to predict positive cytology in pancreatic cancer according to multivariate analysis were tumor location (body, tail; OR 2.66; 95% CI: 1.21-5.85; p = .015), tumor size ≥30 mm (OR 2.95; 95% CI: 1.35-6.47; p = .007) and radiographic other-organ invasion (HR 2.79; 95% CI: 1.01-7.67; p = .047). Patients were scored 0 to 3 corresponding with these factors. Rates of positive cytology increases in each score were: score 0: 2.9%, score 1: 6.7%, score 2: 18.3%, score 3: 36.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor location (body or tail), tumor size ≥30 mm, and radiographic other-organ invasions were risk factors for positive cytology in pancreatic cancer. This scoring system might be a useful indicator to perform staging laparoscopy to diagnose positive cytology.

Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.

The prognosis-based classification model in resectable pancreatic cancer

AIM

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment is mainly based on the anatomical resectability classification. However, prognosis-based classification may be more reasonable. In this study, we stratified resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma according to preoperative factors and reconsidered treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 131 patients who underwent upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2019. Recurrence within 1 year after surgery was defined as early recurrence, and the risk factors for early recurrence were identified using preoperative factors. Subsequently, we calculated the scores and stratified the participant groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (42 %) patients who relapsed within 1 year showed significantly poorer survival than those without recurrence (median overall survival, 14.0 vs. 80.6 months; p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor diameter of ≥24 mm (p < 0.01) and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of ≥380 U/mL (p = 0.04) were the independent risk factors for early recurrence. Early recurrence score was created using these factors, stratifying the participant group into three groups of 0-2 points, and the prognosis was significantly different (median overall survival, 49.3 vs. 31.2 vs. 16.0 months; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We stratified the upfront surgical cases of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The group with a score of 0 had a good prognosis, and upfront surgery was possibly not futile on patients in poor general condition. The group with a score of 2 had a poor prognosis and may require stronger preoperative treatment.

Prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

To elucidate the clinical significance of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with BTC, who received PWC at curative intent surgery from March 2009 to December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were stratified into two groups according to positive or negative PWC. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Independent factors associated with positive PWC were investigated using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 284 patients analyzed, all 53 patients with ampullary carcinoma showed negative PWC and these patients were excluded. Among the remaining eligible 231 patients, 41 patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 55 had gall bladder carcinoma, 72 had hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 63 had distal cholangiocarcinoma. Eleven (4.8%) patients had positive PWC, and 220 (95.2%) had negative PWC. The median recurrence-free survival in the positive and negative PWC groups were 12.0 vs. 60.7 months (p = 0.005); the median overall survival times were 17.0 vs. 60.6 months (p = 0.008), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level over 80 U/mL and multiple lymph node metastasis were independently associated with positive PWC (odds ratio [OR]: 5.84, p = 0.031; OR: 5.28, p = 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with positive PWC exhibited earlier recurrence and shorter survival times compared with those with negative PWC.

Evaluating staging laparoscopy indications for pancreatic cancer based on resectability classification and treatment strategies for patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology

Introduction

The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology (CY1) is poor. We aimed to evaluate the results of staging laparoscopy (SL) and treatment efficacy in CY1 patients based on a resectability classification.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 250 patients with PDAC who underwent SL before the initial treatment between 2017 and 2023 at the University of Toyama.

Results

The breakdown of cases by resectability classification was resectable (R):borderline resectable (BR):unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) = 131:48:71 cases. The frequency of CY1 increased in proportion to the degree of local progression (R:BR:UR-LA = 20:23:34%), but the frequencies of liver metastasis or peritoneal dissemination were comparable (R:BR:UR-LA = 6.9:6.3:8.5%). Most CY1 patients received gemcitabine along with nab-paclitaxel therapy. The CY-negative conversion rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 70:64:52%) and conversion surgery rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 40:27:9%) were inversely proportional to the degree of local progression.Comparing H0P0CY1 factors for each classification, patients with H0P0CY1 had significantly more pancreatic body or tail carcinoma and tumor size ≥32 mm in R patients, whereas in BR patients, duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) ≥ 230 U/mL was a significant factor. In contrast, no significant factors were observed in UR-LA patients.

Conclusion

The CY1 rates, CY-negative conversion rates, and conversion surgery rates varied according to local progression. In the case of R and BR, SL could be considered in patients with pancreatic body or tail carcinoma, large tumor size, or high DUPAN-2 level. In UR-LA, SL might be considered for all patients.

Predictive impacts of peritoneal washing cytology for surgical resection-intended pancreatic cancer cases: Establishment of planned staging laparoscopy criteria

BACKGROUND

Staging laparoscopy (SL) has been advocated for pancreatic cancer, mainly to evaluate the peritoneal washing cytology (CY) status, which seems to impact the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. To establish an optimal treatment strategy for CY positive (CY+) pancreatic cancer cases, real-world clinical data about CY status-depending surgical outcomes should be accumulated.

METHODS

Peritoneal washing samples were collected from 183 consecutive patients who could be classified as either resectable or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer between January 2012 and December 2020. Correlations between the CY status and other clinicopathological parameters with the recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were examined. In addition, we analyzed several risk factors for the CY+ status and attempted to identify the patient population that may benefit most from SL.

RESULTS

A total of 24 of the 183 patients were CY+. Peritoneal recurrence occurred more frequently in CY+ cases than in CY- cases (29% vs. 6%, p < .001) and median survival time after surgery was significantly shorter in CY+ cases than in CY- cases (28.5 months vs. 67.5 months; p < .001). In detail, almost all CY+ patients among curative resection-intended cases had either elevated preoperative serum CA19-9 levels (≥250 U/mL) or DUPAN-2 levels (≥150 U/mL). Significant predictive factors of CY positivity were BR status (p = .028) and serum CA19-9 level exceeding 250 U/mL (p = .008).

CONCLUSION

CY status was identified as an independent prognostic factor, and SL examination should be recommended, especially for patients with risk factors for CY positivity, such as BR cancer and elevated serum CA19-9 levels.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Current Status of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treatment in Japan

Resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although the outcome of technically resectable PDAC has improved with advances in surgery and adjuvant therapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low at 20% to 40%. More effective therapy is needed. Almost 15 years ago, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines proposed a resectability classification of PDAC based on preoperative imaging. Since then, treatment strategies for PDAC have been devised based on resectability. The standard of care for resectable PDAC is adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection, as shown by the results of pivotal clinical trials. With regard to neoadjuvant treatment, several recent clinical trials comparing neoadjuvant treatment with upfront resection have been conducted on resectable PDAC and borderline resectable PDAC, and the benefits and efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer has become clearer. The significance of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable PDAC remains controversial, but in borderline resectable PDAC the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment has been further recognised, although the standard of care has not yet been established. Several promising clinical trials for PDAC are ongoing. This review presents previous and ongoing trials of perioperative treatment for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC, focusing on the difference between Asian and Western countries.

Clinical impact of multimodal treatment including chemoradiotherapy, conversion surgery and postoperative chemotherapy for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without disease progression after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using S-1 with or without conversion surgery after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, patients without disease progression after GnP for BR or UR-LA pancreatic cancer underwent CRT with S-1. If distant metastasis was not detected after CRT, conversion surgery and oral administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for at least 6 months was performed.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the present study. The median number of cycles of GnP was 6. Surgery was performed after CRT in 25 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods from the start of radiotherapy were 24.6 and 27.4 months, respectively. The OS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent conversion surgery and those who did not undergo conversion surgery were 41.3 and 16.8 months, respectively. The PFS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent surgery and those who did not undergo surgery were 28.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Patients who were able to receive S-1 after conversion surgery for more than 6 months had better OS than those who were not (p = 0.039), although there was no significant difference of PFS (p = 0.365).

CONCLUSIONS

In BR/UR-LA pancreatic cancer without disease progression after GnP, multimodal treatment including CRT, conversion surgery and the scheduled postoperative chemotherapy may be effective.

"Conversion surgery" for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the study group at the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), which progresses locally and surrounds major vessels, has historically been deemed unresectable. Surgery alone failed to provide curative resection and improve overall survival. With the advancements in treatment, reports have shown favorable results in LAPC after undergoing successful chemotherapy therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection, so-called "conversion surgery", at experienced high-volume centers. However, recognizing significant regional and institutional disparities in the management of LAPC, an international consensus meeting on conversion surgery for LAPC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. During the meeting, presenters reported the current best multidisciplinary practices for LAPC, including preoperative modalities, best systemic treatment regimens and durations, procedures of conversion surgery with or without vascular resections, biomarkers, and genetic studies. It was unanimously agreed among the experts in this meeting that "cancer biology is surpassing locoregional anatomical resectability" in the era of effective multiagent treatment. The biology of pancreatic cancer has yet to be further elucidated, and we believe it is essential to improve the treatment outcomes of LAPC patients through continued efforts from each institution and more international collaboration. This article summarizes the agreement during the discussion amongst the experts in the meeting. We hope that this will serve as a foundation for future international collaboration and recommendations for future guidelines.

Proton radiotherapy as a treatment strategy to increase survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer in the body and tail: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of proton radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in the body and tail are still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors after proton radiotherapy in a large group of patients with LAPC in the body and tail.

METHODS

The medical records of 200 patients with LAPC in the body and tail who underwent proton radiotherapy between February 2009 and January 2021 at the Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed to identify prognostic factors that contribute to long-term survival.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate at 1- and 2-year after PT was 69.6% and 35.4% with a median overall survival of 18.4 months. The 1- and 2-year local progression-free, and progression-free survival rates were 84.3% and 68.0%, and 44.3% and 19.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) invasion (SMA only invasion vs. celiac artery only invasion; P = 0.049: SMA and celiac artery invasion vs. celiac artery only invasion; P = 0.017), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level ≥ 231.9 U/mL (P = 0.001), anterior peripancreatic invasion (P = 0.006), and incomplete scheduled concurrent chemotherapy (P = 0.009) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. There was no significant difference in local progression-free survival; however, distant metastasis-free survival was statistically worse in patients with prognostic factors than in those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton radiotherapy for LAPC in the body and tail may be a valuable multidisciplinary treatment option. Patients with SMA invasion, higher pre-proton radiotherapy serum CA 19-9 level, anterior peripancreatic invasion, or incomplete scheduled concurrent chemotherapy had worse overall survival because of worse distant metastasis-free survival, suggesting that distant metastases have a significant impact on overall survival in such patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail: A retrospective analysis based on a large population

BACKGROUND

Tumors located in the pancreatic body or tail are more likely to invade splenic vessels; however, splenic artery (SpA) or vein (SpV) involvement is not included in the criteria for resectability. We aimed to analyze the prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail.

METHODS

Patients with resetable PDAC were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. SpA and SpV involvement were graded as clear, abutment and encasement. Multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and risk factors for early recurrence, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 234 patients, 94 patients had radiologic SpA invasion, including abutment in 47 patients and encasement in 47 patients, while 123 patients had radiological SpV invasion, including abutment in 69 patients and encasement in 54 patients. Patients with SpA or SpV encasement showed a significantly worse OS and recurrence-free survival than those with SpA or SpV clear (P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both SpA and SpV encasement were independently associated with poor OS (SpA: hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, P = 0.010; SpV: HR 2.01, P = 0.001) and early recurrence (SpA: odds ratio [OR] 4.98, P < 0.001; SpV: OR 3.71, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Radiological SpA or SpV encasement independently decreases OS, and is associated with early recurrence of resectable PDAC of the body/tail.

Highly Selective Targeting of Pancreatic Cancer in the Liver with a Near-Infrared Anti-MUC5AC Probe in a PDOX Mouse Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Accurately identifying metastatic disease is critical to directing the appropriate treatment in pancreatic cancer. Mucin 5AC is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer but absent in normal pancreas tissue. The present proof-of-concept study demonstrates the efficacy of an anti-mucin 5AC antibody conjugated to an IR800 dye (MUC5AC-IR800) to preferentially label a liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer (Panc Met) in a unique patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. In orthotopic models, the mean tumor to background ratio was 1.787 (SD ± 0.336), and immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of MUC5AC within tumor cells. MUC5AC-IR800 provides distinct visualization of pancreatic cancer liver metastasis in a PDOX mouse model, demonstrating its potential utility in staging laparoscopy and fluorescence-guided surgery.

Increased incidence of positive peritoneal lavage cytology early after fine needle aspiration in patients with pancreatic ducal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The influence of fine needle aspiration (FNA) on peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with resectable left-sided PDAC undergoing FNA prior to CY examination. We assessed clinical factors related to CY+, scored the tumor diameter (<20 mm = 0, ≥20 mm = 1) and examination interval between FNA and CY (>18 days = 0, ≤18 days = 1), and investigated the probability of CY + by the sum of each score (0-2).

RESULTS

The probability of CY+ was 31%. The CY + group had larger tumors and shorter examination intervals than the CY- group. The CY + probability was 75%, 15%, and 13% for a score of 2, 1, and 0, respectively (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A short interval between FNA and CY examination for a large tumor may be a risk factor for CY+ in patients with left-sided PDAC.

Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion for Pancreatic Cancer with Low-Volume Peritoneal Metastasis: Results from a Prospective Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Resection of oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically been ineffective, however modern systemic chemotherapy has improved survival. Thus, re-evaluating safety and outcomes of surgical resection in selected patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (PM) warrants consideration.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2021, patients with PDAC and positive cytology or limited PM without extraperitoneal metastasis and who had an objective response to ≥ 6 months of systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients underwent laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin/mitomycin C. If amenable to a complete cytoreduction, patients went on to cytoreduction and HIPEC.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 patients were enrolled and received a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-17) cycles of chemotherapy; 16 (89%) patients received chemoradiation. Laparoscopic HIPEC was completed in 17 patients, with a median length of stay of 1 day, and no grade III complications or hematological toxicities were observed. All 18 patients subsequently underwent a complete cytoreduction (CC-0) along with definitive treatment of the primary tumor, with formal resection (7/18), irreversible electroporation (IRE; 10/18), or intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT; 1/18). Median PCI was 2 (IQR 0-4), median LOS was 7 days (IQR 6-8), and 7 (39%) patients were readmitted. Eight (44%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher complications, including one 30-day mortality. At a median follow-up of 16 months, the median progression-free survival was 20 months and the median overall survival was 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreduction and HIPEC for selected patients with low-volume PM from PDAC is safe and feasible with favorable short-term outcomes. A phase II trial (NCT04858009) is now enrolling to further assess this multimodality approach in select patients.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer with cavernous transformation of the portal vein: a case report

Background

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) due to extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is a rare vascular anomaly. Since its symptoms usually appear in childhood, most of the adult cases are detected unexpectedly with other diseases. Only a few reports have described surgical difficulties in patients with CTPV. We report a case of pancreatic head cancer with CTPV in a patient who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old man with epigastric and back pain was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed a tumor in the pancreatic head and a CTPV near the hepatic hilum. CTPV consisted of two main collateral vessels connected by multiple surrounding small vessels. Also, portal vein obstruction was observed near the hepatic hilum, which was far from the pancreatic head tumor. After confirming that there was no distant metastasis by a thorough whole-body search, we performed a pancreaticoduodenectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. During the operation, we carefully manipulated the area of the CTPV and omitted lymph node dissection in the hepatoduodenal ligament to prevent massive venous bleeding and intestinal congestion. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed without any intraoperative complications and the postoperative course was uneventful. Complete tumor resection was histologically confirmed.

Conclusion

Although pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with CTPV involves many surgical difficulties, we successfully performed it by determining specific treatment strategies tailored to the patient and following careful and delicate surgical procedures.

Clinical significance of immunocytochemical staining for peritoneal lavage cytology in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal lavage cytology for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is conducted with both an intraoperative rapid diagnosis by Papanicolaou staining (cytology-rapid) and a final diagnosis by immunocytochemical staining at a later date (cytology-final) in our hospital. However, the clinical significance of cytology-final has not yet been elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 675 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent pancreatectomy and cytology between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic results of cytology-rapid and cytology-final and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients (6.4%) were diagnosed as cytology-rapid (+), and all of them were ultimately diagnosed as cytology-final (+). Among the 632 patients with cytology-rapid (-), 19 (3.0%) were eventually diagnosed as cytology-final (+). The overall survival of patients with cytology-rapid (+) and that of patients with cytology-rapid (-) did not differ to a statistically significant extent (median survival time 26.4 vs 32.9 months; P = .106). In contrast, the overall survival of patients who were diagnosed as a false-negative result by cytology-rapid was significantly worse than that of patients diagnosed as a true negative (18.7 vs 34.8 months; P = .031). The overall survival of patients with cytology-final (+) was significantly worse than that of patients with cytology-final (-) (23.6 vs 34.8 months; P = .012). A multivariate analysis showed that cytology-final (+) was an independent prognostic factor for the OS (hazard ratio = 1.43; P = .049), whereas cytology-rapid (+) was not.

CONCLUSION

Immunocytochemical staining may be a useful complement to a diagnosis of cytology by conventional Papanicolaou staining in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

Outcomes and risks in palliative pancreatic surgery: an analysis of the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry

Background

Non-resectability is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to local invasion or distant metastases. Then, biliary or gastroenteric bypasses or both are often established despite associated morbidity and mortality. The current study explores outcomes after palliative bypass surgery in patients with non-resectable PDAC.

Methods

From the prospectively maintained German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry, all patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC who underwent non-resective pancreatic surgery between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively identified, and the influence of the surgical procedure on morbidity and mortality was analyzed.

Results

Of 389 included patients, 127 (32.6%) underwent explorative surgery only, and a biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass was established in 92 (23.7%), 65 (16.7%) and 105 (27.0%). After exploration only, patients had a significantly shorter stay in the intensive care unit (mean 0.5 days [SD 1.7] vs. 1.9 [3.6], 2.0 [2.8] or 2.1 [2.8]; P < 0.0001) and in the hospital (median 7 days [IQR 4–11] vs. 12 [10–18], 12 [8–19] or 12 [9–17]; P < 0.0001), and complications occurred less frequently (22/127 [17.3%] vs. 37/92 [40.2%], 29/65 [44.6%] or 48/105 [45.7%]; P < 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression, biliary stents were associated with less major (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) complications (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.25–0.96], P = 0.037), whereas—compared to exploration only—biliary, gastroenteric, and double bypass were associated with more major complications (OR 3.58 [1.48–8.64], P = 0.005; 3.50 [1.39–8.81], P = 0.008; 4.96 [2.15–11.43], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In patients with non-resectable PDAC, biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass surgery is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Although surgical palliation is indicated if interventional alternatives are inapplicable, or life expectancy is high, less invasive options should be considered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01833-3.

Staging CT and Diagnostic Laparoscopy With Cytology Prior to the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Initial staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is performed with computed tomography (CT). Laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology at staging can uncover occult disease undetected by CT. This case series assessed clinical course following staging laparoscopy with cytology in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

This single-center study examined patients with non-metastatic PDAC diagnosed from 2017 to 2020. Patients underwent CT and subsequent laparoscopy with cytology prior to treatment. Demographics, clinicopathologic status, treatment course, and survival were compared.

RESULTS

Eight patients were identified. All had negative laparoscopies. Five cytologies were negative, two were atypical, and one was positive. Two patients with negative cytology received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent resection, with an average follow-up time of 32.9 months since diagnosis. Of the three remaining patients with negative cytology, none underwent resection. One received delayed chemotherapy, while the others could not due to medical contraindications. The average survival was 3.5 months (n=2). Of two patients with atypical cytology, neither underwent resection. One could not receive chemotherapy due to medical contraindication, while the other was lost to follow-up shortly after diagnosis. The average survival was 1.3 months (n=1). The patient with positive cytology received definitive chemotherapy without resection and survived for 21.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient with positive cytology may have been spared non-therapeutic surgery. Remaining unresected patients showed poor survival, though the lack of immediate chemotherapy may contribute to this finding. Further research is needed to determine optimal candidates for invasive staging and implications of atypical cytology.

Prognostic Significance of Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Cytology in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of PLC status in PDAC patients.

METHODS

Patients intending to undergo resection for PDAC between 2007 and 2020 were included. Survival was compared among patients who underwent resection with negative or positive PLC status and those who did not undergo resection. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the prognostic impact of positive PLC status. A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the correlation between prognosis and the positive PLC rate.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients formed the study cohort and were divided as follows: 438 in the negative PLC group, 18 in the positive PLC group, and 24 in the no resection group. Although the median survival time significantly differed between the negative and positive PLC groups (35.7 vs. 13.6 months, P < 0.001), it did not significantly differ between the positive PLC and no resection groups (13.6 vs. 12.2 months, P = 0.605). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that positive PLC status (hazard ratio = 3.54, 95% confidence interval = 1.97-6.38, P < 0.001) was the strongest poor prognostic factor. Based on statistical analyses for the systematic review, the prognostic impact of positive PLC status weakened significantly as the institutional positive PLC rate increased (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection did not improve the prognosis of patients with positive PLC status in our cohort. The institutional positive PLC rate may be a good reference for surgical indication in these patients.

Analysis of preoperative risk factors for early recurrence after curative pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Objectives

To investigate the risk factors for early recurrence after curative pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

All data were retrospectively collected from patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy at the Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, from January 2015 to December 2020. The preoperative and perioperative risk factors were included into the analysis.

Results

In total, 34 patients were included in the study. The median time for recurrence and median survival time were 17 and 20 months, respectively. The 1, 3, and 5 year disease-free survival rates were 59.6%, 23.87%, and 23.87%, respectively, while the 1, 3, and 5 year overall survival rates were 81%, 24.7%, and 12.4%, respectively. Seventeen patients (50%) from a total of 34 patients had recurrence, and ten patients (29.41%) had recurrence within 12 months. The independent preoperative risk factor associated with adverse disease-free survival was tumor size > 4 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 14.34, p=0.022). The perioperative risk factors associated with adverse disease-free survival were pathological lymphovascular invasion (HR, 4.31; p=0.048) and non-hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon (HR, 5.9; p=0.022). Risk factors associated with poor overall survival were microscopical margin positive (R1) resection (HR, 3.68; p=0.019) and non-hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon (HR, 3.45; p=0.031).

Conclusions

Tumor size > 4 cm from the preoperative imaging study was a poor prognostic factor for early recurrence after curative pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma indicated that they may have radiological occult metastasis, thus, staging laparoscopy may reduce the number of unnecessary laparotomies and avoid missing radiologically negative metastases.

Levels of tumor markers CEA / CA 19–9 in serum and peritoneal lavage predict postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer

Aim

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of tumor markers from peritoneal lavage in selecting patients with a high risk of recurrence and predicting site‐specific recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 (sCEA/sCA 19–9) and paired peritoneal lavage CEA and CA 19–9 (pCEA/pCA 19–9) were measured in 90 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery. Using the cutoff values determined by maximally selected rank statistics for disease‐free survival (DFS), the risk of recurrence and its patterns were evaluated in combination with different markers and different test specimens.

Results

In univariate and multivariate analysis, an elevated pCA 19–9 level (>1.3 U/mL) was an independent prognostic marker for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.391; P = .018) and overall survival (HR, 3.194; P = .033). Combination analyses contributed to further stratification of a very high risk of recurrence. Of the 58 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection, elevated pCA19–9 was also associated with inferior DFS and overall survival (OS). Patients with elevated pCA 19–9 levels were more likely to have an earlier onset of peritoneal recurrence than those with normal pCA 19–9 levels (P = .048, Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test).

Conclusion

pCA 19–9 is a reliable marker for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery. Further risk stratification can be achieved by using combination assays. The combination of pCA 19–9 and sCA19–9 also serves as a predictor of recurrence site‐specific recurrence.

Synopsis of a clinical practice guideline for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal dissemination in Japan; Japan Peritoneal Malignancy Study Group

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with peritoneal dissemination have a dismal prognosis because discontinuation of systemic chemotherapy is required for massive ascites or poor performance status. The natural history, diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination have not been fully investigated. We systematically reviewed published information on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination using the PubMed database (2000-2020) and provided recommendations in response to clinical questions. This guideline was created according to the "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Guide 2017". The literature quality and body of evidence were evaluated with the GRADE System and classified into four levels ("strong", "medium", "weak", "very weak"). The strength of each final recommendation was decided by a vote of committee members based on the GRADE Grid method. These guidelines address three subjects: diagnostic, chemotherapeutic, and surgical approaches. They include nine clinical questions and statements with recommendation strengths, evidence levels, and agreement rates, in addition to one "column". This is the English synopsis of the 2021 Japanese clinical practice guideline for PDAC with peritoneal dissemination. It summarizes the clinical evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination and provides future perspectives.

The clinical benefits of performing staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

The indications and benefits derived from staging laparoscopy (SL) for pancreatic cancer (PC) remain controversial.

METHODS

This study involved PC patients in whom resection had been considered possible between 2009 and 2020. We classified the patients into before 2014 (training set) and 2014 and later (validation set) groups, as SL was introduced in 2014, in our institution. In the training set, the predictors of non-curative factors were investigated, and reproducibility was confirmed in the validation set. In addition, the outcomes were compared between the datasets.

RESULTS

A total of 802 patients were classified into the training set (n = 241) and validation set (n = 561). In the training set, pancreatic body or tail tumors (odds ratio [OR]: 2.62: P = 0.039), CA19-9 > 88 U/ml (OR: 3.21: P = 0.018) and a tumor diameter >36 mm (OR: 6.07; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of non-curative factors. The increased rate of non-curative factors was confirmed as the number of predictors increased in the validation set. The curative resection (CR) rate was significantly higher in the validation set than in the training set (P = 0.035). Although there was no significant difference in the OS in the not-resected group (P = 0.895), the OS in the CR and non-CR group was significantly better in the validation set than in the training set (CR, P < 0.001; non-CR, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest potential candidates for SL and revealed improved outcomes by the advent of treatment strategies including SL.

Preoperative risk factors for positivity of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

The preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) are unknown, especially in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the optimal indications for staging laparoscopy (SL) are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative risk factors of CY positivity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection and to determine the optimal indications for SL.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 493 patients with PDAC, including 356 treated with upfront surgery and 137 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The preoperative risk factor for CY positivity was investigated along with stratification according to NAC.

RESULTS

Among the 493 patients, 36 (7.3%) were CY-positive. The CY-positive frequency in patients who received and did not receive NAC was 9 (6.6%) and 27 (7.6%), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, no independent preoperative predictive factor was found in patients who received NAC, whereas body and tail PDAC were identified as an independent risk factor for CY positivity in patients who did not receive NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative risk factors of CY-positive PDAC are body and tail PDAC in 356 patients who did not receive NAC. However, there is no useful predictive factor for CY positivity in patients treated with NAC. Based on these results, it was difficult to determine the optimal indication for SL especially in NAC cases.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

Only 10–20% of patients with newly diagnosed resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma have potentially resectable disease. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. After surgical extirpation of tumors, up to 80% of patients will develop cancer recurrence, and the initial relapse is metastatic in 50–70% of these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy offers the best strategy to date to improve overall survival but faces real challenges; some patients will experience rapid disease progression within 3 months of surgery and patients who do not receive all planned cycles of chemotherapy have unfavourable oncological outcomes. The neoadjuvant approach is therefore logical but requires further investigation. This approach shows favourable trends regarding disease-free survival and overall survival but, in the absence of rigorous published phase III trials, is not validated to date. Here, we intend to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature to provide direction for future studies.

Abstract

Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. Neoadjuvant treatment is a logical option, as it may overcome some of the limitations of adjuvant therapy and has already shown some encouraging results. The main concern regarding neoadjuvant therapy is the risk of disease progression during chemotherapy, meaning the opportunity to undergo the intended curative surgery is missed. We reviewed all recent literature in the following areas: major surveys, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and randomized trials. We then selected the ongoing trials that we believe are of interest in this field and report here the results of a comprehensive review of the literature. Meta-analyses and randomized trials suggest that neoadjuvant treatment has a positive effect. However, no study to date can be considered practice changing. We considered design, endpoints, inclusion criteria and results of available randomized trials. Neoadjuvant treatment appears to be at least a feasible strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

A simple risk score for detecting radiological occult metastasis in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We advocated carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥ 150 U/mL and tumor size ≥30 mm as "high-risk markers" for predicting unresectability among patients with radiologically resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The main aim is to establish a risk scoring system for occult abdominal metastasis (OAM) in R/BR PDAC.

METHODS

Predictors of OAM were investigated retrospectively in an experiment cohort from 2006 to 2018. The proposed risk scoring system was validated in another cohort from 2019 to 2020.

RESULTS

Five hundred and thirteen eligible patients were divided into the experimental (405 patients; OAM, 22%) and validation cohorts (108 patients). Multivariate analysis identified tumor location of body/tail (odds ratio [OR] 4.45, P < .0001) and "high-risk markers" (OR 2.07, P = .011) as independent predictors of OAM. A scoring system consisting of body/tail (yes: 1, no: 0) and "high-risk markers" (yes: 1, no: 0) was constructed. In the validation cohort, when staging laparoscopy (SL) was performed for patients with scores 1/2, the eligibility for SL, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of OAM were 55%, 91%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor location of body/tail and "high-risk markers" were independent predictors of OAM, composing our simple and reproducible risk scoring system.

Circulating tumor DNA as a predictive marker for occult metastases in pancreatic cancer patients with radiographically non-metastatic disease

PURPOSE

To elucidate the effectiveness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for predicting occult metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer without apparent metastases.

METHODS

Circulating tumor DNA was obtained from plasma samples of 165 patients with pancreatic cancer and analyzed using droplet digital PCR. The prevalence and allele frequencies of ctDNA were compared across different patterns and degrees of metastatic spread.

RESULTS

Of the 142 patients without apparent metastases who underwent abdominal exploration, 39 (27.5%) harbored occult metastases including positive peritoneal lavage cytology. The prevalence of ctDNA was significantly higher in patients with occult metastases than in those without (41.0% vs 14.6%, P = .001). A markedly high prevalence of ctDNA was observed in patients with radiographically visible metastases (78.3%). ctDNA was found to be an independent predictor of the presence of occult metastases (odds ratio: 3.113, P = .039), and its diagnostic performance in combination with tumor markers had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 81.6%. In 62 treatment-naïve patients without metastases, multivariate analysis identified the presence of ctDNA as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 6.311, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Circulating tumor DNA can help predict the presence of occult metastases in pancreatic cancer patients with radiographically non-metastatic disease.

Preceding Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Positive Peritoneal Cytology Provides Survival Benefit Compared with Up-Front Surgery

BACKGROUND

The significance of surgical resection in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether preceding chemotherapy could be beneficial for patients with PDAC with PPC.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, 34 consecutive PDAC patients diagnosed with PPC without distant metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients did not receive neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) and 11 received NAT. All patients received systemic chemotherapy after PPC was confirmed, and they underwent surgical resection if PPC turned negative. The treatment course, ratio of conversion surgery (CS), and prognosis were evaluated. Moreover, the prognosis of PPC patients who underwent up-front surgery without NAT between 2003 and 2016 was analyzed as a comparative cohort.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) of the patients without NAT was 31.4 months. CS was performed in 52.2% of the patients. Patients who underwent CS had better prognoses than those who did not undergo CS (p = 0.005). The CS rate was significantly higher in resectable PDAC (78.5%) than in borderline/unresectable PDAC (11.1%) (p = 0.002). The prognosis of patients with resectable PDAC was improved with preceding chemotherapy compared with up-front surgery (MST 13.0 months; p = 0.016). After NAT, the CS rate was low (27.3%), and the MST was only 14.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

As an initial treatment for PDAC patients with PPC, chemotherapy may lead to a favorable prognosis. Especially, resectable PDAC is associated with a greater chance of improved prognosis. Future studies are required to ascertain whether up-front surgery or preceding chemotherapy should be performed for these patients.

MicroRNA-593-3p Expression in Peritoneal Lavage Fluid as a Prognostic Marker for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Staging Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Some presumed resectable pancreatic cancer patients harbor radiographically occult metastases that are incidentally identified at the time of abdominal exploration. This study aims to identify novel diagnostic or predictive microRNA (miRNA) markers for subclinical peritoneal dissemination in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing abdominal exploration.

METHODS

Peritoneal lavage fluid samples were harvested from 74 patients with pancreatic cancer at the time of staging laparoscopy. Microarray analysis was performed using peritoneal lavage fluids with positive and negative cytology. Candidate microRNA expression was quantified and validated by droplet-digital PCR assays.

RESULTS

In the miRNA array analysis, miR-593-3p showed significant upregulation in peritoneal lavage fluids with positive cytology. Of the 74 patients validated, peritoneal lavage fluids with positive cytology had significantly higher expression of miR-593-3p than those with negative cytology (P < 0.001). Even in cases with no peritoneal dissemination and negative cytology, multivariate analysis revealed that elevated miR-593-3p expression was significantly correlated with worse overall survival than those with low expression (hazard ratio: 3.474, P = 0.042). Of the 48 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, multivariate analysis also demonstrated that higher expression of miR-593-3p in peritoneal lavage was the only significant poor prognostic marker influencing both overall survival (hazard ratio: 23.38, P = 0.005) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 5.700, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated miR-593-3p expression in peritoneal lavage suggests the presence of subclinical micrometastasis even in cases with localized pancreatic cancer, and miR-593-3p could be a useful prognostic predictor for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing staging laparoscopy.