Resection strategy for colorectal liver metastasis focusing on intrahepatic vessels and resection margins

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of non-resectable liver colorectal cancer: Advancing the therapeutic algorithm

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with nearly half of the affected patients developing liver metastases. For three decades, liver resection (LR) has been the primary curative strategy, yet its applicability is limited to about 20% of cases. Liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable metastases was attempted unsuccessfully in the 1990s, with high rates of perioperative death and recurrence. There is now more interest in this strategy due to improvements in systemic therapies and surgical techniques. A significant study conducted by the Oslo group showed that patients receiving liver transplants had a 60% chance of survival after five years. Significantly better results have been achieved by using advanced imaging for risk stratification and further refining selection criteria, especially in the Norvegian SECA trials. This review carefully charts the development and history of LT as a treatment option for colorectal cancer liver metastases. The revolutionary path from the early days of exploratory surgery to the current situation of cautious optimism is traced, highlighting the critical clinical developments and improved patient selection standards that have made LT a potentially curative treatment for such challenging very well selected cases.

Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art

Liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Treatment of CRC liver metastases (CRLM) includes different strategies, prevalently based on the clinical and oncological intent. Valid approaches in liver-limited or liver-prevalent disease include surgery, percutaneous ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation), intra-arterial perfusional techniques (chemo-embolization, radio-embolization) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other biological agents, are the only options for patients with no chance of locoregional approaches. The use of chemotherapy in other settings, such as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or conversion therapy of CRLM, is commonly accepted in the clinical practice, although data from several clinical trials have been mostly inconclusive. The optimal integration of all these strategies, when applicable and clinically indicated, should be ever considered in patients affected by CRLM based on clinical evidence and multidisciplinary experience. Here we revised in detail all the possible therapeutic approaches of CRLM focusing on the current evidences, the studies still in progress and the often contradictory data.

The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection

Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently occurring malignancy tumors. Surgical treatment has made great progress in CRC liver metastasis (CRLM), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and hepatectomy. We perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided RFA and hepatectomy in treating CRLM.

METHODS

This systematic review protocol will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022371561). PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Database, ClinicalTrials.gov trials registry, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry will be searched from January 1980 to December 2022. Only randomized controlled trials will be included. Cochrane systematic evaluation tool is used to assess the risk of bias. The RevMan 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) will be applied to conduct the meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be publicly available and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

This study may provide more convincing evidence to help surgeons make decisions when dealing with CRLM.