Tuberculous peritonitis defying diagnosis: report of a case

Clinical review of 23 patients with tuberculous peritonitis: presenting features and diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To better identify which clinical, laboratory, radiological and invasive procedures were most useful in diagnosing tuberculous peritonitis and to assess the methods in order to reach the diagnosis in future cases.

METHODS

Tuberculous peritonitis cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Their clinical presentation, physical examination, laboratory and diagnostic methods were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases oftuberculous peritonitis were diagnosed. The mean age of the patients were 30 +/- 11 years and 16 were women. The mean duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 3.6 months. All patients presented with abdominal pain. Abdominal swelling (91.3%), loss of appetite (87%) and weight loss (82.6%) were the other commonest symptoms. The major physical findings were ascites (78.3%) and fever (60.9%). The serum ascites albumin gradient was < 1.1 g/dL in all. An ascites fast bacilli smear was positive in 12 (52.2%) patients. Skin tests with purified protein derivative, adenosine deaminase and polymerase chain reaction were performed in seven, four and five patients, respectively. The tuberculous culture was positive in only two. The most common radiological findings were ascites (100%) and omental involvement (65.2%). A laparoscopy was performed in nine of 23 patients. A total of 22 patients completed anti-tuberculous therapy successfully and were cured, except one with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Tuberculous peritonitis may be fatal but is medically cured if diagnosed in a timely fashion. Although both non-invasive and invasive tests have additional benefits, clinician suspicion is still the first step for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis.

TUBERCULOUS PERITONITIS IN NO RISK PATIENTS: DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

BACKGROUND

Incidence of tubercoulosis is increasing in Western countries particularly in immigrants from endemic areas and in patients with HIV or immunocompromised. The disease is unusual in patients without risk factors. In these conditions the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis is often delayed, resulting in high morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We describe a case of tuberculous peritonitis in a man suffering from ascites referred for presumed peritoneal carcinosis. The finding of no malignancies in the peritoneal fluid must rise the suspect of tuberculosis that, if misdiagnosed, is fatal. The patient was submitted to diagnostic videolaparoscopy and multiple biopsies were done. The definitive histological diagnosis was chronic granulomatous flogosis with giant cells, focally necrotizing, caused by peritoneal tubercolosis.

RESULTS

The patient was submitted to chemotherapy with isoniazide, rifampicine, piazafoline, ethambutol and streptomycine which determined the resolution of the clinical picture.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe the diagnostic procedure of choice is videolaparoscopy when tubercolous peritonitis is suspected. This technique allows to obtain selective biopsies of peritoneal nodules and to collect samples for specific cultural and cytohistological exams. The operation is safe, reliable with few complications and permits a prompt diagnosis necessary to cure the patient.

Tuberculous peritonitis-associated mortality is high among patients waiting for the results of mycobacterial cultures of ascitic fluid samples

We identified 60 cases of tuberculous peritonitis during the past 12 years at our health care center. Most of the patients had severe underlying medical conditions, such as cirrhosis, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and malignancy. Abnormal chest radiograph findings, ascitic fluid lymphocytosis, and biochemical findings for exudates could only identify 33%, 37%, and 53% of the cases, respectively. On the other hand, peritoneal biopsy allowed early definitive diagnosis for 9 patients. Thirty-one patients died, 26 of whom died < or =6 weeks after their initial presentation, often before the result of mycobacterial culture was available. Only 8 patients died of advanced disease after antituberculous therapy was started. Univariate analysis showed that advanced age, underlying diagnosis, and delayed initiation of therapy were associated with higher mortality rates. Standard antituberculous chemotherapy is highly effective. However, conventional microbiologic diagnostic methods are slow and not sensitive enough for establishing a diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis.