Continuous subgaleal suction drainage for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma

Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone is often the first choice in cranioplasty following a decompressive craniectomy. However, infection is a common complication, with reported rates up to 25%. While the incidence and management of infection are well documented, the risk factors associated with infection remain less clear. The current study aims to identify predictors of infection risk following autologous cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty using cryopreserved autologous bone flaps between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and infection rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in the development of infection.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 126 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. A total of 10 patients (7.9%) developed an infection following reconstruction, with half resulting in implant failure. We did not identify any significant risk factors for infection. Regression analysis identified placement of subgaleal drain following cranioplasty as a protective factor against the development of infection (OR: 0.16, p = 0.007). On average, drains remained in for 3 days, with no difference between the length of drains for those with infection vs. those without (p = 0.757).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an infection rate of 7.9% in patients who receive an autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy, which is consistent with previous data. Half (4%) of patients who experienced an infection ultimately required removal of the implant. While it is common practice for neurosurgeons to use drains to prevent hematomas and fluid collections, we found that subgaleal drain placement following cranioplasty was associated with decreased infection, thus demonstrating another benefit of a commonly used tool.

Comparison between the use of subdural and subgaleal drainage in treatment of chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common pathologies in our daily practice. The standard treatment is the evacuation making a burr-hole and placement of a subdural drainage, which has shown to decrease its recurrence. However, this procedure can entail risks such as parenchymal damage, infection, or the onset of seizures, prompting the consideration of subgaleal drainage as an alternative. Our objective is to compare the use of subdural and subgaleal drainage in a cohort of patients undergoing intervention for CSDH, as well as to analyze the differences in complication rates and recurrence between the two groups.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective analytical observational study was conducted, analyzing 152 patients diagnosed with CSDH who underwent intervention at our center from January 2020 to April 2022. Patients in whom drainage was not placed were excluded. In all patients, a burr-hole was performed and the type of drainage was chosen by the neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

Out of the 152 patients, subdural drainage was placed in 80 cases (52.63%), while subgaleal drainage was used in 72 cases (47.37%). There were no significant differences in the recurrence rate (30% in the subdural drainage group vs. 20.83% in the subgaleal drainage group; P = .134) or in the complication rate (7.5% in the subdural drainage group vs. 5.5% in the subgaleal drainage group; P = .749).

CONCLUSIONS

Subgaleal drainage shows similar clinical outcomes with a recurrence and complication rate comparable to subdural drainage, suggesting it as a safe and effective alternative to subdural drainage in the treatment of CSDH.

Advances in pathogenic mechanisms, diagnostic methods, surgical and non-surgical treatment, and potential recurrence factors of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A review

Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common hemorrhagic disease in neurosurgery, and with the intensification of global aging, its incidence is gradually increasing. With the advancement of scientific technology, the etiological concepts and surgical treatments for CSDH have continually evolved over time. Currently, neuroscientists' understanding of CSDH is no longer confined to bridging vein rupture; exploration of various mechanisms such as angiogenesis, maturation of blood vessels, and inflammation is also underway. In-depth exploration and discovery of pathogenic mechanisms guide the updating of clinical treatment strategies and methods. For different types of CSDH, there is now a clear guidance for the targeted selection of treatment methods. However, the current treatment of CSDH cannot completely solve all problems, and the updating of treatment methods as well as the development and validation of new effective drugs remain challenges for the future. In addition, the recurrence of CSDH is a significant issue that needs to be addressed. Although we have reviewed potential recurrent factors that may be associated, the strength of this evidence is insufficient. Future research should gradually focus on validating these recurrent factors and exploring new ones, in order to optimize the existing understanding and treatment of CSDH.

Subdural Versus Subgaleal Drain Placement After Minicraniotomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical evacuation with placement of a postoperative drain is the standard treatment for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Subdural and subgaleal drains are equally effective after burrhole craniostomy, but the optimal location of the drain after craniotomy is not clear. We sought to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of subdural and subgaleal drain placement in patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 137 consecutive patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH at a single institution was performed. Cases were stratified by location of postoperative drain. The primary outcome was change in functional status (modified Rankin Score, mRS) at 3 months from preoperative baseline.

RESULTS

Among the patient cohort, 24.6% received subgaleal drain placement. After a median follow-up of 105 days, 79.4% (27/34) in the subgaleal group and 57.3% (59/103) in the subdural group (P = .02) had been discharged home. Worse premorbid mRS (P = .002), subdural drain location (P = .004), and decreased consciousness at presentation (Glasgow Coma Scale<15) (P < .002) were independent predictors of a discharge destination other than home. At the 3-month follow-up, the subgaleal group exhibited a mean improvement of 0.77 ± 1.2 points, while the subdural group had a deterioration of 0.14 ± 0.8 points (P < .01). Subgaleal drain location (P < .0001), better preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (P = .01), and worse premorbid mRS (P = .0003) were independent predictors of improved mRS at 3 months. Recurrence requiring repeat surgery were more common in the subdural (13.6% (14/103) than the subgaleal 2.9% (1/34) group, P = .12), although the absolute incidence rates remained low.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH, subgaleal drains are associated with shorter hospitalization, greater chance of discharge home, and better functional outcomes than subdural drains.

Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Haematoma after Surgery

(1) Background: In this study, epidemiological, clinical, therapeutical, and haemostaseological variables were investigated regarding their correlation with the recurrence of chronic subdural haematomas to assess the risk of recurrence more reliably in everyday clinical practice. (2) Methods: In our retrospective study, the electronic records of 90 patients who underwent surgery for a chronic subdural haematoma at our institute between 1 January 2017 and 31 May 2021 were analysed regarding previously defined variables. (3) Results: In the patient collective, 33.33% of the 90 patients experienced a recurrence requiring treatment. The occurrence of a recurrence was not statistically significantly related to age, gender, known alcohol abuse, a specific location, extension over one or both hemispheres, the surgical method, or anticoagulant medication. However, the recurrence was statistically significantly related to haematoma width (p = 0.000007), septation (p = 0.005), and the existence of a coagulation disorder not treated with medication (p = 0.04). (4) Conclusions: In our study, the width of the haematoma, septation, and coagulation disorders not treated with medication were documented as risk factors for the occurrence of a chronic subdural haematoma. Identifying of these risk factors could help in adapting individual therapeutic concepts for chronic subdural haematomas.

Single Frontal Burr-Hole Craniostomy Under Local Anesthesia for Treating Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the Septuagenarians and Older Adults: Surgical Technique and Results

Background Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is not a totally benign disease in the elderly patients, especially those aged 70 years and above. Hence, the surgical treatment of CSDH in aged patients needs to be as minimally disruptive as possible.

Methods An annotated description of the surgical technique of single frontal burr-hole craniostomy performed under local anesthesia and without closed tube drainage for evacuating CSDH in the septuagenarians and older adults is given. We also review the outcome of the procedure on a prospective consecutive cohort of patients in our service

Results Thirty patients, 25 males, aged 70 years and above successfully underwent this surgical procedure. Their mean age was 76.5 years (standard deviation, 4.3). The CSDH was bilateral in 30% (9/30), and more left sided in the rest, the unilateral cases, and was of mixed density radiologically, in most cases (73%, 22/30). Clinical presentation was mainly gait impairment, cognitive decline, and headache, and 57% (17/30) presented with coma or stupor as assessed by the Markwalder grading scale.

The surgery was successfully executed in all, median duration 45.0 minutes (interquartile range 37.3–60.0), and solely under local anesthesia in 77% (23/30) or with momentary short-acting sedation in the rest. The outcome was very good in 90.0% (27/30) using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) including two-third (20/30) completely asymptomatic (mRS 0) and 7/30 with only slight symptoms/disability, mRS ≤ 2. Three patients died perioperatively, all presenting in coma.

Conclusion This surgical technique appears very effectual for CSDH, is executed at a comparatively low cost, and, being much less disruptive than other traditional methods, may be a more homeostatic operative treatment in geriatric patients at least.

Is a drainage time of less than 24 h sufficient after chronic subdural hematoma evacuation?

BACKGROUND

It is well established that the use of a postoperative drain after chronic subdural hematoma surgery reduces recurrence rates, and it is common to use a postoperative drain for longer than 24 h. It is unclear whether this is superior to a shorter drainage time of less than 24 h. Our aim was to compare a postoperative drainage longer or shorter than 24 h after chronic subdural hematoma evacuation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective single centre study, 207 adult patients undergoing chronic subdural hematoma evacuation with a postoperative drainage longer (LDT-group) or shorter (SDT-group) than 24 h were compared regarding recurrence, mortality within 6 months and complications requiring hospital admission within 30 days. Length of hospital stay was also recorded. An active subgaleal drain was used. In addition to the retrospective cohort, we also studied the total volume drained per hour after cSDH surgery in a prospective cohort of 10 patients.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 12/96 (12.5%) in the LDT-group and in 13/111 (11.7%) patients in the SDT-group (p = 0.15). There was no significant difference between groups regarding recurrence, complications or mortality. The prospective cohort showed that most of the drainage occurred within the first hours after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that a postoperative drainage duration of less than 24 h does not lead to an increase in recurrence, complications or mortality compared to a drainage time of more than 24 h. A shorter drainage duration (< 24 h) after cSDH surgery facilitated earlier mobilisation and shorter hospital stay.

Effect of Irrigation Fluid Temperature on Recurrence in the Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The effect of a physical property of irrigation fluid (at body vs room temperature) on recurrence rate in the evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) needs further study.

Objective

To explore whether irrigation fluid temperature has an influence on cSDH recurrence.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial performed between March 16, 2016, and May 30, 2020. The follow-up period was 6 months. The study was conducted at 3 neurosurgical departments in Sweden. All patients older than 18 years undergoing cSDH evacuation during the study period were screened for eligibility in the study.

Interventions

The study participants were randomly assigned by 1:1 block randomization to the cSDH evacuation procedure with irrigation fluid at room temperature (RT group) or at body temperature (BT group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. Secondary end points were mortality, health-related quality of life, and complication frequency.

Results

At 6 months after surgery, 541 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [9.8] years; 395 men [73%]) had a complete follow-up according to protocol. There were 39 of 277 recurrences (14%) requiring reoperation in the RT group, compared with 16 of 264 recurrences (6%) in the BT group (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.38-4.66; P < .001). There were no significant differences in mortality, health-related quality of life, or complication frequency.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, irrigation at body temperature was superior to irrigation at room temperature in terms of fewer recurrences. This is a simple, safe, and readily available technique to optimize outcome in patients with cSDH. When irrigation is used in cSDH surgery, irrigation fluid at body temperature should be considered standard of care.

Trial Registration

ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02757235.

The Role of Active or Passive Drainage after Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials (cSDH-Drain-Trial and TOSCAN Trial)

The evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common procedures in neurosurgery. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of drainage suction in the surgical treatment of cSDH on the recurrence rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted on two randomized controlled trials (cSDH-Drain-Trial and TOSCAN trial) stratifying a total of 581 patients into active or passive drain type. Of the 581 patients, 359 (61.8%) and 220 (37.9%) were stratified into the active and passive drainage groups, respectively. The reoperation rate following postoperative recurrence was 23.1% and 14.1% in the active and passive drainage groups, respectively (p < 0.011). After propensity score matching, the differences in recurrence rate remained significant (26.6% versus 15.6%, p = 0.012). However, the functional outcome (mRS) at 6−12 months did not differ significantly (median [IQR]) between the 2 groups (passive drainage group 0.00 [0.00, 2.00], active drainage group 1.00 [0.00, 2.00], p = 0.431). Mortality was comparable between the groups (passive drainage group 12 (5.5%), active drainage group 20 (5.6%), p = 0.968). In the univariate analysis, active drainage, short (<48 h) duration of drainage, and early (<48 h) postoperative mobilization were significantly associated with a higher recurrence rate. However, the multivariate logistic regression model could not confirm that any of these parameters were significantly associated with recurrence. Our post hoc analysis proposes that using a passive instead of an active drain might be associated with a reduced recurrence rate after evacuation of a cSDH. We suggest gathering further evidence by means of a randomized controlled trial.

Effect of Twist-Drill Craniostomy With Hollow Screws for Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

This study systematically reviews the clinical efficacy and safety of twist-drill craniostomy with hollow screws in chronic subdural hematoma treatment.

Methods

A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, World Health Organization International Trial Registry platform, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang Database was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials or case-control trials using twist-drill craniostomy (TDC) with hollow screws for the evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma from the date of databases' inception to July 2021. Two investigators independently screened the studies and extracted data in strict accordance with pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 software or STATA was used for meta-analysis after evaluating the methodological quality of the included studies.

Results

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 16 case-control trials with a total of 2,536 cases were included. Results of the meta-analysis showed that the surgical success rate and postoperative recurrence rate of TDC with hollow screws were slightly higher compared to the burr hole craniostomy (BHC) group, but showed no statistical significance (RR = 1.03, P = 0.05; RR = 1.13, P = 0.50). However, subgroup analysis showed that the use of YL-1 needle had a higher success rate and lower recurrence rate (RR = 1.05, P = 0.02 < 0.05; RR = 0.584, P = 0.002), and TDC with hollow screws had a lower incidence rate of postoperative complications and postoperative acute intracranial hemorrhage compared with BHC, also revealing an overall shorter hospital stay (RR = 0.57, P = 0.0002 < 0.05; RR = 0.584, P = 0.027 < 0.05; WMD = −3.752, P < 0.001). However, the postoperative mortality rate was practically the same between the two groups (OR = 1.01, P = 0.95 > 0.05).

Conclusion

Twist-drill craniostomy with hollow screws is not inferior or superior to BHC in efficacy, and this strategy is safer and minimally invasive, which is reflected in a lower incidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage, overall complication rate, and length of hospital stay.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021270835.

Risk factors for postoperative seizures in patients with chronic subdural haematomas

Postoperative seizures are a frequently occurring yet not well-understood complication in patients undergoing surgical treatment of chronic subdural haematomas (cSDHs). Therefore, we investigated surgical and non-surgical risk factors that are commonly considered causal in provoking epileptic seizures, paying special attention to the intracranial course of the subdural drain (SDD) and the configuration of the haematoma. Data of patients with a cSDH, that were treated at our neurosurgical department between 2008 and 2014 were analysed. Patients suffering from severe pre-existing conditions and those who have been treated conservatively were excluded. Epidemiologic data as well as relevant clinical data were collected. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were analysed regarding morpho- and volumetric parameters. In order to objectify the influence of the SDD, its intracranial course and localisation (entering angle as well as the angle between drain and brain surface) were measured. For statistical analysis, univariate and multiple logistic regression models as well as Fisher's exact test were used. Two hundred eleven consecutive patients have been included. Mean age was 75.6 years, and 69% were male. Nineteen (9%) patients suffered from postsurgical seizures. Membranes within the haematoma were present in 81.5%. Pre- to postoperative haematoma reduction was significant (mean of difference - 12.76 mm/ - 9.47 mm in coronal/axial CT planes, p = 0.001/ < 0.001). In 77.9%, SDD showed cortical contact with eloquent regions and had an unfavourable course in 30 cases (14.2%). Surgical complications consisted of cortical bleeding in 2.5%, fresh subdural haematoma in 33.5% and wound infections in 1.4% of patients. Neither in univariate nor in multiple regression analyses any of the following independent variates was significantly correlated with postsurgical seizures: pre-existing epilepsy, alcohol abuse, right-sided haematomas, localization and thickness of haematoma, presence of septations, SDD-localization and to-brain angle, subdural air, and electrolyte levels. Instead, in multiple regression analyses, we found the risk of postsurgical seizures to be significantly correlated and increased with left-sided cSDH treated via craniotomy (p = 0.03) and an unfavourable course of the SDD in left-sided cSDH (p = 0.033). Burr hole trepanation should be preferred over craniotomy and care must be taken when placing a SDD to avoid irritating cortical tissue. The configuration of the haematoma does not appear to affect the postoperative seizure rate.

Using Local Anesthesia for Burr Hole Surgery of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Reduces Postoperative Complications, Length of Stay, and Hospitalization Cost: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Single Center

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to compare the effects of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on the surgical process and postoperative recovery of patients with unilateral chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with unilateral CSDH who underwent burr hole surgery between the years 2013 and 2018. Patients who received local anesthesia were allocated to the LA group, and the patients who received general anesthesia were allocated to the GA group. The clinical data, postoperative complication, length of stay, and hospitalization cost of these two groups were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients was collected for this study. Fifty one patients were assigned to the LA group and 54 to GA group. The duration of anesthesia and operation of the LA group was 37.71 (10.55) min; while for the GA group the duration was 56.04 (8.37) min (p < 0.001). The time from operation to discharge in GA group was greatly longer than that in LA group [(8.51 (1.49) days vs. 10.46 (2.34) days, respectively; p < 0.001]. Hospitalization cost for LA group was 2,721.54 (504.66) USD, which was significantly lesser than that for GA patients [3,314.82 (493.52) USD; p < 0.001]. The total number of complications in LA patients was less than that in GA patients [6 vs. 29 cases, respectively; p < 0.001]. The number of patients with residual hematoma in the LA group was <that in the GA group (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

As compared to GA, LA might be a simpler, safer, and more effective method for burr hole surgery of CSDH to promote patients' recovery. However, further research is still required to confirm this conclusion.

History and current progress of chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is characterized by an encapsulated collection of old blood. Although CSDH has become the most frequent pathologic entity in daily neurosurgical practice, there are some unresolved research questions. In particular, the causes and recurrent risk factors of CSDH remain as an object of debate. The split of the dural border layer forms a few tiers of dural border cells over the arachnoid layer. Tissue plasminogen activator plays an important role as a key factor of defective coagulation. Historically, CSDH has often been treated via burr hole craniostomy using a closed drainage system. Several different operative strategies and peri-operative strategies such as the addition of burr holes, addition of cavity irrigation, position of drain, or postural position, have been described previously. Although the direction of the drainage tube, residual air, low intensity of T1-weighted images on MRI, and niveau formation have been reported as risk factors for recurrence, antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug use has not yet been verified as a risk factor. Recently, pharmaceutical strategies, including atorvastatin, significantly improved the neurological function in CSDH patients. Many case series, without randomization, have been reported; and given its promising result, several randomized clinical trials using pharmaceutical as well as operative and perioperative strategies were initiated to obtain sufficient data. In contrast, relatively fewer basic studies have achieved clinical applications in CSDH, although it is one of the most common clinical entities. Further scientific basic research may be essential for achieving a novel treatment strategy for CSDH.

Comparative study of subdural drain (SDD) versus sub periosteal drain (SPD) in treating patient with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH)

Background:

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is common neurosurgical condition encountered in daily practice. Burr holes evacuation is standard treatment for symptomatic cases. Both subdural drain (SDD) and subperiosteal drain (SPD) have been reported to lower the recurrence rate when used in conjunction with burr holes. A randomized controlled trials were done to see if there were any differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two types of drains.

Methods:

A total of 42 CSDH patients were enrolled and allocated to one of two groups: SDD (n = 21) or SPD (n = 21). Demographic data, perioperative imaging characteristics, clinical outcome, and recurrence rate were recorded for comparison.

Results:

In both groups, demographic characteristics such as sex ratio, mean age of patients, concomitant disease, and antithrombotic agent use were similar. At 6 months, 20 (95.2%) and 21 (100%) cases in the SDD and SPD groups, respectively, had a favorable outcome (mRS 0–3). Complete hematoma resolution at 6 months was achieved in 21 (100%) and 19 (90.5%) cases of the SDD and SPD groups, respectively. The amount of drain within 48 h was not difference between the two groups. None of the SDD recurred, but two of the SPD group did, necessitating reoperation, which had no effect on the final outcome.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that the drain type (SDD or SPD) has no effect on the outcome. The surgeon’s preference determines which procedure is used. Except in symptomatic circumstances, routine postoperative imaging may not be required.

Efficacy of the Direct Aspiration-Irrigation Maneuver for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Single Hospital's Experience

Objective The traditional methods for managing symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) at our hospital include evacuation via single burr-hole irrigation with continuous closed subdural drainage (SBID). The single burr-hole aspiration and irrigation technique with continuous closed subdural drainage (SBAID) is an attractive alternative method. The goal of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of SBAID compared with traditional SBID methods. Methods A database of 51 CSDH patients treated with the SBAID method and 35 CSDH patients treated with the SBID method was compiled, and a retrospective chart review was performed. Information regarding demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, and outcomes were collected. Predictors of recurrence requiring reoperation and other outcomes were analyzed. Results Compared to the patients in the SBID group, the patients in the SBAID group had a shorter mean duration of surgery (56.6±5.6 minutes vs 59.5±4.8 minutes, respectively, P=0.02); a shorter mean interval from procedure to discharge (6.2±1.2 days vs 6.8±1.3 days, respectively, P=0.046); no significant difference in preoperative hematoma volume (106.4±21.7 cm³ vs 101.3±16.3 cm³, respectively, P=0.25); and a smaller subdural space volume 48 hours after the operation (43.6±7.4 cm³ vs 47.4±9.1 cm³, respectively, P=0.03). In addition, symptomatic hematoma recurrence developed in one patient in the SBAID group and five patients in the SBID group (P=0.03). The in-hospital mortality rates of the SBAID and SBID groups were 2% (1 of 51) and 6% (2 of 35), respectively; this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.35). Conclusions The SBAID method results in a remarkably low recurrence rate and good outcomes. This method should be considered for patients presenting with symptomatic CSDHs.

Net Drainage as a Novel Metric for Irrigating Drainage Systems in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Management: A Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical pathology with a projected increase in prevalence as the elderly population grows. Traditional treatment for cSDH involves burr hole drainage or craniotomy with or without a subdural drain. This case describes a novel irrigation and drainage protocol using IRRAflow dual-lumen catheter system that utilizes early irrigation and measurement of the net fluid output to improve postoperative outcomes.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 75-yr-old male presented to the emergency department with 2 wk of progressive dizziness, headache, confusion, and left-sided weakness over the past week. Computed tomography (CT) of the head showed 25-mm-thick, right-sided cSDH with 7 mm of right-to-left midline shift. The patient was taken to the operating room for right-sided craniotomy for subdural hematoma evacuation with placement of IRRAflow irrigating drain in the subdural space. The IRRAflow drain irrigated at 100 cc/h for 23 h with net output consistently greater than irrigation rate. Head CT the following day showed a progressive decrease in subdural collection. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2 and had complete resolution of his neurological symptoms by postoperative day 11.

CONCLUSION

As cSDHs become more prevalent in the aging population, development of improved management strategies is imperative. This report describes the use of an IRRAflow dual-lumen catheter with a novel protocol consisting of a high rate of irrigation but net fluid output, which led to rapid recovery and resolution of neurological deficits in a patient with a cSDH.

Comparative Study of Subgaleal and Subdural Closed Drain in Surgically Treated Cases of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Background:

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is seen most common in geriatric patients, and trauma is the most important reason for CSDH. Operative treatment of CSDH in symptomatic patients is yet the gold standard of therapy because it allows decompression of the subdural space and aids improvement in neurological status. Burr-hole craniostomy is the most common accepted treatment for CSDH. There is still controversy regarding which type of drain placement is best in the outcome: subdural or subgaleal drain.

Aim:

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of subgaleal versus subdural drain in surgically treated patients of CSDH.

Materials and Methods:

Patients were assigned by simple random sampling in two groups. The study was conducted from February 2016 to July 2017. A total of 70 patients were enrolled into the study and were divided in two groups (Group 1 – Subgaleal drain; Group 2 – Subdural drain). Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square and t-test. Outcome was assessed at the end of hospital stay by modified Rankin scale. Postoperative computed tomography scan was done after 24 h of surgery.

Results:

This study concluded that both types of drains are equally effective for the treatment of CSDH. There is a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of seizure in both the groups as there was no seizure in subgaleal drain group compared to 5 (14.3%) patients who had seizures postoperatively in subdural drain group (P = 0.020). There was insignificant difference with respect to preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale/sex/preoperative hematoma volume/postoperative hematoma volume/preoperative midline shift.

Conclusion:

Subgaleal drain is safe and technically easy, as subgaleal drain has no direct contact with brain parenchyma, thus less chances of brain laceration, intracerebral hematoma formation, and seizures.

Risk of Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematomas After Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Background: Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly population. Recurrence rates after surgical evacuation range from 5 to 30%. Factors predicting recurrence remain debated and unclear.

Objective: To identify factors associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Methods: Cases of CSDHs that underwent surgical treatment between 2005 and 2018 in the Neurosurgery Units of two major Italian hospitals were reviewed. Data extracted from a prospectively maintained database included demographics, laterality, antithrombotic therapy, history of trauma, corticosteroid therapy, preoperative and postoperative symptoms, type of surgical intervention, use of surgical drain, and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 1313 patients was analyzed. The overall recurrence rate was 10.1%. The risk of recurrence was not significantly different between patients with unilateral or bilateral CSDH (10.4 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.39). The risk of recurrence was higher in patients that underwent surgical procedure without postoperative drainage (16.1 vs. 5.4%, p < 0.01). No relationship was found between recurrence rates and therapy with antithrombotic drugs (p = 0.97). The risk of recurrence was increasingly higher considering craniostomy, craniectomy, and craniotomy (9.3, 11.3, and 18.9%, respectively, p = 0.013). Lower recurrence rates following Dexamethasone therapy were recorded (p = 0.013).

Conclusion: No association was found between the risk of recurrence of CSDH after surgical evacuation and age, use of antithrombotic medication, or laterality. Burr-hole craniostomy was found to be associated with lower recurrence rates, when compared to other surgical procedures. Placement of surgical drain and Dexamethasone therapy were significantly associated with reduced risk of recurrence of CSDHs.

Drains result in greater reduction of subdural width and midline shift in burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma

BACKGROUND

Drain insertion following chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) evacuation reduces recurrence and improves outcomes. The mechanism of this improvement is uncertain. We assessed whether drains result in improved postoperative imaging, and which radiological factors are associated with recurrence and functional outcome.

METHODS

A multi-centre, prospective cohort study of CSDH patients was performed between May 2013 and January 2014. Patients aged > 16 years undergoing burr hole evacuation of primary CSDH with pre- and postoperative imaging were included in this subgroup analysis. Baseline and clinical details were collected. Pre- and postoperative maximal subdural width and midline shift (MLS) along with clot density were recorded. Primary outcomes comprised mRS at discharge and symptomatic recurrence requiring re-drainage. Comparisons were made using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three hundred nineteen patients were identified for inclusion. Two hundred seventy-two of 319 (85%) patients underwent drain insertion at the time of surgery versus 45/319 (14%) who did not. Twenty-nine of 272 patients who underwent drain insertion experienced recurrence (10.9%) versus 9 of 45 patients without drain insertion (20.5%; p = 0.07). Overall change in median subdural width was significantly greater in the drain versus 'no drain' groups (11 mm versus 6 mm, p < 0.01). Overall change in median midline shift (MLS) was also significantly greater in the drain group (4 mm versus 3 mm, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, change in maximal width and MLS were significant predictors of recurrence, although only the former remained a significant predictor for functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of subdural drains results in significantly improved postoperative imaging in burr hole evacuation of CSDH, thus providing radiological corroboration for their recommended use.

Subperiosteal versus Subdural Drain After Burr-hole Drainage Under Blood Thinners: A Subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain RCT

OBJECTIVE

The chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH)-Drain trial compared recurrence rates and clinical outcome associated with the use of subperiosteal drain (SPD) and subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole drainage for cSDH. This subgroup analysis aimed to determine whether one drain type is preferable for patients treated with platelet inhibitors (PI) or anticoagulants (AC).

METHODS

This subanalysis included 133 patients treated with PI/AC of the 220 patients from the preceding cSDH-Drain trial. For these patients the association between the drain type used and recurrence rates, mortality, as well as clinical outcome at 6 weeks and 12 months follow-up were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis model. Additionally, recurrence rates, clinical outcome, and mortality were assessed for each PI or AC type separately.

RESULTS

The insertion of SPD was associated with 7.35% recurrence rates compared to 13.85% with SDD in patients treated with PI or AC (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.06-2.65, P = 0.36). Outcome measurements and mortality did not differ significantly between both groups at 6-week and 12-month follow-up. In addition, there was no statistically significant association between drain type and recurrence rate or mortality when comparing data for each PI or AC type. At 24 hours postoperatively, significantly more patients under phenprocoumon and natrium-dalteparin had a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 13 and 15 in the SDD group compared with the SPD group (P = 0.006), whereaas at 6-week follow-up significantly more patients in the SDD group treated with ASA had a good modified Rankin scale score (P = 0.01). At 12 months, no significant difference in outcome measurements was seen for all PI and AC types.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with PI or AC, the insertion of SPD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH showed comparable recurrence, mortality, and long term outcome rates when compared with SDD.

Surgical nuances and placement of subgaleal drains for supratentorial procedures-a prospective analysis of efficacy and outcome in 150 craniotomies

Background

For supratentorial craniotomy, surgical access, and closure technique, including placement of subgaleal drains, may vary considerably. The influence of surgical nuances on postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or impaired wound healing overall remains largely unclear. With this study, we are reporting our experiences and the impact of our clinical routines on outcome in a prospectively collected data set.

Method

We prospectively observed 150 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy and recorded technical variables (type/length of incision, size of craniotomy, technique of dural and skin closure, type of dressing, and placement of subgaleal drains). Outcome variables (subgaleal hematoma/CSF collection, periorbital edema, impairment of wound healing, infection, and need for operative revision) were recorded at time of discharge and at late follow-up.

Results

Early subgaleal fluid collection was observed in 36.7% (2.8% at the late follow-up), and impaired wound healing was recorded in 3.3% of all cases, with an overall need for operative revision of 6.7%. Neither usage of dural sealants, lack of watertight dural closure, and presence of subgaleal drains, nor type of skin closure or dressing influenced outcome. Curved incisions, larger craniotomy, and tumor size, however, were associated with an increase in early CSF or hematoma collection (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, p < 0.01 resp.), and larger craniotomy size was associated with longer persistence of subgaleal fluid collections (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Based on our setting, individual surgical nuances such as the type of dural closure and the use of subgaleal drains resulted in a comparable complication rate and outcome. Subgaleal fluid collections were frequently observed after supratentorial procedures, irrespective of the closing technique employed, and resolve spontaneously in the majority of cases without significant sequelae. Our results are limited due to the observational nature in our single-center study and need to be validated by supportive prospective randomized design.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04196-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Does Drain Position and Duration Influence Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Lessons from a UK Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Drain insertion following chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation improves patient outcomes.

Objective

To examine whether this is influenced by variation in drain location, positioning or duration of placement.

Methods

We performed a subgroup analysis of a previously reported multicenter, prospective cohort study of CSDH patients performed between May 2013 and January 2014. Data were analyzed relating drain location (subdural or subgaleal), position (through a frontal or parietal burr hole), and duration of insertion, to outcomes in patients aged >16 yr undergoing burr-hole drainage of primary CSDH. Primary outcomes comprised modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge and symptomatic recurrence requiring redrainage within 60 d.

Results

A total of 577 patients were analyzed. The recurrence rate of 6.7% (12/160) in the frontal subdural drain group was comparable to 8.8% (30/343) in the parietal subdural drain group. Only 44/577 (7.6%) patients underwent subgaleal drain insertion. Recurrence rates were comparable between subdural (7.7%; 41/533) and subgaleal (9.1%; 4/44) groups (P = .95). We found no significant differences in discharge mRS between these groups. Recurrence rates were comparable between patients with postoperative drainage for 1 or 2 d, 6.4% and 8.4%, respectively (P = .44). There was no significant difference in mRS scores between these 2 groups (P = .56).

CONCLUSION

Drain insertion after CSDH drainage is important, but position (subgaleal or subdural) and duration did not appear to influence recurrence rate or clinical outcomes. Similarly, drain location did not influence recurrence rate nor outcomes where both parietal and frontal burr holes were made. Further prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials could provide further clarification.

The influence of irrigation fluid temperature on recurrence in the evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma

Background

Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are one of the most common conditions requiring neurosurgical treatment. The reported recurrence after surgery is 3–21.5% with closed system drainage. In clinical practice, irrigation fluids at body temperature (37 °C) and at room temperature (22 °C) are routinely used in the evacuation of cSDH. Our hypothesis was that irrigation at body temperature might have more beneficial effects on coagulation and solubility of the chronic subdural hematoma than irrigation at room temperature. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different intraoperative irrigation fluid temperatures on recurrence rates.

Methods

This was a retrospective study where we included all consecutive patients from a defined geographical area of western Sweden between September 2013 and November 2014. In the course of 6 months, we performed intraoperative irrigation at body temperature (37 °C, BT-group) during burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. This was then compared with the previous 6-month period, when irrigation fluid at room temperature (22 °C, RT-group) was used. The primary endpoint was same-sided recurrence in need of reoperation within 6 months.

Results

Recurrence occurred in 11 of 84 (13.1%) patients in the RT-group compared with 4 of 88 (4.5%) in the BT-group (p = 0.013). There were no significant between-group differences regarding age, sex, duration of surgery, frequency of bilateral hematomas, hematoma density, and use of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that intraoperative irrigation fluid at body temperature is associated with lower recurrence rates compared with irrigation fluid at room temperature. To investigate this further, a prospective randomized controlled trial has been initiated (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT0275235).

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0275235

Take it seriously or not: postoperative pneumocephalus in CSDH patients?

Background: Pneumocephalus is a common finding after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Its effects have not been specifically studied.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 140 patients with CSDH with single burr-hole drainage. The pre- and postoperative volumes of intracranial hematoma and the postoperative volume of pneumocephalus were calculated and analyzed with their relationships with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores.Results: The preoperative hematoma volume and the patient ages are positively correlated with the 1-day postoperative pneumocephalus volume (p < 0.001, p < 0.01). There is no correlation between postoperative pneumocephalus volume and GCS/GOS scores (p > 0.05) and there is no difference of GCS/GOS scores or CSDH recurrence rate between patients with and without pneumocephalus (p > 0.05). The age and the volume of 1-day postoperative pneumocephalus are positively correlated with the absorbing rate of pneumocephalus (p < 0.01, p < 0.001).Conclusions: The pneumocephalus at a certain range has no effect on the prognosis of patients with CSDH and requires no specific intervention due to its self-absorbing capacity in the normal progress after surgery.HighlightsNo correlation between postoperative pneumocephalus volume and GCS/GOS scores.No difference of GCS/GOS or recurrence between patients with pneumocephalus or not.Pneumocephalus at certain range has no effect on the prognosis of patients.

Subperiosteal versus Subdural Drain After Burr Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of drains has been considered to be superior to no drains after burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). Therefore, routine placement of a subdural drain (SDD) is supported by most neurosurgeons. However, whether the drain location after CSDH burr hole evacuation influences patient outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of subperiosteal drains (SPDs) with those of SDDs for patients with CSDHs.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, eligible studies reported up to September 2019 were identified through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Pooled estimates, confidence intervals (CIs), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 3169 patients were included. The use of a SPD after CSDH burr hole drainage resulted in a significant decrease in recurrences compared with the use of a SDD (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92; I², 14%; P = 0.007). No significant differences were identified between the SPD and SDD groups in the favorable outcomes (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1-1.68; I², 0%; P = 0.05). Adverse event rates, including mortality, seizures, and surgical infection, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, the use of SPDs was associated with a lower risk of parenchymal injuries compared with SDDs (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.76; I², 0%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present meta-analysis suggest that the use of an SPD is safer and might be more effective than an SDD in the treatment of CSDH. However, more large randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the use of SPDs in the management of CSDH.

Outcomes of Subdural Versus Subperiosteal Drain After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although the use of a postoperative drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is known to improve surgical outcomes, the superiority of subdural over subperiosteal drains has not been firmly established. Evidence comparing these 2 drain types is largely restricted to single-center series with limited numbers. Using a multicenter cohort study, we aimed to show noninferiority of subperiosteal drains vis-à-vis subdural drains after burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with CSDH aged 21 years and older who had undergone burr-hole craniostomy across 3 tertiary hospitals from 2010 to 2017. Primary outcome measures included CSDH recurrence and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months. Outcomes of patients in the subdural and subperiosteal drain groups were analyzed and confounders were adjusted for using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 570 cases analyzed, 329 (57.7%) received a subdural drain and 241 (42.3%) received a subperiosteal drain. There was no significant difference between the 2 drain groups in CSDH recurrence (13.1% in the subdural group vs. 11.2% in the subperiosteal group; P = 0.502) or 6-month mRS score (27.2% with mRS 4-6 in the subdural group vs. 20.4% in the subperiosteal group; P = 0.188). Independent predictors of CSDH recurrence identified on multivariate analysis included premorbid mRS score 0-3 (P = 0.021), separated CSDH type on preoperative computed tomography scan (P = 0.002), and postoperative pneumocephalus of ≥15 mm (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of subdural and subperiosteal drains after burr-hole craniostomy for CSDH are largely equivalent based on our findings.

Subperiosteal vs Subdural Drain After Burr-Hole Drainage of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial (cSDH-Drain-Trial)

BACKGROUND

The use of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) reduces recurrence at 6 mo. Subperiosteal drains (SPDs) are considered safer, since they are not positioned in direct contact to cortical structures, bridging veins, or hematoma membranes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the recurrence rate after insertion of a SPD is noninferior to the insertion of a more commonly used SDD.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial analyzing patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH aged 18 yr and older. After hematoma evacuation, patients were randomly assigned to receive either a SDD (SDD-group) or a SPD (SPD-group). The primary endpoint was recurrence indicating a reoperation within 12 mo, with a noninferiority margin of 3.5%. Secondary outcomes included clinical and radiological outcome, morbidity and mortality rates, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 220 randomized patients, all were included in the final analysis (120 SPD and 100 SDD). Recurrence rate was lower in the SPD group (8.33%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.28-14.72) than in the SDD group (12.00%, 95% CI 6.66-19.73), with the treatment difference (3.67%, 95% CI -12.6-5.3) not meeting predefined noninferiority criteria. The SPD group showed significantly lower rates of surgical infections (P = .0406) and iatrogenic morbidity through drain placement (P = .0184). Length of stay and mortality rates were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although the noninferiority criteria were not met, SPD insertion led to lower recurrence rates, fewer surgical infections, and lower drain misplacement rates. These findings suggest that SPD may be warranted in routine clinical practice

Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma after Evacuating It by Two Large Burr Holes, Irrigation, and Subgaleal Low-Pressure Suction Drainage

Background:

There are no current standard operative steps for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). The aim of this study was to detect the recurrence rate after drainage of a unilateral diffuse CSDH by combining certain operative steps.

Materials and Methods:

This is a descriptive, retrospective cohort study that included 47 consecutive adult patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral diffuse CSDH by two large burr holes (≥2 cm in diameter) and irrigation of the subdural space by warm saline, followed by placement of a subgaleal Redivac drain under low-pressure suction in our university hospital from August 2012 to August 2016. There were 29 men and 18 women with a mean age of 69.1 years.

Results:

All the operations were uneventful. All the patients had adequate drainage of their subdural hematomas, and all patients were discharged alert and oriented. No incidence of recurrence within 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated that surgical management of a unilateral diffuse CSDH in adult patients by two large burr holes, irrigation, and a subgaleal Redivac low-pressure suction drainage was effective and associated with no recurrence.

How to Treat Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Past and Now

Treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is relatively straightforward, however, there is still some debate regarding the best strategy for treatment. The most practical recommendations of up to date were identified by a review of literature. The author reviewed the literature on CSDH management from the past to now to identify the best methods. Till 1970s, craniotomy was the most commonly used method. Burr hole (BH) became the most preferred method from 1980s. In 1977, twist drill (TD) craniostomy was introduced. Closed system drainage after a BH or a TD became the most frequently used surgical method. Although nonsurgical treatment is often successful, trephination has more advantages, such as rapid resolution of the symptoms and short period of hospitalization. Nonsurgical treatment is possible in asymptomatic patients with a small CSDH. For the symptomatic patients with CSDH, trephination is the treatment of choice, either by BH or TD. In gray zone between surgery and medical treatment, shared decision making can be an ideal approach. For the recurrent CSDHs, repeated trephination is still effective for patients with a low risk of recurrence. If the risk of recurrence is high, additional management would be helpful. For the refractory CSDHs, it is necessary to obliterate the subdural space.

A retrospective analysis of chronic subdural haematoma recurrence rates following burr hole trephination versus minicraniotomy

The aim of this study was to determine the subdural haematoma recurrence rate in patients with symptomatic chronic subdural haematomas (CSDH) treated with either burr hole trephination (BHT) or minicraniotomy (MC) and to determine whether a statistically significant difference exists between the two techniques. A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with symptomatic CSDH treated with BHT or MC at the John Hunter Hospital Neurosurgery Department between July 2004 and July 2016 was performed. After inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, 368 patients with 439 CSDHs were eligible. Baseline demographic data was recorded for all patients. Statistical analysis was performed assessing haematoma recurrence as the primary outcome and mortality as a secondary outcome. Three hundred and sixty eight patients were included in the study, with 225 being treated with MC and 143 with BHT. Baseline demographic data was similar between the two groups. The recurrence rate for patients treated with BHT was 0.13 (95% CI 0.08-0.18), versus 0.18 (95% CI 0.13-0.23) in the MC group. This difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the two groups. The mortality rate in the BHT group was 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.14) versus 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.13) in the MC group. In our series there was no difference in recurrence rates or mortality rates between the two groups, suggesting MC is an effective alternative to BHT in the management of symptomatic CSDH.

Complications Following Burr Hole Craniostomy and Closed-System Drainage for Subdural Lesions

Objective

Burr hole craniostomy and closed-system drainage (BCD) is a common surgical procedure in the field of neurosurgery. However, complications following BCD have seldom been reported. The purpose of this study was to report our experiences regarding complications following BCD for subdural lesions.

Methods

A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent BCD for presumed subdural lesions at one institute since the opening of the hospital was performed.

Results

Of the 395 patients who underwent BCD for presumed subdural lesions, 117 experienced surgical or nonsurgical complications. Acute intracranial hemorrhagic complications developed in 14 patients (3.5%). Among these, 1 patient died and 5 patients had major morbidities. Malposition of the drainage catheter in the brain parenchyma occurred in 4 patients, and opposite-side surgery occurred in 2 patients. Newly developed seizures after BCD occurred in 8 patients (2.0%), five of whom developed the seizures in relation to new brain lesions. Eighty-eight patients (22.3%) suffered from nonsurgical complications after BCD. Pulmonary problems (7.3%) were the most common nonsurgical complications, followed by urinary problems (5.8%), psychologic problems (4.3%), and cognitive impairments (3.8%).

Conclusion

The incidence of complications after BCD for subdural lesions is higher than previously believed. In particular, catastrophic complications such as acute intracranial hematomas and surgical or management errors occur at rates that cannot be ignored, possibly causing medico-legal problems. Great caution must be taken during surgery and the postoperative period, and these complications should be listed on the informed consent form before surgery.

Management of Subdural Hematomas: Part II. Surgical Management of Subdural Hematomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of patients with subdural hematomas starts with Emergency Neurological Life Support guidelines. Patients with acute or chronic subdural hematomas (SDHs) associated with rapidly deteriorating neurologic exam, unilaterally or bilaterally dilated nonreactive pupils, and extensor posturing are considered imminently surgical; likewise, SDHs more than 10 mm in size or those associated with more than 5-mm midline shift are deemed operative.

RECENT FINDINGS

While twist drill craniostomy and placement of subdural evacuating vport system (SEPS) are quick, bedside procedures completed under local anesthesia and appropriate for patients with chronic SDH or patients that cannot tolerate anesthesia, these techniques are not optimal for patients with acute SDH or chronic SDH with septations. Burr hole SDH evacuation under conscious sedation or general anesthesia is an analogous technique; however, it requires basic surgical equipment and operating room staff, with a focus on a closed system with burr hole followed by rapid drain placement to avoid introduction of air into the subdural space, or multiple burr holes with extensive irrigation to reduce pneumocephalus and continue SDH evacuation via drain for several days. Acute SDH associated with significant mass effect and cerebral edema requires aggressive decompression via craniotomy with clot evacuation and frequently a craniectomy. Chronic SDHs that fail conservative management and progress clinically or radiographically are addressed with craniotomy with or without membranectomy. Surgical SDH management is variable depending on its characteristics and etiology, patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, institutional preferences, and availability of specialized surgical equipment and adjunct therapies. Rapid access to surgical suites and trained staff to address surgical hemorrhages in a timely manner, with appropriate post-operative care by a specialized team including neurosurgeons and neurointensivists, is of paramount importance for successful patient outcomes. Here, we review various aspects of surgical SDH management.

Suction forces generated by passive bile bag drainage on a model of post-subdural hematoma evacuation

BACKGROUND

Passive drainage systems are commonly used after subdural hematoma evacuation but there is a dearth of published data regarding the suction forces created. We set out to quantify the suction forces generated by a passive drainage system.

METHOD

We created a model of passive drainage after subdural hematoma evacuation. We measured the maximum suction force generated with a bile bag drain for both empty drain tubing and fluid-filled drain tube causing a siphoning effect. We took measurements at varying heights of the bile bag to analyze if bile bag height changed suction forces generated.

RESULTS

An empty bile bag with no fluid in the drainage tube connected to a rigid, fluid-filled model creates minimal suction force of 0.9 mmHg (95% CI 0.64-1.16 mmHg). When fluid fills the drain tubing, a siphoning effect is created and can generate suction forces ranging from 18.7 to 30.6 mmHg depending on the relative position of the bile bag and filled amount of the bile bag. The suction forces generated are statistically different if the bile bag is 50 cm below, level with or 50 cm above the experimental model.

CONCLUSION

Passive bile bag drainage does not generate significant suction on a fluid-filled rigid model if the drain tubing is empty. If fluid fills the drain tubing then siphoning occurs and can increase the suction force of a passive bile bag drainage system to levels comparable to partially filled Jackson-Pratt bulb drainage.

A closed system irrigation & drainage technique for surgical evacuation of chronic subdural haematomas

Background: Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH), is a common neurosurgical disorder that is associated with morbidity and mortality affecting the ageing population. The aim is to present the treatment experience of CSDH patients treated with a technique that combines the classical single burr-hole irrigation and the continuous closed system drainage: The closed system irrigation & drainage (CSID) technique. Methods: The cases undergoing CSDH evacuation with the CSID method were captured over a 4-year period at a tertiary neurosurgical centre. The authors describe the performance of this methods with respect to post-operative clinical and radiological features, including recurrence rates, complications, and length of stay. Results: A total of 36 cases undergoing 42 CSID procedures (30 unilateral and 6 bilateral CSDHs) were performed, in cases ranging between 55-95 years old (median age 79 years). The rate of recurrence or significant ruminant blood in the subdural space on post-operative imaging was 11% (n=4). No cases of pneumocephalus were observed in this series (n=0). The mean (SD) skin-to-skin time for this procedure was 13.4 (4.4) minutes, with a mean (SD) length of stay of 4 (1.9) days. Conclusion: We conclude that the one burr-hole closed system irrigation and drainage technique with a sub-periosteal drain seems to be a simple, effective and safe procedure for treatment of CSDH. It's well tolerated under local anaesthesia for patients with high co-morbidities and these preliminary results indicated it may potentially be a better option for treatment of CSDH with a lower rate of post-operative complications.

Evidence based diagnosis and management of chronic subdural hematoma: A review of the literature

Chronic subdural hematomas are encapsulated blood collections within the dural border cells with characteristic outer "neomembranes". Affected patients are more often male and typically above the age of 70. Imaging shows crescentic layering of fluid in the subdural space on a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan, best appreciated on sagittal or coronal reformats. Initial medical management involves reversing anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies, and often initiation of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Operative interventions, such as twist-drill craniostomy (TDC), burr-hole craniostomy (BHC), and craniotomy are indicated if imaging implies compression (maximum fluid collection thickness >1 cm) or the patient is symptomatic. The effectiveness of various surgical techniques remains poorly characterized, with sparse level 1 evidence, variable outcome measures, and various surgical techniques. Postoperatively, subdural drains can decrease recurrence and sequential compression devices can decrease embolic complications, while measures such as early mobilization and re-initiation of anticoagulation need further study. Non-operative management, including steroid therapy, etizolam, tranexamic acid, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) also remain poorly studied. Recurrent hemorrhages are a major complication affecting around 10-20% of patients, and therefore close follow-up is essential.

Dexamethasone for chronic subdural haematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma is a common but retractable neurological disease in the elderly with a high rate of recurrence. Dexamethasone (DX) either as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy has been applied clinically, but its effectiveness and feasibility remain controversial. We conducted this review to clarify this issue.

METHODS

With a systematic review through multiple databases, we retrieved eligible English language publications and extracted relevant data to perform meta-analyses. The respective risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled to evaluate the overall effect.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis showed overall that DX (alone or adjuvant) resulted in a lower recurrence rate when compared with non-DX therapy (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88; p = 0.01), but sensitivity analysis by excluding the most influential study achieved inconsistent results. The pooled effect revealed no statistical difference on recurrence rate between DX alone and non-DX therapy or surgical therapy (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.71; p = 0.66) (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.43-1.85; p = 0.76). Comparison between DX alone with the surgical therapy demonstrated no difference on the poor outcome (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.15-1.04; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

We had no enough evidence to support DX use as an effective alternation to surgical therapy. But adjuvant DX use may facilitate the surgical therapy by reducing recurrence. Further study focusing on adjuvant DX was required.

The Swedish study of Irrigation-fluid temperature in the evacuation of Chronic subdural hematoma (SIC!): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common conditions encountered in neurosurgical practice. Recurrence, observed in 5–30% of patients, is a major clinical problem. The temperature of the irrigation fluid used during evacuation of the hematoma might theoretically influence recurrence rates since irrigation fluid at body temperature (37 ^oC) may beneficially influence coagulation and cSDH solubility when compared to irrigation fluid at room temperature. Should no difference in recurrence rates be observed when comparing irrigation-fluid temperatures, there is no need for warmed fluids during surgery. Our main aim is to investigate the effect of irrigation-fluid temperature on recurrence rates and clinical outcomes after cSDH evacuation using a multicenter randomized controlled trial design.

Methods

The study will be conducted in three neurosurgical departments with population-based catchment areas using a similar surgical strategy. In total, 600 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will randomly be assigned to either intraoperative irrigation with fluid at body temperature or room temperature. The power calculation is based on a retrospective study performed at our department showing a recurrence rate of 5% versus 12% when comparing irrigation fluid at body temperature versus fluid at room temperature (unpublished data). The primary endpoint is recurrence rate of cSDH analyzed at 6 months post treatment. Secondary endpoints are mortality rate, complications and health-related quality of life.

Discussion

Irrigation-fluid temperature might influence recurrence rates in the evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas. We present a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating our hypothesis that irrigation fluid at body temperature is superior to room temperature in reducing recurrence rates following evacuation of cSDH.

Trials registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02757235. Registered on 2 May 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2194-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessment of drainage techniques for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a consecutive population-based comparative cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures. The benefit of postoperative passive subdural drainage compared with no drains has been established, but other drainage techniques are common, and their effectiveness compared with passive subdural drains remains unknown.

METHODS

In Scandinavian population-based cohorts the authors conducted a consecutive, parallel cohort study to compare different drainage techniques. The techniques used were continuous irrigation and drainage (CID cohort, n = 166), passive subdural drainage (PD cohort, n = 330), and active subgaleal drainage (AD cohort, n = 764). The primary end point was recurrence in need of reoperation within 6 months of index surgery. Secondary end points were complications, perioperative mortality, and overall survival. The analyses were based on direct regional comparison (i.e., surgical strategy).

RESULTS

Recurrence in need of surgery was observed in 18 patients (10.8%) in the CID cohort, in 66 patients (20.0%) in the PD cohort, and in 85 patients (11.1%) in the AD cohort (p < 0.001). Complications were more common in the CID cohort (14.5%) compared with the PD (7.3%) and AD (8.1%) cohorts (p = 0.019). Perioperative mortality rates were similar between cohorts (p = 0.621). There were some differences in baseline and treatment characteristics possibly interfering with the above-mentioned results. However, after adjusting for differences in baseline and treatment characteristics in a regression model, the drainage techniques were still significantly associated with clinical outcome (p < 0.001 for recurrence, p = 0.017 for complications).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the AD cohort, more recurrences were observed in the PD cohort and more complications in the CID cohort, also after adjustment for differences at baseline. Although the authors cannot exclude unmeasured confounding factors when comparing centers, AD appears superior to the more common PD.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01930617 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Subperiosteal Drainage versus Subdural Drainage in the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (A Comparative Study)

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) remain one of the most frequent diagnoses in current neurosurgical practice. Burr-hole craniostomy with irrigation and placement of close-system drainage is the current recommended surgery for symptomatic CSDH. The aim of this study is to perform a direct comparison between two surgical techniques in the treatment of symptomatic CSDH, which have been proven in previous studies to be efficient. Our main objective was to compare the efficacy of placement of a subperiosteal drain (SPD) and a subdural drain (SDD) following single burr-hole craniostomy and irrigation, and to demonstrate any significant differences in terms of overall surgical complications, functional outcome at three months and mortality rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in two local neurosurgical centres. The SPD group was performed in Hospital Umum Sarawak (HUS) and the SDD group was performed in Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru (HSAJB), from 1 January 2012 till 30 January 2014 with a total of 30 patients in both treatment groups.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no statistically significant difference in terms of patient general characteristics, pre-operative and post-operative symptoms, Markwalder grades, post-operative hematoma volume and recurrence, mortality and functional outcome at discharge and at three month follow-up between both groups. Albeit not achieving statistical significance, we observed a lower rate of surgical complication especially for post-operative intracranial hematoma with placement of the SPD system.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study concludes that both treatment methods proved to be highly effective in the treatment of CSDH. However, with a lower overall surgical complication rate, treatment with single burr-hole craniostomy, irrigation and placement of the SPD system can be considered a treatment of choice for the management of symptomatic CSDH.

The role of subgaleal suction drain placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation

Introduction:

There is lack of uniformity about the preferred surgical treatment, role of drain, and type of drain among various surgeons in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). The present study is aimed to evaluate role of subgaleal drain.

Materials and Methods:

This was a prospective study of 260 patients of CSDH treated surgically. Burr-hole irrigation with and without suction drain was done in 140 and 120 patients, respectively. Out of 120 patients without suction drain 60 each were managed by single and two burr holes. Pre- and postoperative GCS was recorded. Recurrent hematomas, CSDH secondary to tumor, due to intracranial hypotension, coagulopathy, children below 18 years, and patients treated by twist drill craniostomy or craniotomy were excluded. Subgaleal closed-system drainage with low negative pressure was used.

Results:

Age of the patients ranged from 18 to 75 years with mean age of 57 years. There were 9, 47, 204 patients in GCS of 3-8, 9-12, and 13-15, respectively. Both the groups were comparable in terms of age, etiology, gender, and neurological status. There was no difference in the mortality in both the group. The recurrence and postoperative pneumocephalus was significantly less in suction drain group as compared to without drain group. There was no infection or any other complication related to suction drainage.

Conclusion:

Subgaleal closed suction drainage was safe, simple, and effective in the management of CSDH. Recurrence rate was low in the suction drain group.

Use of Subperiosteal Drain Versus Subdural Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematomas Treated With Burr-Hole Trepanation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most frequent neurosurgical conditions affecting elderly people and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The use of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole trepanation for cSDH was proven to reduce recurrence and mortality at 6 months. To date in neurosurgery practice, evidence-based guidelines on whether an SDD or subperiosteal drain (SPD) should be used do not exist. Currently both methods are being practiced depending on the institute and/or the practicing neurosurgeon.

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the reoperation rates after burr-hole trepanation and insertion of an SPD or SDD in patients with cSDH.

Methods

This is a prospective, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to include 220 patients over the age of 18 years presenting with a symptomatic cSDH verified on cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging who are to undergo surgical evacuation with burr-hole trepanation. After informed consent is obtained, patients are randomly allocated to an SPD or SDD group. The primary endpoint is recurrence indicating a reoperation within 12 months.

Results

This research is investigator-initiated and has received ethics approval. Patient recruitment started in April 2013, and we expect all study-related activities to be completed by the end of 2016 or beginning of 2017.

Conclusions

To date, evidence-based recommendations concerning the operative treatment of cSDH are sparse. Results of this research are expected to have applications in evidence-based practice for the increasing number of patients suffering from cSDH and possibly lead to more efficient treatment of this disease with fewer postoperative complications.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01869855; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01869855 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6fNK4Jlxk)

Chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. There is lack of uniformity in the treatment of CSDH amongst surgeons in terms of various treatment strategies. Clinical presentation may vary from no symptoms to unconsciousness. CSDH is usually diagnosed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is more sensitive in the diagnosis of bilateral isodense CSDH, multiple loculations, intrahematoma membranes, fresh bleeding, hemolysis, and the size of capsule. Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI could detect associated primary or metastatic dural diseases. Although definite history of trauma could be obtained in a majority of cases, some cases may be secondary to coagulation defect, intracranial hypotension, use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, etc., Recurrent bleeding, increased exudates from outer membrane, and cerebrospinal fluid entrapment have been implicated in the enlargement of CSDH. Burr-hole evacuation is the treatment of choice for an uncomplicated CSDH. Most of the recent trials favor the use of drain to reduce recurrence rate. Craniotomy and twist drill craniostomy also play a role in the management. Dural biopsy should be taken, especially in recurrence and thick outer membrane. Nonsurgical management is reserved for asymptomatic or high operative risk patients. The steroids and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may also play a role in the management. Single management strategy is not appropriate for all the cases of CSDH. Better understanding of the nature of the pathology, rational selection of an ideal treatment strategy for an individual patient, and identification of the merits and limitations of different surgical techniques could help in improving the prognosis.

Comparison of subgaleal and subdural closed drainage system in the surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma

OBJECTIVE:

One or two burr-hole craniostomies with subgaleal or subdural drainage system and irrigation are the most common methods for surgical treatment of CSDH. The aim of this study is to compare the advantages or disadvantages of these techniques used for CSDH.

METHODS:

Seventy patients were treated by burr-hole subdural drainage or subgaleal drainage system with irrigation. Our patients were classified into two groups according to the operative procedure as follows: Group I, one or two burr-hole craniostomy with subgaleal closed system drainage and irrigation (n=36), Group II, one or two burr-hole craniostomies with subdural closed drainage system and irrigation (n=38). We compared male and female ratios, complication rates, and age distribution between groups.

RESULTS:

There was no remarkable difference between recurrence rates of the two groups. Recurrence rate was 6.25% in Group I and 7.8% in Group II. Subdural empyema occurred in one of the patients in Group II. Symptomatic pneumocephalus did not develop in patients. Four patients were reoperated for recurrence at an average of 12–20 days after the operation with the same methods.

CONCLUSION:

Both of the techniques have a higher cure rate and a lower risk of recurrence. However, subgaleal drainage system is relatively less invasive, safe, and technically easy. So it is applicable for aged and higher risk patients.