Three years of neurosurgical experience in a multinational field hospital in northern Afghanistan

Implications for future humanitarian aid missions: Lessons from point-of injury and hospital care for Syrian refugees

BACKGROUND

Warzone humanitarian medical aid missions are infrequent and applying lessons from these missions is vital to ensuring preparedness for future crises. Between 2013-2018, the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) provided humanitarian medical aid to individuals injured in the Syrian Civil War who chose to seek medical assistance at the Israeli-Syrian border. Patients requiring care surgical or advanced care were transferred to civilian medical centers within Israel. This study aims to describe the injury characteristics and management of hospitalized Syrian Civil War trauma patients over a five-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis cross-referencing data from the IDF trauma registry, documenting prehospital care, and the Israel National Trauma Registry, documenting in-hospital care, between 2013 and 2018. Syrian trauma patients hospitalized in Israeli hospitals were cross-referenced between the two registries. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 856 hospitalized trauma patients were included following definitive cross-matching. The median age was 23 years, and 93.3% were males. Blast (n = 532; 62.1%) and gunshot (n = 241; 28.2%) were the most common injury mechanisms. Injury Severity Score was ≥25 for 28.8% of patients and most common body regions with severe injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3) were the head (30.7%) and thorax (25.0%). Intensive care unit admission was required for 40.1% of patients, and the median hospital stay was 13 days. In-hospital mortality was recorded for 73 (8.5%). Signs of shock upon emergency department admission and severe head injury were significantly associated with mortality in the adjusted model whereas age of <18 years was associated with decreased odds for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma patients hospitalized in Israel following injuries sustained in the Syrian Civil War were characterized by a high prevalence of blast injuries with concomitant involvement of several body regions. Future missions should ensure preparedness for complex multi-trauma, often involving the head, and ensure high intensive care and surgical capacities.

Neurosurgery in 21st-Century Wars in the Middle East: Narrative Review of Literature

Military neurosurgery has played a crucial role in the development of neurosurgery over time. Much of this progress is due to war-related experiences. Owing to the number and severity of war injuries and the limitations caused by war, surgeons have had to examine different methods and design special protocols for patient management. Given that in recent decades most wars have taken place in the Middle East, many lessons can be learned by reviewing the experiences of neurosurgeons in these wars. Wars in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Yemen have been the largest and longest conflicts in the Middle East since the beginning of the 21st century, and a number of studies reported the experiences of surgeons in these wars. In this study, we reviewed the experience of military surgeons in managing war neurosurgical injuries in these areas within the last 2 decades.

Spine surgery in the International Security Assistance Force Role 3 combat support hospital in Mazar-e-Sharif, northern Afghanistan, 2007-2014

OBJECTIVESince 2007, a continuous neurosurgery emergency service has been available in the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) field hospital in Mazar-e-Sharif (MeS), Afghanistan. The object of this study was to assess the number and range of surgical procedures performed on the spine in the period from 2007 to 2014.METHODSThis is a retrospective analysis of the annual neurosurgical caseload statistics from July 2007 to October 2014 (92 months). The distribution of surgical urgency (emergency, delayed urgency, or elective), patient origin (ISAF, Afghan National Army, or civilian population), and underlying causes of diseases and injuries (penetrating injury, blunt injury/fracture, or degenerative disease) was analyzed. The range and pattern of diagnoses in the neurosurgical outpatient department from 2012 and 2013 were also evaluated.RESULTSA total of 341 patients underwent neurosurgical operations in the period from July 2007 to October 2014. One hundred eighty-eight (55.1%) of the 341 procedures were performed on the spine, and the majority of these surgeries were performed for degenerative diseases (127/188; 67.6%). The proportion of spinal fractures and penetrating injuries (61/188; 32.4%) increased over the study period. These spinal trauma diagnoses accounted for 80% of the cases in which patients had to undergo operations within 12 hours of presentation (n = 70 cases). Spinal surgeries were performed as an emergency in 19.8% of cases, whereas 17.3% of surgeries had delayed urgency and 62.9% were elective procedures. Of the 1026 outpatient consultations documented, 82% were related to spinal issues.CONCLUSIONSCompared to the published numbers of cases from neurosurgery units in the rest of the ISAF area, the field hospital in MeS had a considerably lower number of operations. In addition, MeS had the highest rates of both elective neurosurgical operations and Afghan civilian patients. In comparison with the field hospital in MeS, none of the other ISAF field hospitals showed such a strong concentration of degenerative spinal conditions in their surgical spectrum. Nevertheless, the changing pattern of spine-related diagnoses and surgical therapies in the current conflict represents a challenge for future training and material planning in comparable missions.

Military neurosurgery in operation: experience in the French role-3 medical treatment facility of Kabul

BACKGROUND

In 2009, during the war in Afghanistan, the increasing number of head injuries led to the deployment of a military neurosurgeon at the Kabul International Airport (KaIA) medical treatment facility, in March 2010. The main goal of this study was to depict the neurosurgical activity in this centre and to analyse its different aspects.

METHOD

A retrospective study of all the neurosurgical patients treated in KaIA from March 2010 to June 2013.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy-three interventions performed by the neurosurgeon deployed were reported for 373 surgeries, in 335 patients, representing 10.6 % of the overall surgical activity of the centre. Among the 69 interventions performed on soldiers, 57 surgeries were undertaken in emergency (82.6 %), while 12 were elective procedures (17.4 %). On the other hand, 289 surgeries were performed in civilian Afghans, with 126 emergency procedures in (43.6 %), against 163 elective interventions (56.4 %). Among the 44.5 % (n = 149) of the traumatic casualties, cerebral lesions represented 28.7 % (n = 96) and spinal lesions 12.4 % (n = 42). Ninety patients had multiple injuries. Additionally, patients without trauma accounted for 55.5 % (n = 186) of the overall population. Thus, 49 % (n = 164) were operated on for non-traumatic lesion of the spine. These were mostly civilian Afghans treated under medical aid to the population (90.2 %, n = 148/164).

CONCLUSIONS

The military neurosurgeon had two roles in KaIA: both to support the armed forces and to manage medical aid to the civilian population. This study gives food for thought on the neurosurgical needs in modern warfare, and on the skills required for the military neurosurgeon.

[Spine surgery in a combat support hospital]

BACKGROUND AND AIM

From July 2007 to October 2014, neurosurgical services have been continuously available in a multinational Role 3 combat support hospital in Mazar-e-Sharif (MeS), Afghanistan. In this paper, we analyze a 7-year operative and outpatient spinal surgery caseload experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The overall annual and monthly caseloads were determined. Additionally, the surgical cases were differentiated relating to the strength of the indication, the location of the surgical site, and the origin of the patients. The outpatient caseload and spectrum of the years 2012 and 2013 were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 341 surgeries were performed and 188 of them were spinal surgeries (55.1 %). The vast majority of surgeries were performed for degenerative diseases (127/188; 67.6 %). The proportion of fractures and penetrating injuries (61/188; 32.4%) increased over the observation period. Eighty percent of the immediate and urgent surgeries (within 12 h; n = 70) were performed for these indications. 19.8 % of the surgeries were done as an emergency, whereas 17.3 % had delayed urgency, and 62.9 % were elective procedures. Of the 1026 outpatient consultations documented, 82 % of them were related to spinal diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall caseload in addition to the distribution of location, strength of indication, and patient origin for MeS are significantly lower than that reported by other International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) nations in eastern and southern Afghanistan. In addition, the rate of elective surgeries and those carried out in civilian Afghan patients is highest in MeS. In comparison with MeS, none of the other ISAF military hospitals shows such a strong concentration of degenerative spinal conditions in their surgical spectrum. Nevertheless, the changing pattern of spine-related diagnoses and surgical therapies in the current conflict represents a challenge for future educational and material planning in comparable missions.