1
|
Andersen MS, Kofoed MS, Paludan-Müller AS, Pedersen CB, Mathiesen T, Mawrin C, Wirenfeldt M, Kristensen BW, Olsen BB, Halle B, Poulsen FR. Meningioma animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Transl Med 2023; 21:764. [PMID: 37898750 PMCID: PMC10612271 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04620-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Animal models are widely used to study pathological processes and drug (side) effects in a controlled environment. There is a wide variety of methods available for establishing animal models depending on the research question. Commonly used methods in tumor research include xenografting cells (established/commercially available or primary patient-derived) or whole tumor pieces either orthotopically or heterotopically and the more recent genetically engineered models-each type with their own advantages and disadvantages. The current systematic review aimed to investigate the meningioma model types used, perform a meta-analysis on tumor take rate (TTR), and perform critical appraisal of the included studies. The study also aimed to assess reproducibility, reliability, means of validation and verification of models, alongside pros and cons and uses of the model types. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for all in vivo meningioma models. The primary outcome was tumor take rate. Meta-analysis was performed on tumor take rate followed by subgroup analyses on the number of cells and duration of incubation. The validity of the tumor models was assessed qualitatively. We performed critical appraisal of the methodological quality and quality of reporting for all included studies. RESULTS We included 114 unique records (78 using established cell line models (ECLM), 21 using primary patient-derived tumor models (PTM), 10 using genetically engineered models (GEM), and 11 using uncategorized models). TTRs for ECLM were 94% (95% CI 92-96) for orthotopic and 95% (93-96) for heterotopic. PTM showed lower TTRs [orthotopic 53% (33-72) and heterotopic 82% (73-89)] and finally GEM revealed a TTR of 34% (26-43). CONCLUSION This systematic review shows high consistent TTRs in established cell line models and varying TTRs in primary patient-derived models and genetically engineered models. However, we identified several issues regarding the quality of reporting and the methodological approach that reduce the validity, transparency, and reproducibility of studies and suggest a high risk of publication bias. Finally, each tumor model type has specific roles in research based on their advantages (and disadvantages). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO-ID CRD42022308833.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel Schou Andersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
- BRIDGE (Brain Research - Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Mikkel Seremet Kofoed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- BRIDGE (Brain Research - Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Asger Sand Paludan-Müller
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO) and NHTA: Market Access & Health Economics Consultancy, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Bonde Pedersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- BRIDGE (Brain Research - Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tiit Mathiesen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Mawrin
- Department of Neuropathology, Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Martin Wirenfeldt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Biology, Hospital South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Birgitte Brinkmann Olsen
- Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Bo Halle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- BRIDGE (Brain Research - Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Frantz Rom Poulsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- BRIDGE (Brain Research - Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khan M, Hanna C, Findlay M, Lucke-Wold B, Karsy M, Jensen RL. Modeling Meningiomas: Optimizing Treatment Approach. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:479-492. [PMID: 37210136 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Preclinical meningioma models offer a setting to test molecular mechanisms of tumor development and targeted treatment options but historically have been challenging to generate. Few spontaneous tumor models in rodents have been established, but cell culture and in vivo rodent models have emerged along with artificial intelligence, radiomics, and neural networks to differentiate the clinical heterogeneity of meningiomas. We reviewed 127 studies using PRISMA guideline methodology, including laboratory and animal studies, that addressed preclinical modeling. Our evaluation identified that meningioma preclinical models provide valuable molecular insight into disease progression and effective chemotherapeutic and radiation approaches for specific tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Khan
- Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
| | - Chadwin Hanna
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Matthew Findlay
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | - Randy L Jensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boetto J, Peyre M, Kalamarides M. Mouse Models in Meningioma Research: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153712. [PMID: 34359639 PMCID: PMC8345085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most frequent primitive central nervous system tumors found in adults. Mouse models of cancer have been instrumental in understanding disease mechanisms and establishing preclinical drug testing. Various mouse models of meningioma have been developed over time, evolving in light of new discoveries in our comprehension of meningioma biology and with improvements in genetic engineering techniques. We reviewed all mouse models of meningioma described in the literature, including xenograft models (orthotopic or heterotopic) with human cell lines or patient derived tumors, and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). Xenograft models provided useful tools for preclinical testing of a huge range of innovative drugs and therapeutic options, which are summarized in this review. GEMMs offer the possibility of mimicking human meningiomas at the histological, anatomical, and genetic level and have been invaluable in enabling tumorigenesis mechanisms, including initiation and progression, to be dissected. Currently, researchers have a range of different mouse models that can be used depending on the scientific question to be answered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Boetto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier Universitary Hospital Center, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France;
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013 Paris, France;
| | - Matthieu Peyre
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013 Paris, France;
- Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Michel Kalamarides
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013 Paris, France;
- Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, F-75013 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Suppiah S, Nassiri F, Bi WL, Dunn IF, Hanemann CO, Horbinski CM, Hashizume R, James CD, Mawrin C, Noushmehr H, Perry A, Sahm F, Sloan A, Von Deimling A, Wen PY, Aldape K, Zadeh G. Molecular and translational advances in meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:i4-i17. [PMID: 30649490 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial neoplasm. The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification categorizes meningiomas based on histopathological features, but emerging molecular data demonstrate the importance of genomic and epigenomic factors in the clinical behavior of these tumors. Treatment options for symptomatic meningiomas are limited to surgical resection where possible and adjuvant radiation therapy for tumors with concerning histopathological features or recurrent disease. At present, alternative adjuvant treatment options are not available in part due to limited historical biological analysis and clinical trial investigation on meningiomas. With advances in molecular and genomic techniques in the last decade, we have witnessed a surge of interest in understanding the genomic and epigenomic landscape of meningiomas. The field is now at the stage to adopt this molecular knowledge to refine meningioma classification and introduce molecular algorithms that can guide prediction and therapeutics for this tumor type. Animal models that recapitulate meningiomas faithfully are in critical need to test new therapeutics to facilitate rapid-cycle translation to clinical trials. Here we review the most up-to-date knowledge of molecular alterations that provide insight into meningioma behavior and are ready for application to clinical trial investigation, and highlight the landscape of available preclinical models in meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suganth Suppiah
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farshad Nassiri
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Centre for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Centre for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Clemens Oliver Hanemann
- Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Craig M Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rintaro Hashizume
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Charles David James
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Christian Mawrin
- Institute of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Houtan Noushmehr
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrew Sloan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospital-Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Andreas Von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- Department of Laboratory Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castillo MFR, Cohen A, Edberg D, Hoppensteadt D, Fareed J, Martin B, Halaris A. Vascular endothelial growth factor in bipolar depression: A potential biomarker for diagnosis and treatment outcome prediction. Psychiatry Res 2020; 284:112781. [PMID: 31986357 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) has been implicated in the neurotrophic model of depression. We explored the potential role of VEGF in the pathophysiology of bipolar depression and potential utility as a diagnostic or outcome predictive biomarker. METHODS In a double-blind study, treatment-resistant bipolar depressed patients received Escitalopram and were randomized to receive add-on Celecoxib (26 participants) or Placebo (21 participants). There were 32 healthy controls. Plasma levels of VEGF were determined at three timepoints over eight weeks. RESULTS Bipolar patients had significantly higher VEGF levels at baseline compared to healthy controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the AUC is 0.67 and the VEGF cut point is 8.21. At all timepoints, patients receiving Celecoxib had comparable VEGF levels to those receiving Placebo. VEGF levels did not change significantly over time. Baseline VEGF was a poor predictor of treatment response with an AUC of 0.53. CONCLUSIONS The increased VEGF in bipolar depression agrees with similar findings in major depressive disorder. A high VEGF level tended to accurately predict bipolar disorder, with apparent differential VEGF expression. Baseline VEGF did not predict treatment response, and levels did not change with treatment. Plasma VEGF may have diagnostic utility and guide personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Feliz R Castillo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Arielle Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - David Edberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Debra Hoppensteadt
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Laboratories, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Jawed Fareed
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Laboratories, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Brendan Martin
- Clinical Research Office, Biostatistics Collaborative Core, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Angelos Halaris
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu Z, Nakamura M, Krauss JK, Schwabe K, John N. Intracranial rat glioma model for tumor resection and local treatment. J Neurosci Methods 2018; 299:1-7. [PMID: 29425709 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although tumor resection is among the most important prognostic factors, high grade gliomas regrow in most cases. Also, resection of glial tumors in eloquent brain regions is not or only partially possible. Despite these severe restraints, however, only a few in-vivo models have been established to investigate tumor recurrence and local treatment. Here we characterize the intracranial BT4Ca rat glioma as a model for these aspects. NEW METHOD BT4Ca cells were stereotaxically implanted into the frontal cortex of BDIX rats. Rats were than allocated to (1) a control group, which received no further treatment; (2) a catheter group, where a catheter was implanted for repeated microinjection of vehicle every 3rd day as catheter-control; (3) a resection group, where the tumor was microsurgically removed eight days after cell injection. Postoperatively, survival time, weight and general health condition were scored and the tumor size was histologically assessed. RESULTS Injection of BT4Ca cells induced fast-growing tumors with a mean survival time of 16 days in the control and catheter groups. Resection significantly prolonged survival time whereby the tumor regrew in all rats. Tumor size was similar between all groups. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) We here present a robust and reliable intracranial rat glioma model, which is suitable to simulate tumor recurrence after surgical resection and local treatment. Importantly, this model does not require advanced imaging or elaborate surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS The intracranial BT4Ca glioma model appears to be a feasible tool to investigate tumor recurrence after resection and to test local treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqun Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Makoto Nakamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schwabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Nadine John
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hicks J, Platt S, Kent M, Haley A. Canine brain tumours: a model for the human disease? Vet Comp Oncol 2015; 15:252-272. [PMID: 25988678 DOI: 10.1111/vco.12152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Canine brain tumours are becoming established as naturally occurring models of disease to advance diagnostic and therapeutic understanding successfully. The size and structure of the dog's brain, histopathology and molecular characteristics of canine brain tumours, as well as the presence of an intact immune system, all support the potential success of this model. The limited success of current therapeutic regimens such as surgery and radiation for dogs with intracranial tumours means that there can be tremendous mutual benefit from collaboration with our human counterparts resulting in the development of new treatments. The similarities and differences between the canine and human diseases are described in this article, emphasizing both the importance and limitations of canines in brain tumour research. Recent clinical veterinary therapeutic trials are also described to demonstrate the areas of research in which canines have already been utilized and to highlight the important potential benefits of translational research to companion dogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hicks
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - S Platt
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - M Kent
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - A Haley
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kang HC, Kim IH, Park CI, Park SH. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 and brain fatty acid binding protein expression in grades I-II meningiomas: correlation with tumor grade and clinical outcome after radiotherapy. Neuropathology 2014; 34:446-54. [PMID: 24779988 DOI: 10.1111/neup.12128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 04/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
This study was done to evaluate the association of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and brain fatty acid binding protein (BFABP) with tumor grade and outcome of grades I-II meningiomas treated with radiotherapy. From 1996 to 2008, 40 patients with intracranial grades I-II meningiomas were treated with radiotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining for COX-2 and BFABP were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. COX-2 expression was significantly associated with BFABP status and both COX-2 (P < 0.01) and BFABP (P = 0.01) expression were stronger in the grade II meningiomas than in grade I tumors. Among the clinicopathologic factors, age and COX-2 status were prognostic in progression-free survival. Patients with moderate or strong COX-2 expression had worse outcome than those with negative or weak COX-2 expression (P = 0.03) after controlling for potential confounders. Our results suggest that the molecular biomarker COX-2 has prognostic significance in intracranial grades I-II meningiomas following radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Cheol Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|