"Triple R" tonsillar technique for the management of adult Chiari I malformation: surgical note

Individualized surgical treatment of Chiari 1 malformation: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with an individualized surgical approach to treat Chiari malformation type 1.

METHODS

Based on (1) neurological symptoms, (2) the existence and extent of a syrinx and (3) the degree of the tonsillar descent we performed four types of approaches on a case-by-case basis in 81 patients: (1) foramen magnum decompression (FMD) with dura splitting (FMDds); (2) FMD with duraplasty (FMDdp); (3) FMD with duraplasty and tonsillar manipulation (FMDao); and (4) tonsillar resection/reduction (TR). Patient characteristics, Chiari Severity Index (CSI), fourth ventricular roof angle (FVRA) and Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

CCOS was between 13 and 16 points in 8/11 (73 %) patients after FMDds, 38/45 (84 %) patients after FMDdp, and 24/24 (100 %, one patient lost to follow-up) patients after TR. We experienced an overall complication rate of 13.6 % (11/81) in this series, whereas seven of these eleven complications (64 %) occurred in the FMDao group and the complication rate increased with the invasiveness of the approach (0 % FMDds; 4 % FMDdp; 12 % TR).

CONCLUSION

Given the clear correlation between the extend of the approach and the complication rate the least invasive approach necessary to achieve clinical improvement should be selected. Due to the high complication rates, FMDao should not be used as a treatment option. The severity of the tonsillar descent, basilar invagination and current CM1 scores could be used to aid in the approach selection.

Post-Operative Complications after Foramen Magnum Decompression with Duraplasty Using Different Graft Materials in Adults Patients with Chiari I Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite extensive investigations, the choice of graft material for reconstructive duraplasty after foramen magnum decompression for Chiari type I malformation (CMI) is still a topic of discussion. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature examining the post-operative complications in adult patients with CMI after foramen magnum decompression and duraplasty (FMDD) using different graft materials. Our systematic review included 23 studies with a total of 1563 patients with CMI who underwent FMDD with different dural substitutes. The most common complications were pseudomeningocele (2.7%, 95% CI 1.5-3.9%, p < 0.01, I² = 69%) and CSF leak (2%, 95% CI 1-2.9%, p < 0,01, I² = 43%). The revision surgery rate was 3% (95% CI 1.8-4.2%, p < 0.01, I² = 54%). A lower rate of pseudomeningocele was observed with autologous duraplasty when compared with synthetic duraplasty (0.7% [95% CI 0-1.3%] vs. 5.3% [95% CI 2.1-8.4%] p < 0.01). The rate of CSF leak and revision surgery was lower after autologous duraplasty than after non-autologous dural graft (1.8% [95% CI 0.5-3.1%] vs. 5.3% [95% CI 1.6-9%], p < 0.01 and 0.8% [95% CI 0.1-1.6%] vs. 4.9% [95% CI 2.6-7.2%] p < 0.01, respectively). Autologous duraplasty is associated with a lower rate of post-operative pseudomeningocele and reoperation. This information should be considered when planning duraplasty after foramen magnum decompression in patients with CMI.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.

Chiari type 1-a malformation or a syndrome? A critical review

OBJECTIVE

As the understanding of pathophysiology behind Chiari malformation still is limited, the treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 remains rather empirical. This may result in suboptimal treatment strategy and outcome in many cases. In this review, we critically address whether the condition known today as Chiari malformation type I should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome.

METHODS

The current knowledge of Chiari malformation type 1 is summarized from the historical, etymological, genetic, clinical, and in particular pathophysiological perspectives.

RESULTS

There are several lines of evidence that Chiari malformation type 1 represents a condition significantly different from types 2 to 4. Unlike the other types, the type 1 should rather be considered a syndrome, thus supporting the reasons to reappraise the traditional classification of Chiari malformations.

CONCLUSION

We propose that Chiari malformation type 1 should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome, while the notation malformation is maintained for types 2-4.

Improvement of syrinx resolution after tonsillar cautery in pediatric patients with Chiari Type I malformation

OBJECT Chiari Type I malformation involves caudal displacement of the cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum, which obstructs normal cerebrospinal fluid flow and increases intracranial pressure. Certain aspects of its surgical treatment remain controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy of tonsillar cautery on syrinx resolution among pediatric Chiari patients undergoing cervicomedullary decompression. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients 0-18 years of age who underwent surgical correction for Chiari Type I malformation with syrinx between 1995 and 2013. Basic demographic information was collected as well as data for preoperative symptoms, prior surgical history, perioperative characteristics, and postsurgical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed in addition to bivariate analyses. Candidate predictor variables were identified based on an association with tonsillar cautery with p < 0.10. Forward stepwise likelihood ratio was used to select candidate predictors in a binary logistic regression model (P_in = 0.05, P_out = 0.10) most strongly associated with the outcome. RESULTS A total of 171 patients with Chiari Type I malformation with syrinx were identified, and 43 underwent tonsillar cautery. Patients who underwent tonsillar cautery had 6.11 times greater odds of improvement in their syrinx (95% CI 2.57-14.49, p < 0.001). There was no effect of tonsillar cautery on increased perioperative complications as well as the need for repeat decompressions. CONCLUSIONS Tonsillar cautery is safe and effective in the treatment of Chiari Type I malformation with syrinx and may decrease time to syrinx resolution after cervicomedullary decompression. Tonsillar cautery does not increase postoperative complications in pediatric Chiari Type I malformation patients.

The use of the trendelenburg position in the surgical treatment of extreme cerebellar slump

BACKGROUND

State-of-the-art treatment for Chiari Malformation I (CM-I) consists of decompression by posterior fossa craniectomy. A rare but severe complication that develops over months to years after this procedure is cerebellar slump. Treatment options for this condition are limited. We present a new and promising approach to treat this rare condition.

METHODS

The patients were placed in the Trendelenburg position to facilitate ascent of the cerebellum. After almost complete dissolution of neurologic symptoms, surgical reconstruction was performed by tonsillar resection and the creation of a new structural support using a bone graft.

RESULTS

Both patients experienced good clinical and morphological outcomes immediately after surgery, and for two years thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological symptoms related to cerebellar or brainstem slump can be adequately reversed by placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position. After uneventful gravitational reversal of the slump, safe surgical reconstruction of the cerebellar support can be performed to securely preserve the anatomical reversal.

Changes in cerebrospinal fluid flow assessed using intraoperative MRI during posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformation

OBJECT

The authors completed a prospective, institutional review board–approved study using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in patients undergoing posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for Chiari I malformation. The purpose of the study was to examine the utility of iMRI in determining when an adequate decompression had been performed.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic Chiari I malformations with imaging findings of obstruction of the CSF space at the foramen magnum, with or without syringomyelia, were considered candidates for surgery. All patients underwent complete T1, T2, and cine MRI studies in the supine position preoperatively as a baseline. After the patient was placed prone with the neck flexed in position for surgery, iMRI was performed. The patient then underwent a bone decompression of the foramen magnum and arch of C-1, and the MRI was repeated. If obstruction was still present, then in a stepwise fashion the patient underwent dural splitting, duraplasty, and coagulation of the tonsils, with an iMRI study performed after each step guiding the decision to proceed further.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent PFD for Chiari I malformations between November 2011 and February 2013; 15 prone preincision iMRIs were performed. Fourteen of these patients (93%) demonstrated significant improvement of CSF flow through the foramen magnum dorsal to the tonsils with positioning only. This improvement was so notable that changes in CSF flow as a result of the bone decompression were difficult to discern.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors observed significant CSF flow changes when simply positioning the patient for surgery. These results put into question intraoperative flow assessments that suggest adequate decompression by PFD, whether by iMRI or intraoperative ultrasound. The use of intraoperative imaging during PFD for Chiari I malformation, whether by ultrasound or iMRI, is limited by CSF flow dynamics across the foramen magnum that change significantly when the patient is positioned for surgery.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential recovery following opening of the fourth ventricle during posterior fossa decompression in Chiari malformation: case report

The most appropriate surgical technique for posterior fossa decompression in Chiari malformation (CM) remains a matter of debate. Intraoperative electrophysiological studies during posterior fossa decompression of Type I CM (CM-I) aim to shed light on the entity's pathomechanism as well as on the ideal extent of decompression. The existing reports on this issue state that significant improvement in conduction occurs after craniotomy in all cases, but additional durotomy contributes a further improvement in only a minority of cases. This implies that craniotomy alone might suffice for clinical improvement without the need of duraplasty or even subarachnoid manipulation at the level of the craniocervical junction. In contrast to published data, the authors describe the case of a 32-year-old woman who underwent surgery for CM associated with extensive cervicothoracic syringomyelia and whose intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) did not notably improve after craniotomy or following durotomy; rather, they only improved after opening of the fourth ventricle and restoration of CSF flow through the foramen of Magendie. Postoperatively, the patient recovered completely from her preoperative neurological deficits. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of significant SSEP recovery after opening the fourth ventricle in the decompression of a CM-I. The electrophysiological and operative techniques are described in detail and the findings are discussed in the light of available literature. The authors conclude that there might be a subset of CM-I patients who require subarachnoid dissection at the level of the craniocervical junction to benefit clinically. Prospective studies with detailed electrophysiological analyses seem warranted to answer the question regarding the best surgical approach in CM-I decompression.