Effectiveness of C5 or C6-Cz assembly in predicting immediate post operative facial nerve deficit

The predictive value of intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to explore the value of intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials (FMEP) for facial outcomes in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor surgery to provide an evidence-based consensus standard for future clinical practice and prospective studies.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023. Study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Bivariate and random-effects models for meta-analysis and meta-regression generated summary receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and forest plots for estimates of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies (1,206 participants). Sensitivity was lower in the immediate (IM) post-operative (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.84) compared to follow-up (FU) period (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.88) while specificity was similar in both groups (IM, 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.97; FU, 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.96). Data driven estimates improved FMEP performance but require confirmation from future studies. Amplitude cutoff criteria and studies that scored new deficits as worse than House-Brackmann (HB) grade 2 yielded best sensitivities.

CONCLUSIONS

FMEP demonstrated statistically significant accuracy for facial function monitoring. Implementation of FMEPs varied widely across studies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study is the first systematic review with meta-analysis to demonstrate that intraoperative FMEP is valuable in CPA tumor surgery for facial outcomes. Meta-regression identified the methods that were most useful in the application of FMEPs.

Comparison Between Cz-C3/C4 and C3-C4 Montages to Protect Against Peripheral Stimulation in Transcranial Facial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring

INTRODUCTION

In facial motor-evoked potential monitoring, efforts to reduce peripheral stimulation are necessary because it can cause false-negatives. The effects of peripheral stimulation on Cz-C3/C4 and C3-C4 montages were compared.

METHODS

Facial motor-evoked potentials were recorded from bilateral orbicularis oculi (Oculi) and oris (Oris) muscles. The double-train approach combining single-pulse and five-train pulse stimulation was used to determine the effect of peripheral stimulation. If the five-train pulse produced a significant waveform, it was defined as "total success." In total success cases, "true success" was defined as a case in which no waveform appeared after the single pulse at the threshold level of the five-train pulse. The total and true success rates and the threshold value of Oculi and Oris were compared between Cz-C3/C4 and C3-C4 montages.

RESULTS

Thirty-six muscles each of Oculi and Oris of 18 patients were used for the analysis. True success was more likely to be obtained by the Cz-C3/C4 montage than the C3-C4 montage in Oculi (42% vs. 22%, p = 0.039). Both Oculi and Oris had higher thresholds to elicit facial motor-evoked potentials with the Cz-C3/C4 montage (Oculi: 101.7 vs. 71.4 mA, p = 0.038; Oris: 94.8 vs. 73.1 mA, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Cz-C3/4 montage is more effective at reducing peripheral stimulation compared with the C3-4 montage. This effect was primarily seen in the orbicularis oculi muscle. It should be noted that the Cz-C3/C4 montage has a higher threshold than the C3-C4 montage in facial muscles. In facial motor-evoked potential monitoring, the Cz-C3/C4 montage may be more suitable to eliminate peripheral stimulation.

Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value of Motor Evoked Potentials of the Facial Nerve

OBJECTIVE

 The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the standard alarm criterion of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the facial nerve in surgeries performed for resections of vestibular schwannomas or of other lesions of the cerebellopontine angle.

METHODS

 This retrospective study included 33 patients (16 with vestibular schwannomas and 17 with other lesions) who underwent the resection surgery with transcranial MEPs of the facial nerve. A reproducible 50% decrease in MEP amplitude, resistant to a 10% increase in stimulation intensity, was applied as the alarm criterion during surgery. Facial muscular function was clinically evaluated with the House-Brackmann score (HBS), pre- and postsurgery at 3 months.

RESULTS

 In the patient group with vestibular schwannoma, postoperatively, the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values were found for a 30% decrease in MEP amplitude, that is, a criterion stricter than the 50% decrease in MEP amplitude criterion, prone to trigger more warnings, used intraoperatively. With this new criterion, the sensitivity would be 88.9% and the negative predictive value would be 85.7%. In the patient group with other lesions of the cerebellopontine angle, the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values were found equally for 50, 60, or 70% decrease in MEP amplitude. With these criteria, the sensitivities and the negative predictive values would be 100.0%.

CONCLUSION

 Different alarm criteria were found for surgeries for vestibular schwannomas and for other lesions of the cerebellopontine angle. The study consolidates the stricter alarm criterion, that is, a criterion prone to trigger early warnings, as found previously by others for vestibular schwannoma surgeries (30% decrease in MEP amplitude).

Impact of Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring on Facial Nerve Outcomes after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

Objectives:

Assess the utility of intraoperative transcranial facial motor-evoked potential (FMEP) monitoring in predicting and improving facial function after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection.

Study Design:

Retrospective chart review.

Methods:

Data were obtained from 82 consecutive VS resections meeting inclusion criteria. Sixty-two cases were performed without FMEP and 20 with FMEP. Degradation of FMEP response was defined as a final-to-baseline amplitude ratio of 0.5 or less. House-Brackmann (HB) grade was assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, at follow-up assessments, and it was compared between pre- and post-FMEP cohorts. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of FMEP degradation in predicting facial weakness were calculated.

Results:

In the pre-FMEP group, at length of follow-up (LOF) ⩾9 months, 83.9% (52/62) of patients exhibited HB 1-2 outcome. In the post-FMEP cohort, 75.0% (15/20) exhibited HB 1-2 function at LOF ⩾9 months. There was no difference in rates of HB 1-2 outcomes between groups in the immediate postoperative period ( P = .35) or at long-term follow-up ( P = 1.0). With respect to predicting immediate postoperative facial function, FMEP demonstrated high specificity (88.9%) and moderate sensitivity (54.5%). The PPV and NPV for immediate postoperative facial function were 85.7% and 61.5%, respectively. With respect to long-term (⩾9 months LOF) facial function, intraoperative FMEP was moderately sensitive (71.4%) and highly specific (84.6%); PPV was moderate (71.4%), and NPV was high (84.6%).

Conclusions:

Intraoperative FMEP is highly specific and moderately sensitive in predicting postoperative facial function for patients undergoing VS resection, but its use may not be associated with improved facial nerve outcomes.

Level of Evidence:

4

Role of Facial Nerve Motor-Evoked Potential Ratio in Predicting Facial Nerve Function in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery Both Immediate and at 1 Year

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transcranial electrical stimulation-induced facial motor-evoked potential (FMEP) monitoring of the facial nerve (FN) during vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumor resection can predict both immediate and 1 year postoperative FN functional outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive non-comparative observational case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial function, immediate post operation and at 1 year using House-Brackmann (HB) grading scale.

METHODS

The study included 367 consecutive patients (men 178; women 189; age 13-81 years) monitored during primary sporadic VS microsurgery between November 2002 and April 2015. Neurofibromatosis type II, revision surgery, previous radiotherapy treatment, preoperative facial nerve weakness, and non-VS cases were excluded retrospectively during analysis of data. Data of facial function were missing from eight patients at 1 year and were excluded. The correlation between the final-to-baseline FMEP ratio and immediate and 1 year facial nerve function was examined.

RESULTS

Using logistic regression model, the cut-off points of FMEP ratio were 0.62 (PPV 0.96) and 0.59 (PPV 0.98) which predicted satisfactory FN function (HB grades 1 or 2) immediately postoperative and at 1 year after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transcranial electrical stimulation FMEP is a valuable tool for monitoring facial nerve function during resection of vestibular schwannoma. Maintaining a FMEP event-to-baseline ratio of 60% or greater is predictive of satisfactory long-term FN function.

Intraoperative Monitoring and Mapping of the Functional Integrity of the Brainstem

The risk of iatrogenic damage is very high in surgical interventions in or around the brainstem. However, surgical techniques and intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) have evolved sufficiently to increase the likelihood of successful functional outcomes in many patients. We present a critical review of the methodologies available for intraoperative monitoring and mapping of the brainstem. There are three main groups of techniques that can be used to assess the functional integrity of the brainstem: 1) mapping, which provides rapid anatomical identification of neural structures using electrical stimulation with a hand-held probe, 2) monitoring, which provides real-time information about the functional integrity of the nervous tissue, and 3) techniques involving the examination of brainstem reflexes in the operating room, which allows for the evaluation of the reflex responses that are known to be crucial for most brainstem functions. These include the blink reflex, which is already in use, and other brainstem reflexes that are being explored, such as the masseter H-reflex. This is still under development but is likely to have important functional consequences. Today an abundant armory of ION methods is available for the monitoring and mapping of the functional integrity of the brainstem during surgery. ION methods are essential in surgery either in or around the brainstem; they facilitate the removal of lesions and contribute to notable improvements in the functional outcomes of patients.