1
|
Therapeutic Options and Prognostic Factors in Treatment of Anaplastic Gliomas. SERBIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.2478/sjecr-2021-0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction/objective: Anaplastic gliomas compromise about 5.9% of primary CNS tumors. The main goal of the operation is the maximum removal of the tumor, reduction of the tumor mass and reduction of the increased intracranial pressure. Different pathohistological subtypes of anaplastic gliomas show significantly different prognosis depending on the applied oncological therapeutic protocol as well as the modality of the applied radiotherapy.
Materials and methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, clinical observational study. The study included 34 participants who were diagnosed with anaplastic glioma in the followed time period. Survival rates were calculated based on the localization, modality of therapy and complications.
Results: we concluded that 20,4% of anaplastic gliomas were formed by transformation from previously operated lower grade gliomas. The initial sign of the disease is the appearance of epileptic seizures. Anaplastic gliomas most oftenly occur in the frontal region, with a frequency of 47%. The incidence of anaplastic gliomas in the temporal lobe is 23,5%. The length of survival is in relation to the localization of tumor expansion(p<0.05). The overall survival in the group of anaplastic gliomas operated on in the Department of Neurooncology KCS in the follow-up period of five years is 52.9%.
Conclusion: The application of different chemotherapy modalities is not significant predictor in the length of survival. The radical nature of the operation has significance in the length of patient survival, which confirms the conclusions of most of the conducted studies cited in oncology textbooks.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hong JB, Roh TH, Kang SG, Kim SH, Moon JH, Kim EH, Ahn SS, Choi HJ, Cho J, Suh CO, Chang JH. Survival, Prognostic Factors, and Volumetric Analysis of Extent of Resection for Anaplastic Gliomas. Cancer Res Treat 2020; 52:1041-1049. [PMID: 32324987 PMCID: PMC7577820 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate and prognostic factors of anaplastic gliomas according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification, including extent of resection (EOR) as measured by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the T2-weighted MRI. Materials and Methods The records of 113 patients with anaplastic glioma who were newly diagnosed at our institute between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 62 cases (54.9%) of anaplastic astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type (AAw), 18 cases (16.0%) of anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, and 33 cases (29.2%) of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted. Results The median overall survival (OS) was 48.4 months in the whole anaplastic glioma group and 21.5 months in AAw group. In multivariate analysis, age, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, postoperative tumor volume, and EOR measured from the T2 MRI sequence were significant prognostic factors. The EOR cut-off point for OS measured in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI and T2-weighted MRI were 99.96% and 85.64%, respectively. Conclusion We found that complete resection of the contrast-enhanced portion (99.96%) and more than 85.64% resection of the non-enhanced portion of the tumor have prognostic impacts on patient survival from anaplastic glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Je Beom Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Roh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Kim
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyung Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Jin Choi
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.,Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kataria T, Basu T, Gupta D, Goyal S, Nasreen S, Bisht SS, Abhishek A, Banerjee S, Narang K, Jha AN, Mohapatra I, Modi JA. Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: Indian Single-center Data. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2018; 38:495-501. [PMID: 29333019 PMCID: PMC5759071 DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_200_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate early clinical outcome for anaplastic gliomas (AG) treated in the era of modulated radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) in an Indian setting. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients with AGs treated with modulated RT and concurrent (95%) and adjuvant TMZ (90%) were analyzed. About 80% of patients had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) at least 90 with 30% seizure at presentation. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was available in 65% cases and RT dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. First posttreatment imaging was performed at 1 month and then at 3 and 6 months post-RT and then every 3 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and analysis was done using SPSS version 18.0. Results: With median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year DFS and OS were 75% and 88%. There were only 5% symptomatic central nerves system and 8% symptomatic hematological toxicities. At the 1st evaluation, 30.4% had complete response (CR), at 3 months 40%, and at 6 months 43%. At 6 months, only 4% had progressive disease. Forty-six patients were evaluable till the last follow-up with and 55% had stable to CR. On univariate analysis for DFS, KPS at presentation >90 (P = 0.001) and response at 6 months (P = 0.02) were significant and for OS KPS at presentation (P = 0.004) alone. Conclusion: Modulated RT with TMZ among Grade III glioma patients resulted in minimum treatment-related toxicities and encouraging survival. Molecular prognostic markers will determine most favorable groups in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejinder Kataria
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Trinanjan Basu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shikha Goyal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shahida Nasreen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shyam S Bisht
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ashu Abhishek
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Susovan Banerjee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Kushal Narang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ajaya N Jha
- Division of Neurosurgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ishani Mohapatra
- Department of Pathology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Jayesh A Modi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adjuvant temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with WHO III astrocytoma: The Mainz experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191:665-71. [PMID: 26025143 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0855-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether adjuvant therapy for WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) should be carried out as combined chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ)--analogous to the approach for glioblastoma multiforme--or as radiotherapy (RT) alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of data from 90 patients with AA, who were treated between November 1997 and February 2014. Assessment of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed according to treatment categories: (1) 50%, RT + TMZ according to protocol, (2) 11%, RT + TMZ with dose reduction, (3) 26%, RT alone, and (4) 13%, individualized, primarily palliative therapy. No dose reduction was necessary in the RT alone group. RESULTS Median OS was 85, 69, and 43 months for treatment categories 1/2, 3, and 4, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. PFS was 35, 29, 48, and 33 months for categories 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; again without significant differences between categories. In a subgroup of 39 patients with known IDH1 R132H status, the presence of this mutation correlated with significantly longer OS (p = 0.01) and PFS (p = 0.002). Complete or partial tumor resection and younger age also correlated with a significantly better prognosis, and this influence persisted in multivariate analysis. In the IDH1 R132H subgroup analysis, only this marker retained an independent prognostic value. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION A general superiority of combined chemoradiotherapy compared to RT alone could not be demonstrated. Biomarkers for predicting the benefits of combination therapy using RT and TMZ are needed for patients with AA.
Collapse
|