A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients. A single-center experience

The Impact of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes of Surgically Managed Vertebral Osteomyelitis in the United States: Insights from a National Database Study

This study was conducted to assess the patient characteristics, types of treatment, and outcomes of patients who are surgically treated for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in the United States. VO can be treated with or without surgical intervention. Surgically treated cases of VO are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and incur major healthcare costs. There are few studies assessing the characteristics and outcomes of patients with VO who are treated surgically, as well as the overall impact of surgically managed VO on the healthcare system of the United States. Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, 44,401 patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment for VO over a fifteen year period. Severity of comorbidity burden was calculated using the Deyo Index (DI). Surgical approach and comorbidities were analyzed in regard to their impact on complications, mortality rate, LOS, and hospitalization charges. The incidence of surgical intervention for patients who had VO increased from 0.6 to 1.1 per U.S. persons over the study period. Surgically treated patients had a mean age of 56 years, were 75.8% white, were 54.5% male, 37.9% carried Medicare insurance, and they had a mean DI of 0.88. Anterior/posterior approach (OR: 3.53), thoracolumbar fusion (OR: 2.69), thoracolumbar fusion (OR: 19.94), and anterior/posterior approach (OR: 64.73) were the surgical factors that most significantly predicted any complication, mortality, increased LOS, and increased hospital charges, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean inflation-adjusted total hospital cost increased from $20,355 to $39,991 per patient over the study period. VO has been steadily increasing in the United States. Incidence and inflation-adjusted costs nearly doubled. Anterior/posterior approach and thoracolumbar fusion most significantly predicted negative outcomes. VO is associated with lengthy and expensive hospital stays resulting in a significant burden to patients and the healthcare system.

Influence of instrumentation type on outcomes after surgical management of spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Spondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the literature, but are important in establishing guidelines for surgical management of spondylodiscitis. This study aims to clarify the effect of instrumentation material selection on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Studies that evaluated the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, allograft, and/or autologous bone grafts for spondylodiscitis were identified in the literature. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportions, with estimated risk and confidence intervals reported for our primary study outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two retrospective studies totaling 1088 patients undergoing surgical management of spondylodiscitis with PEEK, TTN, allograft, and autologous bone graft instrumentation were included. There were no differences in fusion rates (p-interaction = 0.55) with rates of fusion of 93.4% with TTN, 98.6% with allograft, 84.2% with autologous bone graft, and 93.9% with PEEK. There were no differences in screw loosening (p-interaction = 0.52) with rates of 0.33% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.3% with autologous bone graft, and 8.2% with PEEK. There were no differences in reoperation (p-interaction = 0.59) with rates of 2.64% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.69% with autologous bone graft, and 3.3% with PEEK.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of instrumentation type in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis resulted in no significant differences in rate of radiographic fusion, screw loosening, or reoperation. Future comparative studies to optimize guidelines for the management of spondylodiscitis are needed.

Single- and Multilevel Corpectomy and Vertebral body replacement for treatment of spinal infections. A retrospective single-center study of 100 cases

Background

The optimal operative approach for treating spinal infections remains a subject of debate. Corpectomy and Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) have emerged as common modalities, yet data on their feasibility and complication profiles are limited.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study examined 100 consecutive cases (2015-2022) that underwent VBR for spinal infection treatment. A comparison between Single-level-VBR and Multi-level-VBR was performed, evaluating patient profiles, revision rates, and outcomes.

Results

Among 360 cases treated for spinal infections, 100 underwent VBR, located in all spinal regions. Average clinical and radiologic follow-up spanned 1.5 years. Single-level-VBR was performed in 60 cases, Two-level-VBR in 37, Three-level-VBR in 2, and Four-level-VBR in one case.Mean overall sagittal correction reached 10° (range 0-54°), varying by region. Revision surgery was required in 31 cases. Aseptic mechanical complications (8% pedicle screw loosening, 3% cage subsidence, 6% aseptic adjacent disc disease) were prominent reasons for revision. Longer posterior constructs (>4 levels) had significantly higher revision rates (p < 0.01). General complications (wound healing, hematoma) followed, along with infection relapse and adjacent disc infection (9%) and neurologic impairment (1%).Multilevel-VBR (≥2 levels) displayed no elevated cage subsidence rate compared to Single-level-VBR. Three deaths occurred (43-86 days post-op), all in the Multi-level-VBR group.

Conclusion

This study, reporting the largest number of VBR cases for spinal infection treatment, affirmed VBR's effectiveness in sagittal imbalance correction. The overall survival was high, while reinfection rates matched other surgical studies. Anterior procedures have minimal implant related risks, but extended dorsal instrumentation elevates revision surgery likelihood.

The one-stop-shop approach: Navigating lumbar 360-degree instrumentation in a single position

Objective

Treatment strategies of patients suffering from pyogenic spondylodiscitis are a controverse topic. Percutaneous dorsal instrumentation followed by surgical debridement and fusion of the infectious vertebral disc spaces is a common approach for surgical treatment. Technical advances enable spinal navigation for dorsal and lateral instrumentation. This report investigates combined navigated dorsal and lateral instrumentation in a single surgery and positioning for lumbar spondylodiscitis in a pilot series.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with 1- or 2-level discitis were prospectively enrolled. To enable posterior navigated pedicle screw placement and lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) patients were positioned semi-prone in 45-degree fashion. For spinal referencing, a registration array was attached to the pelvic or spinal process. 3D scans were acquired intraoperatively for registration and implant control.

Results

27 patients suffering from 1- or 2-level spondylodiscitis with a median ASA of 3 (1–4) and a mean BMI of 27.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2 were included. Mean duration of surgery was 146 ± 49 min. Mean blood loss was 367 ± 307 ml. A median of 4 (4–8) pedicle screws were placed for dorsal percutaneous instrumentation with an intraoperative revision rate of 4.0%. LLIF was performed on 31 levels with an intraoperative cage revision rate of 9.7%.

Conclusions

Navigated lumbar dorsal and lateral instrumentation in a single operation and positioning is feasible and safe. It enables rapid 360-degree instrumentation in these critically ill patients and potentially reduces overall intraoperative radiation exposure for patient and staff. Compared to purely dorsal approaches it allows for optimal discectomy and fusion while overall incisions and wound size are minimized. Compared to prone LLIF procedures, semi-prone in 45-degree positioning allows for a steep learning curve due to minor changes of familiar anatomy.

Distribution of Underlying Causative Organisms, Patient Age, and Survival in Spontaneous spondylodiscitis with Special Focus on Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

 spondylodiscitis is becoming a more frequently encountered diagnosis in our clinical practice. Multimorbid and especially older patients build up a relevant portion of cases. The goal of our study was to evaluate our clinical data and to reveal specifics concerning elderly patients with spontaneous spondylodiscitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We retrospectively analyzed clinical data for the years from 2012 to 2014. The search was conducted on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnoses for spondylodiscitis. Postoperative infections were not included in this study. All cases were evaluated in terms of infectious agents (in blood culture and/or computerized tomography [CT]-guided or surgical biopsy), age, and overall survival.

RESULTS

 Fifty-one patients with spontaneous spondylodiscitis were identified. The most frequent pathogen was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; n = 21; 41.17%). Escherichia coli and S. epidermidis were each found in four patients each (7.84%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and S. hominis were found in three cases (5.88%). Other bacteria were found in one case (each 1.96 %). In 12 cases, there was no bacteria growth (23.53%). One of these patients revealed to have a tuberculosis infection, diagnosed after the study period (in 2015). Two-thirds of the patients were ≥65 years old (n = 34). All three patients with MRSA were >65 years old. Three of seven patients <50 years had IV drug abuse (42.86%). In these patients, rather rare infectious agents for spondylodiscitis were found (P. aeruginosa, S. hominis, Citrobacter). Mortality was 7.84% (n = 4). All of these patients were ≥67 years old, three of four (75%) were ≥75 years old.

CONCLUSION

 Our study of spontaneous spondylodiscitis showed a stronger representation of older patients (>65 years). Lethal outcome exclusively concerned the older age group. S. aureus was the most frequent pathogen as shown previously. MRSA infections might be more common in the older age group. Rare causative organisms mainly occurred in patients with iv drug abuse. Further evaluation through randomized multicenter studies focusing on the different subgroups and comorbidities in larger populations and correlation with appropriate treatment options is necessary.

Postoperative Quality of Life in Patients with Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

 Pyogenic spondylodiskitis affects a fragile patient population frequently fraught with severe comorbidities. Data on long-term outcomes, especially for patients undergoing surgery, are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term quality of life after surgical instrumentation.

METHODS

 Data of 218 patients who were treated for spondylodiskitis at our institution between January 2008 and July 2017 were reviewed. In-hospital death and mortality rates at 1 year and follow-up were assessed. A survey was conducted using the following questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form Work Ability Index (SF-WAI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). We investigated the correlation between the assessed variables and clinical data including patient age, comorbidity score at admission, number of operated levels, corpectomy, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

 In-hospital mortality rate was 1.8% and 1-year mortality rate was 5.5%. At the final follow-up (mean 7 ± 6 years), the mortality rate was 45.4%. Seventy-four patients were lost to follow-up or refused to participate in the study. Forty-four patients responded to the survey and had a mean age of 73 years and mean follow-up of 7 ± 2 years. In the ODI questionnaire, disability grades were classified as minimal (23%), moderate (21%), severe (19%), complete (33%), and bed bound (4%). We found a significant correlation between inability to return to work and severe disability on ODI (p < 0.001), as well as a low score on any component of the SF-36 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Despite low in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates, patients with surgically treated pyogenic spondylodiskitis are prone to long-term limitation in all domains of quality of life, especially in physical health and work ability.

Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Bicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Spinal instrumentation for spondylodiskitis (SD) remains highly controversial. To date, surgical data are limited to relatively small case series with short-term follow-up data. In this study, we wanted to elucidate the biomechanical, surgical, and neurologic long-term outcomes in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 A retrospective analysis from two German primary care hospitals over a 9-year period (2005-2014) was performed. The inclusion criteria were (1) pyogenic lumbar SD, (2) minimum follow-up of 1 year, and (3) surgical instrumentation. The clinical and radiologic outcome was assessed before surgery, at discharge, and at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Follow-up included physical examination, laboratory results, CT and MRI scans, as well as assessment of quality of life (QoL) using short-form health survey (SF-36) inventory, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and visual analog scale (VAS) spine score.

RESULTS

 Complete data were available in 70 patients (49 males and 21 females, with an age range of 67±12.3 years) with a median follow-up of 6.6 ± 4.2 years. Follow-up data were available in 70 patients after 1 year, in 58 patients after 2 years, and in 44 patients after 6 years. Thirty-five patients underwent posterior stabilization and decompression alone and 35 patients were operated on in a two-stage 360-degree interbody fusion with decompression. Pre- and postoperative angles of the affected motion segment were 17.6 ± 10.2 and 16.1 ± 10.7 degrees in patients with posterior instrumentation only and 21.0 ± 10.2 and 18.3 ± 10.5 degrees in patients with combined anterior/posterior fusion. Vertebral body subsidence was seen in 12 and 6 cases following posterior instrumentation and 360-degree instrumentation, respectively. Nonfusion was encountered in 22 and 11 cases following posterior instrumentation and 360-degree instrumentation, respectively. The length of hospital stay was 35.0 ± 24.5 days. Surgery-associated complication rate was 18% (12/70). New neurologic symptoms occurred in 7% (5/70). Revision surgery was performed in 3% (2/70) due to screw misplacement/hardware failure and in 3% (2/70) due to intraspinal hematoma. Although patients reported a highly impaired pain deception and vitality, physical mobility was unaffected and pain disability during daily activities was moderate.

CONCLUSION

 Surgical treatment of SD with a staged surgical approach (if needed) is safe and provides very good long-term clinical and radiologic outcome.

The Role of Diskectomy in Reducing Infectious Complications after Surgery for Lumbar Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

 Surgery for pyogenic Spondylodiscitis as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy is an established treatment. However, the technique and extent of surgical debridement remains a matter of debate. Some propagate diskectomy in all cases. Others maintain that stand-alone instrumentation is sufficient.

METHODS

 We reviewed charts of patients who underwent instrumentation for pyogenic Spondylodiscitis with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Patients were stratified according to whether they underwent diskectomy plus instrumentation or posterior instrumentation alone. Outcome measures included the need for surgical revision due to recurrent epidural intraspinal infection, wound revision, and construct failure.

RESULTS

 In all, 257 patients who underwent surgery for pyogenic Spondylodiscitis were identified. Diskectomy and interbody procedure (group A) was performed in 102 patients, while 155 patients underwent instrumentation surgery for Spondylodiscitis without intradiskal debridement (group B). The mean age was 67 ± 12 years, and 102 patients (39.7%) were females. No significant differences were found in the need for epidural abscess recurrence therapy (group A [2.0%] and 5 cases in group B [3%; p = 0.83]) and construct failure (p = 0.575). The need for wound revisions showed a tendency toward higher rates in the posterior instrumentation-only group, which failed to reach significance (p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

 Overall, intraspinal relapse of surgically treated pyogenic diskitis was low in our retrospective series. The choice of surgical technique was not associated with a significant difference. However, a somewhat higher rate of wound infections requiring revision in the group where no diskectomy was performed has to be weighed against a longer duration of surgery in an already ill patient population.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracolumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Despite advances, the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with spondylodiscitis remains high, with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although conservative therapy has progressed, several cases require surgical intervention. However, the indication and opportunities for surgical treatment are still disputable.

METHODS

In a joint consensus, the members of the 'Spondylodiscitis' working group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery considered current literature, particularly the newly published S2k guideline of the AWMF, and examined the surgical indications and treatment strategies for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.

RESULTS

Surgical intervention for spondylodiscitis is only required in a small percentage of patients. In studies comparing conservative and surgical therapies, most patients benefitted from surgery, regardless of the surgical technique selected. Presently, the standard procedure is a combined dorsoventral approach, in which a monolateral attempt should always be made. The choice of material (PEEK, titanium) for ventral support does not influence the clinical result.

Spinal infection with intraspinal abscess or empyema and acute myelopathy: comparative analysis of diagnostics, therapy, complications and outcome in primary care

INTRODUCTION

This study on pyogenic spinal infections with intraspinal epidural involvement (PSI +) compared the outcome of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) to those without (noSCI) taking diagnostic algorithm, therapy, and complications into account.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an ambispective study (2012-2017). Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, complications, and neurological outcome were analyzed descriptively. Survival was analyzed applying Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 134 patients with a median (IQR) age of 72 (61-79) years were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the SCI (n = 55) and noSCI (n = 79). A higher percentage of endocarditis (9% vs. 0%; p = 0.03) was detected in the noSCI group. The majority (81%) received combinatorial therapy including spinal surgery and antibiotic treatment. The surgery complication rate was 16%. At discharge, improvement in neurologic function was present in 27% of the SCI patients. Length of stay, duration of ventilation and the burden of disease-associated complications were significantly higher in the SCI group (e.g., urinary tract infection, pressure ulcers). Lethality risk factors were age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, p = 0.014), and empyema/abscess extension (≥ 3 infected spinal segments, HR 4.72, 95% CI 1.57-14.20, p = 0.006), dominating over additional effects of Charlson comorbidity index, SCI, and type of treatment. The overall lethality rate was 11%.

CONCLUSION

PSI + are associated with higher in-hospital mortality, particularly when multiple spinal segments are involved. However, survival is similar with (SCI) or without myelopathy (noSCI). If SCI develops, the rate of disease complications is higher and early specialized SCI care might be substantial to reduce complication rates.

Pyogenic spinal infections in patients with chronic liver disease: illustrative case and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pyogenic spinal infections (PSIs) are a group of uncommon but serious infectious diseases that are characterized by inflammation of the endplate–disc unit. PSIs are considered more prevalent and aggressive among patients with chronic immunocompromised states. Association between PSIs and liver disease has not been systematically analyzed. The authors performed a systematic review to study baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and mortality of patients with PSI in the setting of chronic liver disease.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors presented the case of a 72-year-old female patient with chronic liver disease who presented with severe low back pain and bilateral lower weakness. Imaging studies showed T10–11 spondylodiscitis. The patient received decompression and fusion surgery with partial neurological improvement. The authors performed a systematic literature search of spondylodiscitis and liver disease, and eight published articles met the studies inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies featured a total of 144 patients, of whom 129 met inclusion criteria (mean age, 60.5 years, range 40 to 83 years; 62% males). Lumbar infection was the most common report (67%), with Staphylococcus aureus (48%) as the main causative microorganism. Neurological compromise was present in 69% of patients. Surgical intervention occurred in 70.5% of patients, and the average duration of antibiotic treatment was 69.4 days. Postoperative complication rate was 28.5%, with a 30- and 90-day mortality of 17.2% and 24.8%, respectively.

LESSONS

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis in patients with liver disease was associated with a high rate of neurological compromise, postoperative complications, and mortality.

Severity and Outcome of Neurologic Deficits in Patients with Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A Systematic Review

Patients with advanced pyogenic spondylodiscitis can present with neurologic deficits. However, the prevalence, severity, and outcome of the neurologic deficits are not well known. A systematic review was performed to improve the knowledge of this commonly encountered clinical scenario. The considerable number of severe neurologic deficits in addition to their poor recovery, even after surgical intervention, demonstrates that the early diagnosis of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is crucial. Prompt surgical intervention is likely associated with a greater chance of improvement of neurologic status than nonsurgical treatment.

The effect of instrumentation staging on patient outcomes in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: A systematic review

Background

Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis is a bacterial infection of the vertebral body that is often treatable with antibiotics, but some cases require additional surgical debridement of the infected tissue. Instrumentation is often utilized for stabilization of the spine as part of the surgical treatment, but controversy remains over the relative risks and benefits of acute instrumentation performed simultaneously with debridement versus delayed instrumentation performed days or weeks after debridement. The purpose of this review was to investigate the relative effects of acute and delayed instrumentation in treatment for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis on patient outcomes.

Methods

A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between January 1, 1997 and July 23, 2021. Studies were screened for pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome of interest was reinfection. Other outcomes of interest included neurological status, pain, progression of kyphosis, fusion, hardware failure, length of hospitalization, and mortality at two years. Due to the limited multi-armed studies available that distinguish between patients with acute and delayed instrumentation, inferential statistics were not performed, and data are expressed as descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 9 studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising 299 patients, including 113 (37.8%) with surgical treatment without fixation, 138 (46.2%) with acute instrumentation, and 48 (16.1%) with delayed instrumentation. Reinfection rates were 60.0% (15/25) for surgical treatment without fixation, 28.6% (2/7) for the acute instrumentation, and 14.3% (1/7) for the delayed instrumentation group. Pain was present after surgery in 52.0% (13/25) of the surgical treatment without fixation group, 14.3% (1/7) of the acute instrumentation group, and 0% (0/7) of the delayed instrumentation group.

Conclusions

No major differences in patient outcomes were apparent between acute and delayed instrumentation groups. Further research is needed to determine whether instrumentation staging has a significant impact on patient outcomes.

Neurosurgical Management and Outcome Parameters in 237 Patients with Spondylodiscitis

Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis allows for rapid mobilization and shortens hospital stays, which makes surgical treatment the first-line therapy. We aim to describe our experiences with operative treatment on spondylodiscitis and to determine the parameters that are important in the prediction of outcomes. A retrospective review identified 237 patients who were operatively treated for spondylodiscitis in our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Clinical data were collected through review of electronic records and relevant imaging. In all cases, contrast-enhancing MRI from the infected region of the spine was obtained. Leukocyte count and C-reactive protein concentrations (CRP) were determined in all the patients. We included 237 patients in the study, 87 female (36.7%) and 150 male (63.3%), with a mean age of 71.4 years. Mean follow-up was 31.6 months. Forty-five patients had spondylodiscitis of the cervical, 73 of the thoracic, and 119 of the lumbosacral spine. All the patients with spondylodiscitis of the cervical spine received instrumentation. In thoracic and lumbar spine decompression, surgery without instrumentation was performed in 26 patients as immediate surgery and in a further 28 patients in the early stages following admission, while 138 patients received instrumentation. Eighty-nine patients (37.6%) had concomitant infections. Infection healing occurred in 89% of patients. Favorable outcomes were noted in patients without concomitant infections, with a normalized CRP value and in patients who received antibiotic therapy for more than six weeks (p < 0.05). Unfavorable outcomes were noted in patients with high CRP, postoperative spondylodiscitis, and recurrent spondylodiscitis (p < 0.05). Application of antibiotic therapy for more than six weeks and normalized CRP showed a correlation with favorable outcomes, whereas concomitant infections showed a correlation with unfavorable outcomes. A detailed screening for concomitant infectious diseases is recommended.

Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw fixation versus open instrumentation in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Due to the aging society, the incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is still rising. Although surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis in general is increasingly accepted, an optimal surgical strategy for treatment of pyogenic spinal infection has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for surgical treatment in patients with spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine between January 2017 and December 2019. We assessed intraoperative and clinical data, comparing for the classic open and the percutaneous approach. In total, we analyzed 125 cases (39 female, 86 male). The mean age was 69.49 years ± 12.63 years.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (37.6%) patients were operated on by a percutaneous approach for pedicle screw fixation, and 78 (62.4%) received open surgery. There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients between both groups (p= 0.57). The time of surgery for percutaneous fixation was statistically significantly shorter (p= 0.03). Furthermore, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed regarding the recurrence rate of spondylodiscitis and the occurrence of surgical site infections (p= 0.2 and 0.5, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation appears to be a feasible option for the surgical treatment of a selected patient group with spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK instrumentation for spondylodiscitis: a single center experience on safety and efficacy

Radiolucent carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) polyethyl-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has been established in spinal instrumentation for oncological reasons. Laboratory data reported comparable bacterial adhesion as titanium. Thus, using of CFR-PEEK spinal instrumentation for spondylodiscitis bases on artifact-free imaging to evaluate therapeutic success. Studies comparing the rate of pedicle screw loosening and relapse of spondylodiscitis following titanium versus CFR-PEEK instrumentation do not exist so far. This study evaluates the rate of pedicle screw loosening and recurrence of spondylodiscitis after CFR-PEEK instrumentation for spondylodiscitis compared to titanium. We conducted a prospective single center study between June 2018 and March 2019 on consecutive 23 patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis. Imaging data was evaluated for screw loosening at a minimum of three months after surgery. A matched-pair analysis was performed using spondylodiscitis cases between 2014 and 2016 using titanium instrumentation for equal localization, surgery, and microorganism class. Among 17 cases with follow-up imaging, six cases (35%) showed screw loosening while only 14% (two patients) with titanium instrumentation were loosened (p = 0.004). In both groups the most frequent bacterium was Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis. From the S. aureus cases, one infection in both groups was caused by methicillin resistant species (MRSA). No difference was found in the rate of 360° fusion in either group due to matching criteria. As opposed to other indications CFR-PEEK screws show more loosening than titanium in this series with two potentially underlying reasons: a probably stronger bacterial adhesion on CFR-PEEK in vivo as shown by a statistical trend in vitro and instrumentation of spondylytic vertebrae. Until these factors are validated, we advise caution when implanting CFR-PEEK screws in infectious cases.

Safety and efficacy of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in combination with one-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation in Lumbar Brucella Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis with PEEK cages combined with one-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study for adult patients with lumbar brucella spondylitis. Medical records, imaging studies and laboratory data were collected, back pain was measured by employing the visual analog scale (VAS) and the neurological status was evaluated by using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale.

RESULTS

A total of 61 consecutive patients (42 males and 19 females) were enrolled with the mean age at presentation of 56.33 ± 9.16 years old. L3-4 and L4-5 were the most infected levels with the ratios of 21.31 % and 19.67 % respectively. Moreover, 12 (19.67 %) patients suffered multiple-level infection and 5 (5/12, 41.67 %) of them had non-contiguous spondylitis. In addition, epidural masses were found in 26 (42.62 %) cases and psoas abscesses were found in 14 (22.95 %) cases. The number of operative segment depended on operation indications (failure of conservative measures, instability, kyphosis, intractable pain and/or neurological impairment). VAS scores were significantly improved at 6-weeks and the last follow-up. Among the 23 (37.70 %) patients with neurological deficits, 19 (19/23, 82.61 %) obtained a full recovery and 4 (4/23, 17.39 %) had been improved incompletely during the last follow-up. All patients exhibited satisfactory bone fusion during the last follow-up. Local infection of surgical site was identified in 6 (9.84 %) cases and no other surgery-related complications were found.

CONCLUSION

Use of PEEK cages for interbody fusion is feasible and safe in patients suffering from lumbar brucella spondylitis.

De novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vs. methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections of the spine, similar clinical outcome, despite more severe presentation in surgical patients

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is a severe infection of the vertebral body and the adjacent disc space, where Staphylococcus aureus is most commonly isolated. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine risk factors for and compare outcome differences between de novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) VO and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) VO. A retrospective cohort study was performed by review of the electronic medical records of 4541 consecutive spine surgery patients. Among these 37 underwent surgical treatment of de novo MRSA and MSSA spinal infections. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative neurological status (ASIA impairment score), surgical treatment, inflammatory laboratory values, nutritional status, comorbidities, antibiotics, hospital stay, ICU stay, reoperation, readmission, and complications were collected. A minimum follow-up (FU) of 12 months was required. Among the 37 patients with de novo VO, 19 were MRSA and 18 were MSSA. Mean age was 52.4 and 52.9 years in the MRSA and MSSA groups, respectively. Neurological deficits were found in 53% of patients with MRSA infection and in 17% of the patients with MSSA infection, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Chronic renal insufficiency and malnutrition were found to be significant risk factors for MRSA VO. Preoperative albumin was significantly lower in the MRSA group (p < 0.05). Patients suffering from spinal infection with chronic renal insufficiency and malnutrition should be watched more carefully for MRSA. The MRSA group did not show a significant difference with regard to final clinical outcome despite more severe presentation.

Impact of the localization on disease course and clinical management in spondylodiscitis

OBJECTIVES

Spondylodiscitis is a severe infection of the spine that can take a diverse number of disease courses depending on its localization, resulting in specific therapeutic strategies. This study aims to identify localization specific characteristics and clinical parameters for spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 211 patients from 2013-2018 with proven spondylodiscitis. In total, 33 were cervical, 48 thoracic and 112 lumbar. In 18 patients disseminated infestations of several localizations were found. The patient records were evaluated for clinical and outcome parameters and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Patient age, Body Mass Index, inpatient and intensive care stay, and inpatient complications did not differ significantly between different infection localizations. C-reactive protein (CrP) levels showed a significantly reduced value in the thoracic area compared to other localizations. For comorbidities, there was a significantly higher prevalence of endocarditis in disseminated and lumbar infestations compared to thoracic and cervical cases. Epidural abscesses showed a highly increased incidence in cervical cases. With a 30-day mortality rate of 12.1% for cervical, 12.5% thoracic, 13.4% lumbar, and 22.2% in disseminated disease, no significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study determined that, although the 30-day mortality rate does not differ according to the localization of the infection, specific clinical parameters, such as CrP values or comorbidities, showed localization-dependent differences.

Minimally invasive posterior fixation and anterior debridement-fusion for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis: A 40-case series and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a rare disease, but incidence is increasing. Reported failure rates following conservative management range from 12% to 18%. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with anterior debridement and fusion (ADF) for infective spondylodiscitis in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.

METHODS

The retrospective study cohort comprised all patients without neurological deficit who underwent minimally invasive posterior and anterior surgery between April 2008 and April 2016 for thoracic and/or lumbar spondylodiscitis.

RESULTS

Forty patients were eligible (16 female: 40%). The lumbar region was affected in 31 cases (77.5%). Source of infection was identified in only 22 cases (55%) and bacteriological identification was obtained in 32 cases (80%). Mean hospital stay was 14.8 days (range, 6-39 days). Complete recovery was achieved in 39 patients (97.5%) at 3 months' follow-up. Mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 16.1^o, versus 14^o at 1-year (P>0.05). 36 patients (90%) had at least 1 year's follow-up, and fusion was obtained for all these cases.

CONCLUSION

Two-stage minimally invasive surgery is effective and safe for the treatment of single or two-level thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis. It could be an alternative to conventional open surgery or conservative treatment.

Continuous Epidural Irrigation and Drainage Combined with Posterior Debridement and Posterior Lumbar Inter-Body Fusion for the Management of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Purpose: To observe the clinical curative effect of continuous epidural irrigation combined with posterior debridement and posterior lumbar inter-body fusion with instrumentation for the therapy of single-segment lumbar pyogenic spongdylodiscitis. Methods: From June 2010 to November 2013, surgical treatment was performed in 18 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The surgical indications were progressive biomechanical instability, epidural abscesses, deterioration of neurologic status, and intractable back pain. All these patients received posterior decompression with posterior instrumentation, debridement of infected tissue, and inter-body fusion. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were used to assess clinical outcomes. The neural function was evaluated by the Frankel grading system. Laboratory and radiologic results were recorded during clinical follow-up for at least one year. Results: The average follow-up period was 18 months after the operation. The VAS scores decreased from an average of 7.1 points before the procedure to 2.6 points after operation. The neurologic deficits of all the patients were recovered to Frankel grade E. All of the examined laboratory parameters were normalized gradually. Imaging-documented fusion was achieved in each patient, and no implants failure was noted. No patients showed any evidence of recurrence or persistence of infection. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, single-segment lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis can be cured successfully with continuous epidural irrigation and drainage combined with posterior debridement and posterior lumbar inter-body fusion. Instrumentation could provide immediate stability and reconstruction of the spine column, and the presence of instrumentation did not result in any persistence or recurrence of infection. Continuous epidural irrigation and drainage is an effective method facilitating the elimination of residual infection.

Treatment considerations for cervical and cervicothoracic spondylodiscitis associated with esophageal fistula due to cancer history or accidental injury: a 9-patient case series

BACKGROUND

The combination of cervical spondylodiscitis and esophageal fistula is rare but life-threatening. Due to both the rarity of these conditions' coincidence and the complexity and heterogeneity of individual cases, there is no optimal treatment or management approach. The aims of this study are to obtain an overview of patients' outcomes and to discuss treatment options.

METHOD

This study is a retrospective analysis of patients who presented with cervical spondylodiscitis and associated esophageal fistula between January 2010 and November 2018. We examined reports of 59 patients who suffered from cervical spondylodiscitis and included nine patients (15.25%) who had an esophageal fistula as the underlying cause. We assessed clinical findings, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Three of the nine patients were female, and the mean age of the sample was 64.56 years. Six of the patients had a history of esophagopharyngeal cancer and had undergone tumor resection followed by radiotherapy. Two of the remaining patients' fistulas were caused by an iatrogenic injury during cervical spine surgery and a swallowed toothpick; in the final case, the origin remained unclear. Five patients presented with tetraparesis or tetraplegia, and the other four patients were neurologically intact. In seven cases, dorsal instrumentation was initially performed. Three patients secondarily received a ventral approach for debridement, and one received explantation of the ventral implants. Two patients died during the hospital stay, and three were transferred to a palliative care unit. Thus, the spondylodiscitis and esophageal fistula were cured in only four patients. At discharge, two patients were neurologically intact, two others remained in tetraparesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical spondylodiscitis in association with an esophageal fistula carries high morbidity and high mortality. Because patients whose infections are not cured have high morbidity, we recommend using interdisciplinary and individual management, including definite surgical treatment of the discitis and fistula, in every case.

High Prevalence of Multifocal Spine Infections Involving the Cervical and Thoracic Regions: A Case for Imaging the Entire Spine

Objective

Pyogenic spinal infections account for 2%–4% of orthopaedic infections. They are often difficult to diagnose, resulting in a delay in diagnosis. Risk factors for orthopaedic and spinal infection are well-documented in the literature, yet there is a paucity of studies examining risk factors specifically for multifocal spinal infections. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of multifocal spinal infections in comparison to unifocal spinal infections.

Methods

The medical records, imaging studies, and bacteriology data of 20 patients treated surgically for pyogenic spinal infection over 6 years at a tertiary referral center were reviewed and analyzed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection.

Results

Seven patients (35%) had multifocal infections. Three were bifocal, and 4 were trifocal. Patients with surgically treated cervical or thoracic spinal infections had a high rate of concomitant multifocal spinal infections (71% and 83%, respectively). Other potential predictors (e.g., patient age, body mass index, magnetic resonance image findings, etc.) did not reach statistical significance. Each of the multifocal infections involved the lumbar spine.

Conclusion

In this study, the spinal region was the only statistically significant risk factor for multifocal infection. Patients who are diagnosed with a spinal infection that requires operative treatment should have their entire spine evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging to detect multifocal involvement promptly.

Presentation and Outcomes After Medical and Surgical Treatment Versus Medical Treatment Alone of Spontaneous Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (1) describe the clinical features, disabilities, and incidence of neurologic deficits of pyogenic spondylodiscitis prior to treatment and (2) compare the functional outcomes between patients who underwent medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. No year restriction was put in place. Statistical analysis of pooled data, when documented in the original report (ie, number of patients with desired variable and number of patients evaluated), was conducted to determine the most common presenting symptoms, incidence of pre- and postoperative neurologic deficits, associated comorbidities, infectious pathogens, approach for surgery when performed, and duration of hospitalization. Outcomes data, including return to work status, resolution of back pain, and functional recovery were also pooled among all studies and surgery-specific studies alone. Meta-analysis of studies with subgroup analysis of pain-free outcome in surgical and medical patients was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty of 1286 studies were included, comprising 4173 patients undergoing either medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery. Back pain was the most common presenting symptom, reported in 91% of patients. Neurologic deficit was noted in 31% of patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly reported pathogen, seen in 35% of reported cases. Decompression and fusion was the most commonly reported surgical procedure, performed in 80% of the surgically treated patients. Combined anterior-posterior procedures and staged surgeries were performed in 33% and 26% of surgeries, respectively. The meta-analysis comparing visual analog scale score at follow-up was superior among patients receiving surgery over medical treatment alone (mean difference -0.61, CI -0.90 to -0.25), while meta-analysis comparing freedom from pain in patients receiving medical treatment alone versus combined medical and surgical treatment demonstrated superior pain-free outcomes among surgical series (odds ratio 5.35, CI 2.27-12.60, P < .001), but was subject to heterogeneity among studies (I ² = 56%, P = .13). Among all patients, freedom from pain was achieved in 79% of patients, and an excellent outcome was achieved in 73% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Medical management remains first-line treatment of infectious pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Surgery may be indicated for progressive pain, persistent infection on imaging, deformity or neurologic deficits. If surgery is required, reported literature shows potential for significant pain reduction, improved neurologic function and a high number of patients returning to a normal functional/work status.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors for the disease course of patients with spondylodiscitis have not been well studied.

METHODS

The prognostic value of initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography imaging parameters was analyzed in 62 patients (47% women; mean age ± SD, 71.6 ± 9.6 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. The disease course was separately evaluated during initial treatment response during hospitalization, relapse, and clinical short-term follow-up at 3 months.

RESULTS

Overall CT findings graded as definitely inflammatory (P = 0.006), reduced disc height on MRI (P = 0.044) and fluid-equivalent hyperintensity of discs on T2 short tau inversion recovery-weighted sequences (P = 0.047) were associated with poor initial treatment response. High initial C-reactive protein value (>10.1 mg/dL) was associated with a higher relapse rate (P = 0.038). Risk factors for poor outcome were infection with low-virulence bacteria (P = 0.040) and overall MRI findings atypical for infection (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with MRI, CT imaging parameters have a higher prognostic value regarding the disease course. Patients infected with low-virulence bacteria and atypical MRI findings are at higher risk for poor clinical outcome and thus warrant closer monitoring.

First clinical results of minimally invasive vector lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-VLIF) in spondylodiscitis and concomitant osteoporosis: a technical note

PURPOSE

First description of MIS-VLIF, a minimally invasive lumbar stabilization, to evaluate its safety and feasibility in patients suffering from weak bony conditions (lumbar spondylodiscitis and/or osteoporosis).

METHODS

After informed consent, 12 patients suffering from lumbar spondylodiscitis underwent single level MIS-VLIF. Eight of them had a manifest osteoporosis, either. Pre- and postoperative clinical status was documented using numeric rating scale (NRS) for leg and back pain. In all cases, the optimal height for the cage was preoperatively determined using software-based range of motion and sagittal balance analysis. CT scans were obtained to evaluate correct placement of the construct and to verify fusion after 6 months.

RESULTS

Since 2013, 12 patients with lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent MIS-VLIF. Mean surgery time was 169 ± 28 min and average blood loss was less than 400 ml. Postoperative CT scans showed correct placement of the implants. Eleven patients showed considerable postoperative improvement in clinical scores. In one patient, we observed screw loosening. After documented bony fusion in the CT scan, the fixation system was removed in two cases to achieve lower material load.

CONCLUSIONS

The load-bearing trajectories (vectors) of MIS-VLIF are different from those of conventional coaxial pedicle screw implantation. The dorsally converging construct combines the heads of the dorsoventral pedicle screws with laminar pedicle screws following cortical bone structures within a small approach. In case of lumbar spondylodiscitis and/or osteoporosis, MIS-VLIF relies on cortical bony structures for all screw vectors and the construct does not depend on conventional coaxial pedicle screws in the presence of inflamed, weak, cancellous or osteoporotic bone. MIS-VLIF allows full 360° lumbar fusion including cage implantation via a small, unilateral dorsal midline approach.

Safety and efficacy of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in combination with posterior pedicel screw fixation in pyogenic spinal infection

BACKGROUND

To date, there is growing consensus that PEEK material may be used for interbody fusion in spinal infections. Data supporting that claim are however restricted to a few very small clinical series. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment of pyogenic spinal infections with PEEK cages in combination with posterior pedicel screw fixation.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2013, a total of 211 patients suffering from spondylodiscitis underwent surgical debridement and instrumentation. There were 52 cases where PEEK cages were used. Laboratory and physical examinations were assessed at a 3-month follow-up. Last follow-up was performed with at a minimum of 12 months after surgery via a telephone interview.

RESULTS

Mean age at presentation was 67 years, with 19 (37 %) male patients and 33 (63 %) female. Distribution of the infection was lumbar in 29 (56 %%), thoracic in 3 (6 %) and cervical in 11 (21 %) cases. Nine patients (17 %) had concomitant non-contiguous spondylodiscitis. Epidural abscess was found in 17 patients (33 %); 48 (92 %%) had pain; neurological deficits were found in 20 patients (38 %). All patients in this series underwent surgical debridement with instrumentation of the spine. Postoperative intravenous antibiotics were administered for 15.4 ± 6.8 days followed by 2.9 ± 0.5 months of oral antibiotics. Complete resolution of the infection was achieved in all cases. Of the 28 patients with neurological deficits, 6 had full recovery and 10 had improved incompletely after surgery. One patient suffered from a pulmonary embolism postoperatively. There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PEEK cages for interbody fusion is feasible and safe in patients suffering from a pyogenic spinal infection.

Vertebral osteomyelitis in adults: an update

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of vertebral osteomyelitis is increasing, attributed to an ageing population with inherent co-morbidities and improved case ascertainment.

SOURCES OF DATA

References were retrieved from the PubMed database using the terms 'vertebral osteomyelitis' and 'spondylodiscitis' between January 1, 2009 and April 30, 2014 published in English as checked in May 2014 (>1000 abstracts checked).

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Blood cultures and whole spine imaging with magnetic resonance imaging are essential investigations. Thorough debridement is the mainstay of surgical management, although placing metalwork in active infection is becoming increasingly common.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The extent of pursuing spinal biopsies to determine aetiology, antimicrobial choices and duration, monitoring the response to treatment, and surgical techniques and timing all vary widely in clinical practice with heterogeneous studies limiting comparisons. Surgery, rather than conservative approaches, is being proposed as the default management choice, because it can, in carefully selected patients, offer faster reduction in pain scores and improved quality of life.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Further studies are needed to define the most effective technique for spinal biopsies to maximize determining aetiology. High-quality trials are required to provide an evidence base for both the medical and surgical management of vertebral osteomyelitis, including challenging medical management as the default option.

What are we waiting for? An argument for early surgery for spinal epidural abscesses

Background:

In the article: Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess (SEA): A review, Epstein raises one major point; it is imperative that spinal surgeons “take back decision-making” from our medical cohorts and reinstitute early surgery (<24 h) to better treat SEAs.

Methods:

Spine surgeons recognize the clinical triad (e.g., fever [50%], spinal pain [92–100%], and neurological deficits [47%]) for establishing the diagnosis of an SEA. We also appreciate the multiple major risk factors for developing SEA; diabetes (15–30%), elevated white blood cell count (>12.5), high C-reactive protein (>115), positive blood cultures, radiographic cord compression, and significant neurological deficits (e.g., 19–45%).

Results:

Recognizing these risk factors should prompt early open surgery (<24 h from the onset of a neurological deficit). Open surgery better defines the correct/multiple organisms present, and immediately provides adequate/thorough neurological decompression (with fusion if unstable). Although minimally invasive surgery may suffice in select cases, too often it provides insufficient biopsy/culture/irrigation/decompression. Most critically, nonsurgical options result in unacceptably high failure rates (e.g., 41-42.5-75% requiring delayed surgery), while risking permanent paralysis (up to 22%), and death (up to 25%).

Conclusion:

As spine surgeons, we need to “take back decision-making” from our medical cohorts and advocate for early surgery to achieve better outcomes for our patients. Why should anyone accept the >41-42.5 to up to the 75% failure rate that accompanies the nonsurgical treatment of SEA, much less the >25% mortality rate?

Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: A review

Background:

The nonsurgical versus surgical management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) remains controversial. Even with the best preoperative screening for multiple risk factors, high nonoperative failure rates are attended by considerable morbidity (e.g., irreversible paralysis) and mortality. Therefore, the focus remains on early surgery.

Methods:

Most papers promote early recognition of the clinical triad (e.g., fever [50%], spinal pain [92–100%], and neurological deficits [47%]) for SEA. They also identify SEA-related risk factors for choosing nonsurgical versus surgical approaches; advanced age (>65 or 80), diabetes (15–30%), cancer, intravenous drug abuse (25%), smoking (23%), elevated white blood cell count (>12.5), high C-reactive protein >115, positive blood cultures, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomographic documented cord compression, and significant neurological deficits (e.g., 19–45%).

Results:

Surgical options include: decompressions, open versus minimally invasive biopsy/culture/irrigation, or fusions. Up to 75% of SEA involve the thoracolumbar spine, and 50% are located ventrally. Wound cultures are positive in up to 78.8% of cases and are often (60%) correlated with positive blood cultures. The most typical offending organism is methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, followed by methicillin sensitive S. aureus. Unfortunately, the failure rates for nonoperative treatment of SEA remain high (e.g., 41–42.5%), contributing to significant morbidity (22% risk of permanent paralysis), and mortality (3–25%).

Conclusion:

The vast majority of studies advocated early surgery to achieve better outcomes for treating SEA; this avoids high failure rates (41–42.5%) for nonoperative therapy, and limits morbidity/mortality rates.

Application of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages in the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of a pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD) involves a fixation and debridement of the affected segment combined with a specific antibiotic therapy. To achieve a proper stability and to avoid pseudarthrosis and kyphotic malposition many surgeons favour the interposition of an anterior graft. Besides autologous bone grafts titanium (TTN) cages have gained acceptance in the treatment of PSD. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have a more favourable modulus of elasticity than TTN. We compared both cage types. Primary endpoints were the rate of reinfection and radiological results.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2013 51 patients underwent surgery for PSD with fixation and TTN or PEEK cage-implantation. While lumbar patients underwent a partial discectomy by the posterior approach, discs of the cervical and thoracic patients had been totally removed from anterior. Clinical and radiological parameters were assessed in 37 eligible patients after a mean of 20.4 months. 21 patients received a PEEK- and 16 patients a TTN-cage.

RESULTS

A reinfection after surgery and 3 months of antibiotic therapy was not observed. Solid arthrodesis was found in 90.5% of the PEEK-group and 100% of the TTN-group. A segmental correction could be achieved in both groups. Nonetheless, a cage subsidence was observed in 70.3% of all cases. Comparison of radiological results revealed no differences between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A debridement and fixation with anterior column support in combination with an antibiotic therapy appear to be the key points for successful treatment of PSD. The application of TTN- or PEEK-cages does not appear to influence the radiological outcome or risk of reinfection, neither does the extent of disc removal in this clinical subset.