Selection of surgical approaches based on semi-quantifying the skull-base invasion by petroclival meningiomas: a review of 66 cases

Outcomes of Extended Middle Fossa Approach for Petroclival Tumors in the Elderly

Objective  The aims of the study are (1) to evaluate the extended middle fossa approach (eMCF) for resection of tumors in the petroclivus and anterior cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and (2) to compare surgical outcomes between elderly (≥65 years) and nonelderly patients. Design  Retrospective cohort. Setting  Tertiary referral center. Participants  Adults with petroclival, anterior CPA, or posterior fossa lesions who underwent an eMCF approach from 2012 to 2021 were included in the study. Main Outcome Measure  Demographics, symptoms, cranial nerve (CN) function, and postoperative outcomes. Results  Twenty-nine patients (mean age of 55 years, 59% females) were identified. Eleven (38%) were ≥65 years (65-79 years). The most common pathology was meningioma ( n  = 13, 45%), followed by vestibular schwannoma ( n  = 4, 14%) and squamous cell carcinoma ( n  = 3, 10%). Nineteen tumors (65.5%) were located in the petroclivus, 7 (24%) involved the cavernous sinus, and 10 (34%) were located in the posterior fossa. The mean tumor maximal diameter was 3.4 cm (range: 1.3-7.9 cm). Gross total tumor resection was accomplished in 15 (52%) patients. Most patients ( n  = 23, 79%) did not develop new CN deficits postoperatively. Of the 13 patients who had complete pre- and postoperative audiometric data, 69% ( n  = 9) maintained their hearing. Comparing the elderly versus nonelderly patients, there were no significant differences in the development of new CN palsies ( p  = 0.14), length of stay ( p  = 0.91), or incidence of postoperative complications ( p  = 0.30). Conclusions  The eMCF approach provides exposure to the petroclival region, anterior CPA cistern, and posterior fossa for a variety of pathologies. It has a favorable safety profile in the elderly (≥65 years) population with low morbidity.

Step-by-Step Dissection of the Extreme Lateral Transodontoid Approach to the Anterior Craniovertebral Junction: Surgical Anatomy and Technical Nuances

BACKGROUND

Multicompartmental lesions of the anterior craniovertebral junction require aggressive management. However, the lesions can be difficult to reach, and the surgical procedure is difficult to understand. The aim of this study was to create a procedural, stepwise microsurgical educational resource for junior trainees to learn the surgical anatomy of the extreme lateral transodontoid approach (ELTOA).

METHODS

Ten formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric heads were dissected under an operative microscope. Dissections were performed under the supervision of a skull base fellowship-trained neurosurgeon who has advanced skull base experience. Key steps of the procedure were documented with a professional camera and a high-definition video system. A relevant clinical case example was reviewed to highlight the principles of the selected approach and its application. The clinical case example also describes a rare complication: a pseudoaneurysm of the vertebral artery.

RESULTS

Key steps of the ELTOA include patient positioning, skin incision, superficial and deep muscle dissection, vertebral artery dissection and transposition, craniotomy, clivus drilling, odontoidectomy, and final extradural and intradural exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The ELTOA is a challenging approach, but it allows for significant access to the anterior craniovertebral junction, which increases the likelihood of gross total lesion resection. Given the complexity of the approach, substantial training in the dissection laboratory is required to develop the necessary anatomic knowledge and to minimize approach-related morbidity.

Treatment Strategies and Current Results of Petroclival Meningiomas

Petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) are complex skull-base tumors that continue to pose a formidable surgical challenge to neurosurgeons because of their deep-seated location/intimate relationship with the brainstem and neurovascular structures. The advent of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), along with the shifting of management goals from complete radiological cure to maximal preservation of the patient's quality of life (QOL), has further cluttered the topic of "optimal management" in PCMs. Not all patients with PCM need treatment ("watchful waiting"). However, many who reach the neurosurgeons with a symptomatic disease need surgery. The goal of the surgery in PCMs is a GTR, yet this can be achieved in only less than half of the patients with acceptable morbidity. The remainder of the patients are better treated by STR followed by SRS for residual tumor control or close follow-up. A small subset of patients with PCM may be best treated by primary SRS. In this chapter, we have tried to summarize the scientific evidence pertaining to the management of PCMs (including the senior author's series), particularly those regarding the available treatment strategies and current outcomes, and discuss the decision-making process to formulate an "optimal management" plan for individual PCMs.

Mortality and morbidity in surgically treated patients with petroclival meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series

BACKGROUND

Reports on petroclival meningioma (PCM) surgical mortality and morbidity often deviate from established standards; as such, a comprehensive summary is lacking.

METHODS

Eligibility/sources. Peer-reviewed case series of at least 10 PCM patients identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, or Google Scholar. Outcomes. Primary: mortality, tumor recurrence, any cranial nerve deficit (CND); other: individual CNDs, other complications. Data synthesis. Random-effects meta-analysis/meta-regression [effects: surgical approach (supratentorial, S; infratentorial, I; combined, (C), average age and follow-up, sample size, and percent of patients with gross-total resection (GTR)] of logit-transformed proportions.

RESULTS

Data. 73 case-series/3553 patients. Mortality. Adjusted predicted mortalities of 2.4%, 2.5%, and 1.2% (50-month follow-up) for the S, I, and C approaches, respectively, with the upper limits of the 95% credibility intervals at 3.3%, 3.7%, and 3.6%, respectively. Recurrence. Adjusted predicted recurrences of 5.5%, 11.1%, and 12.0% (50-month follow-up and 57% GTR) for the S, I, and C approaches, respectively; recurrence was positively associated with follow-up period and negatively associated with having received GTR. At all covariates at median values but at GTR 90% predictions: 3.1% (95%CI 3.1-9.8), 6.3% (3.8-10.4), and 6.9% (3.4-13.2) with the S, I, and C; prediction credibility intervals 1-4% and 22.4%. Any CND. Adjusted predicted probabilities of 37.2%, 23.4%, and 29.5% (at median covariate values) for the S, I, and C approaches, respectively; prediction credibility intervals ranged from <10% to 78%. Other outcomes. The most common individual CNDs were nVII (14.4%), nV (11.5%), and nIII (10.2%); other common complications included motor deficit (10.8%), infection (9.8%), and CSF leak (7.5%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review on PCM surgical mortality, recurrence, and morbidity. Outcomes differ between surgical approaches and reporting quality varies greatly.

Petroclival Meningiomas: A Simple System That Could Help in Selecting the Approach

BACKGROUND

Petroclival meningiomas (PCM) represent a neurosurgical challenge due to their strategic location close to the brainstem.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of a retrosigmoid approach (RSA) by analyzing the degree of displacement of the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) elicited by PCM.

METHODS

Patients with PCM were prospectively included and divided into those whose imaging studies showed that the posterior end of the MCP was displaced by the tumor and were eligible for and underwent RSA (group A) and those who were not eligible for RSA and who underwent surgery via a posterior transpetrosal approach (group B). We compared tumor behavior, clinical characteristic of patients and surgical results.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with PCM were enrolled and allocated to group A (n = 15) or group B (n = 5). The clinical manifestations were more severe in group B; tumors in this group were larger and gross total removal was achieved in only 1 patient (20%). In comparison, in 12 cases on group A, tumors could be totally removed (80%) and all of these patients could recover their quality of life after surgery.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study is the first to consider displacement of the MCP when establishing a suitable surgical approach for PCM. Our results suggest that the RSA becomes increasingly suitable when peduncle displacement is greater. By using this method, it was also possible to identify two types of tumors: petroclivals (group A) and clivopetrosals (group B), that show some specific clinical and surgical differences.

Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) continues to be debated along with several controversies that persist.

METHODS

A task force was created by the EANS skull base section along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the management of these tumors. To achieve this, the task force reviewed in detail the literature in this field and had formal discussions within the group.

RESULTS

The constituted task force dealt with the existing definitions and classifications, pre-operative radiological investigations, management of small and asymptomatic PCMs, radiosurgery, optimal surgical strategies, multimodal treatment, decision-making, and patient's counselling.

CONCLUSION

This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the management of PCMs.

Differences in surgical outcome between petroclival meningioma and anterior petrous meningioma

BACKGROUND

Petroclival meningiomas (PC MNGs) and anterior petrous meningiomas (AP MNGs) have similar locations. However, these are different tumors clearly divided by the trigeminal nerve. There has never been a study on the comparison of the surgical outcomes of these two meningiomas. In this study, we compared and analyzed the surgical outcome of PC MNGs and AP MNGs.

METHODS

The charts of 85 patients diagnosed with PC MNGs of AP MNGs who underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively reviewed. And we analyzed the characteristics of 49 PC MNGs (57.6%) and compared them with those of 36 AP MNGs.

RESULTS

Preoperative brainstem edema was observed in 11 patients (22.4%) of the PC MNG group and 1 patient (2.8%) of the AP MNG group (p = 0.024). Total tumor removal was achieved in 21 patients (58.3%) of the AP MNG group, but only 17 patients (34.7%) of the PC MNG group were able to completely (p = 0.047). In addition, sixth cranial nerve palsy occurred in 17 patients (34.7%) of the PC MNG group and 4 patients (11.1%) of the AP MNG group (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that PC MNGs has a worse surgical outcome than AP MNGs, because PC MNGs were difficult to completely remove and were more likely to damage abducens nerve.

Treatment Strategy for Petroclival Meningiomas Based on a Proposed Classification in a Study of 168 Cases

Petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) are regarded as one of the most formidable challenges in neurosurgery. We retrospectively assessed the surgical outcomes of PCMs based on a tumor classification to evaluate the long-term outcomes. A series of 168 patients with PCMs from July 1996 to January 2017. On the basis of the difference in the origin of dural attachment and patterns of growth, the PCMs were classified into 4 different types. The clinical characteristics, surgical record, and follow-up data of each type were reviewed. The study included 138 females (82.1%) with an average age of 49.9 ± 16.2 years. And 138 cases (82.1%) had developed neurological deficits preoperatively with the average tumor size of 44.0 ± 10.6 mm. Specific surgical approaches were applied depended on the tumor classification. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 119 cases (70.8%) with the complications of 46 cases (27.7%). With a median follow-up of 86.5 months, there were 41 cases of recurrence/progress (25.7%) and 39 cases of morbidity (26.4%). Compared with the non-GTR group, the GTR significantly decreased the R/P rate (P = 0.001), prolonged the R/P-FS time (P = 0.032) and improved the follow-up neurological status (P = 0.026). Favorable outcomes and acceptable morbidity were achieved with the treatment strategy of the choice of specific approaches for each type. Meanwhile, the differences of each type in diverse clinical characteristic were verified. Individualized assessment and suitable approach choice should be based on the tumor classification to improved the GTR and quality of life for patients.

The role of the basal cisterns in the development of posterior fossa skull base meningiomas

Meningiomas account for more than 30% of all intracranial brain tumors, with 25% of them originating somewhere along the skull base and about 20% of these located in the posterior fossa. The intimate relation of these tumors with neural and vascular structures make them difficult to treat, both surgically and nonsurgically. Their treatment is further hampered by the lack of definitive recommendations, which is partially due to the fact that there is no general accepted model of classification. The present report proposes a new concept of classification of posterior fossa skull base meningiomas, one that takes into account the intimate relation of these tumors with arachnoid structures, simplifies the overcrowded landscape of their systematization and can be extended to oher skull base locations.