Effectiveness of selective peripheral denervation in combination with pallidal deep brain stimulation for the treatment of cervical dystonia

Modified McKenzie-Dandy operation for a cervical dystonia patient who failed selective peripheral denervation: A case report and literature review

Background:

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a rare and difficult-to-treat disorder. Various neurosurgical options are available, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. We investigated using the modified McKenzie-Dandy operation for a patient with CD who failed selective peripheral denervation (SPD).

Case Description:

A 42-year-old man presented left-sided rotational torticollis for 3 years. He was referred for surgery after treating with a variety of oral medications and repeated botulinum toxin injections that became ineffective. For the first operation, the patient underwent SPD (modified Bertrand’s operation); unfortunately, the postoperative outcome was unsatisfactory, and the operation was considered a failure. After his symptoms did not improve after 6 months, the modified McKenzie-Dandy operation was performed. Immediately following surgery, he experienced satisfactory outcomes. He was able to resume his normal activities and employment after 1 month after recovering from his temporary swallowing difficulties. He only complained of minor neck pain and no recurrence was observed after 3 years follow-up.

Conclusion:

For patients who have failed SPD, a modified McKenzie-Dandy procedure is a feasible and effective option. The procedure is relatively safe when performed properly, and the long-term effects can be maintained.

Unilateral pallidotomy as a potential rescue therapy for cervical dystonia after unsatisfactory selective peripheral denervation

OBJECTIVE

Selective peripheral denervation (SPD) is a widely accepted surgery for medically refractory cervical dystonia (CD), but when SPD has failed, the available approaches are limited. The authors investigated the results from a cohort of CD patients treated with unilateral pallidotomy after unsatisfactory SPD.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed patients with primary CD who underwent unilateral pallidotomy after SPD between April 2007 and August 2019. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was used to evaluate symptom severity before surgery, 7 days postsurgery, 3 months postsurgery, and at the last follow-up. TWSTRS subscores for disability and pain and the 24-item Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) were used to assess quality of life.

RESULTS

At a mean final follow-up of 5 years, TWSTRS severity subscores and total scores were significantly improved (n = 12, mean improvement 57.3% and 62.3%, respectively, p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0022), and 8 of 12 patients (66.7%) were characterized as responders (improvement ≥ 25%). Patients with rotation symptoms before pallidotomy showed greater improvement in TWSTRS severity subscores than those who did not (p = 0.049). The most common adverse event was mild upper-limb weakness (n = 3). Patients' quality of life was also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral pallidotomy seems to offer an effective and safe option for patients with CD who have otherwise experienced limited benefits from SPD.

Selective Cervical Denervation for Cervical Dystonia: Modification of the Bertrand Procedure

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia, commonly referred to as spasmodic torticollis, is a neurological disorder characterized by aberrant, involuntary contraction of the muscles of the neck and shoulders. One surgical option that can be considered is selective cervical denervation.

OBJECTIVE

To report our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation.

METHODS

Our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation is reported with intraoperative photographs and schematic depictions of the operative steps.

RESULTS

We report our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation, which consists of a combination of C2-6 denervation, myectomy of the splenius capitis and/or semispinalis capitis, myotomy of the levator scapulae when indicated, and myotomy and selection denervation of the sternocleidomastoid. The combination of techniques utilized depends on the subtype and severity of cervical dystonia.

CONCLUSION

Our modification of the original Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation represents an alternative surgical strategy for the treatment of cervical dystonia, with the potential advantages and disadvantages discussed.

Deep Brain Stimulation Versus Peripheral Denervation for Cervical Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia is a disabling medical condition that drastically decreases quality of life. Surgical treatment consists of peripheral nerve denervation procedures with or without myectomies or deep brain stimulation (DBS). The current objective was to compare the efficacy of peripheral denervation versus DBS in improving the severity of cervical dystonia through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Preoperative and postoperative Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total scores were used to generate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were combined in a random-effects model. Both mean percentage and absolute reduction in TWSTRS scores were calculated. Absolute reduction was used for forest plots.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 870 patients with 180 (21%) undergoing DBS and 690 (79%) undergoing peripheral denervation procedures. The mean follow-up time was 31.5 months (range, 12-38 months). In assessing the efficacy of each intervention, forest plots revealed significant absolute reduction in total postoperative TWSTRS scores for both peripheral denervation (standardized mean difference 1.54; 95% CI 1.42-1.66) and DBS (standardized mean difference 2.07; 95% CI 1.43-2.71). On subgroup analysis, DBS therapy was significantly associated with improvement in postoperative TWSTRS severity (standardized mean difference 2.08; 95% CI 1.66-2.50) and disability (standardized mean difference 2.12; 95% CI 1.57-2.68) but not pain (standardized mean difference 1.18; 95% CI 0.80-1.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Both peripheral denervation and DBS are associated with a significant reduction in absolute TWSTRS total score, with no significant difference in the magnitude of reduction observed between the 2 treatments. Further comparative data are needed to better evaluate the long-term results of both interventions.

Comparison of 2 Operative Methods for Treating Laterocollis and Torticollis Subtypes of Spasmodic Torticollis: Follow-Up of 121 Cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects and complications of microvascular decompression (MVD) and neurectomy of spinal accessory nerve in the treatment of laterocollis and torticollis subtypes spasmodic torticollis (ST).

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 121 patients with laterocollis and torticollis subtypes of ST from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2016. Among all the patients, 80 were treated by MVD and 41 were treated by neurectomy of spinal accessory nerve. The effect of the surgery was evaluated by the reduction in the Toronto Western spasmodic torticollis rating scale total scores before and after the operation. The mean duration of the postoperative follow-up period was 18.7 months (range, 12-27 months).

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the Toronto Western spasmodic torticollis rating scale total score in the MVD group and in the neurectomy group was lowered by 50.43% ± 20.3% and 30.23% ± 19.4%, respectively, compared with the preoperative status (P < 0.05). In the MVD group, 25 (31.25%) patients achieved excellent relief, 44 (55%) patients improved moderate spasm, and 11 (13.75%) showed no relief. In the neurectomy group, 6 (14.63%) patients improved with excellent outcome, 7 (17.07%) had moderate relief, and 28 (68.29%) had no relief. There was no mortality or severe complication postoperatively, with the exception of hoarseness, shoulder numbness, and weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

MVD for ST of laterocollis and torticollis subtypes can provide satisfactory and lasting improvements without nerve impairment. MVD is to be preferred to neurectomy of accessory nerve in treating ST of laterocollis and torticollis subtypes.

Different clinical course of pallidal deep brain stimulation for phasic- and tonic-type cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

Dystonia has been treated well using deep brain stimulation at the globus pallidus internus (GPi DBS). Dystonia can be categorized as two basic types of movement, phasic-type and tonic-type. Cervical dystonia is the most common type of focal dystonia, and sequential differences in clinical outcomes between phasic-type and tonic-type cervical dystonia have not been reported.

METHODS

This study included a retrospective cohort of 30 patients with primary cervical dystonia who underwent GPi DBS. Age, disease duration, dystonia direction, movement types, employment status, relevant life events, and neuropsychological examinations were analyzed with respect to clinical outcomes following GPi DBS.

RESULTS

The only significant factor affecting clinical outcomes was movement type (phasic or tonic). Sequential changes in clinical outcomes showed significant differences between phasic- and tonic-type cervical dystonia. A delayed benefit was found in both phasic- and tonic-type dystonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcome of phasic-type cervical dystonia is more favorable than that of tonic-type cervical dystonia following GPi DBS.