Distal transsylvian keyhole approach for unruptured anterior circulation small aneurysms

Linear Scalp Incision in Brain Tumor Surgery: Intraoperative and Postoperative Considerations

BACKGROUND

Although the linear scalp incision is commonly used in neurosurgical practice, a systematic study elucidating its pros and cons in a specific surgical setting is lacking. Herein, we analyzed our experience with linear scalp incision in brain tumor surgery and the impact on intraoperative variables and postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients undergoing brain tumor surgery (January 2014-December 2021) at 2 neurosurgical departments were included and divided into 2 groups: linear or flap scalp incision. Patients' demographics characteristics, surgical variables, and wound-related complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

More than a total of 1036 craniotomies, linear incision (mean length 6cm) was adopted in 282 procedures (27.2%). Mean maximum diameter of the craniotomy was 5.25 cm, with no statistical difference between the 2 groups. In emergency surgery (36 cases), the linear and flap incisions were used indifferently. Linear incision was predominant in supratentorial and suboccipital lesions. Flap incision was significantly more frequent among meningiomas (P < 0.01). Neuronavigation, operative microscope, and subgaleal drain were more frequently used in the flap scalp incision group (P = 0.01). Overall complication rate was comparable to flap scalp opening (P = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the linear incision was broadly applied for the removal of supratentorial and suboccipital tumors granting adequate surgical exposure with a low rate of postoperative complications. Tumors skull base localization resulted the only factor hindering the use of the linear incision. The choice of 1 incision over another didn't show to have any impact on intraoperative and postoperative variables, and it remains mainly based on surgeon expertise/preference.

'What's in a name', a systematic review of the pterional craniotomy for aneurysm surgery and its many modifications with a proposal for simplified nomenclature

BACKGROUND

The pterional or frontosphenotemporal craniotomy has stood the test of time and continues to be a commonly used method of managing a variety of neurosurgical pathology. Already described in the beginning of the twentieth century and perfected by Yasargil in the 1970s, it has seen many modifications. These modifications have been a normal evolution for most neurosurgeons, tailoring the craniotomy to the patients' specific anatomy and pathology. Nonetheless, an abundance of variations have appeared in the literature.

METHODS

A search strategy was devised according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. To identify articles investigating the variations in the pterional approach, the following search terms were applied: (pterional OR minipterional OR supraorbital) AND (approach OR craniotomy OR technique).

RESULTS

In total, 3552 articles were screened with 74 articles being read in full with 47 articles being included for review. Each article was examined according the name of the technique, temporalis dissection technique, craniotomy technique and approach.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review gives an overview of the different techniques and modifications to the pterional craniotomy since it was initially described. We advocate for the use of a more standardised nomenclature that focuses on the target zone to simplify the management approach to supratentorial aneurysms.

MISIAN (Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms): A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Clinical Trial With Long-Term Follow-Up Comparing Different Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques with Standard Open Surgery

BACKGROUND

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly diagnosed but treatment is still controversial. Although the descriptions and use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have increased, comparative studies with standard approaches are rare.

OBJECTIVE

MISIAN (Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms) is a prospective randomized single-center clinical trial with long-term follow-up comparing different MIS techniques with standard open surgery for treatment of UIAs.

METHODS

We randomly allocated a standard pterional approach (PtA) or MIS (1:2) to 111 patients with UIAs of the anterior circulation (mean dome diameter, 6.4 mm; range, 3-20 mm). Patients selected for MIS underwent a second randomization between a transeyelid approach (TelA) or nanopterional approach (NPtA) (1:1).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were randomized to and treated with the PtA, 36 with the TelA, and 34 with the NPtA. Only patients treated with PtA had permanent facial nerve palsy (n = 4 [10%]; P = 0.032). MIS cosmetic results were considered better than those of PtA by independent observers (P < 0.001), and less temporal atrophy in the MIS group was also observed (P = 0.0034). The proportion of excellent results was higher in the TelA group than in the NPtA group (86% vs. 67.6%; P = 0.039). Patients undergoing MIS also reported consistently higher satisfaction and quality-of-life scores (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS is superior to standard PtA for microsurgical clipping of small UIAs of the anterior circulation in terms of cosmetic, satisfaction, and quality-of-life outcomes. The TelA or NPtA for UIAs did not show significant outcome differences at 12-18 months.