A counterforce to diversion of cerebrospinal fluid during ventriculoperitoneal shunting: the intraperitoneal pressure. An observational study

Chronic Pleural Effusion in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt due to Diaphragmatic CSF Fistula: Report of a Case Treated by Endoscopic Choroid Plexus Coagulation and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pleural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) effusion is a rare complication after ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion and only 18 cases in children and adults have been described so far without catheter dislocation to the intrathoracic cavity.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report on a 4-year-old girl with a complex history of underlying neurogenetic disorder, a hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after influenza A infection with septic shock and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, followed by meningitis at the age of 10 months. In consequence, she developed a severe cerebral atrophy and post-meningitic hydrocephalus requiring placement of a VP shunt. At age 4, she was admitted with community-acquired mycoplasma pneumonia and developed increasing pleural effusions leading to severe respiratory distress and requiring continuous chest tube drainage (up to 1,000-1,400 mL/day) that could not be weaned. β trace protein, in CSF present at concentrations >6 mg/L, was found in the pleural fluid at low concentrations of 2.7 mg/L. An abdomino-thoracic CSF fistula was finally proven by single photon emission computerized tomography combined with low-dose computer tomography. After shunt externalization, the pleural effusion stopped and the chest tube was removed. CSF production rate remains high above 500 mL/24 h. An atrial CSF shunt could not be placed, since a hemodynamically relevant atrial septum defect with frail circulatory balance would not have tolerated the large CSF volumes. Therefore, she underwent a total bilateral endoscopic choroid plexus laser coagulation (CPC) within the lateral ventricles via bi-occipital burr holes. Postoperatively CSF production rate went close to 0 mL and after external ventricular drain removal no signs and symptoms of hydrocephalus developed during a follow-up of now 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

In summary, pleural effusions in patients with VP shunt can rarely be caused by an abdomino-thoracic fistula, with non-elevated β-trace protein in the pleural fluid. The majority of reported cases in literature were treated by ventriculoatrial shunt. This is the 2nd reported case, which has been successfully treated by radical CPC alone including the temporal horn choroid plexus, making the child shunt independent.

In vitro performance of combinations of anti-siphon devices with differential pressure valves in relation to the spatial position

BACKGROUND

Programmable differential pressure (DP) valves combined with an anti-siphon device (ASD) represent the current standard of care in preemtping overdrainage associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunting for hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide comparative data of four combinations of two ASDs of different working principles in combination with two DP valves in an in vitro model in order to achieve a better understanding of the flow characteristics and potential clinical application.

METHODS

We analyzed the flow performance of four possible combinations of two DP valves (CHPV [HM]; proGAV 2.0[PG]) in combination with either a gravity-regulated (Shuntassistant [SA]) or a flow-regulated (SiphonGuard [SG]) ASD in an in vitro setup. A DP between 4 and 60 cmH₂O was generated, and the specific flow characteristics were measured. In addition, the two combinations with gravity-regulated ASDs were measured in defined spatial positions.

RESULTS

Flow characteristics of the SA combinations corresponded to the DP in linear fashion and to the spatial position. Flow characteristics of the SG combinations were dependent upon the DP in a non-linear fashion and independent of the spatial position. Highest mean flow rate of the PG-SG- (HM-SG-) combination was 1.41 ± 0.24 ml/min (1.16 ± 0.06 ml/min). The mean flow rates sharply decreased with increasing inflow pressure and subsequently increased slowly up to 0.82 ± 0.26 ml/min (0.77 ± 0.08 ml/min).

CONCLUSION

All tested device combinations were able to control hydrostatic effect and prevent consecutive excessive flow, to varying degrees. However, significant differences in flow characteristics can be seen, which might be relevant for their clinical application.