1
|
Helbok R, Rass V, Beghi E, Bodien YG, Citerio G, Giacino JT, Kondziella D, Mayer SA, Menon D, Sharshar T, Stevens RD, Ulmer H, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Vespa P, McNett M, Frontera J. The Curing Coma Campaign International Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy (COME TOGETHER). Neurocrit Care 2022; 37:47-59. [PMID: 35141860 PMCID: PMC9283177 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Although coma is commonly encountered in critical care, worldwide variability exists in diagnosis and management practices. We aimed to assess variability in coma definitions, etiologies, treatment strategies, and attitudes toward prognosis. Methods As part of the Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign, between September 2020 and January 2021, we conducted an anonymous, international, cross-sectional global survey of health care professionals caring for patients with coma and disorders of consciousness in the acute, subacute, or chronic setting. Survey responses were solicited by sequential emails distributed by international neuroscience societies and social media. Fleiss κ values were calculated to assess agreement among respondents. Results The survey was completed by 258 health care professionals from 41 countries. Respondents predominantly were physicians (n = 213, 83%), were from the United States (n = 141, 55%), and represented academic centers (n = 231, 90%). Among eight predefined items, respondents identified the following cardinal features, in various combinations, that must be present to define coma: absence of wakefulness (81%, κ = 0.764); Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8 (64%, κ = 0.588); failure to respond purposefully to visual, verbal, or tactile stimuli (60%, κ = 0.552); and inability to follow commands (58%, κ = 0.529). Reported etiologies of coma encountered included medically induced coma (24%), traumatic brain injury (24%), intracerebral hemorrhage (21%), and cardiac arrest/hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (11%). The most common clinical assessment tools used for coma included the GCS (94%) and neurological examination (78%). Sixty-six percent of respondents routinely performed sedation interruption, in the absence of contraindications, for clinical coma assessments in the intensive care unit. Advanced neurological assessment techniques in comatose patients included quantitative electroencephalography (EEG)/connectivity analysis (16%), functional magnetic resonance imaging (7%), single-photon emission computerized tomography (6%), positron emission tomography (4%), invasive EEG (4%), and cerebral microdialysis (4%). The most commonly used neurostimulants included amantadine (51%), modafinil (37%), and methylphenidate (28%). The leading determinants for prognostication included etiology of coma, neurological examination findings, and neuroimaging. Fewer than 20% of respondents reported routine follow-up of coma survivors after hospital discharge; however, 86% indicated interest in future research initiatives that include postdischarge outcomes at six (85%) and 12 months (65%). Conclusions There is wide heterogeneity among health care professionals regarding the clinical definition of coma and limited routine use of advanced coma assessment techniques in acute care settings. Coma management practices vary across sites, and mechanisms for coordinated and sustained follow-up after acute treatment are inconsistent. There is an urgent need for the development of evidence-based guidelines and a collaborative, coordinated approach to advance both the science and the practice of coma management globally. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ettore Beghi
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- Neuro-Intensive Care, ASST Di Monza, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neuro-Intensive Care Medicine, Sainte-Anne Hospital, University of Paris, GHU-Psychiatry & Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Robert D Stevens
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hanno Ulmer
- Director Department of Medical Statistic, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao
- Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Vespa
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Frontera
- Department of Neurology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Early Goal-directed Therapy During Endovascular Coiling Procedures Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2022; 34:35-43. [PMID: 32496448 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintenance of euvolemia and cerebral perfusion are recommended for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We conducted a pilot randomized controlled study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of goal-directed therapy (GDT) to correct fluid and hemodynamic derangements during endovascular coiling in patients with aSAH. METHODS This study was conducted between November 2015 and February 2019 at a single tertiary center in Canada. Adult patients with aSAH within 5 days of aneurysm rupture were randomly assigned to receive either GDT or standard therapy during endovascular coiling. The incidence of dehydration at presentation and the efficacy of GDT were evaluated. RESULTS Forty patients were allocated to receive GDT (n=21) or standard therapy (n=19). Sixty percent of all patients were found to have dehydration before the coiling procedure commenced. Compared with standard therapy, GDT reduced the duration of intraoperative hypovolemia (mean difference 37.6 [95% confidence interval, 6.2-37.4] min, P=0.006) and low cardiac index (mean difference 30.7 [95% confidence interval, 9.5-56.9] min, P=0.035). There were no differences between the 2 treatment groups with respect to the incidence of vasospasm, stroke, death, and other complications up to postoperative day 90. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of aSAH patients presented at the coiling procedure with dehydration and a low cardiac output state; these derangements were more likely to be corrected if the GDT algorithm was used. Compared with standard therapy, use of the GDT algorithm resulted in earlier recognition and more consistent treatment of dehydration and hemodynamic derangement during endovascular coiling.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao J, Xuan NX, Cui W, Tian BP. Neurogenic pulmonary edema following acute stroke: The progress and perspective. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 130:110478. [PMID: 32739737 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) following acute stroke is an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with clinical characteristics that include acute onset, apparent pulmonary interstitial fluid infiltration and rapid resolution. The pathological process of NPE centers on sympathetic stimulation and fulminant release of catecholamines, which cause contraction of resistance vessels. Elevated systemic resistance forces fluid into pulmonary circulation, while pulmonary circulation overload induces pulmonary capillary pressure that elevates, and in turn damages the alveolar capillary barrier. Damage to the alveolar capillary barrier leads to pulmonary ventilation disorder, blood perfusion disorder and oxygenation disorder. Eventually, NPE will cause post-stroke patients' prognosis to further deteriorate. At present, we lack specific biological diagnostic indicators and a meticulously unified diagnostic criterion, and this results in a situation in which many patients are not recognized quickly and/or diagnosed accurately. There are no drugs that are effective against NPE. Therefore, understanding how to diagnose NPE early by identifying the risk factors and how to apply appropriate treatment to avoid a deteriorating prognosis are important scientific goals. We will elaborate the progress of NPE after acute stroke in terms of its pathophysiological mechanisms, etiology, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis and early prediction, comprehensive treatment strategies, and novel drug development. We also propose our own thinking and prospects regarding NPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Nan-Xia Xuan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Wei Cui
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Bao-Ping Tian
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.
| |
Collapse
|