Enhanced recovery and accelerated discharge after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: safety, patient feedback, and cost implications

Enhanced recovery after endoscopic sinus surgery: Establishing comprehensive protocols for improvement of perioperative patient care

Objectives

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have not been widely implemented, and a critical review of ERAS recommendations and a comprehensive analysis of the supporting literature has not been undertaken. We describe an ESS ERAS protocol including key perioperative interventions for patients undergoing ESS and assess the available evidence.

Data Sources

A search was conducted of all relevant ERAS literature in otorhinolaryngology, anesthesia, and surgery using Medline (via PubMed), and Scopus. Keywords included "endoscopic sinus surgery," "sinus surgery," "FESS," and "ESS" for each area of intervention. Where applicable, the authors considered high-level evidence for recommendations devised for patient cohorts in otorhinolaryngology not undergoing ESS, as well as cohorts undergoing surgical procedures for which ERAS protocols have been extensively evaluated.

Methods

Studies received grades of "low," "moderate," or "high" quality evidence based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Each intervention was subsequently assigned a grade of "strong," "weak," or "conditional" based on the available evidence.

Results

Strong recommendations include comprehensive patient education and counseling, minimization of preoperative fasting, application of topical/local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors, use of total intravenous anesthesia, avoidance of pharyngeal packing, and use of postoperative nasal irrigation and multimodal analgesia. Conditional recommendations include antibiotic prophylaxis. Weak recommendations include perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, controlled hypotension, and use of postoperative nasal packing/dressing.

Conclusion

A comprehensive ERAS protocol for ESS can include a variety of high yield, evidence-based interventions that would likely improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Factors Associated With 30-Day Readmissions After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

PURPOSE

Determine the association between clinical and demographic factors and 30-day readmission risk after pituitary surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pituitary surgery between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were extracted from a converged electronic health record that included surgeries performed at the Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest campuses of the same healthcare Enterprise. Variables were compared between patients with 30-day readmission following discharge after pituitary surgery (N = 83) and a randomly sampled patient cohort with pituitary surgery but no readmission within 30 days (N = 174).

RESULTS

In a multivariable regression model looking at the relationship between patient characteristics and readmission risk, every increase in the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group score resulted in a nearly 2.3-fold increase in the risk of readmission (OR = 2.335, 95% CI 1.050, 5.562, P = .045). The presence of arginine vasopressin deficiency increased the odds of readmission by more than 2-fold (OR = 2.784, 95% CI 1.118, 7.124, P = .029). The Midwest site was observed to have a nearly 67% decrease in readmission risk compared to the Southwest site (OR = 0.334, 95% CI 0.134, 0.813, P = .016), with the Southeast site being comparable to the Southwest.

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies postoperative arginine vasopressin deficiency, greater co-morbidities, and geographic location as risk factors for 30-day readmission after pituitary surgery. Further investigation is required to determine how site-specific care processes can be adopted to lower readmission risk at other locations in the same healthcare enterprise.

Combined Endonasal and Transseptal Approach to Achieve Binostril Access in Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches to Minimize Nasal Morbidity: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic endonasal approaches have become well established, and focus has now shifted to minimizing nasal morbidity. To this end, several modifications in the nasal stage have been described that focus primarily on preservation of nasal mucosa on right side of the nasal cavity. However, nasal mucosal preservation on the left side of the nasal cavity has largely been ignored. This technical note describes a modified technique that can eliminate mucosal damage in the left nasal cavity.

METHODS

A transseptal approach is used on the left, and an endonasal approach is used on the right side. A hemitransfixion incision is used to raise the left submucosal tunnel. The mucosa of the tunnel lies laterally in apposition with the lateral nasal wall, thereby protecting it from injury by repeated passage of instruments. When the tunnel mucosa is pushed back medially, the left nasal cavity appears absolutely normal without any evidence of mucosal damage.

RESULTS

Combined endonasal and transseptal technique for the nasal stage was performed in 51 patients with sellar/suprasellar lesions. Nonfunctional pituitary adenomas were the most common pathology (macroadenomas: n = 14; giant adenomas: n = 10) followed by functional adenomas (acromegaly: n = 10; prolactinomas: n = 3; Cushing disease: n = 1), craniopharyngiomas (n = 6), clival tumors (n = 5), and tuberculum sellae meningiomas (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of endonasal and transseptal approaches uses the advantages of both endoscopic and microscopic approaches sans the disadvantage of restricted space seen in microscopic approaches. It makes the binostril approach least disruptive to the left nasal mucosa and thus can reduce overall morbidity of endoscopic endonasal approaches.

Video-Based Performance Analysis in Pituitary Surgery-Part 1: Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery has a steep learning curve, with varying surgical techniques and outcomes across centers. In other surgeries, superior performance is linked with superior surgical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the prediction of patient-specific outcomes using surgical video analysis in pituitary surgery.

METHODS

Endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery videos from a single center were annotated by experts for operative workflow (3 surgical phases and 15 surgical steps) and operative skill (using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills [mOSATS]). Quantitative workflow metrics were calculated, including phase duration and step transitions. Poisson or logistic regression was used to assess the association of workflow metrics and mOSATS with common inpatient surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

100 videos from 100 patients were included. Nasal phase mean duration was 24 minutes and mean mOSATS was 21.2/30. Mean duration was 34 minutes and mean mOSATS was 20.9/30 for the sellar phase, and 11 minutes and 21.7/30, respectively, for the closure phase. The most common adverse outcomes were new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency (n = 26), dysnatremia (n = 24), and cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 5). Higher mOSATS for all 3 phases and shorter operation duration were associated with decreased length of stay (P = 0.003 &P < 0.001). Superior closure phase mOSATS were associated with reduced postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (P < 0.001), and superior sellar phase mOSATS were associated with reduced postoperative visual deterioration (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Superior surgical skill and shorter surgical time were associated with superior surgical outcomes, at a generic and phase-specific level. Such video-based analysis has promise for integration into data-driven training and service improvement initiatives.

Long term results with medpor® reconstruction of the anterior skull base at a single institute

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a technique of multi-layered CSF repair following endonasal anterior skull base surgery using medpor graft.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of consecutive case series from a single centre.

SUBJECTS

68 cases of repair of CSF leaks utilising medpor identified from a larger prospectively maintained database of endonasal endoscopic procedures at our centre.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a database of consecutive anterior skull base cases from 2016-2022, and further data collection from electronic hospital records.

RESULTS

During follow up there were 7 cases of post-op CSF leak (10.3%). There were no radiological complications, and no cases of medpor removal or extrusion. Rates of infection were low, there were 3 (4.4%) cases of confirmed bacterial meningitis within our cohort. The mean length of stay was 4.7 days (median 3 days), with 16 cases discharged on the first post-operative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience of using medpor in anterior skull base reconstruction demonstrates that medpor is a readily available, easily handled, and reliable graft option with relatively low rates of infection and post-op CSF leak. Its use reduces the use of autologous graft materials and the associated donor site morbidity. Our long term follow up data further demonstrates the safety and efficacy of this technique.

Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for the Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prime Candidate for a Shortened Length of Stay Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative model of care aimed at optimizing postoperative rehabilitation and reducing hospital length of stay (LOS). Decreasing LOS avoids hospital-acquired complications, reduces cost of care, and improves patient satisfaction. Given the lack of ERAS protocols for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) resection of pituitary adenomas, a systematic review of EETS was performed to compile patient outcomes and analyze factors that may lead to increased LOS, reoperation, and readmission rates with the intention to contribute to the development of a successful ERAS protocol for EETS.

METHODS

The authors performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines-based systematic review of the literature. Information was extracted regarding patient LOS, surgery complications, and readmission/reoperation rates. Pearson's correlations to LOS and reoperation/readmission rates were performed with variables normalized to the number of participants. Statistical significance was set at P value <0.05.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, consisting of 2083 patients. The most common complications were cerebrospinal fluid leaks (37%) and postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) (9%). Transient DI was significantly correlated with shorter LOS. Functional pituitary adenomas were significantly correlated with lower readmission rates while nonfunctional pituitary adenomas were correlated with higher readmission rates. No other factor was found to be significantly correlated with a change in LOS or reoperation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

EETS may be an ideal candidate for the development of ERAS cranial protocols. While our data largely supports the safe implementation of shortened LOS protocols in EETS, our findings highlight the importance of transient DI and nonfunctional pituitary adenomas management when formulating ERAS protocols.

Exploring the influence of nasal morbidity on quality of life following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients

The endoscopic endonasal approach is more disruptive to normal anatomy (particularly nasal mucosa) than the transseptal submucosal microscopic approach. This may result in greater postoperative nasal morbidity, in turn reducing quality of life. We aimed to assess the severity and time course of nasal morbidity, and its impact on quality of life, following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in this retrospective cohort study. We identified 95 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for anterior skull base pathologies. Nasal-specific questions from the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the Anterior Skull Base inventory (ASB-12) were combined with quality-of-life questions. Patient demographics, diagnosis, and operative data were collected from electronic records. Age of the cohort ranged from 14-83 years. Time elapsed since surgery ranged from 3-85 months. 85/95 (89%) felt that nasal morbidity associated with surgery was acceptable, given the underlying reason for, and outcome of surgery; 10/95 (11%) did not. 71/95 (75%) reported no change or improvement in olfaction 3-months following surgery. 24/95 (25%) reported a deterioration in olfaction which was mild in 7%, moderate in 7%, and severe in 11%. Nasal crusting, nasal obstruction, and headache were moderately problematic symptoms but improved significantly by 3-month follow-up. Nasal discharge, nasal pain, and nasal whistling were mildly problematic and improved significantly by 3-months. 62/95 (65%) patients reported 'no change' in day-to-day activities due to the effects on their nose after surgery. 19/95 (20%) had 'mild inconvenience', 8/95 (8%) 'moderate inconvenience' and 6/95 (6%) 'severe inconvenience'. Endoscopic anterior skull base surgery is associated with nasal morbidity. Whilst 35% of patients appreciate a consequent negative impact on day-to-day life, the overwhelming majority feel that nasal morbidity is acceptable, given the wider surgical goals.

Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program in neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines have been proven to simplify postoperative care and improve recovery in several surgical disciplines. The authors set out to create and launch an ERAS® program for cranial neurosurgery that meets official ERAS® Society standards. The authors summarize the successive steps taken to achieve this goal in two specific neurosurgical conditions and describe the challenges they faced.

METHODS

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (Pit-NET) resected by a transsphenoidal approach and craniosynostosis (Cs) repair were selected as appropriate targets for the implementation of ERAS® program in the Department of Neurosurgery. A multidisciplinary team with experience in managing these pathologies was created. A specialized ERAS® nurse coordinator was hired. An ERAS® certification process was performed involving 4 seminars separated by 3 active phases under the supervision of an ERAS® coach.

RESULTS

The ERAS® Pit-NET team included 8 active members. The ERAS® Cs team included 12 active members. Through the ERAS® certification process, areas for improvement were identified, local protocols were written, and the ERAS® program was implemented. Patient-centered strategies were developed to increase compliance with the ERAS® protocols. A prospective database was designed for ongoing program evaluation. Certification was achieved in 18 months. Direct costs and time requirements are reported.

CONCLUSION

Successful ERAS® certification requires a committed multidisciplinary team, an ERAS® coach, and a dedicated nurse coordinator.

Current and Future Advances in Surgical Therapy for Pituitary Adenoma

The vital physiological role of the pituitary gland, alongside its proximity to critical neurovascular structures, means that pituitary adenomas can cause significant morbidity or mortality. While enormous advancements have been made in the surgical care of pituitary adenomas, numerous challenges remain, such as treatment failure and recurrence. To meet these clinical challenges, there has been an enormous expansion of novel medical technologies (eg, endoscopy, advanced imaging, artificial intelligence). These innovations have the potential to benefit each step of the patient's journey, and ultimately, drive improved outcomes. Earlier and more accurate diagnosis addresses this in part. Analysis of novel patient data sets, such as automated facial analysis or natural language processing of medical records holds potential in achieving an earlier diagnosis. After diagnosis, treatment decision-making and planning will benefit from radiomics and multimodal machine learning models. Surgical safety and effectiveness will be transformed by smart simulation methods for trainees. Next-generation imaging techniques and augmented reality will enhance surgical planning and intraoperative navigation. Similarly, surgical abilities will be augmented by the future operative armamentarium, including advanced optical devices, smart instruments, and surgical robotics. Intraoperative support to surgical team members will benefit from a data science approach, utilizing machine learning analysis of operative videos to improve patient safety and orientate team members to a common workflow. Postoperatively, neural networks leveraging multimodal datasets will allow early detection of individuals at risk of complications and assist in the prediction of treatment failure, thus supporting patient-specific discharge and monitoring protocols. While these advancements in pituitary surgery hold promise to enhance the quality of care, clinicians must be the gatekeepers of the translation of such technologies, ensuring systematic assessment of risk and benefit prior to clinical implementation. In doing so, the synergy between these innovations can be leveraged to drive improved outcomes for patients of the future.

Correlation of Pituitary Descent and Diabetes Insipidus After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Macroadenoma Resection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery remains the technique of choice for resection of pituitary adenoma. Postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) is most often transient and observed in 1.6% to 34% of patients, whereas permanent DI has been reported in 0% to 2.7% of patients. The proposed mechanism was the transduction of traction forces exerted by the surgeon on the descended diaphragma sellae and through the pituitary stalk.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify and correlate the degree of pituitary gland descent with postoperative DI.

METHODS

Of 374 patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary adenoma between 2010 and 2020 at our institution, we report a cohort of 30 patients (Group A) DI. We also report a matched cohort by tumor volume of 30 patients who did not develop DI (Group B). We quantified the tension on the pituitary stalk by calculating pituitary descent interval (PDI) by comparing preoperative and postoperative position of the pituitary gland and using Pythagoras' formula where , with craniocaudal (CC) and anterior-posterior (AP) representing measurements of pituitary translation in respective directions after resection.

RESULTS

Patients who developed DI had significantly greater pituitary gland translations in the craniocaudal (23.0 vs 16.3 mm, P = .0015) and anteroposterior (2.4 vs 1.5 mm, P = .0168) directions. Furthermore, Group A had a statistically greater PDI, which was associated with development of DI (23.2 vs 16.6 mm, P = .0017).

CONCLUSION

We were able to quantify pituitary descent and subsequent tension on the pituitary stalk, while also associating it with development of postoperative DI after pituitary adenoma resection.

Time taken to resume activities of daily living after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors

Postoperative management after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is important; however, the guidelines for resuming daily activities after TSS are insufficient. This study aimed to examine the time to return to activities of daily living (ADL) after TSS for pituitary tumors. A 4-month prospective data collection was completed for 114 of 117 patients who underwent TSS for pituitary tumors from April to July 2021. The time when the patient returned to ADL after surgery was measured using the self-recording sheet. More than 97% and 92% of the patients returned within 1 month (median: within 7 days) for the elements of basic ADL and within 2 months (median: within 15 days) for the elements of instrumental ADL, excluding a few. Notably, 73.3% of patients returned to work within 4 months. The median time for the activities included 64 days for washing hair head down, 44 days for blowing nose, 59 days for lifting heavy objects, and 102 days for sexual activity. For patients who received extended-TSS or had postoperative problems, the time to return was delayed. Based on these results, it will be possible to provide practical information and guidelines on the time to return to ADL after TSS in pituitary tumor patients.

Hospital Frailty Risk Score Predicts Adverse Events and Readmission Following a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) on unplanned readmission and health care resource utilization in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients undergoing a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database. All NPH patients (≥60 years) undergoing a VP shunt surgery were identified using ICD-10-CM diagnostic and procedural codes. Patients were dichotomized into 2 cohorts as follows: Low HFRS (<5) and Intermediate-High HFRS (≥5). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to identify independent predictors of adverse event (AE) and 30- and 90-day readmission.

RESULTS

Of 13,262 patients, 4386 (33.1%) had an Intermediate-High HFRS score. A greater proportion of the Intermediate-High HFRS cohort experienced at least one AE (1.9 vs. 22.1, P < 0.001). The Intermediate-High HFRS cohort also had a longer length of stay (2.3 ± 2.4 days vs. 7.0 ± 7.7 days, P < 0.001), higher non-routine discharge rate (19.9% vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001), and greater admission cost ($14,634 ± 5703 vs. $21,749 ± 15,234, P < 0.001). The Intermediate-High HFRS cohort had higher rates of 30- (7.6% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (6.8% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001) readmissions. On a multivariate regression analysis, Intermediate-High HFRS compared to Low HFRS was an independent predictor of any AE (odds ratio, 16.6; 95% confidence interval, [12.9-21.5]; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, [1.2-1.7]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that frailty, as defined by HFRS, is associated with increased resource utilization in NPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. Furthermore, HFRS was an independent predictor of adverse events and 30-day hospital readmission.

Optimizing Perioperative Care in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify key recommendations for maximizing the efficiency and efficacy of perioperative care in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a comprehensive literature search of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols implemented for patients undergoing transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA); individual recommendations were abstracted, and the evidence base thoroughly reviewed.

RESULTS

The authors identified 19 individual recommendations pertinent to the care of patients undergoing TSA, which were subdivided into preoperative (n=6), intraoperative (n=6), and postoperative (n=7) interventions. Key factors recommended for minimizing length of stay, preventing readmission, and improving patient outcomes included comprehensive patient education, multidisciplinary evaluation, avoidance of routine lumbar drain placement and nasal packing, and rigorous postoperative monitoring of pituitary function and salt-water imbalances. The overall level of evidence for 7/19 (37%) implemented recommendations was found to be low, suggesting a need for continued research in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Several key interventions should be considered in the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for TSA, which may aid in further decreasing length of stay and promoting positive patient outcomes.

Integration of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing pituitary surgery

Evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs aim to improve patient outcomes and shorten hospital stays. The objective of this study is to describe the development, implementation, and evolution of an ERAS protocol to optimize the perioperative management for patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery for pituitary tumors. A systematic review of the literature was performed, best practices were discussed with stakeholders, and institutional guidelines were established and implemented. Key performance indicators (KPI) were measured and patient-reported outcome surveys were collected. The ERAS protocol was introduced successfully at our institution. We describe the process of initiation of the program and the perioperative management of our patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of integration of ERAS protocols for pituitary tumors with multidisciplinary engagement, with a particular emphasis on the use of data informatics and metrics to monitor outcomes. We expect that this approach will translate to improved quality of care for these often-complex patients.

Effects of a transsphenoidal surgery quality improvement program on patient outcomes and hospital financial performance

OBJECTIVE

A comprehensive quality improvement (QI) program aimed at all aspects of patient care after pituitary surgery was initiated at a single center. This initiative was guided by standard quality principles to improve patient outcomes and optimize healthcare value. The programmatic goal was to discharge most elective patients within 1 day after surgery, improve patient safety, and limit unplanned readmissions. The program is described, and its effect on patient outcomes and hospital financial performance over a 5-year period are investigated.

METHODS

Details of the patient care pathway are presented. Foundational elements of the QI program include evidence-based care pathways (e.g., for hyponatremia and pain), an in-house research program designed to fortify care pathways, patient education, expectation setting, multidisciplinary team care, standard order sets, high-touch postdischarge care, outcomes auditing, and a patient navigator, among other elements. Length of stay (LOS), outcome variability, 30-day unplanned readmissions, and hospital financial performance were identified as surrogate endpoints for healthcare value for the surgical epoch. To assess the effect of these protocols, all patients undergoing elective transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors and Rathke's cleft cysts between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 609 adult patients who underwent elective surgery by experienced pituitary surgeons were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and payer mix did not change significantly over the study period (p ≥ 0.10). The mean LOS was significantly shorter in 2019 versus 2015 (1.6 ± 1.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.2 midnights, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients discharged after 1 midnight was significantly higher in 2019 versus 2015 (75.4% vs 15.6%, p < 0.001). The 30-day unplanned hospital readmission rate decreased to 2.8% in 2019 from 8.3% in 2015. Per-patient hospital profit increased 71.3% ($10,613 ± $19,321 in 2015; $18,180 ± $21,930 in 2019), and the contribution margin increased 42.3% ($18,925 ± $19,236 in 2015; $26,939 ± $22,057 in 2019), while costs increased by only 3.4% ($18,829 ± $6611 in 2015; $19,469 ± $4291 in 2019).

CONCLUSIONS

After implementation of a comprehensive pituitary surgery QI program, patient outcomes significantly improved, outcome variability decreased, and hospital financial performance was enhanced. Future studies designed to evaluate disease remission, patient satisfaction, and how the surgeon learning curve may synergize with other quality efforts may provide additional context.

Complication avoidance protocols in endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a retrospective cohort study in 514 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of using consistent complication-avoidance protocols in patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery including techniques for avoiding anosmia, epistaxis, carotid artery injury, hypopituitarism, cerebrospinal fluid leaks and meningitis.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endoscopic adenoma resection from 2010 to 2020 were included. Primary outcomes included 90-day complication rates, gland function outcomes, reoperations, readmissions and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were extent of resection, short-term endocrine remission, vision recovery.

RESULTS

Of 514 patients, (mean age 51 ± 16 years; 78% macroadenomas, 19% prior surgery) major complications occurred in 18(3.5%) patients, most commonly CSF leak (9, 1.7%) and meningitis (4, 0.8%). In 14 of 18 patients, complications were deemed preventable. Four (0.8%) had complications with permanent sequelae (3 before 2016): one unexplained mortality, one stroke, one oculomotor nerve palsy, one oculoparesis. There were no internal carotid artery injuries, permanent visual worsening or permanent anosmia. New hypopituitarism occurred in 23/485(4.7%). Partial or complete hypopituitarism resolution occurred in 102/193(52.8%) patients. Median LOS was 2 days; 98.3% of patients were discharged home. Comparing 18 patients with major complications versus 496 without, median LOS was 7 versus 2 days, respectively p < 0.001. Readmissions occurred in 6%(31/535), mostly for hyponatremia (18/31). Gross total resection was achieved in 214/312(69%) endocrine-inactive adenomas; biochemical remission was achieved in 148/209(71%) endocrine-active adenomas. Visual field or acuity defects improved in 126/138(91.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that conformance to established protocols for endoscopic pituitary surgery may minimize complications, re-admissions and LOS while enhancing the likelihood of preserving gland function, although there remains opportunity for further improvements.

Systematic Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Cranial Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly being integrated in neurosurgical patient management. The full extent of ERAS in cranial surgery is not well studied. We performed a systematic review examining ERAS in cranial surgery patients to 1) identify the extent to which ERAS is integrated in cranial neurosurgical procedures and 2) assess effectiveness of ERAS interventions for patients undergoing these procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (CRD42020197187). Studies eligible for inclusion assessed patients undergoing any cranial surgical procedure using an ERAS or ERAS-like pathway, defined by ≥2 ERAS protocol elements per the ERAS Society's RECOvER Checklist and the recommendations of Hagan et al. 2016 (not including patient education, criteria for discharge, or tracking of postdischarge outcomes).

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in qualitative synthesis, 2 of which were randomized controlled trials. All studies showed a moderate risk of bias. The most common ERAS elements used were screening and/or optimization and formal discharge criteria. The least common ERAS elements used were fasting/carbohydrate loading and antithrombotic prophylaxis. Complication rates were similar in studies comparing ERAS with non-ERAS groups. ERAS interventions were associated with reduced length of stay, with comparable and/or improved patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS is a safe and potentially favorable perioperative pathway for select patients undergoing cranial surgery. Future studies of ERAS in cranial surgery patients should emphasize postoperative optimizations and patient-reported outcome measures as key features.

Anesthetic management during transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pituitary adenoma resections comprise a large proportion of intracranial tumor surgeries. This patient population is medically and physiologically complex and requires careful perioperative planning and management on the part of the anesthesiologist. This review will summarize anesthetic considerations for pre, intra, and postoperative management of patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

An endoscopic approach is favored for patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Hemodynamic monitoring is important to maintain cerebral perfusion and avoid risk of bleeding; however, 'controlled' hypotension may have adverse effects. Multimodal analgesia is effective for the management of postoperative pain and may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including respiratory depression and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

SUMMARY

Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is a preferred approach for the surgical management of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas with symptoms of mass effect and functioning adenomas that cannot be otherwise managed medically. Understanding tumor pathologies and systemic effects are essential for preoperative planning and providing safe anesthetic care during the perioperative period.

Neurosurgery perception of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are widespread in several fields, particularly general surgery, and attempt to deliver surgical care at a lower cost while also improving patient outcomes. However, few institutions have implemented ERAS protocols in neurosurgery. As such, a survey of neurosurgeons on the current state of ERAS in neurosurgery was conducted to provide insight on scaling the practice nationally. A 15-question survey was designed to assess the implementation of andsatisfaction with ERAS protocols at individual institutions. A total of 39 responses were collected from 38 unique institutions. 58.9%(N = 23) reported implementation of neurosurgical ERAS protocols. 52.1% (N = 12) of the responses were neurosurgeons at academic institutions withneurosurgical residency programs. Most neurosurgeons used ERAS protocolsfor spine cases (N = 23), with only 17.3% (N = 4) employing ERAS protocolsfor cranial cases. 69.5% (N = 16) of survey participants reported that thedesign and implementation of ERAS was a multidisciplinary effort acrossmany departments, including neurosurgery, anesthesia, and pharmacy.Decreased costs and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were reported tobe unanticipated benefits of ERAS implementation. Unanticipated challenges to implementation of new protocols included difficulties withelectronic medical record (EMR) integration, agreement of protocoldetails amongst stakeholders, uniform implementation of protocols by allneurosurgeons, and lack of adaptability by multidisciplinary staff. Meandepartment satisfaction with ERAS protocol implementation was 4.00 +/- 0.81 (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale.

Use of a Surgical Stepdown Protocol for Cost Reduction After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

No established standard of care currently exists for the postoperative management of patients with surgically resected pituitary adenomas. Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of a postoperative stepdown unit protocol for reducing patient cost.

METHODS

In 2018-2020, consecutive patients undergoing transsphenoidal microsurgical resection of sellar lesions were managed postoperatively in the full intensive care unit (ICU) or an ICU-based surgical stepdown unit based on preset criteria. Demographic variables, surgical outcomes, and patient costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (27 stepdown, 27 full ICU; no difference in age or sex) were identified. Stepdown patients were also compared with 634 historical control patients. The total hospital length of stay was no different among stepdown, ICU, and historical patients (4.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.9 ± 2.8 vs. 4.4 ± 4.3 days, respectively, P = 0.1). Overall costs were 12.5% less for stepdown patients (P = 0.01), a difference mainly driven by reduced facility utilization costs of -8.9% (P = 0.02). The morbidity and complication rates were similar in the stepdown and full ICU groups. Extrapolation of findings to historical patients suggested that ∼$225,000 could have been saved from 2011 to 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that use of a postoperative stepdown unit could result in a 12.5% savings for eligible patients undergoing treatment of pituitary tumors by shifting patients to a less acute unit without worsened surgical outcomes. Historical controls indicate that over half of all pituitary patients would be eligible. Further refinement of patient selection for less costly perioperative management may reduce cost burden for the health care system and patients.

Streamlining brain tumor surgery care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a reconsideration of surgical patient management in the setting of scarce resources and risk of viral transmission. Herein we assess the impact of implementing a protocol of more rigorous patient education, recovery room assessment for non-ICU admission, earlier mobilization and post-discharge communication for patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

A case-control retrospective review was undertaken at a community hospital with a dedicated neurosurgery and otolaryngology team using minimally invasive surgical techniques, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and early post-operative imaging protocols. All patients undergoing craniotomy or endoscopic endonasal removal of a brain, skull base or pituitary tumor were included during two non-overlapping periods: March 2019-January 2020 (pre-pandemic epoch) versus March 2020-January 2021 (pandemic epoch with streamlined care protocol implemented). Data collection included demographics, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, tumor pathology, and tumor resection and remission rates. Primary outcomes were ICU utilization and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were complications, readmissions and reoperations.

FINDINGS

Of 295 patients, 163 patients were treated pre-pandemic (58% women, mean age 53.2±16 years) and 132 were treated during the pandemic (52% women, mean age 52.3±17 years). From pre-pandemic to pandemic, ICU utilization decreased from 92(54%) to 43(29%) of operations (p<0.001) and hospital LOS≤1 day increased from 21(12.2%) to 60(41.4%), p<0.001, respectively. For craniotomy cohort, median LOS was 2 days for both epochs; median ICU LOS decreased from 1 to 0 days (p<0.001), ICU use decreased from 73(80%) to 29(33%),(p<0.001). For endonasal cohort, median LOS decreased from 2 to 1 days; median ICU LOS was 0 days for both epochs; (p<0.001). There were no differences pre-pandemic versus pandemic in ASA scores, resection/remission rates, readmissions or reoperations.

CONCLUSION

This experience suggests the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for implementing a brain tumor care protocol to facilitate safely decreasing ICU utilization and accelerating discharge home without an increase in complications, readmission or reoperations. More rigorous patient education, recovery room assessment for non-ICU admission, earlier mobilization and post-discharge communication, layered upon a foundation of minimally invasive surgery, TIVA anesthesia and early post-operative imaging are possible contributors to these favorable trends.

Application of and Clinical Research on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Perioperative Care of Patients With Supratentorial Tumors

PURPOSE

This study intends to explore the safety and effectiveness of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative care of patients with supratentorial tumors.

METHODS

A total of 151 supratentorial tumor patients were enrolled in this study, and they were divided into control group (n = 75) and observation group (n = 76) according to the random number table method. Patients in the control group received routine neurosurgery care, and patients in the observation group received enhanced recovery after surgery care. The incidence of perioperative complications, postoperative hospital stays, early postoperative eating time, catheter removal time, and time to get out of bed were observed for the two groups of patients, and the quality of postoperative recovery was evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the basic data of the two groups of patients, such as age, gender, lesion location, and condition (P>0.05), and they were comparable. The observation group's postoperative eating time, catheter removal time, and time to get out of bed were significantly earlier than those of the control group. Postoperative hospital stays and hospitalization expenses were less than those of the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Applying the ERAS concept to implement perioperative care for patients with supratentorial tumors is safe and effective. It can not only reduce after-surgical stress and accelerate postoperative recovery, but also shorten hospital stays and reduce hospital costs. It is worthy of clinical application.