Perineural spread to the brachial plexus: a focused review of proposed mechanisms and described pathologies

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Detecting the Perineural Spread of Head and Neck Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study was to review the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting perineural spreading (PNS) of head and neck tumors using histopathological or surgical evidence from the afflicted nerve as the reference standard. Previous studies in the English language published in the last 30 years were searched from PubMed and Embase databases. We included studies that used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (with and without contrast enhancement) to detect PNS, as well as the histological or surgical confirmation of PNS, and that reported the exact numbers of patients required for assessing diagnostic accuracy. The outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Heterogeneity was assessed with the Higgins inconsistency test (I2). P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 11 retrospective studies were found, reporting 319 nerve samples from 245 patients. Meta-analytic estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were as follows: sensitivity 0.85 (0.70-0.95), specificity 0.85 (0.80-0.89), PPV 0.86 (0.70-0.94), and NPV 0.85 (0.71-0.93). We found statistically significant heterogeneity for sensitivity (I2 = 72%, p = 0.003) and PPV (I2 = 70%, p = 0.038), but not for NPV (I2 = 65%, p = 0.119) or specificity (I2 = 12%, p = 0.842). The most frequent MRI features of PNS were nerve enlargement and enhancement. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma were the most common tumor types, and the facial and trigeminal nerves were the most commonly affected nerves in PNS. Only a few studies provided examples of false MRI diagnoses. MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in depicting PNS of cranial nerves, yet this statement was based on scarce and heterogeneous evidence.

In search of zebras: Critical analysis of the rarity of perineural breast cancer spread to the brachial plexus in men

BACKGROUND

Perineural spread (PNS) of breast cancer to the brachial plexus is rare, with reports limited to cases only in female patients. This study aimed to determine the incidence of PNS in male compared with female patients.

METHODS

Adult breast cancer patients referred to a single institution between 1994 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for imaging or biopsy-confirmed cases of PNS to the brachial plexus. Two independent reviewers of articles published in any language between 1990 and 2022 in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar performed a systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Of the 10,466 patients with breast cancer (10,355 female, 111 male) referred to a single institution, there were 42 female patients with PNS to the brachial plexus for an estimated incidence of 0.4%. In the same time period, there were 111 male patients treated for breast cancer, including 88 patients with Klinefelter's syndrome (KS); however, there were no cases of male patients with PNS. A systematic review of the world's literature did not identify male patients with PNS to the brachial plexus.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of any reported cases of PNS of breast cancer to the brachial plexus in men or patients with KS, who have a much higher incidence of breast cancer. This may reflect either the compounding rarity of these two events or point toward a distinct hormonally-driven link between breast cancer and PNS, highlighted by the disparity in PNS incidence in men and women.

The spectrum of brachial plexopathy from perineural spread of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Perineural spread of breast cancer to the brachial plexus can lead to pain, sensory alterations, and upper-extremity weakness. Although rare, perineural spread is an often-misdiagnosed long-term complication following breast cancer diagnosis. The objective of this study was to critically review the clinical, radiological, and pathological findings of biopsy-proven perineural spread of breast cancer to the brachial plexus.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a single institution in which a total of 19 patients with brachial plexus involvement from perineural spread of breast cancer who underwent fascicular biopsy between 1999 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and pathological data were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the cohort.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer perineural spread was 60.6 ± 11.5 years. The diagnosis of brachial plexopathy due to perineural spread was on average 12 years after the primary diagnosis of breast cancer. There was also a delay in diagnosis due to the rarity of this disease, with a mean time from initial symptom onset to diagnosis of perineural spread of 25 ± 30 months. All patients at the time of presentation had upper-extremity weakness and pain. Nearly all patients demonstrated T2 signal change and nodular so-called sugar-coating contrast enhancement on brachial plexus MRI. Similarly, all patients who underwent PET/MRI or PET/CT had increased FDG uptake in the involved brachial plexus. Breast cancer perineural spread has an overall poor prognosis, with 16 of 19 patients dying within 5.9 ± 3.0 years after diagnosis of perineural spread.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural spread should be considered in patients with a history of breast cancer, even 10 years after primary diagnosis, especially in patients who present with arm pain, weakness, and/or sensory changes. Further diagnostic workup with electrodiagnostic studies; brachial plexus MRI, PET/CT, or PET/MRI; and possibly nerve biopsy is warranted to ensure accurate diagnosis.

Lumbosacral plexopathy caused by the perineural spread of pelvic malignancies: clinical aspects and imaging patterns

BACKGROUND

Perineural spread (PNS) of tumors from pelvic malignancies is a rare phenomenon but constitutes an important differential diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy (LSP). Herein, we describe the clinical and imaging features of patients with LSP due to PNS of pelvic malignancies along with a literature review.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 9 cases of LSP caused by PNS of pelvic malignancy between January 2006 and August 2021, and all clinical and imaging parameters were recorded in detail. Clinical symptoms and signs of patients were described and listed in the order in which they occurred. The results of imaging test were analyzed to describe specific findings in LSP caused by PNS.

RESULTS

This study enrolled nine adult patients (mean age, 50.1 years). Two cases initially presented as LSP and were later diagnosed with pelvic malignancy. Pain in the perianal or inguinal area preceded pain at the extremities in six patients. Neurogenic bladder or bowel symptoms developed in five patients. On the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the S1-S2 spinal nerve was most commonly involved, and S1 myotome weakness was more prominent in six patients than the other myotomes. One patient had an intradural extension. ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) showed abnormal signal intensity in six patients. No abnormality in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was detected in the nervous structures in one patient. Only four patients survived until the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Though rare, physicians should always keep in mind the possibility of LSP due to the PNS in patients with pelvic malignancy. Thorough physical examination and history taking could provide clues for diagnosis. Pelvic MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT should be considered for patients with LSP to rule out neoplastic LSP.

A novel mechanism for the formation and propagation of neural tumors and lesions through neural highways

By recognizing anatomic and radiologic patterns of rare and often misdiagnosed peripheral nerve tumors/lesions, we have defined mechanisms for the propagation of neural diseases. The novel concept of the nervous system serving as a complex system of "highways" driving the neural and perineural spread of these lesions is described in three examples: Intraneural dissection of joint fluid in intraneural ganglion cysts, perineural spread of cancer cells, and dissemination of unknown concentrations of neurotrophic/inhibitory factors for growth in hamartomas/choristomas of nerve. Further mapping of these pathways to identify the natural history of diseases, the spectrum of disease evolution, the role of genetic mutations, and how these neural pathways interface with the lymphatic, vascular, and cerebrospinal systems may lead to advances in targeted treatments.