Early surgery may lower mortality in patients suffering from severe spinal infection

Evaluation of spinal deformity and its progression in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: A retrospective MRI study of 59 cases

Introduction

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis management often remains conservative without surgical intervention, yet the risk of spinal deformity under such therapy is unclear.

Research question

This study explores spinal deformity progression in conservatively treated patients and identifies predictive factors for deformity advancement.

Material and methods

Retrospective cohort design with radiological data analysis from 59 patients with conservatively treated pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Deformities were categorized into four progression types reflecting severity: Type 1 (progressive vertebral body edema/endplate erosion), Type 2 (Type 1 plus disc space collapse), Type 3 (vertebral body destruction/mild translation), and Type 4 (significant segmental kyphosis >20°/severe translation).

Results

Among 59 patients, 66% exhibited progressive deformity over a mean follow-up of 10.75 months. The distribution of deformity progression was: Type 1 in two cases (3%), Type 2 in seven cases (12%), Type 3 in 13 cases (22%), and Type 4 in 17 cases (29%). Progression of deformity included a 92% increase in cases with segmental kyphosis >20°; and a 167% increase in cases with segmental translation. Risk factors for significant kyphosis included >50% vertebral body erosive destruction (p < 0.01) and the presence of an epidural abscess (p < 0.05). Lumbar region involvement significantly reduced the likelihood of spinal fusion at follow-up (p < 0.05). A paravertebral abscess was significantly associated with the presence of a fractured vertebrae at follow-up (p < 0.05).

Discussion and conclusion

This study underscores the importance of closely monitoring patients with conservatively managed pyogenic spondylodiscitis for progressive spinal deformity, and suggests considering early surgical intervention in cases with a high risk of progression.

Management of severe pyogenic spinal infections: the 2SICK study by the EANS spine section

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spondylodiscitis management presents significant clinical challenges, particularly in critically ill patients, where the risks and benefits of surgical intervention must be carefully balanced. The optimal timing of surgery in this context remains a subject of debate.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of early surgery versus delayed surgery or conservative management in critically ill patients with de novo pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 24 centers, primarily in Europe.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included 192 critically ill patients (65.63% male) with a median age of 69 years, all severely affected by pyogenic spondylodiscitis characterized by an initial CRP level >200 mg/l or the presence of two out of four Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria upon admission.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and relapse rates of spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Patients were divided into three groups: early surgery (within three days of admission), delayed surgery (after three days of admission), and conservative therapy. Propensity score matching and multivariate regression analyses were performed to adjust for baseline differences and assess the impact of treatment modalities on mortality and other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Delayed surgery was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality (4.05%) compared to early surgery (27.85%) and conservative therapy (27.78%) (p<.001). Delayed surgery also resulted in shorter hospital stays (42.76 days) compared to conservative therapy (55.53 days) and early surgery (26.33 days) (p<.001), and shorter ICU stays (4.52 days) compared to conservative therapy (16.48 days) and early surgery (7.92 days) (p<.001). The optimal window for surgery, minimizing mortality, was identified as ten to fourteen days post-admission (p=.02). Risk factors for increased mortality included age (p<.05), multiple organ failure (p<.05), and vertebral body destruction (p<.05), whereas delayed surgery (p<.05) and the presence of an epidural abscess were associated with reduced mortality (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed surgery, optimally between 10 to 14 days post-admission, was associated with lower mortality in critically ill spondylodiscitis patients. These findings highlight the potential benefits of considering surgical timing to improve patient outcomes.

Comparing Conservative and Early Surgical Treatments for Pyogenic Spondylodiskitis: An International Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Outcome Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pyogenic spinal infections pose therapeutic challenges, with the optimal treatment approach remaining contentious. This study aimed to compare outcomes of conservative vs early surgical treatment (SuT) modalities in primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis through an international cohort analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective outcome analysis was conducted of 392 patients from the United Kingdom and Germany, treated between 2017 and 2022 with primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis. Patients were stratified by treatment modality. Propensity score matching, facilitated by a directed acyclic graph and principal component analysis, was used to balance risk factors between the compared patient cohorts. Primary outcome was mortality rate, while secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration, infection relapse, and neurological status at discharge.

RESULTS

The study included 95 patients undergoing conservative treatment, primarily treated in the United Kingdom, and 297 receiving SuT, predominantly in Germany. The mortality rate was notably higher in the conservative group ( P < .001), while the surgical cohort experienced a shorter hospitalization duration ( P < .01). After propensity score matching, 2 comparable cohorts of 95 patients each emerged. Subsequent analysis revealed a markedly increased mortality in the conservative group (24.2% for conservative treatment vs 4.2% for SuT, P < .001). Neither relapse nor neurological status at discharge showed significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that early surgical intervention may be more effective than conservative management in reducing mortality and hospital stay for patients with primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis. These findings highlight the need for prospective trials and more definitive treatment guidelines.

Long-term survivability of surgical and nonsurgical management of spinal epidural abscess

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare and life-threatening infection within the epidural space with significant functional impairment and morbidity. Active debate remains over whether to operate for SEAs, with limited existing data comparing the long-term survivability after surgical versus nonsurgical management.

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical and nonsurgical management for SEA.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 250 consecutive SEA patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Survival and mortality rates, complications.

METHODS

All patients treated at a tertiary medical center for a primary SEA from January 2000 to June 2020 are identified. Data collection is by retrospective chart review. Cox proportional hazards regression models are used for all survival analyses while controlling for potential confounding variables and with multiple testing corrections.

RESULTS

A total of 35 out of 250 patients died with an overall all-cause mortality of 14%. More than half of all deaths occurred within 90 days after treatment. The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates are 92.8%, 89.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. Among surgery patients, the all-cause mortality was 13.07%, compared to 16.22% for medically-managed patients. Surgical treatment (decompression, fusion, debridement) significantly reduced the risk of death by 62.4% compared to medical therapy (p=.03), but surgery patients experienced a significantly longer mean length of stay (p=.01). Risk factors of short-term mortality included hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 4+, and cardiac arrest. Risk factors of long-term mortality were immunocompromised state, elevated WBC count >12,000, sepsis, septic shock, ASA 4+, and cardiac arrest (p<.05). In terms of complications, surgically-managed patients experienced a higher proportion of deep vein thrombosis (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall long-term survivability of SEA treatment is relatively high at (86% at 5-year) in this study. The following SEA mortality risk factors were identified: hypoalbuminemia (short-term), immunocompromised state (long-term), leukocytosis (long-term), sepsis and septic shock (long-term), ASA 4+ and cardiac arrest (overall). For primary SEA patients, surgical management may reduce mortality risk compared to nonsurgical management.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Bone Cement in the Treatment of Burkholderia cepacia Infection After Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of spinal internal fixation operations has increased significantly, correlating with an elevated risk of postoperative surgical site infection and a rising incidence rate. While the conventional treatment approach involves surgical debridement combined with antibiotic administration, there is a notable gap in reported strategies for Burkholderia cepacia infection and patients exhibiting multidrug resistance.

METHODS

Surgical site infection occurred in a patient following internal fixation surgery for thoracic vertebral fractures. Despite the application of systemic antibiotics and regular dressing changes, no improvement was observed. Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity experiments revealed a multidrug-resistant Burkholderia cepacia infection. Two comprehensive debridement procedures were performed along with continuous post-operative irrigation combined with antibiotic administration; however, no significant improvement was observed. The patient's infection was significantly controlled following treatment with vancomycin loaded bone cement.

RESULTS

Following spinal internal fixation surgery, the management of a B. cepacian infection with multidrug resistance presented a significant challenge, despite the application of debridement procedures and systemic antibiotics. In this case, after 20 days of treatment with vancomycin-loaded bone cement, the patient's C-reactive protein level decreased to 54 mg/L, was normalized by February, and normal levels were maintained in the surgical area 1 month and 6 months after bone cement removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vancomycin-loaded bone cement proves effective in treating postoperative B. cepacian infection in a multidrug-resistant case following spinal internal fixation surgery.

Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in critically ill septic patients

PURPOSE

Surgical procedures in critically ill patients with spondylodiscitis are challenging and there are several controversies. Here, we present our experience with offering surgical intervention early in critically ill septic patients with spondylodiscitis.

METHOD

After we introduced a new treatment paradigm offering early but limited surgery, eight patients with spondylodiscitis complicated by severe sepsis and multiple organ failure underwent urgent surgical treatment over a 10-year period. Outcome was assessed according to the Barthel index at 12-month follow-up and at the last available follow-up (mean 89 months).

RESULTS

There were 7 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 62 years. The preoperative ASA score was 5 in 2 patients, and 4 in 6 patients. Six of them presented with high-grade paresis, and in all of them, spondylodiscitis with intraspinal and/or paravertebral abscesses was evident in MR imaging studies. All patients underwent early surgery (within 24 h after admission). The median time in intensive care was 21 days. Out of the eight patients, seven survived. One year after surgery, five patients had a good outcome (Barthel index: 100 (1); 80 (3); and 70 (1)). At the last follow-up (mean 89 months), 4 patients had a good functional outcome (Barthel index between 60 and 80).

CONCLUSION

Early surgical treatment in critically ill patients with spondylodiscitis and sepsis may result in rapid control of infection and can provide favorable long-term outcome. A general strategy of performing only limited surgery is a valid option in such patients who have a relatively high risk for surgery.

Conservative versus early surgical treatment in the management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Spondylodiscitis is the commonest spine infection, and pyogenic spondylodiscitis is the most common subtype. Whilst antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment, some advocate that early surgery can improve mortality, relapse rates, and length of stay. Given that the condition carries a high mortality rate of up to 20%, the most effective treatment must be identified. We aimed to compare the mortality, relapse rate, and length of hospital stay of conservative versus early surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. All major databases were searched for original studies, which were evaluated using a qualitative synthesis, meta-analyses, influence, and regression analyses. The meta-analysis, with an overall pooled sample size of 10,954 patients from 21 studies, found that the pooled mortality among the early surgery patient subgroup was 8% versus 13% for patients treated conservatively. The mean proportion of relapse/failure among the early surgery subgroup was 15% versus 21% for the conservative treatment subgroup. Further, it concluded that early surgical treatment, when compared to conservative management, is associated with a 40% and 39% risk reduction in relapse/failure rate and mortality rate, respectively, and a 7.75 days per patient reduction in length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis demonstrated that early surgical intervention consistently significantly outperforms conservative management in relapse/failure and mortality rates, and length of stay, in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Early fusion outcome after surgical treatment of single-level and multi-level pyogenic spondylodiscitis: experience at a level 1 center for spinal surgery-a single center cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single center cohort study.

PURPOSE

Spinal instrumentation in combination with antibiotic therapy is a treatment option for acute or chronic pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD). This study compares the early fusion outcome for multi-level and single-level PSD after urgent surgical treatment with interbody fusion in combination with fixation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Over a 10 year period at a single institution, all surgically treated patients received surgical debridement, fusion und fixation of the spine to treat PSD. Multi-level cases were either adjacent to each other on the spine or distant. Fusion rates were assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. We analyzed demographic data, ASA status, duration of surgery, location and length of spine affected, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and early complications.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were included. Of these, 114 patients suffered from single-level and 58 from multi-level PSD. The most frequent location was the lumbar spine (54.0%) followed by the thoracic spine (18.0%). The PSD was adjacent in 19.0% and distant in 81.0% of multi-level cases. Fusion rates at the 3 month follow-up did not differ among the multi-level group (p = 0.27 for both adjacent and distant sites). In the single-level group, sufficient fusion was achieved in 70.2% of cases. Pathogen identification was possible 58.5% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of multi-level PSD is a safe option. Our study demonstrates that there was no significant difference in early fusion outcomes between single-level and multi-level PSD, whether adjacent or distant.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracolumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Despite advances, the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with spondylodiscitis remains high, with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although conservative therapy has progressed, several cases require surgical intervention. However, the indication and opportunities for surgical treatment are still disputable.

METHODS

In a joint consensus, the members of the 'Spondylodiscitis' working group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery considered current literature, particularly the newly published S2k guideline of the AWMF, and examined the surgical indications and treatment strategies for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.

RESULTS

Surgical intervention for spondylodiscitis is only required in a small percentage of patients. In studies comparing conservative and surgical therapies, most patients benefitted from surgery, regardless of the surgical technique selected. Presently, the standard procedure is a combined dorsoventral approach, in which a monolateral attempt should always be made. The choice of material (PEEK, titanium) for ventral support does not influence the clinical result.

A scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of prognosis in spinal infection: the MSI-20 score

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal infection (SI) is a life-threatening condition and its treatment remains challenging. Recent studies have supported early and aggressive surgery, but mortality still reaches 5% to 10% and it remains unclear, if an aggressive surgical strategy also applies for severely sick patients.

PURPOSE

The aim of this analysis was to generate an assessment score to predict mortality of SI in order to facilitate decision-making.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective risk factor analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred fifty-two patients were retrospectively analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiologic measures, functional measures.

METHODS

Diagnosis was based on clinical presentation, imaging findings and inflammatory markers. Factors associated with mortality were identified by multivariate analysis, weighted according to their relative risk ratio (RR) and included in the novel assessment score.

RESULTS

Eight parameters were included: (1) BMI, (2) ASA score, (3) presence of sepsis, (4) age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, (5) presence and degree of renal failure, (6) presence of hepatopathy, (7) neurological deficits and (8) CRP levels at diagnosis. Each parameter was assigned a certain range of points, resulting in a maximum total score of 20. The mortality in spinal infection (MSI-20) score - indicating poorer status with higher values - was obtained for each patient and correlated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

An MSI-20 score of 11 or more points seems to identify the small group of patients being "too sick to undergo surgery," while early surgery can be recommended in the remainder (MSI-20 ≤10). Our results need to be confirmed in prospective studies, but may give guidance for indicating surgery even in rather sick and comorbid patients.

Long-term quality of life outcome after spondylodiscitis treatment

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spondylodiscitis is the most common spinal infection of which the incidence has increased and the peak prevalence is between 50 and 70 years of age. Spondylodiscitis is often a complication of a distant infection. Early diagnosis can be challenging, and although improvements in diagnostic techniques and modern therapy have diminished the mortality of the disease, current literature about the outcome of spondylodiscitis is scarce.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of patients who suffered from spondylodiscitis.

STUDY DESIGN

A two-center cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with spondylodiscitis in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function, and Short Form 36 (SF-36) for general quality of life of spondylodiscitis patients.

METHOD

Eligible patients were identified from electronic patient databases and completed multiple patient reported outcome measures after obtaining informed consent. General demographic and clinical information (age, sex, medical history) were extracted from the patient records. SF-36 domain scores of spondylodiscitis patients were compared with a nationwide population sample.

RESULTS

183 patients were treated for spondylodiscitis; additional questionnaires were received from 82 patients. After a median follow-up of 63 months, the overall mortality was 28%. The mean VAS for back pain was 3.5, and the mean ODI score was 22. In all SF-36 domains a significantly lower score was found in the spondylodiscitis group compared with a normative national Dutch cohort. There was a strong correlation between back pain and ODI scores (ρ=0.81, p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that spondylodiscitis is a disease causing a profound impact on back pain, function and quality of life. The results suggest that chronic back pain is a debilitating problem, as it has an extensive influence on daily activities and social and psychological well-being, causing significant disability.