Ultra-short antibiotic prophylaxis guided by preoperative microbiological nasal swabs in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

Intraoperative prevention of nasal mucosal injury and surgical field contamination during single-nostril transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection

BACKGROUND

The common complications of transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection include nasal hemorrhage, olfactory disorder, nasal adhesion, and intracranial infection. Consequently, the protection of nasal mucosa and the prevention of surgical field contamination are critical.

METHOD

We presented a step-by-step description of the methods of the disinfection and protection of nasal mucosa and the prevention of surgical field contamination during transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection, and these comprehensive measures to prevent these complications have not been documented.

CONCLUSION

These measures effectively reduce the risk of nasal mucosal injury and surgical field contamination, and are easy to perform.

Microbiologic and Clinical Description of Postoperative Central Nervous System Infection After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) have not been developed. The study objective was to define the microbiologic and clinical characteristics of post-EES central nervous system (CNS) infections.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients >18 years of age who underwent EES between January 2010 and July 2021 at a high-volume skull base center. Patients with confirmed CNS infection within 30 days of EES were included. During the study period, the standard prophylaxis regimen was ceftriaxone 2 g every 12 hours for 48 hours. For patients with a documented penicillin allergy, vancomycin plus aztreonam was recommended.

RESULTS

In total, 2440 EES procedures were performed on 2005 patients; the CNS infection rate was 1.8% (37/2005). CNS infections were more common among patients with a history of previous EES (6.5%; 20/307) compared with those who did not (1%; 17/1698; P < 0.001). The median time from EES to CNS infection was 12 (6-19) days. Thirty-two percent (12/37) of CNS infections were polymicrobic, which was more common among patients without previous EES (52.9%; 9/17) compared with those with previous EES (15%; 3/20; P = 0.03). Across all cases, Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8) were commonly isolated pathogens. Among those with confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization before EES, 75% (3/4) developed MRSA CNS infections compared with 6.1% (2/33) of noncolonized patients (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

CNS infection after EES is rare and causative pathogens vary. Further studies are needed to identify the impact of MRSA nares screening on antimicrobial prophylaxis before EES.

Antibiotics Prophylaxis for Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Skull Base Tumor Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The regimen of prophylactic antibiotic for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EE-SBS) varies considerably depending on surgeons and their institutes. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to assess the effect of antibiotic regimens on EE-SBS surgery for anterior skull base tumor.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched through October 15, 2022.

RESULTS

The 20 included studies were all retrospective. The studies included a total of 10,735 patients who underwent EE-SBS for skull base tumor. The proportion of patients with postoperative intracranial infection across all 20 studies was 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5%-1.3%). The proportion of postoperative intracranial infection in the multiple antibiotics group did not show statistically significant difference to that of the single antibiotic agent group (proportion: 0.6%, 95% CI 0%-1.4% vs. proportion: 1%, 95% CI 0.6%-1.5%, respectively, P = 0.39). The ultra-short duration maintenance group showed lower incidence of postoperative intracranial infection, although it did not reach statistical significance (ultra-short group: 0.7%, 95% CI 0.5%-0.9%; short duration: 1.8%, 95% CI 0.5%-3%; and long duration: 1%, 95% CI 0.2%-1.9%, P = 0.22) The combination of the multiple antibiotics group did not show meaningful low incidence of postoperative intracranial infection (antibiotics combination group: 0.6%, 95% CI 0%-1.4%; cefazolin single group: 0.8%, 95% CI 0%-1.6%; and single antibiotics other than cefazolin: 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7%-1.7%, P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple antibiotics did not show superiority compared with single antibiotic agent. Also, long maintenance duration of antibiotics did not reduce the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection.

Optimizing Perioperative Care in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify key recommendations for maximizing the efficiency and efficacy of perioperative care in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a comprehensive literature search of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols implemented for patients undergoing transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA); individual recommendations were abstracted, and the evidence base thoroughly reviewed.

RESULTS

The authors identified 19 individual recommendations pertinent to the care of patients undergoing TSA, which were subdivided into preoperative (n=6), intraoperative (n=6), and postoperative (n=7) interventions. Key factors recommended for minimizing length of stay, preventing readmission, and improving patient outcomes included comprehensive patient education, multidisciplinary evaluation, avoidance of routine lumbar drain placement and nasal packing, and rigorous postoperative monitoring of pituitary function and salt-water imbalances. The overall level of evidence for 7/19 (37%) implemented recommendations was found to be low, suggesting a need for continued research in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Several key interventions should be considered in the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for TSA, which may aid in further decreasing length of stay and promoting positive patient outcomes.

Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: An evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence-based guidance.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols.

Comparing Rates of Postoperative Meningitis After Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures Based on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Antibiotic Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) procedures are inherently contaminated due to direct access through the nasopharyngeal mucosa. The reported rate of postoperative meningitis in EEA procedures is 0.7%-3%. A variety of methods exist to minimize the risk of meningitis with antibiotic prophylaxis, although their value is not completely understood. This study investigated whether there is a difference in rates of postoperative meningitis based on Staphylococcus aureus colonization and use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

METHODS

All adult patients who underwent EEA resection at our institution from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with preoperative cerebrospinal fluid infections were excluded. Data including recent preoperative infections, preoperative colonization status, antibiotic administration, and postoperative outcomes were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Of 483 patients identified (mean age, 51 years; range, 18-90 years; 274 [56.7%] female), 80 (16.6%) had a positive preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) screening swab. Twenty-one (26.3%) colonized patients were treated with preoperative decolonizing antibiotics. Within 30 days of surgery, 13 (2.7%) patients developed culture-positive meningitis. There was no significant difference in meningitis rates based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status. Among colonized patients, there was no significant difference in rates of MRSA/MSSA meningitis based on preoperative antibiotic decolonization.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative rates of meningitis after EEA surgery were not significantly changed based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status of the patient or preoperative decolonization. The utility of preoperative testing of MRSA/MSSA status and antibiotics for decolonization to prevent postoperative meningitis should be further investigated.

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Neurosurgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study

Pediatric neurosurgery is a highly specialized branch of surgery in which surgical site infections (SSIs) are potentially serious complications that can also adversely affect a good surgical outcome, compromising functional recovery and, in some cases, even putting the patient’s life at risk. The main aim of this consensus document is to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis for neonates and children undergoing neurosurgery. The following scenarios were considered: (1) craniotomy or cranial/cranio-facial approach to craniosynostosis; (2) neurosurgery with a trans-nasal-trans-sphenoidal approach; (3) non-penetrating head injuries; (4) penetrating head fracture; (5) spinal surgery (extradural and intradural); (6) shunt surgery or neuroendoscopy; (7) neuroendovascular procedures. Patients undergoing neurosurgery often undergo peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis, with different schedules, not always supported by scientific evidence. This consensus provides clear and shared indications, based on the most updated literature. This work has been made possible by the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies, and represents, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of recommendations on the behavior to be held in the peri-operative setting in this type of intervention, in order to guide physicians in the management of the patient, standardize approaches and avoid abuse and misuse of antibiotics.

A One-Week Course of Levofloxacin/Dexamethasone Eye Drops: A Review on a New Approach in Managing Patients After Cataract Surgery

A new fixed-dose combination of dexamethasone and levofloxacin eye drops has recently been approved for the prevention and treatment of inflammation, and the prevention of infection associated with cataract surgery in adults. This combination has been developed to respond to a series of unmet needs in the practical management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. Namely, despite updated guidelines, many ophthalmologists employ protocols mainly based on their personal experience. As a result, the choice of drugs, treatment duration, and drug association is not evidence-based medicine (EBM)-oriented. In addition, antibiotic resistance may occur since antibiotics are used for an extended length of time, even with tapering. Corticosteroids are also prescribed for prolonged periods, frequently without follow-up. Therefore, patient adherence to postsurgical self-care is low, and mainly affects older patients who are the majority undergoing cataract surgery. In both rabbit and human trials, it has been demonstrated that both active ingredients penetrate the ocular system without pharmacokinetic interaction between the two. The concentrations of both ingredients in aqueous humor after their ocular instillation are high enough at the site of action to carry out their expected potent anti-inflammatory and antibiotic activity. Tested in a pivotal study aimed at investigating efficacy and safety of the intended indication, the mixture/compound was non-inferior to a 2-week treatment with dexamethasone/tobramycin in preventing or reducing inflammation and in preventing infection when administered for 1 week, followed by the administration of dexamethasone alone for another week. The outcomes obtained by this study suggest that a 1-week course of levofloxacin/dexamethasone eye drops is sufficient to resolve inflammation and prevent infection in patients undergoing cataract surgery. In addition, this study underlines that a follow-up visit after 1 week allows for a decision about whether to stop or continue a treatment in patients still experiencing symptoms or inflammation. In conclusion, this new dose combination could represent a turning point in managing patients after cataract surgery, while mostly avoiding antibiotic resistance and improving treatment adherence.

Perioperative Antibiotic Use in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

Background Improved evidence-based guidelines on the optimal type and duration of antibiotics for patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) are needed. We analyze the infectious complications among a large cohort of EETS patients undergoing a standardized regimen of cefazolin for 24 hours, followed by cephalexin for 7 days after surgery (clindamycin if penicillin/cephalosporin allergic).

Methods A retrospective review of 132 EETS patients from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics were collected, along with infection rates. Multivariate logistic regression determined the variable(s) independently associated with infectious outcomes.

Results Nearly all patients (99%) received postoperative antibiotics with 78% receiving cefazolin, 17% receiving cephalexin, 3% receiving clindamycin, and 2% receiving other antibiotics. Fifty-three patients (40%) had an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and three patients (2%) developed a postoperative CSF leak requiring surgical repair. Within 30 days, no patients developed meningitis. Five patients (4%) developed sinusitis, two patients (3%) developed pneumonia, and one patient (1%) developed cellulitis at a peripheral intravenous line. Two patients (2%) developed an allergy to cephalexin, requiring conservative management. After adjustment for comorbidities and operative factors, presence of postoperative infectious complications was independently associated with increased LOS (β = 3.7 days; p = 0.001).

Conclusion Compared with reported findings in the literature, we report low rates of infectious complications and antibiotic intolerance, despite presence of a heavy burden of comorbidities and high intraoperative CSF leak rates among our cohort. These findings support our standardized 7-day perioperative antibiotic regimen.

Role of Anterior Nasal Packing in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Italian Survey

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, the endoscopic endonasal approach to sellar and parasellar region tumors is a common technique in neurosurgery, and surgical nuances, complications, and management strategies are shared in a multidisciplinary setting between neurosurgeons and ear, nose, and throat surgeons. Due to the heterogeneity of its variations, the role of the anterior nasal packing in endoscopic endonasal approach to the skull base surgery (EESBS) has not yet been unanimously accepted and no consensus or guidelines on its use exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey containing 10 questions about indications, management advantages, and pitfalls of the use of anterior nasal packing in EESBS was created by using an online open-source tool (SurveyMonkey). The questionnaire was sent to 39 Italian neurosurgical departments, which routinely adopt the endoscopic endonasal approach.

RESULTS

Almost half of 39 selected centers (19; 48.7%) answered our survey. The main results can be summarized as 1) anterior nasal packing after EESBS is considered useful by 84% of participants, 2) prevention of epistaxis is the principal indication for anterior nasal packing, 3) the type of approach and skull base reconstruction influence the use of anterior nasal packing, and 4) nasal discomfort is considered the principal negative aspect of nasal packing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified that anterior nasal packing is commonly adopted in certain conditions, namely when extensive nasal dissection is performed. Furthermore, the choice to adopt or not the anterior nasal packing should be tailored taking in account specific conditions, such as acromegaly and Cushing disease. It represents an important factor in reducing postoperative sinonasal complications of EESB.